[Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2011-09-27 Thread Andre Robatino
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. In general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2011-09-27 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as

Broken dependencies: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables

2011-09-27 Thread buildsys
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4) On i386: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8

2011-09-27 Thread buildsys
perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8 has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4) On i386: perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4) Please resolve this as soon as

Broken dependencies: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch

2011-09-27 Thread buildsys
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as

unison formal review

2011-09-27 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Hi, Anyone want to review this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update. Regards, Greg -- Vitamin C deficiency is apauling. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list

F16 /usr/sbin/smbd: undefined symbol: wbcSidsToUnixIds

2011-09-27 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I did a samba test update on my F16 from 3.5 to 3.6 and I get this error [2011/09/27 18:14:31, 0] smbd/server.c:1045(main) smbd version 3.6.0-72.fc16 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2011 /usr/sbin/smbd: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/smbd: undefined symbol:

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-09-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hi, Owing to limited time recently I have been unable to look into my packages and so I am orphaning the following packages: agave gnujump mausezahn moe peppy gnurobots It would be nice if someone can pick them up. Done, except for agave. Does it need to stay dead? I only see

Re: [X-Post] Fedora medical needs package maintainers

2011-09-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hello all, If you've been following the planet[1], you'd know that my GSoC project this year was packaging for the Fedora Medical SIG. I packaged quite a few of them during the GSoC period[2]. The issue here is that I cannot maintain these packages: I do not use them. Are any maintainers

Re: unison formal review

2011-09-27 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: Hi, Anyone want to review this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update. Questions ... Are we going to obsolete these packages:

Re: Orphaning packages

2011-09-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
Hi, Owing to limited time recently I have been unable to look into my packages and so I am orphaning the following packages: agave gnujump mausezahn moe peppy gnurobots It would be nice if someone can pick them up. Done, except for agave. Does it need to stay dead? I only see

Re: unison formal review

2011-09-27 Thread Gregor Tätzner
Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 19:46:08 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: Hi, Anyone want to review this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update.

Re: PDF printouts with no top margin?

2011-09-27 Thread Steven P. Ulrick
On 09/27/2011 02:40 PM, Horst H. von Brand wrote: I'm running Fedora 15 on x86_64, up to date, with JNovy's TeXlive (but that one doesn't seem to be at fault). Printing PDFs created by pdflatex (even oldish ones) on a HP LaserJet m1522nf MFP over the 'net gives me pages that start on flush

[Bug 741777] New: Bogus requires on perl-devel from perl-tk

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Bogus requires on perl-devel from perl-tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741777 Summary: Bogus requires on perl-devel from perl-tk

Re: PDF printouts with no top margin?

2011-09-27 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:40:00PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: I'm running Fedora 15 on x86_64, up to date, with JNovy's TeXlive (but that one doesn't seem to be at fault). Printing PDFs created by pdflatex (even oldish ones) on a HP LaserJet m1522nf MFP over the 'net gives me pages

Re: PDF printouts with no top margin?

2011-09-27 Thread Horst H. von Brand
Horst H. von Brand vonbr...@inf.utfsm.cl wrote: I'm running Fedora 15 on x86_64, up to date, with JNovy's TeXlive (but that one doesn't seem to be at fault). Printing PDFs created by pdflatex (even oldish ones) on a HP LaserJet m1522nf MFP over the 'net gives me pages that start on flush

[Test-Announce] F16 Beta Go/No Go Meeting, Round 2.

2011-09-27 Thread Robyn Bergeron
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is

gnome 3.2

2011-09-27 Thread Ray Strode
Hey everyone, I'm going to be doing a big gnome 3.2 update for f16 soon and as such I've been running a script to automate package bumps/rebuilds. The script[1] is pretty hacked together so it may not always do the right thing. It's chugging through the output of jhbuild list for the

[Bug 741576] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.39 is available

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.39 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741576 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.39 is available

[Bug 741576] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.39 is available

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741576 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-27 06:56:27 EDT ---

[Bug 741576] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.39 is available

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741576 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-27 06:55:58 EDT ---

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2011-09-27 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon

[Bug 737320] Update to upstream 3.10.1

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-27 14:32:20 EDT --- dspam-3.10.1-1.el5 has been

[Bug 737320] Update to upstream 3.10.1

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 737320] Update to upstream 3.10.1

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-27 14:30:41 EDT --- dspam-3.10.1-1.el6 has been

[Bug 737320] Update to upstream 3.10.1

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737320 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added