Hello,
I wanted to point out that about a month and a half ago intel released
a new driver version 2.13.0. Could we please have an update in
rawhide?
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Monday, November 08, 2010 16:26:22 Rex Dieter wrote:
Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local
rpm build and usual user's environment.
You mean the difference between rpmbuild and... a manual ./configure;
make?
something like that
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 08:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:43AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com)
On Monday, November 08, 2010 19:34:14 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:49:28PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for
local rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression
tests to %check section of
On 11/09/2010 10:05 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 08:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:43AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 21:43 +0200, Marius Andreiana wrote:
Hi,
Even when not playing any audio, pulseaudio uses CPU and memory
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+
COMMAND
2257 marius20 0 941m 7524 3188 S 2.9 0.4 14:22.57
chrome
2956
Summary of changes:
2c7f08b... Increase release number to be higher than perl one (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Den 09-11-2010 13:56, Brendan Jones skrev:
On 11/09/2010 10:48 PM, Rasmus Ory Nielsen wrote:
Unfortunately yum-builddep doesn't work for me. I need to be able to change
$releasever and enabled repositories (hence the mock config file). Is that
possible with yum-builddep?
You could try
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:50:15PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:41 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Really, I have no
problem using my keyboard,
Given your location and native language, I suspect your keyboard layout
is en_US, in which case this isn't much of a
Hi,
Given a SRPM file and a mock config file, how do I get a list of all missing
buildrequires for this SRPM?
Is it possible using the command line tools, or do I need to use the python
api? I looked at the yum/mock api and it seemed a bit overwhelming.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rasmus
--
commit 2c7f08beedcecd8e5a8e302661a1fbd55fb5a727
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Nov 9 11:50:49 2010 +0100
Increase release number to be higher than perl one
Unbundled Class::ISA should be preferred.
perl-Class-ISA.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:07:05AM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
tried, but there does not seem to be significant difference. Also the %check
script I used was the same script rpmbuild creates from the %check section
(in
/var/tmp/rpm*) and it defines the same environment:
On 11/09/2010 10:33 PM, Rasmus Ory Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
Given a SRPM file and a mock config file, how do I get a list of all missing
buildrequires for this SRPM?
Is it possible using the command line tools, or do I need to use the python
api? I looked at the yum/mock api and it seemed a bit
Hi,
Den 09-11-2010 13:37, Brendan Jones skrev:
On 11/09/2010 10:33 PM, Rasmus Ory Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
Given a SRPM file and a mock config file, how do I get a list of all missing
buildrequires for this SRPM?
Is it possible using the command line tools, or do I need to use the python
api?
2010/11/9 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK Hello, I wanted to point out that about a month and a half ago intel
RK released a new driver version 2.13.0. Could we please have an update
RK in rawhide?
Currently rawhide seems to be at
On 11/09/2010 10:48 PM, Rasmus Ory Nielsen wrote:
Unfortunately yum-builddep doesn't work for me. I need to be able to change
$releasever and enabled repositories (hence the mock config file). Is that
possible with yum-builddep?
You could try something like:
mock -r fedora-14-i386
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 08:00 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7794
RK guess you pulled that somewhere else.
fedpkg co xorg-x11-drv-intel; less xorg-x11-drv-intel/*spec
2.13.901 wasn't
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK Hello, I wanted to point out that about a month and a half ago intel
RK released a new driver version 2.13.0. Could we please have an update
RK in rawhide?
Currently rawhide seems to be at 2.13.901, a development version past
the one you are
2010/11/9 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 08:00 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7794
RK guess you pulled that somewhere else.
fedpkg co xorg-x11-drv-intel; less
Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com writes:
So it seems rpmbuild has a bug and breaks sigpipe somehow...
Perhaps it leaves it ignored? You can check with /proc/$$/status.
$ (trap '' SIGPIPE; bash x.sh)
early termination not causing broken
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 16:09 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/09/2010 10:05 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 08:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:43AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Monday, November 08, 2010 15:49:28 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local
rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression tests to
%check section of ksh spec file. These
On Monday, November 08, 2010 15:49:28 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local
rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression tests to
%check section of ksh spec file. These tests never fails when executed in
user's
So, local mock x86_64 builds work just fine. But AFAICS the build just
hangs in fairly random places when put through x86_64 koji, anyone got
any good ideas about how to find out even what process is hung ?
e.g.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2589336name=build.logoffset=-4000
RK == Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com writes:
RK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7794
RK guess you pulled that somewhere else.
fedpkg co xorg-x11-drv-intel; less xorg-x11-drv-intel/*spec
- J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A few folks have sufficient access to log into the builders and strace
things if necessary. You're welcome to ping me on IRC.
- J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com writes:
time taken was 0.004 seconds
zip warning: help.jar not found or empty
adding: com.sun.PresenterScreen-linux_x86_64/presenter.xhp (deflated 81%)
and nothing else.
Perhaps some ENOSPC condition?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:30:17 Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Monday, November 08, 2010 15:49:28 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for
local rpm build and usual user's environment.
On 11/9/10 8:23 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
I've seen the responses on the Wayland list, and it's always Wayland
isn't intended to do that. So, there's no point raising objections
there.
The risk is that Wayland gets developed and a bunch of key
applications in Fedora get broken. The Wayland
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 02:48 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2010/11/09 07:39 (GMT+0100) David Tardon composed:
Btw, maybe you should look at the proverb in your signature and try to
apply it to yourself. Because in this thread you have neither shown
understanding nor used pleasant words.
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
And what happens when all the apps are native Wayland apps and
none of those can be run remotely?
If I wanted to step back to the pre-net era, I'd run Windows.
+1 for bringing these points up. No offense to krh (because it's nice
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:29 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:50:15PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:41 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Really, I have no
problem using my keyboard,
Given your location and native language, I
On 11/09/2010 03:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 11/9/10 7:23 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
At which point, it's too late. Unless Server-y people point out that
things like network apps actually matter, the default path may be to do
what will look nice on a local desktop (for the record, I can see
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
+1 for bringing these points up. No offense to krh (because it's nice
technology) but you can pull my genuine networked applications from my
cold dead hands. I agree that I see this ongoing trend to move toward
things that are fluffy and
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
+1 for bringing these points up. No offense to krh (because it's nice
technology) but you can pull my genuine networked applications from my
cold dead hands. I agree that
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:44 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I think we'd like to see the Fedora community figure out its position
on the subject— so that it can tell the Wayland developers If you
continue on this track, then as things stand, Fedora will not be
making it a part of the default
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 08:45 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, once more for the cheap seats: *why* do you think closing an older
bug as a dupe of a newer one is a respect issue? What's the big problem
with it?
As a devel - I've found that I close bugs as dupes of other bugs and I
try to have
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:23:22AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
At which point, it's too late. Unless Server-y people
I object strongly to this perception that nobody involved in developing
desktop technologies has any idea what server admins want. What we're
seeing is the development of
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:25 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:23:22AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
At which point, it's too late. Unless Server-y people
I object strongly to this perception that nobody involved in developing
desktop technologies has any idea what server
On 11/09/2010 05:13 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:44 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I think we'd like to see the Fedora community figure out its position
on the subject— so that it can tell the Wayland developers If you
continue on this track, then as things stand, Fedora
On 11/09/2010 04:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
And what happens when all the apps are native Wayland apps and
none of those can be run remotely?
If I wanted to step back to the pre-net era, I'd run Windows.
+1 for bringing these points
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:16 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 08:45 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
So, once more for the cheap seats: *why* do you think closing an older
bug as a dupe of a newer one is a respect issue? What's the big problem
with it?
As a devel - I've found
Adam Williamson wrote:
Only point to note is that it would definitely be a good thing to fix
Bugzilla to merge the CC lists, I'll file a bug on that. =)
Filed 9 years ago: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108983
Or 1 year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523634
--
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:49 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Only point to note is that it would definitely be a good thing to fix
Bugzilla to merge the CC lists, I'll file a bug on that. =)
Filed 9 years ago: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108983
Is anyone interested in resurrecting SWI Prolog? I just noticed that it was
dropped from F13 and F14.
The version in F12 was 5.7.11, the current version is 5.10.2 according to:
http://www.swi-prolog.org/
The previous packager was Gerard Milmeister.
Gregory Maxwell (gmaxw...@gmail.com) said:
So,
You are, in short, scared.
... I think this is a rather unfair characterization.
I don't know about that. Something new is discussed, and not everyone
understands it, and they have concerns about how it may handle some particular
cases.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
Then why are people already calling for the rejection of Wayland even
though Wayland is still far from being finished and hasn't even touched
Fedora yet.
raising concerns != screaming the sky is falling
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:27 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
B/c the perception I get is that only the desktop-oriented folks know
what users want or need and the server-oriented folks do not.
I think that's in error, too.
In fact, us
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:40 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'm wondering of I'm reading this correctly. The downsides that have
been described are quite severe in contrast to the possible benefits.
It is, of course, possible that a mistake has been made, and the acute
loss of functionality is
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 19:12 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 11/09/2010 06:12 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 04:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
+1 for bringing these points up. No offense to krh
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
wayland...when they feel its ready. By introducing it for discussion
before they were ready to engage in that discussion you've actually
made it more difficult for the discussion to move forward as you've
taken away their
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:12 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Remoting a wayland application is _trivial_. Either to an X or to a
wayland view system. It's hard to make wayland remoting less flexible
than X over the network, since the natural remoting level (surface
updates) is basically
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:43 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
- All my X apps have to be ported! Yes, if they want to be native
wayland clients, they do.
Minor correction (I think?) - the apps don't really need to be ported,
the toolkits do. Once GTK+ is ported to Wayland, fr'instance, all GTK+
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:47 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:12 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Remoting a wayland application is _trivial_. Either to an X or to a
wayland view system. It's hard to make wayland remoting less flexible
than X over the network, since
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:47 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:12 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Remoting a wayland application is _trivial_. Either to an X or to a
wayland view system. It's hard to make wayland remoting less flexible
than X over the network, since
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic Updates policy
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
Hi,
On 11/09/2010 07:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:49 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Only point to note is that it would definitely be a good thing to fix
Bugzilla to merge the CC lists, I'll file a bug on that. =)
Filed 9 years ago:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:44:19PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
And where does that sit in the architecture?
Looking over the architecture page (2nd figure) it looks like the only
way to get the kind of network transparency that X has under Wayland is
to put the network between the Wayland
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12:02 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic Updates policy
#351 Create a policy for updates - status
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 20:06 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11/09/2010 07:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 11:49 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Only point to note is that it would definitely be a good thing to fix
Bugzilla to merge the CC
On 11/09/2010 06:43 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:40 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'm wondering of I'm reading this correctly. The downsides that have
been described are quite severe in contrast to the possible benefits.
It is, of course, possible that a mistake has been
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 11/09/2010 06:12 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I've mostly been watching here and I think people have been fairly
clearly about their concerns: Network transparency is important to
them, and they understand that
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 10:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:43 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
- All my X apps have to be ported! Yes, if they want to be native
wayland clients, they do.
Minor correction (I think?) - the apps don't really need to be ported,
the
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:05 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:44:19PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
And where does that sit in the architecture?
Looking over the architecture page (2nd figure) it looks like the only
way to get the kind of network transparency that X
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:19 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:01 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:47 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
And I'm saying you can get the network remoting effect you like in X, in
Wayland. It's not built into the local Wayland
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
To the extent that those apps call (and link) only against the toolkit
and not against an assumed backend, sure. The strict linking changes in
F12 or F13 or whichever it was helped a lot with this, and gtk3 will
help more, but to pick an
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:24 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:14:32PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:05 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:44:19PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
And where does that sit in the architecture?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, so it's likely that everything will just continue to work
remotely, and people won't experience any problems. And they won't
have to run VNC just to get their favourite app to display remotely.
If this had been explained
On 2010/11/09 08:45 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed:
There isn't a prize system for bug reports.
Actually there is. When someone files a good bug, as opposed to one that
requires more than trivial attention due to significant missing or invalid
information, achieving fixed status is an
Once upon a time, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com said:
- We lose network transparency! Well, sure, the protocol doesn't have
that directly. You can still do vnc-like things trivially and with a
VNC-like remoting is a significant loss for server environments compared
to X-like remoting.
With an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
--- Comment #12 from Sandro Janke bugzilla_red...@penguinpee.nl 2010-11-09
14:34:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 13:34 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com said:
- We lose network transparency! Well, sure, the protocol doesn't have
that directly. You can still do vnc-like things trivially and with a
VNC-like remoting is a significant loss
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:33 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2010/11/09 08:45 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed:
There isn't a prize system for bug reports.
Actually there is. When someone files a good bug, as opposed to one that
requires more than trivial attention due to significant
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
Actually there is. When someone files a good bug, as opposed to one that
requires more than trivial attention due to significant missing or invalid
information, achieving fixed status is an informal statement that the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651571
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=459236action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=459236action=edit
Description: If an entry contains a to-be-encrypted attribute,
id2entry_add_ext handles a copy of the entry in
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:28:10PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:24 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:14:32PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:05 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:44:19PM -0500, Brian
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:53:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
well, I imagine you know more about this than me, but I run with
Japanese input support at least occasionally, and my impression is that
a lot of it is a fragile tower necessitated by the fact that the deep
underlying stuff was
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:43:06PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
- We lose network transparency! Well, sure, the protocol doesn't have
that directly. You can still do vnc-like things trivially and with a
modest amount of additional wayland protocol (or just inter-client
conventions) you can do
I'm using the experimental 3d now with gnome shell. After a few days,
it seems like it performs OK although it locks up for a few seconds
now and then. It seems to recover and I can't see any obvious log
messages around the time of the freeze. It does survive
suspend/resume, which is great. My
On 11/09/2010 07:33 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
Then why are people already calling for the rejection of Wayland even
though Wayland is still far from being finished and hasn't even touched
Fedora yet.
raising
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:03:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:43:06PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
- We lose network transparency! Well, sure, the protocol doesn't have
that directly. You can still do vnc-like things trivially and with a
modest amount of
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:55 +, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Remoting a wayland application is _trivial_. Either to an X or to a
wayland view system. It's hard to make wayland remoting less flexible
than X over the network,
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 21:05 +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I'm using the experimental 3d now with gnome shell. After a few days,
it seems like it performs OK although it locks up for a few seconds
now and then. It seems to recover and I can't see any obvious log
messages around the time of the
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
The UX will probably be somewhere between ssh -Y, vncserver(1), and:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591
Hopefully with a better security model than 'ssh -Y'?
If this has Xpra-like functionality (i.e. screen for X)
Hi Seth,
Den 09-11-2010 15:05, seth vidal skrev:
Unfortunately yum-builddep doesn't work for me. I need to be able to
change
$releasever and enabled repositories (hence the mock config file). Is that
possible with yum-builddep?
yum-builddep --releasever --disablerepo='*'
On 11/09/2010 07:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In practice, we run very few metrics on Bugzilla
This is the problem we should be gather all kinds of bug metrics and
general component activity from bugzilla.
This is very vital information for QA group to harvest and have.
( without it we cant
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
No. I'm sorry but it's fundamentaly unfair to hold me responsible for the
behaviour of others. If you think this shouldn't have been brought up fine
but if others decide to draw premature conclusions from this
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:29 +0100, Rasmus Ory Nielsen wrote:
Hi Seth,
Den 09-11-2010 15:05, seth vidal skrev:
Unfortunately yum-builddep doesn't work for me. I need to be able to
change
$releasever and enabled repositories (hence the mock config file). Is
that
possible with
At least it's winter now and a hot netbook is less of a problem than in the
summer.
On 9 Nov 2010 21:22, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 21:05 +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I'm using the experimental 3d now with gno...
You're probably not. nouveau basically has no
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 16:26 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
The UX will probably be somewhere between ssh -Y, vncserver(1), and:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591
Hopefully with a better security model than 'ssh
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 21:31 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/09/2010 07:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In practice, we run very few metrics on Bugzilla
This is the problem we should be gather all kinds of bug metrics and
general component activity from bugzilla.
This is very
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:35:33PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
The UX will probably be somewhere between ssh -Y, vncserver(1), and:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651591
Hopefully with a better security model than 'ssh -Y'?
What kind of attack are you trying to prevent, and
On 11/09/2010 09:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 21:31 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/09/2010 07:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In practice, we run very few metrics on Bugzilla
This is the problem we should be gather all kinds of bug metrics and
general component
On Tue, 09.11.10 04:05, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote:
From what I've read so far you can run rootless X as a Wayland client so
you can just use your remote X apps like you did in the past next to
native
Wayland apps. Also if there is a real interest in this feature
On 11/09/2010 08:04 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 11/09/2010 06:12 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
I've mostly been watching here and I think people have been fairly
clearly about their concerns: Network
Lennart Poettering píše v Út 09. 11. 2010 v 23:07 +0100:
I think you aren't even aware how broken this mix and match network
approach of classic X11 is. The semantics of D-Bus and other IPCs in a
distributed X11 session has never been clearly defined, and all kinds of
integration between apps
On Tue, 09.11.10 23:14, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
Lennart Poettering píše v Út 09. 11. 2010 v 23:07 +0100:
I think you aren't even aware how broken this mix and match network
approach of classic X11 is. The semantics of D-Bus and other IPCs in a
distributed X11 session has
That's true, using freenx to access a whole desktop works well with xfce and
no sound. I can't imagine it working so well if trying to run gnome-shell,
sound etc remotely.
I get the impression a lot of the current desktop infrastructure doesn't
make sense when accessed remotely, eg if I ssh'ed
Le mardi 09 novembre 2010 à 14:19 -0500, Adam Jackson a écrit :
When I say vnc-like I mean let's scrape the pixels out of the
rendering buffer and shove them over the wire. VNC itself is rooted,
but vnc-like remoting can be rooted or rootless. In wayland the
fundamental object of
On 11/09/2010 10:33 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
No. I'm sorry but it's fundamentaly unfair to hold me responsible for the
behaviour of others. If you think this shouldn't have been brought up fine
but if others
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
