The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
552
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
27
and it happens again:
the bugreport is for Fedora 18 while on my workstations currently F19
is installed - do maintainers *really* not understand how angry it
makes bugreporters if they have no f*** koji-build to test and verify
it would make *more sense* to first serve the reporter, get
Hello Bruno!
A few days ago on Fedora devel@ list, the ancient and stalled Review Request
of mindi-busybox has been pointed at. Together with the hint that the
submitter is still waiting to be sponsored since five years. That's also
the reason I'm posting a copy of this message to devel@ list.
Compose started at Sat Oct 26 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
Hi Florian,
On 10/25/2013 11:44 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:13 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
On 10/14/2013 10:08 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a write-up somewhere documenting what strategies are
implemented by bcache to keep the SSD and the hard disk contents in
sync even in
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, and the 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are
over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 6 (TC6)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
On 10/23/2013 04:01 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I believe that quote describes what we'd like to do someday, not
what it does now?
You're right, it's about plans for the future.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On 10/22/2013 07:53 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
Well, I agree, there's more to it. Like cost. One could consider to
pair serveral HHD' each with a dedicated bcache SSD. And from that one
could build a RAID array. This RAID array has excellent (read)
performance because of the combined SSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
Beta TC6 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-69bfe000 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-c5bfe0ac : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:13:56AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-Beta-TC6/Images/i386/Fedora-Images-i386-20-Beta-TC6-AMI
Hi,
I just noticed that my rawhide installation, which was originally
installed when F18 was rawhide in summer 2012 and upgraded since, has
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/sandro/.local/bin:/home/sandro/bin
On a fresh rawhide installation, I get
Am 27.10.2013 01:10, schrieb Sandro Mani:
I just noticed that my rawhide installation, which was originally installed
when F18 was rawhide in summer 2012 and
upgraded since, has
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/sandro/.local/bin:/home/sandro/bin
On a
On 27.10.2013 01:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.10.2013 01:10, schrieb Sandro Mani:
I just noticed that my rawhide installation, which was originally installed
when F18 was rawhide in summer 2012 and
upgraded since, has
Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't think we'd really be correct in blocking the release for such
issues - especially not Beta. We used to have 'polish' criteria for
Final which at least required the icons used in the system menus - i.e.
what's specified in the app's .desktop file - to be sane for
Am 27.10.2013 01:41, schrieb Sandro Mani:
On 27.10.2013 01:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.10.2013 01:10, schrieb Sandro Mani:
I just noticed that my rawhide installation, which was originally installed
when F18 was rawhide in summer 2012 and
upgraded since, has
your first post is unclear because you speak about two setups
to get rid of all this UsrMove fragments make a strict config
Ah yes, I could have expressed it better. My problem is the following:
[sandro@oldrawhide]$ echo $PATH
On Sat, 19 Oct, 2013 at 22:22:58 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
How about anytime someone (who is not a sponsor) has helped someone not
yet sponsored and thinks their package(s) are ready for official
review/sponsorship, they mail the pool of sponsors asking for someone
to step up and do so? Or we
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.x86_64 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On i386:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.i686 requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
On armhfp:
perl-BerkeleyDB-0.53-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libdb = 0:5.3.21
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic:
4faa7c55f94b2068770d6f41f3a1cc6f Perl-Critic-1.120.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2702ff7c1f714180c3de5ed9f335c6d56ce11365
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Oct 26 19:52:59 2013 +0100
Update to 1.120
- New upstream release 1.120
- Fix precedence error in Perl::Critic::Utils (CPAN RT#88866)
perl-Perl-Critic.spec |6 +-
Summary of changes:
2702ff7... Update to 1.120 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Critic-1.120-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
2702ff7... Update to 1.120
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Critic-1.120-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
2702ff7... Update to 1.120
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757089
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757089
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|cpanspec error: Dest dir|Dest dir longer
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-TreeBuilder:
adbc1cacbcf6c4ff371f85b9e498fa3f XML-TreeBuilder-5.0_1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4dbb98c639e15c385ba21a075b138ca372245b4b
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Oct 27 06:43:54 2013 +1000
new upstream
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec | 74 +---
sources |
commit e9875e22deeb527434d16c70b689338691579045
Author: Ruediger Landmann r.landm...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Oct 27 08:14:15 2013 +1000
new upstream
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec | 74 +---
sources |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022678
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree:
On ppc64:
perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
On i386:
perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022678
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Math-NumSeq-66-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
On 10/25/2013 11:00 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 10/25/2013 01:36 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
Hello Roberto and Thierry,
as I promised, I am sending you a proof-of-concept code that demonstrates,
how
we can mock DS in unit tests for library function (see attachment). You can
run
tests just
40 matches
Mail list logo
