Github user sanjaydasgupta commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
I would like your views @felixcheung @zjffdu @Tagar on the following
approach to escaping and regex errors etc:
I wish to suggest that no escaping is needed, as the substitution
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2326
Hi @vipul1409 , Could you check
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2505?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2490
@tinkoff-dwh It's the default binding in emacs mode.
## in default modes
https://github.com/ajaxorg/ace/wiki/Default-Keyboard-Shortcuts
Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2495
@felixcheung
another solution to count whitespaces
CI green https://travis-ci.org/tinkoff-dwh/zeppelin/builds/257656645
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2495
[HOTFIX] JDBC completions. fix cursor position
### What is this PR for?
If text of paragraph contains interpreter name then parser works incorrect
(cursor position incorrect).
Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2495
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2504
This is because travis use 'precise' by default before, so at that time it
is OK when we don't specify dist. But now travis is upgrading ubuntu from
`precise` to `trusty`, `trusty` will become
Github user ebuildy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1151
Hello, the Jira issue is still opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1137 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2504
I will merge it soon, as it affect all the following PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2504
I get that, I see one test matrix is explicitly setting dist to trusty, and
so I assume some tests passes on trusty at least
e2e test
Github user sanjaydasgupta commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
Thank you for the observations @felixcheung.
Will review these points and make suitable changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2504
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2504
fair enough
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2504
yeah, seems e2e tests needs trusty. @1ambda may have more context.
A long term solution might be to upgrade all tests to trusty, but may need
more changes. This PR is just trying to make the
Pasha created ZEPPELIN-2812:
---
Summary: JDBC driver for Denodo
Key: ZEPPELIN-2812
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2812
Project: Zeppelin
Issue Type: Improvement
Github user p0wl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/497
Thanks for the feature!
Any news on automatic github integration? Or a guidline how to setup github
sync?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user Tagar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
@sanjaydasgupta great job on getting this done.
ZEPPELIN-1967 was inspired by Jupyter so I just we should do the same as it
is done there.
So it's less confusing for users who are switching
Github user herval commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/497
@p0wl I started remote git support here:
https://github.com/herval/zeppelin/tree/remote-git-support - it's a WIP, if
someone wants to take over (it would work w/ github or any other git repo)
---
Github user sanjaydasgupta commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2502
The choice of {...} for identifying parameter/variable names comes from the
parent issue
[ZEPPELIN-1967](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1967). Though
#{...} seems more
Github user dabaitu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2479
Ping for review.
This regex will avoid a lot of bugs...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2505
I'll merge this guy as to master as a hotfix. and reopen
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2505
[ZEPPELIN-2806] New paragraph does not displayed before refresh the page
### What is this PR for?
Problem reported in
[ZEPPELIN-2806](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2806).
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2465
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2422
Thanks @herval for the review. If you have time, you can also check the
unit test which is much more readable and will easy for you to get what I done
in this PR. (InterpreterFactoryTest,
24 matches
Mail list logo
