Re: Connection reset by peer

On Donnerstag, September 18, 2003, at 04:03 Uhr, CHARBONNIER Christophe wrote: Hi list, I've got a little problem with the http-administration of Kannel: when I access the web interface with IE 6, an HTTPClient is well created and reseted. But when I close IE, just before the destroying of the

Re: [CFP] own KSF vs. ASF project

> Too bad.. I wont be there as I have a conference call exactly at this time... > I might be there a bit later the discussion whould be open a couple of hours. I guess all of us who are online can have their IRC clients open until evening, so we can have a wide ranged discussion. BTW, we will als

Re: [CFP] own KSF vs. ASF project

Too bad.. I wont be there as I have a conference call exactly at this time... I might be there a bit later On Donnerstag, September 18, 2003, at 03:51 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote: Hi list, this is a call for participation: Alexander and me would like to invite all codebase developers with CVS righ

Re: [CFP] own KSF vs. ASF project

just in advance. The call is for all individuals who are involved actively in the project. They don't have to claim cvs write access for having the participation done ;) We want to have a wide consensus here, so if you have been or are currently actively moving the project, please do join the dis

Connection reset by peer

Hi list, I've got a little problem with the http-administration of Kannel: when I access the web interface with IE 6, an HTTPClient is well created and reseted. But when I close IE, just before the destroying of the HTTPClient, I got: [1] ERROR: Error reading from fd 37: [1] ERROR: System error 1

[CFP] own KSF vs. ASF project

Hi list, this is a call for participation: Alexander and me would like to invite all codebase developers with CVS rights to participate in an online discussion via IRC for the future organizational aspects of Kannel. The place is: IRC channel #kannel irc.freenode.net The date and ti

RE: SAR well tested?

Ok, good to know. Thanks > -Original Message- > From: Igor Ivoilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercoledì 17 settembre 2003 17.29 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: SAR well tested? > > > You' are right. NACK is not imlemented for receiption. I did not > impleme

Re: [openss7]interoperability GSM and CDMA

On Donnerstag, September 18, 2003, at 12:55 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote: Andreas Fink schrieb: we have one too, it will cost too but much less *grin*... On Donnerstag, September 18, 2003, at 10:46 Uhr, John Bourke wrote: Logica have one. It will cost you ! why is an openss7 topic mailed to [EMAIL

Re: [openss7]interoperability GSM and CDMA

we have one too, it will cost too but much less *grin*... On Donnerstag, September 18, 2003, at 10:46 Uhr, John Bourke wrote: Logica have one.  It will cost you ! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of wicaksono Sent: 18 September 2003 08:45 To

Re: [RFC] get rid of inconsistent -1 values

Hi, @Bruno: nice to see you back ;) On Thursday 18 September 2003 00:40, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: [snip] > > I've done this msg initialization hack because I had problems with mt_reply > messages with errors, where mt_reply would inherit values from mo messsage > (think reply-* messages). ahh, the

Re: dlr mask question...

On Thursday 18 September 2003 00:50, Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tuesday 16 September 2003 18:25, Bill Brigden wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Really obvious question. when I submit a message via sendsms with a > >> dlrmask as 7 - why do I