On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:43AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not
If I wanted to step back to the pre-net era, I'd run Windows.
I wonder if there will be someone saying (when all the apps are native
Wayland apps) If I wanted to step back to the pre-stetic* era, I'd
run X
I get the impression that comparing current Fedora and Linux in
general running on varied
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:17:59 +, Jóhann wrote:
On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
maintainer on a
On 11/06/2010 01:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
ABRT
It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
Parts of the
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:15:36 -0700, Adam wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 23:09 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:45:37 -0700, Adam wrote:
Something is terribly wrong here, if reporter adjusts F12 - F13 - F14
over a period of N months in reply to the automated
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:17:59 +, Jóhann wrote:
On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
maintainer on a
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:20:08AM +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
If I wanted to step back to the pre-net era, I'd run Windows.
I wonder if there will be someone saying (when all the apps are native
Wayland apps) If I wanted to step back to the pre-stetic* era, I'd
run X
I get the
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and not
expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many ticket EOL warnings some users receive all of
a sudden? They may be able to pay
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many ticket EOL warnings some users receive all of
a sudden? They may be able to pay
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many ticket EOL warnings some users receive all of
a sudden? They may be able to
Is Fedora for developers or what?
If it is exclusively for developers with the exclusion of general
purpose features such as web browsing, photo management, and
multimedia consumption then I'll have to find a more general purpose
OS. I count myself as a developer but concede that I have a life
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:51:37AM +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Is Fedora for developers or what?
If it is exclusively for developers with the exclusion of general
purpose features such as web browsing, photo management, and
multimedia consumption then I'll have to find a more general
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many ticket EOL
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 12:23:00PM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
Why does everyone want to put more and more burden on maintainers and arguing
about small things that users should do?
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and not
expect the user to verify
I believe it is possible to do photo management, web browsing and
watching video, even on the current version of Fedora.
Indeed. It's not the point that it's possible or not. I could do much
of that on a Windows 3.11 machine... Be honest with yourself, is it
every bit as good as the experience
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:51:32PM +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I believe it is possible to do photo management, web browsing and
watching video, even on the current version of Fedora.
Indeed. It's not the point that it's possible or not. I could do much
of that on a Windows 3.11 machine...
Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 10:57 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
Is Fedora for developers or what?
We want to ditch extremely useful, ground-breaking features because of
tearing when scrolling in a browser window?
Well it would be mightily nice to have an infrastructure that can
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 10:57 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
Is Fedora for developers or what?
We want to ditch extremely useful, ground-breaking features because of
tearing when scrolling in a browser window?
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs
and not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
Have you noticed how many
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:51:32PM +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I believe it is possible to do photo management, web browsing and
watching video, even on the current version of Fedora.
Indeed. It's not the point that
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:36:24 +0200, Alexander wrote:
Hmm, let's switch user with maintainer?
Have you noticed how many new tickets some maintainers receive all of a
sudden?
In general or because of the EOL script creating a flood? ;)
Who classifies whether an incoming bug report is
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:38:36 +0200, Alexander wrote:
Oh and I forgot to add this:
If you think it is discouraging for the user do get his bug autoclosed, why
do
you think it is not discouraging for the maintainer to ask questions and
noone
answers them?
Perhaps read my other replies
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 13:51, Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote:
With virtualization I have more Linux machines than ever (about 50 in
active use at last count). All on my local 1GB network. Consequently
I use X to them and to other physical machines _all the time_.
If there is no way
Out of interest, do you use individual shells/terms or something that
provides a more remote desktop like experience?
I use ssh -Y. Anything that sits in a huge window showing an entire
desktop-in-a-desktop is so obviously the wrong way to do it, from both
a usability and efficiency
Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote:
[..] As much as I love Nouveau's freeness, last time I
checked I couldn't even run gnome shell on it.
I was doing that back in November[1].
--Ben
[1]http://blipper.dev.benboeckel.net/one-soap-box/2009/11/03/gnome-day-2-gnome-shell/
--
devel mailing
Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 14:21 +, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
Why throw away everything just so we can make input better?
Because those are just the examples I know where X11 has been blocking
progress for *years*. I'm sure there are lots of others.
(And in any case wasn't evdev
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote:
[..] As much as I love Nouveau's freeness, last time I
checked I couldn't even run gnome shell on it.
I was doing that back in November[1].
--Ben
Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
Camilo Mesias cam...@mesias.co.uk wrote:
[..] As much as I love Nouveau's freeness, last time I
checked I couldn't even run gnome shell on it.
I was doing that back in
On 11/06/2010 04:16 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote:
Out of interest, do you use individual shells/terms or something that
provides a more remote desktop like experience?
I use ssh -Y. Anything that sits in a huge window showing an entire
desktop-in-a-desktop is so obviously the wrong way to do it,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Params-Classify:
07c11d0a78a07d4431f9c6d12398ce0d Params-Classify-0.012.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7d7e3f44875f32e3b439d8abcb8f2e81a29a7308
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Nov 6 07:47:11 2010 +0100
initial import
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Params-Classify.spec | 59 +
sources |1 +
commit 856d2da8bc1f9d29f08a8e9dad8a9a30902c39a3
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Nov 6 07:49:11 2010 +0100
clarify ExtUtils::ParseXS build requirement version
perl-Params-Classify.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
7d7e3f4... initial import (*)
856d2da... clarify ExtUtils::ParseXS build requirement version (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Action-REST:
f675a5a26112923e84a3c21982096cbb Catalyst-Action-REST-0.87.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0e1c038973c72ff86e72654693b16f0319924351
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Nov 6 11:54:34 2010 +0100
update to 0.87
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Catalyst-Action-REST.spec |9 +++--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 9
commit 6665e725e01184d73291670aae2c78d28c4b7426
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Nov 6 13:21:51 2010 +
Update to 0.07
- New upstream release 0.07:
- Allow multiple finally blocks
- Pass the error, if any, to finally blocks when called
-
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.07-1.el6' was created pointing to:
6665e72... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Summary of changes:
781ff92... Initial import of perl-Test-Fatal 0.003-1 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.003-1.el6' was created pointing to:
781ff92... Initial import of perl-Test-Fatal 0.003-1
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650459
Summary: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.09 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645060
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-Smoke-1.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650460
Summary: perl-Test-Smoke-1.44 is available
Product: Fedora
42 matches
Mail list logo
