I have used Fedora 21 with 4k display for almost a year, but few weeks
ago some update broke support for 4k display resolution. I'm guessing
that intel driver is at fault.
Have any of have also noticed this issue with 4k displays on Intel
hardware or also on some other hardware?
Obligatory link
This album shows how badly this affects productivity when using Fedora
as your main workstation:
https://goo.gl/photos/d2EAXWTZQRVMsSSPA
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-07-01)
===
Meeting started by thozza at 18:01:35 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-07-01/fesco.2015-07-01-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
c0fbfdd058075c9271a1384c822c9a87 Inline-C-0.76.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Inline-C/Inline-C-0.76.tar.gz/md5/c0fbfdd058075c9271a1384c822c9a87/Inline-C-0.76.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238625
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
Hello everyone,
I would like to start with Mass bug filing process and as stated
at wiki, the first step is to gain consensus for what I want to make.
Note please that this mass bug filing is conditioned with acceptance of
'Python3 as default'
Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
I would like to start with Mass bug filing process and as stated
at wiki, the first step is to gain consensus for what I want to make.
I maintain several python applications, but not all python libraries are
available for python3 yet.
Just few weeks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238493
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-Inline-C-0.76-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=666445
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238625
sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238494
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-Inline-Filters-0.17-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=666454
--
You are receiving this mail
From b9ac1099356becd7996366c6f3800ae9ca7dbf6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:54:52 +0100
Subject: 0.75 bump, documentation fixes
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4340b70..704b4a3 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
From 1ba207c7ee2a7a1baa74df8f7c6512ced695e187 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:25:59 +0200
Subject: 0.76 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 704b4a3..3be1fed 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4
From 137e479097165ffa39f44827ce1225f975f81b2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:54:55 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Inline-C.spec b/perl-Inline-C.spec
index
From e9ccc582d73239dfd14d518dd9a6a4c6531265d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 08:45:07 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Inline-C.spec b/perl-Inline-C.spec
index 3080910..4d1b29c 100644
--- a/perl-Inline-C.spec
+++
From 8c591588c4ebd7fa6f8007acfcced706875f2577 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:36:23 +0200
Subject: 0.17 bump
- Modernize SPEC
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 779c3ce..5adc1e6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
From e8e95ef157283c14540b48335bfaa69688caf18b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 09:05:05 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Inline-Filters.spec b/perl-Inline-Filters.spec
index 7186d57..4d355a6 100644
---
From 8c591588c4ebd7fa6f8007acfcced706875f2577 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:36:23 +0200
Subject: 0.17 bump
- Modernize SPEC
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 779c3ce..5adc1e6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
9038d669366c15fe45a40c337e4a6bda Inline-Filters-0.17.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Inline-Filters/Inline-Filters-0.17.tar.gz/md5/9038d669366c15fe45a40c337e4a6bda/Inline-Filters-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:03:35 AM
Subject: Re: Mass bug filing proposal - switching to Python3
Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
Hello everyone,
I would like to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238493
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Inline-C-0.76-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Inline-C-0.76-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
From 42c7460f0c03b0aec296f85a955ee2b43e1cac6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:55:14 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Inline-Filters.spec b/perl-Inline-Filters.spec
index
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/01/15 at 09:08am, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dave Young dyo...@redhat.com wrote:
Pratyush,
Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
from Fedora experts.
A bit late announce, sorry for that, but I was offline for couple of days.
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* New meeting time?
* Elections wrap-up
* Changes in governance
* Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238625
Bug ID: 1238625
Summary: kwrite is missing in Component list at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com for 'Product: Fedora'
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: bugzilla
From 1ba207c7ee2a7a1baa74df8f7c6512ced695e187 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:25:59 +0200
Subject: 0.76 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 704b4a3..3be1fed 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -5,3 +5,4
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl-MongoDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Task-Kensho-Testing has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Kensho-Testing-0.38-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Task-Kensho-Testing-0.38-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Apocalypse has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.006-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.006-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Devel-Cover has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-Cover-1.18-1.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
perl-Devel-Cover-1.18-1.fc23.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-Cover-1.18-1.fc23.i686 requires
On Seg, 2015-06-29 at 13:47 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/06/15 12:00, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jan Kurik jku...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings, all!
The elections for FESCo - June 2015 have concluded, and the results
are shown below.
FESCo is electing 4
Hello,
As suggested in the packaging guide [0], I'm here to introduce myself! I'm Jie,
currently working as a software engineering intern on the Java team at RedHat.
Most of my work is on Thermostat [1], a instrumentation tool for the Hotspot
JVM and Icedtea-Web [2], a browser plugin for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238625
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Principles are good and well. But how many times did you actually USE
that option you so reluctantly
- Original Message -
Il giorno mar, 30/06/2015 alle 06.13 -0400, Bastien Nocera ha scritto:
It doesn't need updating, the error you're seeing is:
DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for 65536 bytes at device :09:00.1
Which I reported upstream here:
- Original Message -
From: Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:30:22 AM
Subject: Re: Mass bug filing proposal - switching to Python3
Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a):
I would like to start with Mass bug
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
I agree , ask him that, please , he gave me commit permissions on
packages gammu and wammu a while ago ...
Just got a response from him overnight and he said he'd take a look at my
bug.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 04:04:37PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
a self signed certificate is exactly as secure as a CA certificate you pay
for after there are hundrets and thousands by default trusted CA's in the
browsers with the only difference you have to accept it once
No its not. Because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238494
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Inline-Filters-0.17-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Inline-Filters-0.17-1.fc22
--
You are
For rubygem-apipie-rails-0.3.4-1.fc23, the license was changed from
MIT and ASL 2.0 and (MIT or GPLv2)
to
MIT and ASL 2.0
since the bundled jQuery was replaced by symlink to the system version
of jQuery.
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-07-02)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 12:02:14 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:04 schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Principles are good and well. But how many times did you actually
Compose started at Thu Jul 2 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[airsched]
airsched-1.00.0-12.fc23.i686 requires libzmq.so.4
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
I will update a belated bump of armadillo (that happened in May) in rawhide.
# dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires
'libarmadillo.so.4()(64bit)'
armadillo-devel-0:4.650.2-3.fc23.x86_64
gdal-0:1.11.2-10.fc23.x86_64
gdal-java-0:1.11.2-10.fc23.x86_64
- Original Message -
snip
*lol* and with a CA certificate you can?
A lot of us are sick of this type of attitude on fedora-devel, to
the point where we don't actually care what you think anymore. Take
this as an opportunity to read instead of jumping at people's throat
with an attitude
On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
and apps are, what the typical overhead is like, etc. The results
are... unpleasant,
[snip]
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
* AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve the option to
have netizen as optional suite in anaconda. Please work with
Workstation WG. (+7, 0, -0) (thozza, 18:48:50)
Hi, maybe there was some misunderstanding about the
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
* AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve the option
to
have netizen as optional suite in anaconda. Please work with
Workstation WG. (+7, 0, -0)
Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
and apps are, what the typical overhead is like, etc. The results
are... unpleasant, but not so much because of the hardening change
itself. I started by
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
- Original Message -
snip
*lol* and with a CA certificate you can?
A lot of us are sick of this type of attitude on fedora-devel, to
the point where we don't actually care what you think anymore. Take
this as an opportunity to read
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 02.07.2015 um 16:04 schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 02.07.2015 um 02:30 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:59 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Principles are good
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Beyond that, the fact that we have such blatant packaging errors, and
that nearly 4% of our binary packages haven't rebuilt in F23, is quite
worrisome.
I agree. What can and should we do about it?
--
Matthew Miller
In any case, this is drifting significantly off-topic. Anyone
interested in continuing it further, please use other venues.
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 21:33 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I haven't gone through all the requirements but it seems pretty clear
that brasero is unmaintained.
FWIW, it's unmaintained upstream as well. If anyone is looking for a
GNOME package to take care of
--
devel mailing list
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48214
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48214/0001-Ticket-48214-ldapsearch-on-nsslapd-maxbersize-return.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48214/0002-Ticket-48214-CI-test-added-test-cases-for-ticket-482.patch
git patch file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238898
Bug ID: 1238898
Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.041 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PPIx-Regexp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238898
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1045696
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1045696action=edit
[patch] Update to 0.041 (#1238898)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238898
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10275996
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Hey folks, just wanted to post a quick heads-up that I wrote a little
app which is to Test Day pages as relval is to release validation
pages. It's called 'testdays', and you can read about it at
https://www.happyassassin.net/testdays , and download it from the
wikitcms/relval repository. Right
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject pretty much says it all...
I have an appdata file from upstream that I think has a bad screenshot URL,
how do I test this?
You can either ask upstream to fix that, or disable that screenshot
for a while(make
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPSCo weekly meeting on 2015-07-03 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
At e...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2542/
___
epel-devel
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
Which “that”? The file (with a different URL) or the bad URL itself (to
make it not bad)?
'That' should be 'that 404 problem'.
or disable that screenshot for a while(make sure there are still other shots)
Any file
Subject pretty much says it all...
I have an appdata file from upstream that I think has a bad screenshot URL,
how do I test this?
I tried changing the file installed by the package but of course it didn't
do much.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/03/2015 06:45 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject pretty much says it all...
I have an appdata file from upstream that I think has a bad screenshot URL,
how do I test this?
You can either ask upstream to fix
I just took over maintainership of libax25 and ax25-tools and I am working
on an update.
The update is only from rc2 to rc4 but abi-compliance checker shows it as
an incompatible update:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235709
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
HI
I have intention to orphaning apache-poi [1] ,
because, it, for build, use resources with unknow license [2].
I tried to contact several time the developer/s [3] of these files but
without succes.
regards
gil
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/apache-poi/
[2]
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 11:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Beyond that, the fact that we have such blatant packaging errors, and
that nearly 4% of our binary packages haven't rebuilt in F23, is quite
worrisome.
I agree. What can
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
and apps are, what the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Bug ID: 1238804
Summary: /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237123
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:56 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
* AGREED: Netizen is not approved as
On 2 July 2015 at 16:55, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 2 July 2015 at 15:49, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
some statistics on the actual impact:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
* AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve the option
to
have netizen as optional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 01:47:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
I agree. What can and should we do about it?
Good question. I'm not entirely sure, but I have opinions.
That's a good start... we can build from there in to plans.
The binaries-in-/usr/share/doc thing is the sort of clearly
Are there any Intel Haswell users with Chromium running having similar issues?
On 2 July 2015 at 09:35, valent.turko...@gmail.com
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
This album shows how badly this affects productivity when using Fedora
as your main workstation:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
Following up on the hardened cflags change in F23, I wanted to gather
some statistics on the actual impact: what the most impacted packages
and apps are, what the typical overhead is like, etc. The results
are... unpleasant, but not
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 14:59 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
First, there's no way to let a good enough package in and have it
progress to excellent — it must be excellent at the start, because we
generally don't trust the package quality to do much but go down.
This is actually something I'd
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 01:47:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
The longstanding FTBFS thing is harder. In principle we do actually
retire things that haven't built for multiple releases; in practice,
things apparently get missed. pathfinder logiweb and python-rpi-gpio,
for example, were all
On 04/08/2015 02:12 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
One reason I'm building my OSJourno Docker images on Fedora and not
the more popular and theoretically more stable CentOS is that EPEL
doesn't have a few LaTeX packages I need. Sometime when I run out of
more pressing things to fix, I'm
On 04/08/2015 12:46 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
I look at tl2pm and think it would be fairly easy to patch that to
spit out 4000 and something spec files rather than one 16 MB one. The
unresolved issues are whether doing that would invalidate the previous
license audit (it shouldn't
97 matches
Mail list logo
