Stipe Tolj wrote:
Kyriacos Sakkas schrieb:
This will happen, but I am holding off for a bit more, as meta-data was
used to implement some new requirements, so I am waiting for a bit to
make sure I am meeting those before making any further change. I will
update when that happens.
Hi,
any
Hi
Has anybody implemented or added new protocol to support Latvia LMT operator
SMPP protocol with LMT extentsions?
Would u suggest adding to to current SMPP development or add new protocol
based on SMPP implementation?
Thanks,
Illimar
Hi,
what is LMT extention? Could you please provide some links?
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
Have somebody implemented it or its new to Kannel. Would Kannel be
interested adding support for it to Kannel if someone (me) would write it?
Illimar
Jurijs Cerepanovs wrote:
Illimar
LMT uses SMPP procol with some additions to it for billing and DLR purpose.
*
*For example:*
* **LMT_REPORT – Contains information regarding the result of the
processing and execution of the SUBMIT_SM command;*
*LMT_GEN_CODE_RESP – Contains information regarding the result of the
processing
Hi,
Am I right that LMT uses reserved command ids there?
If yes, then in my opinion it may be useful to implement some API for
adding vendor specific SMPP commands processing as DSO and after this
LMT extension as such DSO :-)
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
LMT uses SMPP procol with
Kyriacos Sakkas schrieb:
I am currently running my full live load via GET request on the version
before the patch fixing the POST method. The wait is until me (or
someone else that can put some stress on it) confirms operation of the
current meta-data cvs under some sort of heavy load via POST
