Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011:
After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity
unless I'm missing something.
I am still interested. Anyone else?
Sorry for taking time to reply, but I had a bit too many things at
once sprung up on me
Excerpts from Jason L Tibbitts III's message of Thu Oct 06 22:30:06 +0200 2011:
RS == Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
RS After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity
RS unless I'm missing something.
Never could gather enough interest for anyone to actually
Hi,
I have just built pybliographer-1.2.15 for rawhide. The documentation
of the program was converted into Mallard, and it's license changed to
Creative Commons.
So, the license changed from GPLv2+ and GFDL to GPLv2+ and CC-BY-SA.
Zoltan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2011-10-06, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
I've written an ultimate heavy-parallel rebuilding tool. (Actually it's
so much parallel that Fedora infrustructure, git repositories namely,
spontaneously fails.) It's packaged in
RS == Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
RS After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity
RS unless I'm missing something.
Never could gather enough interest for anyone to actually do anything.
Basically I stopped after I called for a couple of folks to help me
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744165
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Compose started at Fri Oct 7 08:15:32 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011:
After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity
unless I'm missing something.
I am still interested. Anyone else?
On Oct 7, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2011-10-06, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
I've written an ultimate heavy-parallel rebuilding tool. (Actually it's
so much parallel that Fedora infrustructure, git repositories
Excerpts from tim.laurid...@gmail.com's message of Fri Oct 07 16:41:49 +0200
2011:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011:
After some initial interest there doesn't appear to
A side issue...
Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be
high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since
people live across multiple time zones. Also, it would make subjects
easier since right now on the devel list we have to make it pretty
obvious to
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:53:25AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Might have gone quicker if you pull via git:// and then only push via ssh://
reducing your ssh handshakes by half.
How do you ensure the integrity of the git repo if it is pulled via
git://? As far as I can see doing this
I posted this on the main mailing list but didn't get any hits.
Hopefully I'll have better luck here.
---
I found the following thread but I don't think mine is the same problem:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-June/100861.html
I am, however, running BTRFS on main main
hi
i have two machines with the same USB3 card and massive problems
with two different external disks - should this be a bugreport for
the kernel? i am wondering about this troubles because AFAIK the
linux-kernel was first with support for USB3 and that 2 different
disks and/or both controllers
On 10/07/2011 11:31 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I posted this on the main mailing list but didn't get any hits.
Hopefully I'll have better luck here.
---
I found the following thread but I don't think mine is the same problem:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-June/100861.html
On 10/07/2011 03:38 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hi,
I think this is a development problem. I have tried everything obvious
to get TFTP to work on F14 but to no avail. Could some one in the know
look in to this please.
I have tftp -server working on F14 and have done PXE Instillations
using it.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
Don't really know...but, if no LV snapshots, then suspect BTRFS as it is
still very experimental. There is a newer lvm2
(lvm2-2.02.84-4.fc15.x86_64) which fixed the LVM snapshot problem and
systemd
Richard Shaw wrote:
I rebooted a few times just to make sure it's not a scheduled fsck
(not that there is a full fsck for BTRFS yet) and the hard drive light
is on pretty solid the whole time...
The fsck tool does nothing and will not be the cause of your delay. If
your fs gets even one bit
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:29:45AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I rebooted a few times just to make sure it's not a scheduled fsck
(not that there is a full fsck for BTRFS yet) and the hard drive light
is on pretty solid the whole time...
The fsck tool does
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:29:45AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I rebooted a few times just to make sure it's not a scheduled fsck
(not that there is a full fsck for BTRFS yet) and the hard
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Do you have caches enabled and fully built? Remounting with
-o space_cache,inode_cache will enable them. Then wait few minutes
for caches to be built (I/O will stop when they're ready). Subsequent
mounts should be faster.
No. I'm using defaults as my mount option.
Reply inline :-
2011/10/7 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
On 10/07/2011 03:38 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hi,
I think this is a development problem. I have tried everything obvious to
get TFTP to work on F14 but to no avail. Could some one in the know look in
to this please.
I
On 10/07/2011 12:57 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Do you have caches enabled and fully built? Remounting with
-o space_cache,inode_cache will enable them. Then wait few minutes
for caches to be built (I/O will stop when they're ready). Subsequent
mounts should be
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:31 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I am, however, running BTRFS on main main partitions on top of LVM
(since anaconda as of F15 still creates an LVM setup regardless of
filesystem?)
FYI as of F16 there is a checkbox on the what type of partitioning do
you want? screen (near
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Josef Bacik wrote:
What Tomasz said, and if that doesn't help use bootchart and upload
the chart somewhere so I can see what's going on. Thanks,
I posted[1] my systemd-analyze results to the list to show as proof that
Josef Bacik wrote:
I don't doubt it's btrfs, but bootchart will tell me which one of our
kernel threads is running so I can tell_what_ in btrfs is taking it's
sweet time. Thanks,
I'll run bootchart and get back to you when I'm at the system in question.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I rebooted a few times just to make sure it's not a scheduled fsck
(not that there is a full fsck for BTRFS yet) and the hard drive light
is on pretty solid the whole time...
The fsck tool does
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:29:45AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I rebooted a few times just to make sure it's not a
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
but since we had the opportunity to hack on this we did. I believe
there are still many of us still interested,
On 10/07/2011 05:00 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
Transfer timed out.
Usually one needs full output from the above but anyway check the usual
stuff as in your /etc/xinet.d/tftp file and make sure it's not disabled
as in disable = yes, file permissions etc...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
but since we had the opportunity to hack on this
On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
If I remember correctly it's not that TrueCrypt is non-free, but that
the license is
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
If I remember correctly
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Oct 7, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 07:53:25AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
Might have gone quicker if you pull via git:// and then only push
via ssh:// reducing your ssh handshakes by half.
How do you ensure the integrity of the git repo
Hi Aron,
Johann proposed to check for /etc/xinetd.d/tftp - please try it.
What about xinetd? Is xinetd really running? You should find something
similar in /var/log/messages:
Oct 7 21:54:51 hostname xinetd[12970]: xinetd Version 2.3.14 started
with libwrap loadavg labeled-networking options
On 10/07/2011 12:19 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I don't doubt it's btrfs, but bootchart will tell me which one of our
kernel threads is running so I can tell_what_ in btrfs is taking it's
sweet time. Thanks,
Here you go:
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll20/daumas/bootchart.png
It looks like
On 10/07/2011 09:25 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw
On 10/08/2011 12:55 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is there any reason to use TrueCrypt, over the whole disk encryption
that Fedora already provides? LUKS just works afaict ...
Does it? It is not easily accessible for a regular end user and is not
cross platform.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.010 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744166
Summary: perl-Module-Runtime-0.010 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-NetAddr-IP-4.047 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744167
Summary: perl-NetAddr-IP-4.047 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-IRC-Utils-0.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744165
Summary: perl-IRC-Utils-0.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.72 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744168
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.72 is available
Product: Fedora
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-LibXSLT:
574c5d44749517af18faf1911a010547 XML-LibXSLT-1.72.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744168
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit d4175301c1584dd1a85bb68a8ebc80f8703ab647
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 7 12:57:18 2011 +0200
1.72 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |7 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Runtime:
069e890c996c99d283070e7aad3de10b Module-Runtime-0.010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cc5139d410a0bf80170c5e5d0323c04cb3a6c6ac
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 7 13:16:33 2011 +0200
0.010 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Module-Runtime.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
cc5139d... 0.010 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
commit fe8c62d974dac01b412fee65520f311461611818
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 7 13:28:04 2011 +0200
Move benchmark.pl
perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec b/perl-XML-LibXSLT.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744168
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744166
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-07
07:40:12 EDT ---
perl-Module-Runtime-0.010-1.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744166
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744167
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetAddr-IP:
670cda79f225afa73bcd2709c3032cf7 NetAddr-IP-4.047.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b803a15fae9080ce0fd35bbdaab73fd168d0d275
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 7 13:59:01 2011 +0200
4.047 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-NetAddr-IP.spec | 16 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744167
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IRC-Utils:
05e99007ca07dbb9b77e534c71d2a5c1 IRC-Utils-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3ab7ff9bde3b41cd6ebe6619782ba04715cd353c
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 7 14:15:42 2011 +0200
0.12 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-IRC-Utils.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Bio-Graphics has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
On i386:
perl-Bio-Graphics-2.25-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(Bio::DB::BigWig)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-SetOnce:
17d95fb1257f484ef3cd4fcaef2a1af6 MooseX-SetOnce-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 53b364bbbaf93662649bf56bac50f0efef9a70f2
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Oct 8 07:03:45 2011 +0200
update to 0.21
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-SetOnce.spec | 17 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9
Summary of changes:
53b364b... update to 0.21 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
37b7c7e... Perl mass rebuild (*)
53b364b... update to 0.21 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Feed:
3089c4a19346165d1e3692c2cd912beb XML-Feed-0.46.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
66 matches
Mail list logo
