On 2020.03.30 15:42, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:39, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 15:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
...
Again, I am happy to merge this patch. The argument is about whether
we need to upgrade RPi4 to 6.3
Last time I checked, quite a few of the people
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:39, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 15:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
...
> > Again, I am happy to merge this patch. The argument is about whether
> > we need to upgrade RPi4 to 6.3
> >
>
> Last time I checked, quite a few of the people who contributed code to
> the
On 2020.03.30 15:34, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:29, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 15:16, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
On
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:29, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 15:16, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Pete Batard wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard
On 2020.03.30 15:19, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On
On 2020.03.30 15:16, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel
> >>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 16:07, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel
> >>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar
On 2020.03.30 15:01, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:09, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 14:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:56, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:09, Pete Batard wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2020.03.30 14:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar
On 2020.03.30 14:20, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:09, Pete Batard wrote:
On 2020.03.30 14:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 14:06, Pete Batard wrote:
Incidentally, this is not an [edk2-platform]
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:12, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:09, Pete Batard wrote:
> >
> > On 2020.03.30 14:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 14:06, Pete Batard wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Incidentally, this is not an [edk2-platform] patch, as the subject
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 15:09, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> On 2020.03.30 14:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 14:06, Pete Batard wrote:
> >>
> >> Incidentally, this is not an [edk2-platform] patch, as the subject line
> >> from previous mail seemed to indicate, but an [edk2] patch.
On 2020.03.30 14:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 14:06, Pete Batard wrote:
Incidentally, this is not an [edk2-platform] patch, as the subject line
from previous mail seemed to indicate, but an [edk2] patch.
Do we have a user for this?
Yes we do. I have a pachset lined up
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 14:06, Pete Batard wrote:
>
> Incidentally, this is not an [edk2-platform] patch, as the subject line
> from previous mail seemed to indicate, but an [edk2] patch.
>
Do we have a user for this?
>
> On 2020.03.27 13:01, Pete Batard wrote:
> > ACPI 6.3 added a 16-bit SPE
Incidentally, this is not an [edk2-platform] patch, as the subject line
from previous mail seemed to indicate, but an [edk2] patch.
/Pete
On 2020.03.27 13:01, Pete Batard wrote:
ACPI 6.3 added a 16-bit SPE overflow Interrupt field, replacing
2 of the 3 reserved bytes that are defined at the
16 matches
Mail list logo