11
To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alexander Malysh'
Cc: 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
I see. Isn't it always in openSMPPbox installation instructions to "download
and install latest kanell sources"? It wouldn't be a bad idea to release an
o
No, sqlbox doesn't use dlr_find().
-Original Message-
From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 02 August, 2010 20:11
To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alexander Malysh'
Cc: 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
I see. Isn't it alwa
essage-
From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 02 August, 2010 19:29
To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alexander Malysh'
Cc: 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi Rene,
Why get things unnecessarily complicated? You can update openSMPPbox code
a
luwen; 'Alexander Malysh'
Cc: 'Kannel Devel'
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi Rene,
Why get things unnecessarily complicated? You can update openSMPPbox code
and leave the new argument always to 0 if you don't need it, or - even
better - set it to 1 to match
uting.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Rene Kluwen"
To: "'Alexander Malysh'" ; "'Nikos Balkanas'"
Cc: "'Kannel Devel'"
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 2:39 AM
Subject: RE: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
I propose
Message - From: "Nikos Balkanas"
> To: "Kyriacos Sakkas"
> Cc: "Kannel Devel"
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 7:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
>> Kyriaco,
>>
>> Previous svn diff I got with -ub, which may be
define does not exist) with the "old" dlr_find.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Alexander Malysh
Sent: Wednesday, 28 July, 2010 22:59
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: Kannel Devel
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (
;Kyriacos Sakkas"
Cc: "Kannel Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Kyriaco,
Previous svn diff I got with -ub, which may be relevant. Try this one
which
is only -u.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Kyriacos Sa
- From: "Kyriacos Sakkas"
>
> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc: "Kannel Devel"
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 5:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
>> Hi Nikos,
>>
>> I got the svn snapshot today.
>>
>
f : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol
> using serf.
> - handles 'http' scheme
> - handles 'https' scheme
>
> Hope this helps,
> Nikos
> - Original Message - From: "Nikos Balkanas"
> To: "Kyriacos Sakkas" ;
via WebDAV protocol using
serf.
- handles 'http' scheme
- handles 'https' scheme
Hope this helps,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Nikos Balkanas"
To: "Kyriacos Sakkas" ; "Kannel Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 4:04 PM
Subj
Hi Kyriaco,
Are you patching against latest svn?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Kyriacos Sakkas"
To: "Kannel Devel"
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Trying to patch to svn downloaded today (same version as
ction, except for some cosmetic changes. I am mostly
>>> concerned about the correct behaviour of the concat statement in Mysql &
>>> Oracle, and of course the overall compatibility with EMI & CIMD2, and SMPP
>>> for positive control.
>>>
>>> BR,
>&g
;
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Alexander Malysh"
>> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:05 AM
>> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>>
>>
>> Hi Niko
10 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Nikos,
You can send to the same hash number that you got from the operator for a
certain period of time from his last MO
after that he is no longer accessible for you until he sends a new MO - and
then a new (other) hash is generated
hash
; - Original Message - From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" <
> aguerri...@kannel.org>
>
> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc: ; "Alexander Malysh" ; <
> devel@kannel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 4:31 PM
>
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP
Hi Alex,
It looks that this is not an issue, after all. You could commit patch as is
(if you haven't done so already).
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent CHAVANIS"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
is a non-issue, and we can go ahead. Is that what you
were referring, to?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - From: "Nikos Balkanas"
To: "Thomas Gottgens"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Thanks, Thomas.
Absolutely,
, patch won't be affected by this.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Gottgens"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hello Nikos,
this becomes relevant if you not use the sms-servic
O?
NB> BR,
NB> Nikos
NB> - Original Message -
NB> From: "Alejandro Guerrieri"
NB> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
NB> Cc: ; "Alexander Malysh" ;
NB>
NB> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 4:31 PM
NB> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
; "Alexander Malysh" ;
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Some operators don't send the phone number in plain text. Instead, they send
some sort of hashed string.
To send an MT in response to an MO, you send it with the destination
ent CHAVANIS"
>
> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we cannot predict the alias from the MSISDN
>> this was designed for ;)
>>
>&
ncent CHAVANIS"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi,
we cannot predict the alias from the MSISDN
this was designed for ;)
Also, This should IMO be mentionned into the source
of the driver, that we cannot send
. A better way would be to calculate the encryption
>> and
>> implement it when used. Is there a way to predict it? How can I get more
>> info about it?
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> - Original Message - From: "Vincent CHAVANIS"
>>
>&
ould be to calculate the encryption and
implement it when used. Is there a way to predict it? How can I get more info
about it?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - From: "Vincent CHAVANIS"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi nikos,
&#
encryption
and implement it when used. Is there a way to predict it? How can I get more
info about it?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent CHAVANIS"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi nikos,
'alias'
Hi nikos,
'alias' is an "crypted" MSISDN done by the operator-side
to protect the customer (avoid spamming, and any abuses)
This actually exists here in fr but i assume,
this also exists on other countries
I just want to be sure this will not
break any existing installations.
Vincent.
Le 21/0
ay, July 21, 2010 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
This avoid the problem on the first DLR at least (the one Kannel creates on
the submit response), but there's nothing you could do if the SMSC deliver
the messages to the device on the same second and sends you the DLR&#
s,
>>>>
>>>> +1 except some indents issues but I will fix it myself...
>>>>
>>>> Any test results from users?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alexander Malysh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 20.0
> Vincent
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 20/07/2010 23:05, Alexander Malysh a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Nikos,
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 except some indents issues but I will fix it myself...
>>>>>
>>>>>
gt; >>>
> >>> Am 20.07.2010 um 12:07 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> OK. I believe this is it.
> >>>>
> >>>> BR,
> >>>> Nikos
> >>>> - Original Mess
Malysh"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou";
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi Nikos,
see below ...
Am 20.07.2010 um 03:03 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi Alex,
Please see inlined comments: I am still waiting feedback
xcept some indents issues but I will fix it myself...
>>>
>>> Any test results from users?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexander Malysh
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 20.07.2010 um 12:07 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
>>>
>&
t;>> Nikos
>>> - Original Message - From: "Alexander Malysh"
>>> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
>>> Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou";
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:14 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>>&
quot;
Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou";
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi Nikos,
see below ...
Am 20.07.2010 um 03:03 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi Alex,
Please see inlined comments: I am still waiting feedback from some users
testing it.
with EMI & CIMD2, and SMPP
for positive control.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi Nikos,
+1 except some indents issues but I
t;
> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou" ;
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
> Hi Nikos,
>
> see below ...
>
> Am 20.07.2010 um 03:03 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
>
>> H
OK. I believe this is it.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou" ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi Nikos,
see below ...
Am 20.07.2010 u
ikos Balkanas"
>> Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou" ;
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:14 AM
>> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
>> Hi Nikos,
>
>> I'm back from vacation and here are comments to your patch. Patch looks OK
>
Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou" ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 4:03 AM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi Alex,
Please see inlined comments: I am still waiting feedback from some users
testing it.
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "N
Hi Alex,
Please see inlined comments: I am still waiting feedback from some users
testing it.
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc: "Byron Kiourtzoglou" ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI
no access to them.
>
> @Byron: Could you please test patch for CIMD2 against some of the DBs you use?
>
> Thanks,
> Nikos
> - Original Message - From: "Alexander Malysh"
> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi All,
It might be possible for me to do some testing with the mysql dlr storage.
One point is that at least on my system the connection ID for CIMD
(smsc) used for the dlr store is not the name set in t
tzoglou"
>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 3:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
>> Here it is. Added support for dest also for cimd2 as reported by Byron.
>>
>> I have tested thoroughly dlr_mem.c, but only compilation for DBs,
>
Hi Byron,
Any news? Were you able to test?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Nikos Balkanas"
To: "Alexander Malysh" ; "Byron Kiourtzoglou"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Here it is. Added s
-
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi,
sorry for delay... I have limited inet access now... see answers bellow.
Am 30.06.2010 um 19:30 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi,
Please
"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi,
sorry for delay... I have limited inet access now... see answers bellow.
Am 30.06.2010 um 19:30 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
Hi,
Please see inlined answers.
Thanks fo
> - Original Message - From: "Alexander Malysh"
> To: "Nikos Balkanas"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
>
>
>> Hi,
>
>> IMO we don't need to handle no destination case i
Hi,
Please see inlined answers.
Thanks for the comments and corrections. Please confirm a few remaining
choices.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: Patch:
Hi,
IMO we don't need to handle no destination case in DLR lookup but maybe it's
not a wrong idea to be able to ignore destination for some
reasons when SMSC send some junk to us.
ok here is the review for your patch:
+if (dst){
+ int len = octstr_len(dst);
+ char *p = octstr_get
: "Nikos Balkanas"
To: "Alexander Malysh"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi,
I can think of 2 cases to handle no destination:
1) There are SMScs that do not include destination in their DLRs (that I
have found throug
-
From: "Alexander Malysh"
To: "Nikos Balkanas"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: Patch: EMI UUCP DLRs (final)
Hi,
I don't think we have to handle case when no destination given. Destination
is always there.
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 26
Hi,
I don't think we have to handle case when no destination given. Destination is
always there.
Thanks,
Alexander Malysh
Am 26.06.2010 um 10:23 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
> Hi,
>
> I believe I have accounted for almost all your comments to produce the final
> working patch. I have no way of te
Hi,
I believe I have accounted for almost all your comments to produce the final
working patch. I have no way of testing, other than compilation.
This patch will povide:
1) Align dlr_oracle.c with the rest. Currently, Oracle does a full dst
find/remove/update on each DLR.
2) Dst use on find/
54 matches
Mail list logo
