Hi,
> As the first step CC_GUEST_TYPE is defined in this patch. In the
> next patch GUEST_TYPE will be deleted. This is to make sure the
> bisect work correctly.
Hmm, what exactly went wrong? Splitting into two patches looks
pointless. If the change is too big for an all-in-one patch typical
On April 18, 2022 9:48 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > +//
> > +// Confidential computing guest type
> > +//
> > +typedef enum {
> > + CCGuestTypeNonEncrypted = 0,
> > + CCGuestTypeAmdSev,
> > + CCGuestTypeIntelTdx,
> > +} CC_GUEST_TYPE;
>
> Should these be CcGuest... ? The precedent seems to be
On 4/16/22 22:01, Min Xu wrote:
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3902
The confidential computing guest type (GUEST_TYPE) was defined in
OvmfPkg/Include/WorkArea.h. Now it is to be moved to
MdePkg/Include/ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr.h and renamed as
CC_GUEST_TYPE.
There are
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3902
The confidential computing guest type (GUEST_TYPE) was defined in
OvmfPkg/Include/WorkArea.h. Now it is to be moved to
MdePkg/Include/ConfidentialComputingGuestAttr.h and renamed as
CC_GUEST_TYPE.
There are 2 reasons for this change.
1.
