The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
581
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
96
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
56
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 13:47 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 15:30 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
libverto
Upstream itself requires the pkgconfig file for libev.
That's just a terrible idea, as it means libverto won't build on e.g
Debian, or with the upstream
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:34:19PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
By using github you are also eliminating the possibility of some people to
contribute to your project. I personally won't create an account on
github. Just because I believe that open projects should be hosted on open
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem?
possibility to close or refer to a ticket from the git commit,
Referring just works in Trac
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem?
It is possible, but I have
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 04:25:00PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Several packages are using git for patch management. eg:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem?
possibility to close or
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:48:53PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
maintainer, apply it with git
Compose started at Sun Nov 24 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I really don't see what is missing there, apart from missing automation for
the one-time creation process.
Something I just noticed:
- Github allows to reply to ticket notifications via email instead of
requiring to change to a
Hi,
I wondered what the reason is that debuginfo packages seem to enter the
repos only at the successive push compared to the regular packages,
which ultimately means that debuginfo packages are available in updates
ca 1 day after the regular packages. From abrt-reported bugs where
people
On Sun, 2013-11-24 at 16:50 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
From abrt-reported bugs where
people generate the backtraces locally, it occasionally happens that
they send incomplete backtraces due to mismatching debugsymbols, and
it
would certainly help increasing the quality of backtraces if such
On 24.11.2013 17:55, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2013-11-24 at 16:50 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
From abrt-reported bugs where
people generate the backtraces locally, it occasionally happens that
they send incomplete backtraces due to mismatching debugsymbols, and
it
would certainly help
On 11/24/2013 09:13 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Oh, I never noticed this! I take the reason the debuginfo packages do
not live in the normal repos is that one wants to reduce the
repodata/filelist size? Could the current situation be improved by an
approach similar to:
- Move the debuginfo repo
On 11/24/2013 10:51 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
On 11/24/2013 09:13 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Oh, I never noticed this! I take the reason the debuginfo packages do
not live in the normal repos is that one wants to reduce the
repodata/filelist size? Could the current situation be improved by an
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:50:51 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I wondered what the reason is that debuginfo packages seem to enter the
repos only at the successive push compared to the regular packages,
which ultimately means that debuginfo packages are available in updates
ca 1 day after
On 24.11.2013 21:52, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:50:51 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I wondered what the reason is that debuginfo packages seem to enter the
repos only at the successive push compared to the regular packages,
which ultimately means that debuginfo packages
Hi,
Python-tag is broken in F19/20/rawhide. It failed to build during the
boost 1.54 rebuild for some reason and is therefore in FTBFS for
rawhide. I checked out the SCM and rebuilt it in mock, both for F20 and
rawhide, quite successfully. No fixes were needed. Could a proven
packager please bump
Planned Outage: Server reboots - 2013-11-25 22:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2013-11-25 22:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2013-11-25 22:00
Hello list,
I'm a computer science major interested in Linux software engineering and
just beginning to learn programming so I'm use-case #1 and #2. Currently
out of all my peers I'm the only one using Linux as far as I know. Most
students and developers even those working on Linux oriented
Hi,
IIRC fedora-review suggested to test packages on all sup-
ported Fedora releases. So, with a larger hard disk, I want
to install Fedora 19, 20 (soon) and Rawhide and throw in
(recent) Debian and Ubuntu as well. As my notebook doesn't
support VMs, I'm interested in best practices for
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 06:33 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
More contested seems to be the multi-boot setup.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826 has a
myriad of opinions on how it should be set up;
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Multiple_OS_Bootloader_Guide
suggests
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-11-25
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We're into Final validation grind
now, so I expect we'll mostly
On 11/25/2013 07:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 06:33 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
More contested seems to be the multi-boot setup.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826 has a
myriad of opinions on how it should be set up;
Summary of changes:
0eb2cfe... Upstream update. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH:
8ac1f86a239448c5a581e237f0aa29db CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9cc5367317e515acb0e5b8ca1e5004ea5f1711fb
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Nov 24 12:24:33 2013 +0100
Update to 4.03
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Tiny:
d239ea56157fcd61ac796fc13d585dc3 Config-Tiny-2.20.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Future:
9e76cf75a297ffc4136db1d366fc9e06 Future-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 85f94aca1b671eea590ac82ed8abf1e07abf81ce
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Nov 24 11:29:55 2013 +
Update to 2.20
- New upstream release 2.20
- Relax pre-req version requirements
perl-Config-Tiny.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2
commit 073d0438143439f1f98fa810ce94bb9b2a2203a1
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Nov 24 12:33:56 2013 +0100
Update to 0.20
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Future.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
bcd73285601713e0a26949826c6c2d2b Mojolicious-4.58.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Config-Tiny-2.20-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
85f94ac... Update to 2.20
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d43a313902176b0222ec98886df44878a627bc37
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Nov 24 12:43:07 2013 +0100
Update to 4.58
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
commit 00db753a0e6458b2b3e7689fd8e1cc138591dea2
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Sun Nov 24 17:32:54 2013 +0100
Slic3r 1.0.0RC1
slic3r-buildpl.patch | 25 ++
slic3r-datadir.patch | 15
slic3r-english-locale.patch | 35
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for slic3r:
f720fbbaeb15c3048db880dc85955927 1.0.0RC1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c38570f527b95870acd916070779fd6c57eb59d6
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Sun Nov 24 17:38:42 2013 +0100
Sources for previous commit
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032056
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/368
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033994
Bug ID: 1033994
Summary: amavisd-new missing dependency on
clamav-server-sysvinit
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: amavisd-new
Assignee: st...@silug.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SOAP-Lite:
d5de2cd5a4415590cfc96d7a41fa811e SOAP-Lite-1.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8ed6d9aa697f0603f13d8e2a86b8e010449ba4ec
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 25 14:47:08 2013 +0900
1.08 bump, no code changes
.gitignore |1 +
perl-SOAP-Lite.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030917
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
Summary of changes:
043e5e6... Initial import (#1028521). (*)
8d529fb... Modified sources. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
45 matches
Mail list logo
