Hi Paul,
Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. The thing that confused me is
that perl-Readonly and perl-Readonly-XS are missing from
rhel-everything-7.0-beta-1-x86_64-dvd.iso .
- Ken
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
Hi Ken,
On 24/01/14 16:29, Ken
Hi folks,
RHEL 7 does not ship perl-Readonly. This package is a dependency for
perl-boolean, which is a dependency for perl-MongoDB, so I'd like to
have it in EPEL 7.
Would one of you mind branching and building it for EPEL 7?
I did a scratch-build unmodified from perl-Readonly in Rawhide, and
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:20:33AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
On 23.01.2014 19:26, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info
wrote:
The packaging guidelines are very daunting. Automating as much of
that as possible, either
Compose started at Mon Jan 27 08:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ansible-1.4.3-1.el7.noarch requires python-httplib2
bodhi-server-0.9.7-1.el7.noarch requires python-simplemediawiki
On 24 January 2014 17:52, Nilamdyuti Goswami ngosw...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
While translating some of the fedora packages we often come across some
source strings whose context or meaning is not clear. This results in wrong
translations which is discovered later while using the actual
On 27-01-2014 02:08 অপৰাহ্ন, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 January 2014 17:52, Nilamdyuti Goswami ngosw...@redhat.com
mailto:ngosw...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
While translating some of the fedora packages we often come across
some source strings whose context or meaning
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Matthias Runge
mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
On 01/26/2014 09:09 AM, Kenjiro Nakayama wrote:
Hi, List
Can anyone swap review or take it as sponsor?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063
Kenjiro,
in order to get a package approved,
commit 533b1f620cba7391323f2dd7dc460a92c8466a85
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 10:24:55 2014 +0100
Enable dependency on Text::English
perl-Tk-Pod.spec |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Tk-Pod.spec
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
645
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
135
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11560/fail2ban-0.8.10-4.el5
99
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
645
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
101
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11865/quassel-0.9.1-1.el6
74
On 23 January 2014 21:57, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:54 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 13:48 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
To be honest my concerns are more with
Hello all,
I haven't thought about possible replacement plans, in my opinion it's too
early to talk about that now.
As for the packaging process, the package requires some rework and
improvement - it's actually in the process.
It takes some time and efforts from a submitter (Antonio Trande),
On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free
version firefox.
I'd argue it's *less* free since it seeks to restrict what you can do:
Finally, we need to
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton)
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling)
On i386:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires
On 01/27/2014 09:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
I would have happily reviewed the package but I've been swamped for a
few weeks, and I didn't know how to handle the takeover.
Also as Christopher mentioned, I'm not a sponsor, so I can't approve
the submission (I'm aware of that). I've
commit 8eb59884dd4adae4db89049d91790be2a9f5de37
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 13:09:12 2014 +0100
Specify all dependencies
perl-version.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-version.spec b/perl-version.spec
Dne 21.1.2014 18:01, Kaleb KEITHLEY napsal(a):
Take, for example,
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where there's a
button for Source code (tar.gz) pointing at
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz
Note V2.0.0.tar.gz versus
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Event-RPC:
d40147fe814a5c5c976a940b68db3029 Event-RPC-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1c8dcf301f21cfd65d3fef96d7b703c86d713de8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 13:28:50 2014 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Event-RPC.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
Indeed, as well as in other places e. g., the iconcache snippets.
--alec
On 1/27/14, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 21.1.2014 18:01, Kaleb KEITHLEY napsal(a):
Take, for example,
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where there's a
button for Source code (tar.gz)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058004
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This is a bug-fix release suitable for F≥20.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
1c8dcf3... 1.04 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2014 05:36 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
So without, unfortunately, the time to read through reams of stuff
on this and with my user hat on (don't think I've seen any
discussion of this on the users list), if it means how fedora
actually works is
- Original Message -
From: Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com
To: Fedora QA Development qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:03:40 PM
Subject: gitflow and branch naming conventions
So, we're going the gitflow way [1][2]. However, when I looked at our
On 27 January 2014 13:06, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:36 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
does this mean there will be things unavailable on some 'products'
that are not on others?
No.
The Products will be defining an environment and a standard install
set. They
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 12:04 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
After hacking a simple tool which provides a GUI for a repository file
it's possible to create repository packages complete with desktop and
appdata file. I have some 5-10 such repository packages under way, my
plan is to push them
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
2 packages were orphaned
xom [EL-6] was orphaned by gil
XML Pull Parser
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/xom
mlton [EL-5] was orphaned by agoode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/2014 03:49 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
Slightly OT, but is SELinux stopping programs from executing code at
address zero? (And how can I stop it doing that?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/24/2014 07:29 PM, Alek Paunov wrote:
On 24.01.2014 21:20, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
No, we pretty much allow executable stack/memory from user processes now
and block it for most daemons, except for those that need it. My
understanding of
OK, I created new report[1] to be the reporter of a review request.*1
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991
Dridi, can you please review it, if you can.
I know I still need to look for the sponsor, but it is helpful.
Thank you in advance,
*1 I closed old report as duplicated.
2014-01-26 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 18:14 +0100, Heiko Adams a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:57 AM, drago01 wrote:
No this isn't an issue at all. No one is saying that
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:46:41PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Any ideas how to attract more testers?
How to make the updates-testing repo more sexy?
* More automated smoke-tests, so that:
a) you know the most boring tests have been handled so you
can focus on more interesting apsects
On 01/27/2014 01:06 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
No.
The Products will be defining an environment and a standard install
set. They may have separate initial*installation* repositories if
they need to provide different options to Anaconda, but beyond that
the intent is for all of the Products
Le lundi 27 janvier 2014 à 17:11 +0100, Andreas Tunek a écrit :
2014-01-26 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 18:14 +0100, Heiko Adams a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:57 AM, drago01
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Data-Inheritable-0.08-0.3.1.el6' was created
pointing to:
5ed815e... Prefix release with 0. for limited-arch EPEL support
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Icecat package review has NOT the goal to replace Firefox in Fedora.
I wish to offer the opportunity to everyone of try a browser like so
a GNU user would do.
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org
http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 08:13 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Interesting... However, if you're working with an actual release
tag, I would think Peter's method would be much better.
It is a good idea to use a
Hi,
might be totaly out of scope for Fedora.next, but this is what I would
like to get better in Fedora.
If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file
services, I get a working configuration.
- If I install a Fedora-server with dhcpd, dhcpd doesn't do anything
- If I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2014 01:31 PM, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
might be totaly out of scope for Fedora.next, but this is what I
would like to get better in Fedora.
If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file
services, I get a
On 27.01.2014 05:08, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free
version firefox.
Do we allow this in Fedora now?
Thanks.
[1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:45:48 +0100
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27.01.2014 05:08, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free
version firefox.
Do we allow this in Fedora now?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 19:31:58 +0100,
Robert M. Albrecht li...@romal.de wrote:
I think this is a real problem. The missing working default-configs
are a real hassle for replacing small servers in Windows-shops with
Linux as the non-expert-Linux-admin has an enormous entry-barrier to
get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2014 01:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 19:31:58 +0100, Robert M. Albrecht
li...@romal.de wrote:
I think this is a real problem. The missing working
default-configs are a real hassle for replacing small servers in
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 17:24 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From the BlueZ 5.0 release notes:
Remove internal support for telephony (HFP and HSP) profiles. They
should be implemented using the new Profile interface preferably by the
telephony subsystem of choice (e.g.
On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
copr has no provision currently to sign packages.
I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in
a secure way.
Ouch!
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/
Results:
http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/
http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/fedora-20-x86_64/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2014 07:56 PM, poma wrote:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/
Results:
http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 13:05 +0100, drago01 wrote:
Installing an application and then not finding it anywhere is
confusing. So we limit it
to visible apps i.e GUI apps.
Before people get too angry about this: Software is being designed as a
tool to do what's being discussed in this thread,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
copr has no provision currently to sign packages.
I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in
a secure way.
Ouch!
I'm skeptical about the whole
Once upon a time, Robert M. Albrecht li...@romal.de said:
If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file
services, I get a working configuration.
Can you be more specific on what you mean by working configuration?
As far as I know, you still have to configure the service on
Most of the services you described do have a working configuration but
the service is not turned on. You are right though, when you install a
Windows CA it's ready to go. In regards to DHCP, the dhcpd.conf file has
a commented sample that needs to be edited and then turned on. Is this
what you
2014-01-27 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Le lundi 27 janvier 2014 à 17:11 +0100, Andreas Tunek a écrit :
2014-01-26 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 18:14 +0100, Heiko Adams a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Hi
commit f1bf3e60921e3d9d3972503e735499de5c2778ab
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 27 20:26:25 2014 +
Bootstrap epel7 build
perl-Test-Mojibake.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Mojibake.spec
Hi,
dhcpd is just an (maybe bad) example.
But even dhcpd needs a lot of work. I need to configure ranges, options
(which could like gateqway and dns partly automagically gathered from
the exsting network configuration), ... binding dhcpd to bind to enable
dynamic updates, ...
and double
Hi,
if the server sits in a RFC1918 network (192.168.1.0/16), has a static
IP and a configured gateway and DNS, it might be reasonable to assume,
the dhcpd should operate in this range and set the options for DNS and
gateway accordingly.
At least the installation could produce a
Hi,
He's not suggesting turning services on by default just by installing
pacakges (I don't think). I think his request here is similar to our
Fedora Server Roles idea where there are special packages (possibly
meta-packages) that are separate from the simple installed bits. So
you might have
commit dc1038373c2318e653d59e7442b051f9863befdf
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 27 21:13:48 2014 +
Bootstrap build for epel7 done
perl-Test-Version.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-Version.spec
On 27 January 2014 14:01, Robert M. Albrecht li...@romal.de wrote:
Hi,
dhcpd is just an (maybe bad) example.
But even dhcpd needs a lot of work. I need to configure ranges, options
(which could like gateqway and dns partly automagically gathered from the
exsting network configuration), ...
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:18:56 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
snip
* possibly adding a what should users test? field to the update
info.
I know that there's a notes field in the update, but maybe it'd
help to explicitly include testing instructions?
Each
On 27.01.2014 20:17, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 01/27/2014 07:56 PM, poma wrote:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/
…
Package URLs:
http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat-24.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Not Found
The requested URL /Icecat/icecat-24.0-1.fc20.src.rpm was
On 27.01.2014 20:28, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
copr has no provision currently to sign packages.
I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in
a secure
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:41:35 +0100
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27.01.2014 20:28, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com
wrote:
...snip...
I'm skeptical about the whole package-signing thing.
skeptical in what way?
On 27.01.2014 22:01, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
dhcpd is just an (maybe bad) example.
It is good example. See dhcp configuration in your home router - it
requires some attention. Then try some Cisco or HP router and its dhcp
configuration. This smart devices are not so smart to work for
On Jan 27, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason why these daemons are not ready to run is that when they used to
be ready to run, they caused problems with whatever environment was already
there. We used to ship tools which could do what was thought to
On 27.01.2014 22:05, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
if the server sits in a RFC1918 network (192.168.1.0/16), has a static
IP and a configured gateway and DNS, it might be reasonable to assume,
the dhcpd should operate in this range and set the options for DNS and
gateway accordingly.
Two of the libraries emitted by libxcb (for XKB and SYNC extension
support) have changed soname in 1.10. Sorry about that. Outside of
libxcb itself the only packages affected are qt5-qtbase, kde-workspace,
sddm, and weston; all have been rebuilt. Thanks to Rex Dieter for
helping work around the
On Monday 27 January 2014 14:01:32 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
...
or some mechanism to interactively configure and deploy a DHCP server.
IMO, that's exactly the crux of the matter. Most non-trivial services
requires some administrative decisions to configure them properly.
Since rpm does not
Hi,
I just deployed new version of Copr.
Changes:
* copr-cli has been build for epel6 (no planned build for el5 due
dependency on python-requests)
* you should see less internal server errors. Especially when deleting
tasks with multiple srpm
* All packages produced by Copr now have as vendor
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:18:56 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
snip
* possibly adding a what should users test? field to the update
info.
I know that there's a notes field in the update, but maybe
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 10:39 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:18:56 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
snip
* possibly adding a what should users test? field to the update
info.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I just deployed new version of Copr.
Changes:
* copr-cli has been build for epel6 (no planned build for el5 due
dependency on python-requests)
* you should see less internal server errors. Especially when
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free
version firefox.
I'd argue it's *less* free
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 22:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which
commit 2016014d90af6512c1d2ab5c93365e0b0213e454
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 13:37:05 2014 +0100
0.46 bump
perl-File-Fetch.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Fetch.spec b/perl-File-Fetch.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058005
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This release fixes tests on NetBSD.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058004
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058004
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Event-RPC-1.04-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Event-RPC-1.04-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
Summary of changes:
2016014... 0.46 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Fetch:
319dcd7886b3a51f54836915eecd7d53 File-Fetch-0.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5f13d11e8fb161e3640865738091bfe074459b08
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 13:43:47 2014 +0100
Cache 0.48 sources
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index
Summary of changes:
5f13d11... Cache 0.48 sources (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Load:
828060b6c19f63f474957cf54bd46c68 Module-Load-0.30.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ca82bcad09c6f3961f86313fd46eca8ab968572f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 13:50:41 2014 +0100
0.30 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Module-Load.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058005
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058005
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-File-Fetch-0.48-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-Fetch-0.48-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Load-Conditional:
93481bb58cb008b235825cb9bcee89da Module-Load-Conditional-0.62.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058006
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
commit 8b33df4568b943e7ef53f04dad32813187c8603a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 14:02:25 2014 +0100
0.62 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Module-Load-Conditional.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033514
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Should be handled in rel-eng ticket and pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033514
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033515
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Should be handled in rel-eng ticket and pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033515
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058007
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
The lightweight tag 'perl-File-MMagic-1.30-1.el7' was created pointing to:
2e64dea... 1.30 bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Find-0.11-5.el7' was created pointing to:
66e874d... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5a1164e... Initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
5a1164e... Initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
