On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
And what about the many system administrators using handwritten
rules (see Harald Reindl's reply)?
There is a --direct option that is supposed to provide a
compatibility/escape mechanism with full iptables functionality
Now that FESCo accepted http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.11
for F19... (in what might well be a record time - less than a minute in
the meeting from proposal to acceptance :)
Rpm 4.11 alpha (or actually post-alpha snapshot to pull in a few
accumulated fixes + enhancements) will
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:34:22PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/14/2012 07:33 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:44:55AM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Great - let's take something that
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0
Should we start changing
%doc README COPYING
to
%doc README
%license COPYING
?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On 11/15/2012 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0
Should we start changing
%doc README COPYING
to
%doc README
%license COPYING
?
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 06:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/15/2012 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0
Should we start changing
On 11/15/2012 12:21 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 06:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/15/2012 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
On 11/13/2012 01:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
The update is now in Bodhi, thanks to everyone who pitched in with builds.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18258
It missed the
On 11/15/2012 11:43 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
This is the ticket I've filed to ask QA to consider including this in
the Beta release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876922
(Sorry, messed up the bugzilla link in the original message.)
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
commit 7e3320b2fc52fcd430356adda5f50f319d3ea188
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 15 11:54:58 2012 +0100
Modernize the spec a bit
perl-Inline-Files.spec | 19 ---
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Inline-Files.spec
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C bindings with thin textual or
bytecode(*) LuaJIT/FFI shims in benefit of things with great set of
dependencies like Anaconda (thanks to lupa, Lua
On 11/15/2012 12:20 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/15/2012 11:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0
Should we start changing
%doc README
Le jeudi 15 novembre 2012 à 03:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
iptables rules are a long-established cross-
distribution interface
Not really. For example, ubuntu use ufw, mandriva used shorewall. Debian
offered several frontend, but IIRC, didn't use one by default.
And I have worked as
commit 473337bb37698841ad212e69bb895004a7be69bd
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 15 13:36:09 2012 +0100
Add BR, filter duplicated requires.
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
From: Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
I think a good way to approach this is by looking for the interesting
usecases for a minimal installation:
A) Containers
B) VMs
C) Bare-Metal Servers
D) Paranoid people (not relevant)
E) Embedded (out of focus for Fedora)
I don't believe
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C bindings with thin textual or
bytecode(*) LuaJIT/FFI shims in
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C
From: Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
On 14 November 2012 17:19, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de
wrote:
Oh, I wasn't aware that this is solely about anaconda-based installs,
sorry.
Well actually I think the correct question here is.. is this about
anaconda based
Adam Williamson wrote:
There seems to be a mania for CURRENTRELEASE lately. I don't know where
it's coming from.
Well, it used to be what we used in the beginnings of Fedora. It got changed
to ERRATA because that makes a lot more sense.
The policy clearly states ERRATA:
I thought unhashed userpassword was removed from the entry, but it still
might be there, so I added back the code to remove it.
Original Message
Subject: [389-devel] please review ticket 394 - error deleting a
specific userpassword
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:52:47 -0500
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
--- Comment #1 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com ---
This issue affects the versions of the perl-CGI package, as shipped with Fedora
release of 16 and 17. Please schedule an update.
--
You are receiving this
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:53:32AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
In fact, all system bus services should be configured to defer
activation to systemd, so that all services regardless how they are
triggered are executed in the same clean execution environment, and can
be manipulated with the
=2012 |impact=moderate,public=2012
|1112,reported=20121115,sour |1112,reported=20121115,sour
|ce=internet,cvss2=2.6/AV:N/ |ce=internet,cvss2=2.6/AV:N/
|AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N,fedor |AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N,rhel-
|a-all/perl-CGI
Product: Security Response
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877015
--- Comment #3 from Jan Lieskovsky jlies...@redhat.com ---
This issue affects the versions of the perl package, as shipped with Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 5 and 6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
commit afe37c043b4f2380e4d5679890cfa20e69b65907
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 15 16:10:08 2012 +0100
Added some missing build dependencies
perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:34:00PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
Also, creating individual groups for all the various
privileged operations we have simply doesn't scale.
This is a better argument.
So, PK's usecase is a valid and an important one. You cannot replace
that by Unix groups.
Which
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:43:41AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyway, I'd like to hear what FESCo members have to say about this,
because it would strongly influence who I would vote for.
Yeah, I too came up with a couple of questions I'd like to add to
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:03:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Is there any reason those two can't be split up? Maybe @really-hard-core
for the first, and @core for the second. ;-)
That's basically what Kevin proposed several mails back, and I agree it
seems like we have two broadly
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
For containers a yum group for usage with --installroot= is the only
thing that matters.
For this, is a group even necessary or useful?
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ mat...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:13:09AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Well, it would be weird that the minimal installation is actually not
minimal at all, but the container installation is.
That would be weird. But fortunately, it's @core, not @minimal. So we could
easily have @minimal, @core,
On 11/12/2012 11:28 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
I see three basic options for the target:
A) kernel + init system and we're done
B) boot to yum (with network): a text-mode bootstrap environment on which
other things can be added by hand (or by kickstart)
C) a traditional Unix command
On 2012-11-15, 15:06 GMT, Matthew Miller wrote:
I was looking for resources on systemd and dbus activation. I realized
that
the documentation here is very scarce -- there's this tutorial on just dbus
activation http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/documents/dbus-tutorial and our
wiki page
commit cfb2b6537a3fa9c24b395230b4d6e73888492aaa
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 15 17:05:00 2012 +0100
BuildRequire perl(lib)
perl-IO-stringy.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-IO-stringy.spec
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 09:43:41AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Anyway, I'd like to hear what FESCo members have to say about this,
because it would strongly influence who I would vote for.
Yeah, I too came up
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:15:25PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
I was looking for resources on systemd and dbus activation. I realized
that
the documentation here is very scarce -- there's this tutorial on just dbus
activation http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/documents/dbus-tutorial and our
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:59:26AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I don't know if that is what you're after, because busybox
duplicates the functionality of individual packages (and may have
some limitations in how well it duplicates, I'm sure). All the same,
I would definitely consider
Am 15.11.2012 13:33, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le jeudi 15 novembre 2012 à 03:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
iptables rules are a long-established cross-
distribution interface
Not really. For example, ubuntu use ufw, mandriva used shorewall. Debian
offered several frontend, but IIRC,
On 11/15/2012 11:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:59:26AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I don't know if that is what you're after, because busybox
duplicates the functionality of individual packages (and may have
some limitations in how well it duplicates, I'm sure).
On 11/14/2012 01:07 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
http://davidz25.blogspot.dk/2012/06/authorization-rules-in-polkit.html
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/polkit/docs/master/polkit.8.html
I've just reviewed those pages, and it's certainly not obvious to me
how I would go about porting a
Once upon a time, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov said:
Since busybox package already exists, I think it makes sense to use
it--not because we're doing some tiny-linux, but because why not, it's
just 651 kB. Most packages we discussed here (openssh-clients, sendmail)
are
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:31:52AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Well, this is part of what I mean by Fedora is not a tiny-linux
distribution. It might be interesting to have a busybox-based spin, but I
think that's a different thing.
Since busybox package already exists, I think it makes
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just reviewed those pages, and it's certainly not obvious to me
how I would go about porting a PKLA file.
[libvirt Management Access]
Identity=unix-group:wheel
Action=org.libvirt.unix.manage
ResultAny=no
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 11:43 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 11/13/2012 01:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
The update is now in Bodhi, thanks to everyone who pitched in with builds.
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 14:48 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 13:33, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le jeudi 15 novembre 2012 à 03:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
iptables rules are a long-established cross-
distribution interface
Not really. For example, ubuntu use ufw, mandriva
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] but this seems like a terrible burden
to put on system administrators, particularly those who are (sometimes
proudly) averse to anything that smacks of programming.
Thus are by definition not system administrators.
Once upon a time, tim.laurid...@gmail.com tim.laurid...@gmail.com said:
the .rules file should look like this: and go into *
/usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d/ *
System-local config belongs in /etc, not /usr. Is there a corresponding
/etc path for rules?
--
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:52:23AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Luke Macken wrote:
A new bugfix release of Bodhi has just been deployed to production.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Bugs and enhancement requests can be filed here:
http://bodhi.fedorahosted.org
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:06:44PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
Thus are by definition not system administrators. There are not
supposed to be software developers but being able to deal with simple
code (shell scripts?!) is part of a sysadmins jobs.
So the solution would be fire him and hire a new
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:09:07AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, tim.laurid...@gmail.com tim.laurid...@gmail.com said:
the .rules file should look like this: and go into *
/usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d/ *
System-local config belongs in /etc, not /usr. Is there a corresponding
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:09:53 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:06:44PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
Thus are by definition not system administrators. There are not
supposed to be software developers but being able to deal with
simple code (shell
Am 15.11.2012 18:06, schrieb Adam Williamson:
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 14:48 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 13:33, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Not really. For example, ubuntu use ufw, mandriva used shorewall. Debian
offered several frontend, but IIRC, didn't use one by default
and
Dne 15.11.2012 18:04, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 11:43 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 11/13/2012 01:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
The update is now in Bodhi, thanks to
Dne 15.11.2012 18:45, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15.11.2012 18:04, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 11:43 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 11/13/2012 01:07 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
It's time for the last big GNOME update for F18 to bring bug fixes
and translation updates to users!
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:49:50 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 15.11.2012 18:45, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
...snip...
I wish it would be installable as a single update. If bodhi could
compose the yum install command for copy paste at least, it might
be helpful as well.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:09:07AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, tim.laurid...@gmail.com tim.laurid...@gmail.com said:
the .rules file should look like this: and go into *
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 18:06, schrieb Adam Williamson:
Right. I hate to say it, but Harald is correct here: AFAIK, all those
and other firewall configuration mechanisms were ultimately just
UI/abstraction layers wrapped around
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 10:57 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:49:50 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 15.11.2012 18:45, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
...snip...
I wish it would be installable as a single update. If bodhi could
compose the yum install command
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/507
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/507/0001-Ticket-507-use-mutex-for-FrontendConfig-lock-instead.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 19:02 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 18:06, schrieb Adam Williamson:
Right. I hate to say it, but Harald is correct here: AFAIK, all those
and other firewall configuration
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 19:02 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 18:06, schrieb Adam Williamson:
Right. I hate to say it, but
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:10:43AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Sure, but the background here was the 'replace vs. augment' question -
is firewalld actually planned to replace iptables in the long run, or
are we committed to maintaining iptables as an alternative mechanism? It
sounds like
Am 15.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 18:06, schrieb Adam Williamson:
Right. I hate to say it, but Harald is correct here: AFAIK, all those
and other firewall configuration mechanisms were
On Thu, 15.11.12 10:06, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 01:53:32AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
In fact, all system bus services should be configured to defer
activation to systemd, so that all services regardless how they are
triggered are
Am 15.11.2012 19:16, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
(as far as I understand the situation:) iptables as a kernel
interface and a low-level command will exist, but applications will
expect the existence of the firewalld D-Bus service (as opposed to the
system-config-firewall D-Bus service, at
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
It would be very helpful for judging the maturity/suitability of
firewalld if you could try converting your iptables script to
firewall-cmd --direct (which, at least I
Am 15.11.2012 19:27, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
It would be very helpful for judging the maturity/suitability of
firewalld if you could try converting your iptables script
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:30:27 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 19:27, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
It would be very helpful for judging the
Vít Ondruch wrote:
I wish it would be installable as a single update. If bodhi could
compose the yum install command for copy paste at least, it might be
helpful as well.
Assuming you already have GNOME installed, these commands:
yum install yum-security
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing
Hi Florian,
On 15.11.2012 13:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/15/2012 01:49 AM, Alek Paunov wrote:
So, to me it seems natural joining all above together to start thinking
for replacing the classic python C bindings with thin textual or
bytecode(*) LuaJIT/FFI shims in benefit of things with
Am 15.11.2012 19:37, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Have you actually _tried_? It's supposed to be as easy as
s/iptables/firewall-cmd --direct --passthrough ipv4/
I don't know for a fact whether it is good enough. You seem to
have a script that could tell us.
i posted a script realier this day as
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 19:46 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 19:37, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Have you actually _tried_? It's supposed to be as easy as
s/iptables/firewall-cmd --direct --passthrough ipv4/
I don't know for a fact whether it is good enough. You seem to
have a
commit 37361aeae7d7d4eca39de9ec35ed6394ad00357b
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:04:14 2012 -0500
0.9914 + more complete list of Provides
perl-Wx.spec | 374 +-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed,
commit 9df52c8f768409c128c62c6eb15b425ca8dd3f86
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:06:15 2012 -0500
0.9914 + more complete list of Provides
perl-Wx.spec | 363 +-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed,
commit b84078132c3f0c213da6687ea716c8ac2f6aafa5
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:06:49 2012 -0500
0.9914 + more complete list of Provides
perl-Wx.spec | 329 +-
1 files changed, 326 insertions(+), 3
commit f78b62cbacba8fb8868d5788a5fe4640998aa08a
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:07:24 2012 -0500
0.9914 + more complete list of Provides
perl-Wx.spec | 329 +-
1 files changed, 326 insertions(+), 3
bodhi -D FEDORA-2012-18258
will download all packages in that update for you.
Usability is so poor that you might give up
[all on up-to-date Fedora 18 Beta-TC8+]:
# type bodhi
bash: type: bodhi: not found
No hints?
# yum install bodhi
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
On 11/12/2012 02:15 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Right. We need to stop writing core system components in scripting
languages!
Well, there _are_ significant advantages to using a higer-level
language than C.[1] Using
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876221
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876221
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876221
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Wx-0.9914-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this
On 11/15/12 2:11 PM, John Reiser wrote:
# yum install bodhi
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
fedora/18/x86_64/metalink | 12 kB
00:00:00
updates/18/x86_64/metalink | 18 kB
00:00:00
No package
Am 15.11.2012 19:58, schrieb Adam Williamson:
I don't think anyone asked you to do any of those things. Fedora
obviously does not have the power to replace iptables with firewalld on
your router, so the question is not 'can you replace iptables with
firewalld on everything in your network
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12. 11. 2012 at 17:59:00, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com said:
Change still frightens people to varying degree s., and many busy
end-users
may not have time to
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:03:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Is there any reason those two can't be split up? Maybe @really-hard-core
for the first, and @core for the second. ;-)
That's basically what Kevin proposed several mails back,
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Well, it would be weird that the minimal installation is actually not
minimal at all, but the container installation is.
That would be weird. But fortunately, it's @core, not @minimal. So we could
easily have @minimal, @core, and @standard,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
Well, it would be weird that the minimal installation is actually not
minimal at all, but the container installation is.
That would be weird. But fortunately, it's
On 15 November 2012 04:40, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
A few months ago earlier in the F-17 release cycle, we had a problem
with jackd turning verbose, flooding the stdout, even when its
verbosity was turned off. This was a bug [1] in the compiler,
specifically in the
On 11/15/2012 11:11 AM, John Reiser wrote:
bodhi -D FEDORA-2012-18258
will download all packages in that update for you.
Usability is so poor that you might give up
[all on up-to-date Fedora 18 Beta-TC8+]:
yum search bodhi?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876951
Bug ID: 876951
Summary: perl-CGI-3.63 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CGI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876952
Bug ID: 876952
Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.48 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-GitHub
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
commit 10244d5461435a0c7e18561af1f3fe39792b8f24
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 15 12:47:46 2012 +0100
Fix the dependencies, license, and re-enable the tests
perl-IO-Tty.spec | 44 +++-
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 25
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876165
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876951
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mmasl...@redhat.com
Summary of changes:
10244d5... Fix the dependencies, license, and re-enable the tests (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
5fe5d55... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
d45c90e... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
10244d5... Fix the dependencies, license, and re-enable the tests (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876951
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Bug-fixing release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI:
78eb3acb736205ca12ec2c79bc737e6c CGI.pm-3.63.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 586f47573df5ddfd1b38c25f90920e3efd242500
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Nov 15 13:08:56 2012 +0100
3.63 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-CGI.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
Summary of changes:
e326e55... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*)
5fe5d55... Perl 5.16 rebuild (*)
d45c90e... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass (*)
10244d5... Fix the dependencies, license, and re-enable the tests (*)
(*) This commit
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
