Compose started at Thu Jul 30 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
Il 30/07/2015 13:45, Fedora Branched Report ha scritto:
Removed package: deltaspike-1.2.1-3.fc23
Removed package: openwebbeans-1.2.0-6.fc23
why these was removed?
they are already built for F23, please revert tese changes!
deltaspike
From dce2b04e668800c10365640984617716b7316fb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:46:56 +0200
Subject: 0.033 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e3fa011..c6ab1be 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248235
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-2.05-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-2.05-1.fc23
--
You are
a33546053e47ed3511f6e6fc089e72b3 Git-Repository-1.315.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Git-Repository/Git-Repository-1.315.tar.gz/md5/a33546053e47ed3511f6e6fc089e72b3/Git-Repository-1.315.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248241
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-Git-Repository-1.315-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=674187
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248241
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Git-Repository-1.315-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Git-Repository-1.315-1.fc22
--
You are
From dce2b04e668800c10365640984617716b7316fb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:46:56 +0200
Subject: 0.033 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e3fa011..c6ab1be 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248502
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248502
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-d5bLds/100.0%
return code: 1
stdout:
stderr:
sha256sum:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248502
Bug ID: 1248502
Summary: perl-Test-Moose-More-0.033 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Moose-More
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
322deea41e33c2b652abea07a3e6557f Catalyst-Runtime-5.90097.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Catalyst-Runtime/Catalyst-Runtime-5.90097.tar.gz/md5/322deea41e33c2b652abea07a3e6557f/Catalyst-Runtime-5.90097.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248502
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-Moose-More-0.033-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-Moose-More-0.033-1.fc23
--
You are
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
Compose started at Thu Jul 30 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
From 00c5f6a328dbd798c4080f87c317aad6050ff143 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:23:33 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Git-Repository.spec b/perl-Git-Repository.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|dropbox-api-command-1.17-5.
64bd41ad0d5b7afa909840ba95d1e4a9 generators-1.04.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-generators/generators-1.04.tar.gz/md5/64bd41ad0d5b7afa909840ba95d1e4a9/generators-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248502
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248502
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Test-Moose-More-0.033-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=674205
--
You are receiving this
From 5f4a9d201357454d8757ad6ed59a3d1b0dda474c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:48 +0200
Subject: 1.315 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5e29b3d..a43c7d3 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3
fb0196cc49a8e2e407f7ea90c2be6dbc Test-Moose-More-0.033.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Moose-More/Test-Moose-More-0.033.tar.gz/md5/fb0196cc49a8e2e407f7ea90c2be6dbc/Test-Moose-More-0.033.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248241
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Git-Repository-1.315-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Git-Repository-1.315-1.fc23
--
You are
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
perl-MongoDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
Il 30/07/2015 14:42, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto:
Removed package: deltaspike-1.2.1-3.fc23
Removed package: openwebbeans-1.2.0-6.fc23
why these was removed?
they are already built for F23, please revert these changes!
deltaspike
From a85088c7f7f154e00dc0149240d08092243dee68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:14:18 +0200
Subject: 1.04 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c66b50d..3d7fc4e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
From 5f4a9d201357454d8757ad6ed59a3d1b0dda474c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:48 +0200
Subject: 1.315 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5e29b3d..a43c7d3 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3
From 5f4a9d201357454d8757ad6ed59a3d1b0dda474c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:18:48 +0200
Subject: 1.315 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 5e29b3d..a43c7d3 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3
From b61a25fbea2e853eac0b4ebc0da7725066c5f00d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:59:18 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Git-Repository.spec b/perl-Git-Repository.spec
index 96fe59f..e8dfa6f 100644
---
From 2bea4fc20cf3ffc5da2ee79273f463241eccc803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:36:31 +0200
Subject: Update to 5.90097
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index b904323..b88854b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -21,3 +21,4 @@
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 18:50 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:40:37PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
OK, I spun up a Fedora Server 23 Alpha TC2 system and installed the
Rawhide kernel, then rebooted with kdbus=1
I then tried to run 'rolectl list
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:28:03 +0200
gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 30/07/2015 13:45, Fedora Branched Report ha scritto:
Removed package: deltaspike-1.2.1-3.fc23
Removed package: openwebbeans-1.2.0-6.fc23
why these was removed?
they are already built for F23, please revert tese changes!
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
Rawhide system adding kdbus=1 to
On 07/30/2015 04:54 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with built-in support, too now. If you are running an
Also, When using the python_provide macro as detailed in the guidelines,
I can't seem to get fedpkg to generate an srpm:
fedpkg srpm
error: line 36: Unknown tag: ERROR: not recognized.
error: query of specfile
/home/tibbs/work/fpkg/python-requests/python-requests.spec failed, can't parse
That
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with built-in support,
Jiří Konečný wrote:
I have a theoretical question. Is it possible to a create package to
Fedora which is using oauth2 authentication and that means there are
app_id and secret_code strings generated by api provider? These strings
are used in the program but can't be shipped in the code because
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
scantailor
This has some weird CMake error about being unable to figure out how
to use -pthread.
This one boiled down to crappy upstream build scripts which disregard
the provided CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS values:
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing
atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still
some
sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;(
So this useless Fedora
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing
atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some
sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;(
So this useless Fedora Atomic toy now delayed updates (including security
updates!) for
Radek Holy wrote:
Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
fixed in dnf-1.0.2.
I still don't understand why we don't just enable keepcache by default. Even
after a successful update/install, deleting the cached packages is a major
data loss because it prevents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247995
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
cmd: sha256sum /var/tmp/thn-w0T8gJ/100.0%
return code: 1
stdout:
stderr:
sha256sum:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247995
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Radek Holy wrote:
Known, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220074. Should be
fixed in dnf-1.0.2.
I still don't understand why we don't just enable keepcache by default. Even
after a successful update/install,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 04:54:18PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/30/2015 11:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with built-in support, too
JLT == Jason L Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
JLT Also, When using the python_provide macro as detailed in the
JLT guidelines, I can't seem to get fedpkg to generate an srpm:
OK, I think a question mark somehow got converted to a % in the draft.
%{?python_provide:%python_provide
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 15:58 +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in Fedora
23
and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions
removed,
some has new/type changed parameters. Read more[2].
I believe you'll want to
User over on users@ list reports booting Fedora 22 Workstation (live
media), and doing:
# dnf install Developer Tools
Implodes.
I've reproduced the problem, and the gist is that there's a dm
snapshot that's too small for this task, it gets full quickly, the
file system face plants, and the
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 21:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
User over on users@ list reports booting Fedora 22 Workstation (live
media), and doing:
# dnf install Developer Tools
Implodes.
I've reproduced the problem, and the gist is that there's a dm
snapshot that's too small for this task,
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPSCo weekly meeting on 2015-07-31 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
At e...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2542/
___
epel-devel
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:58:09PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in Fedora 23
and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions removed,
some has new/type changed parameters. Read more[2].
Packages which needs
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 02:40:37PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
OK, I spun up a Fedora Server 23 Alpha TC2 system and installed the
Rawhide kernel, then rebooted with kdbus=1
I then tried to run 'rolectl list roles', which returned Rolekit is
not running. So it failed to provide D-BUS
27f967930f011b646c1bf839b606e164 File-Which-1.19.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-Which/File-Which-1.19.tar.gz/md5/27f967930f011b646c1bf839b606e164/File-Which-1.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
From 6ec78b2e91370c11de59ed5c601fe45c9ef5d765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:59:50 -0400
Subject: 1.19
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 0a4bb76..a17814c 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
Johnny Robeson composed on 2015-07-30 03:25 (UTC-0400):
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 03:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
# dnf upgrade
(dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before installing
any packages)
dnf then reports package xxx needs ##MB on / filesystem and exits without
On 07/29/2015 11:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:36:07AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Secondly, it would be excellent if someone could commit to spinning
test ISOs when requested. Turn around time on
Dne 29.7.2015 v 19:42 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:53:27 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
The Emacs add-on packaging guidelines no longer stipulate that packages
which
also bundle support for Emacs should split out those Emacs files into
separate
sub-packages. This package
229a13abff9f16d140f65ccf053df59b Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-0.41.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau/Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-0.41.tar.gz/md5/229a13abff9f16d140f65ccf053df59b/Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-0.41.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 291bc402453a5befb9315568ce8e38bd2ad8f0a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:48:10 +0200
Subject: Initial import
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..afee533 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
- Original Message -
From: Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:21:19 AM
Subject: gross DNF bandwidth inefficiency if filesystem space limited
# dnf upgrade
(dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before
MH == Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com writes:
MH * in example spec, you mix srcname and pypi_name macros
Yeah, fixed that up.
MH * For example, the python 3 version of coverage must ship
MHexecutables
MH /usr/bin/coverage, /usr/bin/coverage-2 and /usr/bin/coverage-2.7,
MH while the
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
Rawhide system adding
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
Hello Andrew,
Yes I'm Real. To prove I'm real first off.. You are Development discussions
related to Fedora and your mail Id devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I was just taking a quick shower and I heard my phone vibrate, my hair isnt
even close to being dry yet but I wanted to quickly check my
limb changed psabata's 'approveacls' permission on
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
limb changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
limb changed psabata's 'commit' permission on perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
limb changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on
perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-Levenshtein-Damerau-XS/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 09:43 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
AFAICT, so far, it seems to boot (and work) without any apparent
immediate issues. So, my wild guess would be on an iso/boot-image
composition or tooling issue.
No. It's clearly a kernel bug. It's just that it happens to be in code
# dnf upgrade
(dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before installing any
packages)
dnf then reports package xxx needs ##MB on / filesystem and exits without
doing any installing
dnf all deletes downloaded packages
# dnf upgrade (package subset, e.g. dnf* rpm* a* b* c* d* e* f*
On July 29, 2015 2:06:52 PM PDT, Richard W.M. Jones
rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:45:57AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
ocaml
The comps.xml group for ocaml is pretty weird. It has some mandatory
base packages, which are OK-ish (although there are some notable ones
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 11:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
this thread, comps has things such as the (still mysterious to me)
environment groups,
Environment groups are, quite simply, groups of groups. That's the
entirety of the matter. They have a 'grouplist' of member groups that
are
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 03:21 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
# dnf upgrade
(dnf nearly exhausts freespace downloading all packages before
installing any
packages)
dnf then reports package xxx needs ##MB on / filesystem and exits
without
doing any installing
dnf all deletes downloaded packages
Hi,
I'm planning today to update libgit2[0] and libgit2-glib[1] in Fedora 23
and Fedora Rawhide to new version. API has changed, some functions removed,
some has new/type changed parameters. Read more[2].
Packages which needs rebuild (probably patches or updates needed):
* gitg
* gnome-builder
*
After some additional discussion and cleanup, I've gone ahead and moved
my drafts into place in the main guidelines. Please let me know if I've
made any mistakes or typos or left out anything important.
However, there is one thing I'm trying to understand about the new
guidelines (which came
Matěj Cepl wrote:
I take Gnumeric and Emacs, but all other ones are in-Gnome
projects, aren't they (at least having repository in
git.gnome.org)?
Gnumeric is part of GNOME Office, so it is also under the GNOME umbrella
these days.
The thing is that GTK+ 3 is becoming more and more useless
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248502
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
For folks not keen to jump headfirst into Rawhide, is it expected that
this should work on Fedora 23 or Fedora 22 if one installs only the
kernel and systemd packages from Rawhide? That might make people more
Heya!
I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully
added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come
with built-in support, too now. If you are running an up-to-date
Rawhide system adding kdbus=1 to your kernel command line is hence
everything you need to
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
