Re: Stripping Kannel

2002-01-16 Thread Alex Judd
but with #ifdef it could be done quite nicely - and this would avoid the split builds that have hit projects like Mame so painfully. Alex Hi, I made some progress in stripping kannel. I have removed some drivers for smsc protocol, I got bearerbox binary of reduced size (around 170 KB less

Re: Stripping Kannel

2002-01-16 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alex Judd wrote: If there is a need for a lighter weight binary with reduced driver support shouldn't this be something put into the build process so that on compilation people can define the support and drivers they want to build in their binaries. Yes, definitly. This would add a pro to

Stripping Kannel

2002-01-15 Thread Shridhar Raju
Hi, I made some progress in stripping kannel. I have removed some drivers for smsc protocol, I got bearerbox binary of reduced size (around 170 KB less). The changes made are 1. smsc_p.h Removed entry for CIMD, CIMD2, Sema 4.5 Sema OIS 5.0 2. smsc.c Removed entry for CIMD

Re: Stripping Kannel

2002-01-04 Thread Valter Santos
- Original Message - From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Kannel Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:15 PM Subject: Re: Stripping Kannel Angel Fradejas wrote: I agree this is an interesting thing. We also use kannel as a SMS gateway only, and striping down everything

RE: Stripping Kannel

2002-01-04 Thread Angel Fradejas
Stipe Tolj wrote: I agree this is an interesting thing. We also use kannel as a SMS gateway only, and striping down everything wap related makes sense to us, too. so you would agree to have a configure switch that strips down everything WAP related in bearerbox, right?! Yes, that would be

Re: Stripping Kannel

2002-01-03 Thread Shridhar Raju
Hi Stipe, As suggested by u, I defined #define KANNEL_NO_WAP 1 in config.h file, which was generated by configure script. But result was same, make compiled everything in gw/ and made all executables (bearerbox, wapbox smsbox). Little reading into bearerbox.c, we found that there r mention

Stripping Kannel

2001-12-26 Thread Shridhar Raju
Hi, We have been using Kannel 1.1.5 and cvs for SMS applications. It has been working fine with AT and CIMD2 driver. Is it possible to strip Kannel to bare minimum like bearerbox will have only required SMSC driver and no WDP layer. If yes, how to do it. I thought about some options like 1.

Re: Stripping Kannel

2001-12-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
We have been using Kannel 1.1.5 and cvs for SMS applications. It has been working fine with AT and CIMD2 driver. Is it possible to strip Kannel to bare minimum like bearerbox will have only required SMSC driver and no WDP layer. If yes, how to do it. I thought about some options like 1.

Re: Stripping Kannel

2001-12-26 Thread Shridhar Raju
Hi Stipe, Thanks for the reply, it was very encourging for us to start doing something like this. It would be better idea, I guess, having --with-bearerbox-mode=[sms|wap] for the configuration. Any more suggestion from the list would be appreciated regarding striping of Kannel, which I have