Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> I tried this morning and tonight to push this update to stable:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14375
>
> Both times, bodhi told me that this update has not yet met the minimum
> testing requirements defined in the P
The 14 day period is only for critical path packages though. This is odd.
-
Michel Alexandre Salim
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, 11:04 gil wrote:
>
>
> Il 08/09/2015 05:02, Jerry James ha scritto:
>
> I tried this morning and tonight to push this update to stable:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd
Hi folks,
Hiredis is going to be updated in rawhide ONLY with soname version
bumped from 0.12 to 0.13.
Following packages need to be rebuilt:
collectd
yaz
opensips
openvas
rsyslog
syslog-ng
zmap
Cheers.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Beta Test Compose 4 (TC4) is now available
for testing. Please help us complete as much of the validation testing
as we can!
In case you're wondering what happened to TC2 and TC3, there were some
release engineering issues. They never made it out of releng.
Content inf
Il 08/09/2015 05:02, Jerry James ha scritto:
I tried this morning and tonight to push this update to stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14375
Both times, bodhi told me that this update has not yet met the minimum
testing requirements defined in the Package Update Acc
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 04:57:42 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > Missing expected images:
> >
> > Kde Live i386
> > Kde Live x86_64
> > Kde Disk armhfp
>
> These fail to compose because Bodhi 2 failed in the middle of the
> push of: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upda
I tried this morning and tonight to push this update to stable:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14375
Both times, bodhi told me that this update has not yet met the minimum
testing requirements defined in the Package Update Acceptance Criteria.
But why not? It has been in tes
Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde Live i386
> Kde Live x86_64
> Kde Disk armhfp
These fail to compose because Bodhi 2 failed in the middle of the push of:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14271
and sent parts of the update to stable, parts not. As
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Kde Live x86_64
Kde Disk armhfp
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150906:
Cloud base Disk i386
Games Live i386
Games Live x86_64
Cloud base Disk x86_64
Images in 23 Branched 20150906 but not this:
Docker Filesystem x86_
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
49 packages were orphaned
-
activemq [f21] was orphaned by kevin
Open source messaging and Integration Patterns server
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/a
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Workstation Live i386
Cloud base Disk i386
Cloud base Disk x86_64
Kde Live x86_64
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Kde Disk armhfp
Workstation Live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150906:
Soas Live i386
No images in Rawhide 20150906 but not this.
On 07.09.2015 15:11, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> Agenda:
>>
>> - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued)
>> - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued)
>> - define the minimal install (continued)
>> - define the docker base image (continued)
>> -
2015-09-07 15:42 GMT+02:00 Ian Malone :
> On 7 September 2015 at 13:21, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
> > Also, it seems to me that it would be useful to, at least conceptually,
> to
> > not think about Fedora as a self-hosting perpetual motion^Wrecompilation
> > machine, but as “just another huge applic
On 7 September 2015 at 13:21, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
>
> Also, it seems to me that it would be useful to, at least conceptually, to
> not think about Fedora as a self-hosting perpetual motion^Wrecompilation
> machine, but as “just another huge application” being built using compilers
> and other t
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Agenda:
>
> - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued)
> - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued)
> - define the minimal install (continued)
> - define the docker base image (continued)
> - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (contin
Agenda:
- Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued)
- Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued)
- define the minimal install (continued)
- define the docker base image (continued)
- minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued)
- generic installer? (continued)
- Open Floor
Please add ite
Dne 2.9.2015 v 20:59 Brendan Conoboy napsal(a):
> 5. Ring membership is at the source package level, not the binary
> package. If one source package's binary/noarch sub-package is in ring
> 0, all sub-packages are in ring 0.
So we are going to include all those *-doc subpackages? And all language
2015-09-02 23:24 GMT+02:00 Brendan Conoboy :
> [blc]
> >> 5. Ring membership is at the source package level, not the binary
> >> package. If one source package's binary/noarch sub-package is in ring
> >> 0, all sub-packages are in ring 0.
> > [simo]
> > Can you elaborate more on this point (5) ?
OK, thanks, I hadn't realized it was all done through the %_font_pkg macro.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Compose started at Mon Sep 7 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[ScientificPython]
ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.jud
Compose started at Mon Sep 7 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
[ScientificPython]
On 4 September 2015 at 11:17, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems Fedora Jam is not included in current test composes for F23
> and is not being included in nightly composes
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=livecd&order=-id
> (not failing to build as Live Work
No need to modify. all the trick is done in the rpm macro that
fontpackages provides. so the font package maintainers just need to
rebuild it when they need to do something for other purpose. I assume
all of the transition should be done sooner or later when we will have
mass-rebuild for others.
Does this mean that we need to modify spec files for font packages?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Removing rubygem-rgen (→ yum-utils, puppet → mock → koji → ...) doesn't
look good...
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> Depending on: rubygem-rgen (47), status change: 2015-08-31 (0 weeks ago)
> puppet (maintained by: kanarip, domcleal, gchamoul, georgiou,
> jehane, jpo, lzap, mma
Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice, but I'm proposing we cancel
Monday's QA meeting. There's nothing really pressing on the agenda
that I know of, and it's a holiday in North America, so I probably
won't be around.
If folks do want to meet, go right ahead and do it, doesn't need
anyone's permissi
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
28 matches
Mail list logo
