On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The practical point is that F12
is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
Why? Obviously it needs to be clear that nothing further should be
expected
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The practical point is that F12
is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
Why? Obviously it needs to be clear that nothing further should be
Le 05/11/2010 03:10, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
On 11/05/2010 06:41 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Considering that it was started by a Red Hat employee, I would say there
has already been some involvement
Rahul
Kristian does not work for Red Hat anymore but at Intel OSTC.
Will Ubuntu
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:58:21PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/04/2010 10:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
outstanding needinfo? flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
shouldn't be able to send a new bug
On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want to
orphan my package?
Welcome to the world without gtk, openjdk, eclipse-platform, kdelibs
I think maybe it is meant more as You have 100 bugs, 80 are not
[mbo...@t500 virt-v2v (f14)]$ git push origin f14
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: C refs/heads/f14 mdbooth DENIED by refs/heads/f[0-9][0-9]
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/f14
To ssh://mdbo...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/virt-v2v
! [remote rejected] f14 - f14 (hook
Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com writes:
[mbo...@t500 virt-v2v (f14)]$ git push origin f14
$ git push origin f14:f14/master
(It was a very bad idea to name the local branches differently than the
remote branches.)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
Release of libxml2-2.7.8
libxml2.spec | 10 --
Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
Dependent packages should be rebuild.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:11:22AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
Am Montag, den 01.11.2010, 21:12 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
I am planning to push libnotify 0.7.0 into rawhide by the end of this
week;
Next time you are making an update that affects a large number of
packages, please use devel-announce.
TIA,
Christoph
--
devel mailing list
On 11/05/2010 07:47 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want to
orphan my package?
Welcome to the world without gtk, openjdk, eclipse-platform, kdelibs
I think maybe it is meant more
Java SIG pseudo user has been created with commit emails from monitored
packages[1] flowing to java-devel mailing list (thanks to tibbs and mjw).
If you want java-sig to monitor and check your commits you can add
java-sig pseudo user to CC for your package. For old packages follow
[2]. For new
Hi All,
Unfortunately I don't have the time to proper maintain the
packages below. So I believe it is better to orphan them,
and have just done so.
If you're interested in any of these feel free to pick them up
bochs - Portable x86 PC emulator
I believe everyone is pretty much using qemu now.
Frank Murphy said the following on 11/05/2010 12:47 AM Pacific Time:
On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want to
orphan my package?
Welcome to the world without gtk, openjdk, eclipse-platform, kdelibs
I
Hi,
I would like to bring tritonus back from the dead
(as it is a dependency for vorbisspi, which is needed
to be able to playback .ogg files under java).
I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but there
does not seem to be anything written about it on the wiki
(or I cannot find it).
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:11 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
Until
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
I would like to bring tritonus back from the dead
(as it is a dependency for vorbisspi, which is needed
to be able to playback .ogg files under java).
I'm pretty sure this has been discussed before, but there
does not seem to be
Hi,
Please review the patch for the following bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643979
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=458122action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=458122action=diff
Thanks!
--
Endi S. Dewata
--
389-devel mailing list
Nathan Kinder wrote:
Please review these design notes for implementing one way AD sync. In
particular, I'm concerned about the possible inconsistencies that can
arise from directly modifying a synced entry on the DS side. Does using
access control seem sufficient for avoiding these
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
What's the implication for people who absolutely need to use
X applications remotely?
I believe the idea for the overall plan is that the traditional X
server grows the ability to be a Wayland client and that any
Orcan Ogetbil, Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:02:02 -0400:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
From what I have seen, the maintainers are more responsive to
On 11/05/2010 05:41 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil, Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:02:02 -0400:
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did not fit Fedora as is.
From what I have seen, the
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:12:09AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:11 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:07:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:57:56AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:11:22AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:38:35 -0700, Adam wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 13:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
So can someone please explain my why I should continue to try to
improve Fedora by reporting bugs ?
Glad you ask this. The bugzapping script is stupid. It asks the reporter
On 11/04/2010 06:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
outstanding needinfo? flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
shouldn't be able to send a new bug report through ABRT for my
packages.
That's a little harsh---I have been in
Hello fellow Fedorans.
I'm trying to build a new package for Fawkes which has just passed
review. It build fine on f13/f14/f15, but it fails on el5/el6 with an
error that seems to be related to the build system, not to the actual
package.
Koji Builds:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.003-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
781ff92... Initial import of perl-Test-Fatal 0.003-1
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:47:38 -0400
Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de wrote:
Hello fellow Fedorans.
I'm trying to build a new package for Fawkes which has just passed
review. It build fine on f13/f14/f15, but it fails on el5/el6 with an
error that seems to be related to the build system,
On 5 November 2010 19:47, Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de wrote:
Koji Builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2580299
That then points to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2580322
Note the
Result : BuildError: error building package (arch noarch), mock
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
Release of libxml2-2.7.8
libxml2.spec | 10 --
Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
Dependent
On 05.11.2010 14:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
The userdel seems unrelated to the real problem:
DEBUG util.py:260: No Package Found for gearbox-devel= 9.11
[...]
Thanks, missed those. I wish it could be made more clear which state
failed. I wonder why it says return code 0, although this failed?
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
What's the implication for people who absolutely need to use
X applications
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
Release of libxml2-2.7.8
libxml2.spec | 10 --
Seems to break the koji
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:16:32 -0400
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 16:10 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The practical point is that F12
is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
Why? Obviously it needs to be clear that nothing further should be
expected from the
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:49 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2010/11/4 Orcan Ogetbil :
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial products such as RHEL, but it
obviously did
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 07:27 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Frank Murphy said the following on 11/05/2010 12:47 AM Pacific Time:
On 05/11/10 07:27, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
So what if I got 100 bug reports and didn't answered 10 bugs you will want
to
orphan my package?
Welcome to the
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 18:29 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
It is inefficient, if some time later another user needs to report the
same issue only to get ignored, too. It is not encouraging our users to
spend time on reporting bugs and on replying to NEEDINFO or other
questions in the tickets.
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 13:48 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 11/04/2010 06:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
outstanding needinfo? flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
shouldn't be able to send a new bug report through ABRT
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:19:14 +0200
Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
rebuilt?
About 30min after the rawhide compose kicked off:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 13:57:18 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:19:14 +0200
Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
rebuilt?
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:30:41 -0700, Adam wrote:
If the bug hasn't had any attention for the last
year and a half it's not particularly likely to magically get it now, is
it?
Then why should the reporter take action in reply to the NEEDINFO
bugzapping request?
Something is terribly wrong
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:30:41 -0700, Adam wrote:
If the bug hasn't had any attention for the last
year and a half it's not particularly likely to magically get it now, is
it?
Then why should the reporter take action in reply to
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
ABRT
It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
Parts of the Fedora user base abuse ABRT in that they refuse to
fill in the empty fields. Blame the reporters not the
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:05:01 +0100, Jiri wrote:
- if you think ABRT is not providing a good info for you packages, then
please write me an email how to improve it
Could you please add another hurdle that tries to stop users from not
filling in the empty fields about how to reproduce a
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:05:01 +0100, Jiri wrote:
- if you think ABRT is not providing a good info for you packages, then
please write me an email how to improve it
Could you please add another hurdle that tries to stop users from not
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask the
ABRT maintainers to block any reports against those component that a
maintainer has not responded
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:27:46 +0200, Alexander wrote:
I can't see why can't we just admit - This is our best feel free to join us
and help ?? (someone should find better wording)
Yeah. It isn't that obvious to our users (and potential contributors
among them) where help is needed, where help
Well, there's the cprops library, but I'd need to make a package out of that
first
http://cprops.sourceforge.net/
Seems like this might be generically useful (i.e. not just for radix tries but
the other search types).
Not sure if the threading support is needed or not... plus it might
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 19:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 15:41 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 19:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:45:37 -0700, Adam wrote:
Something is terribly wrong here, if reporter adjusts F12 - F13 - F14
over a period of N months in reply to the automated NEEDINFO requests and
still doesn't get any response other than another automated one after
six more months.
So,
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:14:08 +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:10:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
The practical point is that F12
is about to go EOL which means the bug must be closed...
Why? Obviously it
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be
the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
What's
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:08:40 -0400
Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de wrote:
Some more question related to el6:
When will packages appear in el6? I maintain some of the dependencies
for el5, but they are not in el6.
They will appear when someone branches them and builds them, or when
the
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
right time getting involved in the discussion.
On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
ABRT
It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
Parts of the Fedora user base abuse ABRT in that they refuse to
fill
On 11/05/2010 08:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 17:49 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
2010/11/4 Orcan Ogetbil :
Maybe it is time to discuss the usefulness of ABRT to Fedora. I think
that it is a great idea for commercial
On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask the
ABRT maintainers to block any reports against those
On 11/06/2010 01:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
ABRT
It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
Parts of the Fedora user
On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
maintainer on a component they have reported against I not only ask the
ABRT
The lightweight tag 'perl-Mojolicious-0.35-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
7e696e3... - Latest upstream release. http://search.cpan.org/src/KRA
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
abde086... 1.30 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632176
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-11-05 04:45:30
EDT ---
I've asked for EL-6, #176137 but you can
perl-Gtk2-Notify has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk2-Notify-0.05-8.fc14.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Gtk2-Notify-0.05-8.fc14.i686 requires libnotify.so.1
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-XML-LibXSLT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.70-4.fc14.x86_64 requires
libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit)
On i386:
perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.70-4.fc14.i686 requires libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07002-1.fc15.noarch requires
perl(DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader::Utils)
On i386:
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.07002-1.fc15.noarch requires
commit 4b568684e5235fb4773b709e1eb9480b078a0b01
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Nov 5 10:25:33 2010 +0100
provides perl(DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader::Utils)
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632176
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-05
05:50:37 EDT ---
perl-Log-Log4perl-1.30-1.fc14
commit f3818e7091b1fa5ed7f3a483fa8d7bcc4e008583
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 5 11:50:23 2010 +0100
rebuilt with new libxml2
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec
commit 2cfd398e92c531acce82e869564eece426d73d7c
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 5 11:55:28 2010 +0100
rebuild with new libxml2
perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec
commit 71468021c09fdc029412c79f0648f18a5fc8a258
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 5 12:35:06 2010 +0100
Add missing BR. Thanks ppisar.
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632176
--- Comment #5 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt 2010-11-05 08:48:50
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I've asked for
commit 5cd6b1f4fb2562d4efc919ce648b71933820af1b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 5 13:59:26 2010 +0100
Fix function according to new libnotify.
libnotify.patch | 19 +++
perl-Gtk2-Notify.spec |5 +++--
2 files changed, 22
Hello perl-de...@f.o subscribers,
as Mailman 2.1.9 offers to moderate incomming messages on e-mail header basis,
and Red Hat MTAs hosting fedoraproject.org mailing lists mark suspicious
e-mails with X-RedHat-Spam-Warning: header, I deciced to utilize this feature
to help to moderate messages
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
ffe1a2b4a29441e4332f2c34547f904e Mojolicious-0.36.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4ae102b19ec2a2ff7b312b3b070453cd4bf1682c
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Fri Nov 5 15:29:30 2010 +0200
New upstream bugfix release
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
John Griffiths fedora.jr...@grifent.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596103
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-05
17:51:04 EDT ---
perl-Net-Patricia-1.18-1.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632176
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
81 matches
Mail list logo
