On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A lot of packages
give different results when built twice in a row, on the *same*
architecture.
There is an effort under way to
From f9151fbb5e3f6be593f5cc329f98bcf6012a27ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:35:05 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Test-Spec.spec b/perl-Test-Spec.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231079
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On 07/28/2015 07:57 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22
and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local
mirrors.
I guess no.
I am waiting for my updates to get for weeks and am already withholding
other
From 7548e18f5ab1e82036a2a49ae6eb79a608a7dc26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:16:43 +0200
Subject: 0.06 bump; Modernize spec
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e7c069d..cea9ec2 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1
On 07/28/2015 07:33 AM, Jiří Konečný wrote:
I have a theoretical question. Is it possible to a create package to
Fedora which is using oauth2 authentication and that means there are
app_id and secret_code strings generated by api provider? These strings
are used in the program but can't be
be66a577f8790c16947d8e3e5a0e65a2 Time-Piece-MySQL-0.06.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Time-Piece-MySQL/Time-Piece-MySQL-0.06.tar.gz/md5/be66a577f8790c16947d8e3e5a0e65a2/Time-Piece-MySQL-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:57:44 +0300
Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com wrote:
Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22
and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local
mirrors.
No. We continue to work on it.
The current issue is
From db1849da9a34074829ea51308178196581e1efc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:20:04 +0200
Subject: 0.51 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2567caf..5de7496 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -14,3
From db1849da9a34074829ea51308178196581e1efc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:20:04 +0200
Subject: 0.51 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2567caf..5de7496 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -14,3
From 8f9434367bfeb234694cf814283486d3cfd7e078 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 20:00:44 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Test-Spec.spec b/perl-Test-Spec.spec
index 4c2adb0..5a9513d 100644
--- a/perl-Test-Spec.spec
+++
W dniu 22.07.2015 o 10:49, Honza Šilhan pisze:
The resolution configuration hints are printed to the output and user
is notified which packages were skipped during update in case there
are conflicts.
No information about skipped updates on my system (or I misunderstood
how it is supposed to
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps since the version
0.6.9 too thus rich deps work also in hawkey and dnf if the version 0.6.9 or
a newer version of libsolv is installed.
Lubos
- Original Message -
From: Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com
To:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247219
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
Dne 28.7.2015 v 08:48 Marcin Juszkiewicz napsal(a):
W dniu 22.07.2015 o 10:49, Honza Šilhan pisze:
The resolution configuration hints are printed to the output and user
is notified which packages were skipped during update in case there
are conflicts.
No information about skipped updates on
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-07-27 22:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com:
Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
Should I make the doc packages arch
a52b44c071ec4c32e30f4c949e8b2f1a Test-Spec-0.51.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Spec/Test-Spec-0.51.tar.gz/md5/a52b44c071ec4c32e30f4c949e8b2f1a/Test-Spec-0.51.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
On 07/28/2015 09:43 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps since the version
0.6.9 too thus rich deps work also in hawkey and dnf if the version 0.6.9 or
a newer version of libsolv is installed.
Right now only AND and OR is supported by libsolv.
From db1849da9a34074829ea51308178196581e1efc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:20:04 +0200
Subject: 0.51 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2567caf..5de7496 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -14,3
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/07/15 14:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/07/15 19:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul
Excerpts from Peter Robinson's message of 2015-07-28 18:01 +10:00:
This is completely NOT appropriate, it breaks on secondary arches
where they then end up with no documentation due to the lack of any
x86_64. Please DO NOT do this and please revert the change on any
packages you might have
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
condor
Another BuildRequires failure with libpoppler.so
In fact you managed to get an attempt through which failed in
compilation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8134/10448134/build.log
I've been figuring that one
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:05:30 +0300
Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
No. We continue to work on it.
Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in
the submission process.
Nope. ;)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247421
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-Test-Spec-0.51-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=672833
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247421
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-Spec-0.51-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Spec-0.51-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this
From 5d4edaf44eb6ca9a5ee83f964ce5b53bf0e13a11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:39:08 +0200
Subject: 0.200013 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 14c355a..a90b7de 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3
On 28/07/15 14:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/07/15 19:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on
every arch (which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247219
Bug 1247219 depends on bug 1247248, which changed state.
Bug 1247248 Summary: Compressed patches are no longer applied
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247248
What|Removed |Added
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
No. We continue to work on it.
Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in
the submission process.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/28/2015 02:49 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for File
Triggers? I suppose /sbin/ldconfig is one of them. Do you plan to have
some F24 feature to get rid of these?
Well, we do not yet have concrete plans with which scriptlets to start.
With the new upstream release python-ntplib-0.3.3 the license was
changed from LGPLv2+ to the MIT license. The only package that requires
python-ntplib seems to be anaconda which is not affected by the change,
but I'm rather letting you guys know.
Thanks,
--
Vratislav Podzimek
Anaconda Rider |
Compose started at Tue Jul 28 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[abrt]
abrt-2.6.2-3.fc24.i686 requires librpmio.so.3
abrt-2.6.2-3.fc24.i686 requires librpm.so.3
abrt-atomic-2.6.2-3.fc24.i686 requires
On 27/07/15 19:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:37:05AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging formats
what to use. Right now rpm accepts 3 different styles:
* AND OR IF ELSE
* | ? :
*
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pyorbit.git/plain/dead.package
last user has been retired, package EOL
Error: nothing provides pyorbit(x86-64) = 2.0.1 needed by
gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-16.fc23.x86_64
What's the full story here? Where has this been discussed/announced?
I'm no
2015-07-28 5:03 GMT-03:00 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
%ifarch x86_64
%package doc
BuildArch: noarch
...
%endif
This looks like a very wise way of handling it. Actually, while debugging
It's not, it breaks all secondary architectures.
it, I found that the translated
* Emmanuel Seyman [24/06/2015 02:03] :
FYI, I'll be giving a talk on Perl's integration in Fedora at
the French Perl Workshop Saturday in Paris.
FTR, the recording of the conference is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1fDECqiaq0
Emmanuel
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
2015-07-28 5:58 GMT-03:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com:
On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A lot of packages
give different results when built twice in a row,
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-MongoDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
92d4934f601c2d291a65b0bf2ab08dd3 Throwable-0.200013.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Throwable/Throwable-0.200013.tar.gz/md5/92d4934f601c2d291a65b0bf2ab08dd3/Throwable-0.200013.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
From 5d4edaf44eb6ca9a5ee83f964ce5b53bf0e13a11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:39:08 +0200
Subject: 0.200013 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 14c355a..a90b7de 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,3
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/28/2015 09:43 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps since the
version
0.6.9 too thus rich deps work also in hawkey and dnf if the version
0.6.9 or
a newer version
Compose started at Tue Jul 28 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
Dne 28.7.2015 v 13:37 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com
mailto:ffe...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/28/2015 09:43 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote:
Support in rpm is not enough but libsolv supports rich deps
since the version
0.6.9 too
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
polymake has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-MongoDB has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247473
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-Throwable-0.200013-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=672857
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247473
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 10:50 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/28/2015 07:33 AM, Jiří Konečný wrote:
No, this is not possible. May be you could create a tool which
simplifies obtaining suitable API keys and ship that instead?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
Ok thank you for
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
fityk
Not Boost related:
app.cpp:12:2: error: #error Not everything is working with wxGTK3.
Use default wxGTK instead, based on GTK+2. If you want to test it,
just remove this #error.
So this one does exactly what it says on
limb changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Pinto (f23) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Pinto/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
limb changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Pinto (master) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Pinto/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
limb changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Pinto (f23) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Pinto/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/28/2015 10:58 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A lot of packages
give different results when built twice in a row, on the *same*
limb changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Pinto (master) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Pinto/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for File
Triggers? I suppose /sbin/ldconfig is one of them. Do you plan to
have some F24 feature to get rid of these?
Here is a list of candidates:
On Ter, 2015-07-28 at 16:48 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/pyorbit.git/plain/dead.package
last user has been retired, package EOL
Error: nothing provides pyorbit(x86-64) = 2.0.1 needed by
gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-16.fc23.x86_64
What's the
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 17:35 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Any problems rebuilding either open a
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic ticket #1427 List of release
86 matches
Mail list logo
