On 04/09/2014 02:07 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 04/08/2014 03:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change. It needs to have
the equivalent filed for the fpc to evaluate, though.
On 04/08/2014 10:46 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Playground repository =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Playground_repository
Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com, Mirek
To chime in here, we have been doing something like this in
GStreamer for a long while. There is 'plugins-base' and 'plugins-good'
plugins which is comparable to the current core Fedora repository.
Any plugin going into base or good need to conform to certain
coding standards, licensing
Hi there,
I've been struggling keeping a fedora 20 install on a small SSD, with 6gb
/ partition (/home is separate).
Besides removing packages, I also found this useful:
1. remove /usr/share/docs
2. remove /usr/share/locale/* (all except en and en_US)
3. cleanup /var/log/journal, which seems
On 8 April 2014 23:01, Corey Sheldon sheldon.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm glad to supply a mirror site for initial seeding for such actions as
needed (GMT-4 (US ES/DT)
Also great mailing list but curious do you plan on creating a blog or
podcast with such info for those not always near email
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Marius A marius1...@gmail.com wrote:
1. remove /usr/share/docs
Try this in /etc/rpm/macros.whatever:
%_excludedocs 1
But that'll exclude _all_ files marked as docs in packages such as man
pages, it's not limited to /usr/share/doc. You might also/instead want
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On Apr 8, 2014, at 9:48 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote:
== Detailed Description == A new D-Bus service will be made
available, exposing available server roles, making it possible to
deploy, configure and manage them. Appropriate functionality will
also be exposed as a
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 07:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Framework for Server
On 04/08/2014 01:44 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 3.4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_3.4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz elsupergo...@fedoraproject.org
Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10 to 3.4
== Detailed
- Original Message -
On 04/08/2014 01:44 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 3.4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_3.4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
elsupergo...@fedoraproject.org
Update the Mono stack in Fedora from
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Hi everyone,
As you may know I am working on updating our package database
(pkgdb) to a new version named pkgdb2. In this process, pkgdb-cli
has got re-writen and now ships a pkgdb2.py python module that can
be used as an
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
My question is thus, is there anyone here that is using
RHEL5/CentOS5 to do packaging for Fedora/EPEL? If so, and if you
rely on fedpkg/pkgdb-cli for it, please say so :) (here or on [2]).
OK I think I read this backwards in
On 04/09/2014 09:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
3. cleanup /var/log/journal, which seems it's not automatically rotated
It's supposed to be automatic. How big did it become on your system?
If the default size limits do not suit you, you can change them in
/etc/systemd/journald.conf.
Michal
--
devel
On 04/09/2014 07:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
Are there any other disk space saving tips?
Users should not have to result doing disk saving tips.
I would say in the long run we should be working towards creating
separated locale,doc,man packages
JBG
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 07:23 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
Are there any other disk space saving tips?
Users should not have to result doing disk saving tips.
I would say in the long run we should be
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:14:37PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
OTOH, how does the Cloud SIG want to use the SCL? If they want to create
things that are outside of the SCL that make use of it, that would seem to
be a point of coordination and thus would be Fedora Change worthy... On yet
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:23:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
My question is thus, is there anyone here that is using
RHEL5/CentOS5 to do packaging for Fedora/EPEL? If so, and if you
rely on fedpkg/pkgdb-cli for it,
On 04/09/2014 11:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 07:23 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
Are there any other disk space saving tips?
Users should not have to result doing disk saving tips.
I
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:50:37AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I would say in the long run we should be working towards creating
separated locale,doc,man packages
Hmm, I wonder if RPM 4.12 would allow us to do this with weak
dependencies?
Perhaps something like having a metapackage on
On 04/09/2014 01:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:23 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
Are there any other disk space saving tips?
Users should not have to result doing disk saving tips.
I would say in the long run we should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 06:02 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 07:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jaroslav
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:33:25AM +0300, Marius A wrote:
I've been struggling keeping a fedora 20 install on a small SSD, with 6gb
/ partition (/home is separate).
This part of conversation probably belongs on the user list rather than
devel. But there are some development-related aspects (see
On 04/09/2014 03:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
I think less than 0.1% of users ever look into /usr/share/doc, but I
don't have any data to back this up.
I think I must fit into this 0.1% (and I am not disputing that that is
the correct ratio, either) because I definitely use /usr/share/doc, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085336
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:53:10AM -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
I think I must fit into this 0.1% (and I am not disputing that that is
the correct ratio, either) because I definitely use /usr/share/doc, but
mostly because that holds more than just documentation. For example,
avahi stores
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085579
--- Comment #3 from simon.gal...@gmail.com ---
I can confirm that the issue was local to one system -- our bad!
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 10:01 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:53:10AM -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar
wrote:
I think I must fit into this 0.1% (and I am not disputing that
that is the correct ratio, either) because I definitely use
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:10:37AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I think I must fit into this 0.1% (and I am not disputing that
that is the correct ratio, either) because I definitely use
/usr/share/doc, but mostly because that holds more than just
documentation. For example, avahi
commit 99236d52ff15dafb27b0e2b2541de0c65303481f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Apr 9 15:15:25 2014 +0100
Update to 1.77
- Update to latest upstream version
- This release by RIBASUSHI - update source URL
- BR: perl(Data::Dumper) and perl(Test::Deep) ≥
On 04/09/2014 04:01 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:53:10AM -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
I think I must fit into this 0.1% (and I am not disputing that that is
the correct ratio, either) because I definitely use /usr/share/doc, but
mostly because that holds more than
The lightweight tag 'perl-SQL-Abstract-1.77-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
99236d5... Update to 1.77
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04/09/2014 03:53 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
Having said that, I am all for saving space on a default install and/or
making a more minimal install possible. I noticed just now that
manpages are compressed, but with gz. I am sure this discussion has
already happened, but maybe we can
Hello.
New version landed in rawhide. Sorry for the late info - incidental
soname change happened (fixed in spec now):
/usr/lib64/libMagick++-6.Q16.so.1
/usr/lib64/libMagick++-6.Q16.so.1.0.0
/usr/lib64/libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.1
/usr/lib64/libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.1.0.0
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 08:39 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:50:37AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I would say in the long run we should be working towards creating
separated locale,doc,man packages
Hmm, I wonder if RPM 4.12 would allow us to do this with weak
On 04/09/2014 02:31 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
So, I'd question the usefulness of not installing man-page
It's more about getting to the point of being able to remove them and or
have the option not to install them.
Whether they should or should not be installed by default depends on
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
So, I'd question the usefulness of not installing man-pages, because their
sizes are comparatively small on today's disk-scales, e.g. on my primary
system:
# du -sh /usr/share/man
89M /usr/share/man
That's almost
may be easier to just rewrite the mandb for it rather than create extra
confusion of two man pages
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 04/09/2014
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
It's more about getting to the point of being able to remove them and or
have the option not to install them.
See my other email on this thread. Following on what I wrote there,
instead of reworking all the
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:49:56PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So, I'd question the usefulness of not installing man-page
It's more about getting to the point of being able to remove them and
or have the option not to install them.
Since man pages are marked as %doc, you can use
On 04/09/2014 02:59 PM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:49:56PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So, I'd question the usefulness of not installing man-page
It's more about getting to the point of being able to remove them and
or have the option not to install them.
On 04/09/2014 04:53 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
From the desktop/workstation perspective, here are a few things I would
like to see if we decide to work on this:
Support for a new locale is more or less like a 'system extension' for
the OS. It would be good to define clear rules for what it
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:00:24PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Does not solve the problem of dependency like for example if we want
to get rid of man-db and it's dependency's so forth and so on.
Well, it does solve the wasted disk space problem.
The only way we can move forward is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 08:42 AM, Florian Festi wrote:
On 04/09/2014 01:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:23 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/09/2014 07:33 AM, Marius A wrote:
Are there any other disk space saving tips?
Users
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 06:02 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On
On 04/09/2014 05:23 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This construct would be extremely valuable to the SSSD as well:
%package -n client
Recommends: sssd-client.i686 if glibc.i686
That's not exactly by accident...
It's pretty easy to install a language at package-install time, but in
order to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085905
Bug ID: 1085905
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema-0.61-1.fc21 FTBFS
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-Catalyst-Model-DBIC-Schema
Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 08:45 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 04/09/2014 06:02 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 07:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at
On 04/09/2014 04:49 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 04/09/2014 02:31 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
So, I'd question the usefulness of not installing man-page
It's more about getting to the point of being able to remove them and or
have the option not to install them.
Well, rpm-wise, all
Dear all,
Today, Ralph and I braced ourselves and went onto the fedora-meeting,
fedora-meeting-1 and fedora-meeting-2 calendars on fedocal and moved all the
meetings in there into other calendars.
With the introduction of the meeting location, having a dedicated calendar for
the irc chans does
On 04/09/2014 04:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
C'mon, we have packages whose install-sizes are measured in 10ths and
100s of MBs ... and we have other dirs which can easily grow beyond
any limits.
I was refering to it being in the eye of the beholder so to speak but as
I see it we need
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-04-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-04-10 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-04-10 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-04-10
James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said:
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a
Florian Festi (ffe...@redhat.com) said:
1) Normal weak dependencies. In a normal install all the docs (and all
other bells and whistles) get installed by default. You can
remove/deselect packages which are pulled in by weak dependencies. You
can even switch off all weak dependencies to only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 08:04 PM, James Antill wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-04-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
(approval and retirement
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
You need to install or reinstall grub2-efi and shim packages.
Aha, a correct answer! Thanks! Based on this hint, I think I figured
it out. I updated the
wiki accordingly.
Can you take a quick look at:
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 20:45 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
I don't see the topic about bundled files in Icecat (
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/391).
It's still pending.
AFAIK it's not, if you look at the log from the last meeting:
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 12:37 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Marius A marius1...@gmail.com wrote:
1. remove /usr/share/docs
Try this in /etc/rpm/macros.whatever:
%_excludedocs 1
For recent yum it's significantly better to do:
yum fs filter nodocs
Try this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/2014 05:54 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Apr 8, 2014, at 9:48 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au
mailto:will...@firstyear.id.au wrote:
== Detailed Description == A new D-Bus service will be
made available, exposing
I would like to see logic like this:
manpage files don't get installed unless/until:
1) packagename-manpages is requested to be installed by the user. that
package would require the 'man' package.
OR
2) package is installed AND man is installed.
Don't wan't the manpages taking up disk space?
On Wed, 02.04.14 09:12, quickbooks office (quickbooks.off...@gmail.com) wrote:
[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
All the info has been sitting here @
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
since March 20th.
Did I mess something
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:57:27PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
For recent yum it's significantly better to do:
yum fs filter nodocs
Dito. to get rid of extra languages by:
yum fs filter langs en
...then you can yum fs refilter / yum fs refilter-cleanup.
So -- if the host is originally
Am 09.04.2014 22:05, schrieb Billy Crook:
I would like to see logic like this:
manpage files don't get installed unless/until:
1) packagename-manpages is requested to be installed by the user. that
package would require the 'man' package.
OR
2) package is installed AND man is installed.
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
[technical reasoning snipped]
Hence: please let's just remove securetty entirely from the default PAM
stacks. It's annoying, it creates a false sense of security, it's a
relict of a different time and not compatible with modern
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 10:54 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
There are some limited use cases that aren't ideal now with
install_lang and exclude_docs. For example, installing missing docs or
langs -- for all or some packages. But that seems like it could be
solved by a script that drives rpm to
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 09.04.2014 22:05, schrieb Billy Crook:
I would like to see logic like this:
manpage files don't get installed unless/until:
1) packagename-manpages is requested to be installed by the user. that
package would
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
[technical reasoning snipped]
Hence: please let's just remove securetty entirely from the default PAM
stacks. It's annoying, it creates a false sense of
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
[technical reasoning snipped]
Hence: please let's just remove securetty entirely from the default PAM
stacks. It's
On 04/09/2014 08:42 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Given the number of packages that ship localization, this seems like it
would have a pretty dramatic effect on metadata size. Is this a concern?
Meta data is a concern. But the major part of the meta data is file data
and change logs. Everything
On 04/09/2014 10:05 PM, Billy Crook wrote:
I would like to see logic like this:
manpage files don't get installed unless/until:
1) packagename-manpages is requested to be installed by the user. that
package would require the 'man' package.
OR
2) package is installed AND man is installed.
In
Am 09.04.2014 23:01, schrieb Billy Crook:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.04.2014 22:05, schrieb Billy Crook:
I would like to see logic like this:
manpage files don't get installed
Once upon a time, Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca said:
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:20:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
[technical reasoning snipped]
Hence: please let's just remove
On 04/09/2014 12:42 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
So yes, FESCo should take it into consideration but I'd like to avoid
situation when this Change will be banned solely on not a
maintainer.
Yes -- I am hoping that someone who understands the Mono stack and has
distro-wide commit access would step
On Wed, 09.04.14 22:20, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
This sounds entirely backwards, and I'd instead vote for removing
securetty from the PAM stacks we ship altogether. The concept is
outdated. It was useful in a time where the primary way to access a
server was via
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Rob Kearey r...@ningaui.net wrote:
This Change, as written, is *extremely* vague, moreso that most other
changes that are filed for Fedora. Is it intended to be updated with more
information when that becomes available?
+1 - What are 'server roles'? Are we just
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:39:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
To clarify this: while I believe dropping securetty from the default PAM
config is the right thing to do, I am not vulunteering to do it. But I'd
love to see somebody to pick this up!
I looked, and I think this is just a
On 04/09/2014 09:12 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/09/2014 10:05 PM, Billy Crook wrote:
I would like to see logic like this:
manpage files don't get installed unless/until:
1) packagename-manpages is requested to be installed by the user. that
package would require the 'man' package.
OR
2)
Am 10.04.2014 00:00, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 04/09/2014 09:12 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/09/2014 10:05 PM, Billy Crook wrote:
I would like to see logic like this:
manpage files don't get installed unless/until:
1) packagename-manpages is requested to be installed by the
On 04/09/2014 10:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
no - if i type man whatever and that starts to pull 10 MB packages i stop
and think 5 seconds if there is one of my ,ore than 30 machines which have
it already
That is you
If I was concern with that I would have done the thinking ahead of time
Hi,
I just deployed new version of Copr.
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/
Changes:
* a lot of small bugfixes
* each src.rpm have separate task now - you can still submit bunch of
src.rpm, but the list of src.rpm are split and each src.rpm is submitted
to builders as one task. This means that
On 10/04/2014 7:50 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
+1 - What are 'server roles'? Are we just reinventing Ansible/Puppet/et al here?
Yeah, why is someone spending time creating a new Fedora-specific
configuration management system rather than just shipping an Ansible
playbook or a Salt formula or
Hi!
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:30 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Packages for rebuild:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick\* |
fgrep -v 'ImageMagick-' | sort -u
As Michael Schwendt already pointed out, your query missed some packages
that need rebuilding (BTW, I
I've contacted the current mono maintainer since last autumn, he had been
working on it for a while.
And I think he is an expert on this rather than the current proposer. Plus
it's my first time to see the proposal from an extraneous people outside.
We ought not to bring in extraneous people in
On Qui, 2014-04-10 at 01:40 +0200, Tadej Janež wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:30 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Packages for rebuild:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick\* |
fgrep -v 'ImageMagick-' | sort -u
As Michael Schwendt already pointed out,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085704
Bug ID: 1085704
Summary: tests failing on big endians
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: slic3r
Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
Reporter: d...@danny.cz
QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085230
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Starlet-0.21-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Starlet-0.21-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085230
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Starlet-0.21-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Starlet-0.21-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085230
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085579
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085704
--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Honestly, I have no idea how to fix this. I will report this upstream, but
chances are, the bug is in some of the used Perl module.
Looking at [1] it is clear the test was introduced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085704
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Reported https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/issues/1924
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082957
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
This has been worked around by adding -fwrapv to ccflags with these two
commits:
commit 869747506fd0081f6c7eed149ec6f7adbcc4d5b1
Author: H.Merijn Brand h.m.br...@xs4all.nl
Date: Wed Apr 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085336
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|unspecified |high
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803340
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Type|--- |Bug
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803340
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Class:
4c574ad83a6f7456801e234f78c45f10 DBIx-Class-0.08270.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085336
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 14999c3525ac7993a8db3615087d46445fb5bcc0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Apr 9 15:42:48 2014 +0200
Adapt to new sqlite-3.8.2 exception messages
...SQLite-changed-their-exception-text-again.patch | 67
perl-DBIx-Class.spec
Summary of changes:
14999c3... Adapt to new sqlite-3.8.2 exception messages (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085579
--- Comment #2 from simon.gal...@gmail.com ---
Thanks -- will check on the other systems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
