Compose started at Sun Jun 22 08:15:02 UTC 2014
New package: perl-Class-XSAccessor-1.19-2.el7
Generate fast XS accessors without run-time compilation
New package: perl-File-Find-Object-0.2.11-1.el7
Object oriented File::Find replacement
New package:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc wrote:
Check the post-install tools; I believe at least one of apper or yumex
still
uses them.
Yes, Yumex is still using categories to organize groups, both in the
current stable release and in nextgen release based on the
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be too much trouble to use the sqlite data in DNF?
I suppose it would be a step backwards to have our primary (future)
tool using gzip metadata.
the information in the sqlite files is orded i a way the yum is using the
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Tim,
Is there anyone working on a protected packages plugin for Dnf? In the
past, it has helped users avoid trashing their systems due to bugs in
package-cleanup and so on. So it is not just the command line users
Am 22.06.2014 08:18, schrieb Tim Lauridsen:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
mailto:methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anyone working on a protected packages plugin for Dnf? In the
past, it has helped users avoid
trashing their systems due to
Hi all,
libgit2 soname mechanism has been changed to reflect the ABI breakage,
accordingly the result is:
libgit2.so.0 - libgit2.so.21
Some packages are affected, that could be solved by rebuilding the package.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be too much trouble to use the sqlite data in DNF?
I suppose it would be a step backwards to have our primary (future)
tool using gzip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2014 08:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:55:02PM -0500, Jon wrote:
These packages could have dependencies on other packages
which are essential to that product's identity (like ye olde
dreaded
Hi,
One of my package generates debuginfo by specifying -gdwarf-2 option
in CFLAGS. As gcc 4.8 onwards DWARF4 is the default, is it still
acceptable to use this option for Fedora now? Since DWARF4 provides
many features demonstrated at [1], Should I remove that option?
Thanks.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 09:55:05PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
One of my package generates debuginfo by specifying -gdwarf-2 option
in CFLAGS. As gcc 4.8 onwards DWARF4 is the default, is it still
acceptable to use this option for Fedora now? Since DWARF4 provides
many features demonstrated
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 09:55:05PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
One of my package generates debuginfo by specifying -gdwarf-2 option
in CFLAGS. As gcc 4.8 onwards DWARF4 is the default, is it still
acceptable to use this
On 22 June 2014 00:18, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tim,
Is there anyone working on a protected packages plugin for Dnf? In the
past, it has helped users avoid trashing their systems due to bugs in
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
on the other hand, there's a clear overlap with 'environment groups'. it
seems like we kinda have one type of group too many. :P
environments is something you can install, categories is not, they fit
different a
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Where should the RFE be filed?
Bugzilla againt dnf or dnf-plugins-core
Tim
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:26 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be too much trouble to use the sqlite data in DNF?
I suppose it would be a
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:26 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be too much
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:29:30 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we should make createrepo default to XZ in Fedora rawhide,
and make all the tools do the right thing?
We have already done that. rawhide and epel7 repos use
--compress-type xz
Would be nice if createrepo was
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:29:30 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we should make createrepo default to XZ in Fedora rawhide,
and make all the tools do the right thing?
We have already done that. rawhide and
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 09:18:24AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Is there anyone working on a protected packages plugin for Dnf? In the
past, it has helped users avoid trashing their systems due to bugs in
package-cleanup and so on. So it is not just the command line users of the
HI
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
This isn't for a plugin, but as a core feature:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955673
As previously noted, the yum functionality was originally a plugin but then
adopted as core feature.
I think there are much more important things to be concerned about than:
1. Childproofing software.
2. Writing software to protect against software bugs.
DNF already requires that you have root privileges, in addition to
requiring you to answer Yes to apply changes. Those safeguards are more
Hi folks! Once again I don't think we have anything that needs to be
discussed in a meeting tomorrow, so I'm proposing to cancel it and save
us all the trouble :)
If anyone has anything that does need to be talked over, please do reply
to this mail (or send out a meeting announcement mail) and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sys-Detect-Virtualization-0.107-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105958
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sys-Detect-Virtualization-0.107-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084032
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
The Fedora 21 branch date is coming up fast - iteration 4 will be the
last complete iteration before our planned production deployment date
and we have plenty things to do before then. Iteration progress is
being tracked in:
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T219
I think we're a bit
29 matches
Mail list logo
