pghmcfc requested branch epel7 for package perl-File-LibMagic

pghmcfc requested branch epel7 for package perl-File-LibMagic https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-File-LibMagic/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

Dne 1.10.2015 v 09:38 Felix Miata napsal(a): > Is anybody else bothered by the latest BZ changes? Where does one select the > Fedora release to limit search results to? And how does one figure out where > to select kernel or dracut? Those scroll lists are much too difficult to find > anything in,

bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

Is anybody else bothered by the latest BZ changes? Where does one select the Fedora release to limit search results to? And how does one figure out where to select kernel or dracut? Those scroll lists are much too difficult to find anything in, overscrolling nearly always except doing one line at

ppisar pushed to perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose (master). "Build-require namespace::autoclean instead of namespace::clean"

From c71413315e9b25cc9239d8e7009259c2262da45a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:58:25 +0200 Subject: Build-require namespace::autoclean instead of namespace::clean diff --git a/perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose.spec

rawhide report: 20151001 changes

Compose started at Thu Oct 1 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [CableSwig] CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0

psabata uploaded DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-Event-ICal

cc7fc1f939c41c3c6e25b349917fbcdc DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal/DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13.tar.gz/md5/cc7fc1f939c41c3c6e25b349917fbcdc/DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

F-23 Branched report: 20151001 changes

Compose started at Thu Oct 1 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [CableSwig] CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)

Schedule of Fedora 24 published

Hi, let me inform you that schedule of Fedora 24 has been approved by FESCo [1]. You can find the schedule on [2] and [3]. The key dates follows: * Alpha Release Public Availability: 2016-03-01 * Beta Release Public Availability: 2016-04-12 * Final Release Public Availability (GA): 2016-05-17 I

Schedule of Fedora 24 published

Hi, let me inform you that schedule of Fedora 24 has been approved by FESCo [1]. You can find the schedule on [2] and [3]. The key dates follows: * Alpha Release Public Availability: 2016-03-01 * Beta Release Public Availability: 2016-04-12 * Final Release Public Availability (GA): 2016-05-17 I

Re: bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 04:53 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > doesn't any kind of list in SeaMonkey (maybe because of noscript?) Yeah, the fact is that NoScript is incompatible with the Internet... probably that's not how the web should be, but it is how it is For those of us not blocking the

[Bug 1267965] New: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [epel-6]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267965 Bug ID: 1267965 Summary: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [epel-6] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: perl-IPTables-Parse

[Bug 1267962] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267962 Adam Mariš changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1267963

[Bug 1267965] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [epel-6]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267965 --- Comment #1 from Adam Mariš --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure

[Bug 1267964] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [epel-5]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267964 --- Comment #1 from Adam Mariš --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-10-01)

WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston, 21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode. = Topics = * Fedora + CentOS docker images naming conventions Honza -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ppisar pushed to perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom (master). "1.18 bump"

From 1b824429199d2c2c6de35adb56f935e0ac95f891 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:48:07 +0200 Subject: 1.18 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index f7673eb..9e10156 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1

[Bug 1264745] perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.15-6.fc24 FTBFS: t/main.t tests fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264745 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1265951] Upgrade perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom to 1.18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265951 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

ppisar uploaded Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.18.tar.gz for perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom

e9c77458ffd5fdfb9b9f433efc9178de Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.18.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom/Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.18.tar.gz/md5/e9c77458ffd5fdfb9b9f433efc9178de/Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.18.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1267927] New: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267927 Bug ID: 1267927 Summary: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-Event-ICal Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

Dne 1.10.2015 v 10:53 Felix Miata napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch composed on 2015-10-01 04:22 (UTC-0400): > >> Does http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/dracut work for you? > Marginally better than nothing: > > doesn't any kind of list in SeaMonkey (maybe because of noscript?) > tiny gray (painful) text > no

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Event-ICal (f22). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From 8b69fcb2a95b1baed3f25b054fdf35554b3c5e05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 02:33:42 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal.spec

[Bug 1264745] perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.15-6.fc24 FTBFS: t/main.t tests fail

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264745 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1265951] Upgrade perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom to 1.18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265951 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Event-ICal (master). "0.13 bump, documentation enhancements"

From 732eb4186dce591e1463d239ef0017248cdb15d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:52:12 +0200 Subject: 0.13 bump, documentation enhancements diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b8f20c9..c5f1244 100644 --- a/.gitignore

[Bug 1267962] New: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267962 Bug ID: 1267962 Summary: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files Product: Security Response Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security

[Bug 1267963] New: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267963 Bug ID: 1267963 Summary: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: perl-IPTables-Parse

[Bug 1267964] New: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [epel-5]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267964 Bug ID: 1267964 Summary: perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [epel-5] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Component: perl-IPTables-Parse

[Bug 1267963] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267963 --- Comment #1 from Adam Mariš --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure

Broken dependencies: polymake

polymake has broken dependencies in the F-23 tree: On x86_64: polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2 polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:31:13 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: [...] > You do know you should be able to add yourself as co-maintainer and/or > re-take point of contact (If you feel you have time to), right? FWIW, I have re-taken ownership of 4 of my packages, which are ones that I

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > suitesparse (el5) > suitesparse (f21) > suitesparse (f22) > suitesparse (f23) > suitesparse (master) I checked - the package is orphaned, but it does have 3 "administrators" - should I first check if any of them would like to take over

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Event-ICal (f23). "0.13 bump, documentation enhancements"

From 732eb4186dce591e1463d239ef0017248cdb15d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:52:12 +0200 Subject: 0.13 bump, documentation enhancements diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b8f20c9..c5f1244 100644 --- a/.gitignore

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Event-ICal (f22). "0.13 bump, documentation enhancements"

From 732eb4186dce591e1463d239ef0017248cdb15d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:52:12 +0200 Subject: 0.13 bump, documentation enhancements diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index b8f20c9..c5f1244 100644 --- a/.gitignore

psabata pushed to perl-DateTime-Event-ICal (f22). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From 86024840368dc7bdcce619f7578b41804deb6b73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 00:56:51 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild diff --git a/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal.spec b/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal.spec index 8be40da..b5fada5 100644 ---

[Bug 1267927] perl-DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267927 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-792c04de6b -- You are receiving

[Bug 1267927] perl-DateTime-Event-ICal-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267927 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:49:07PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > * linux_logo Huh. Does this always default to Source Mage, or does it have heuristics which are misfiring? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1267963] perl-IPTables-Parse: Use of predictable names for temporary files [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267963 Miloslav Trmač changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

Strange missing dependencies for claws-mail-plugins-geolocation

Hello I'm tring to build claws-mail 3.13.0 with its plugins. After running ./configure I've that the geolocation plugin (the only one), will not build, cause missing dependencies. It claims for champlain-gtk-0.8 (and perhaps clutter-gtk-0.10 too). But they are already installed:

Re: Strange missing dependencies for claws-mail-plugins-geolocation

On 10/01/2015 09:19 AM, Luigi Votta wrote: > Hello I'm tring to build claws-mail 3.13.0 with its plugins. > After running > ./configure > > I've that the geolocation plugin (the only one), will not > build, cause missing dependencies. > > It claims for > champlain-gtk-0.8 > (and perhaps

Re: Strange missing dependencies for claws-mail-plugins-geolocation

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:40:49 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 10/01/2015 09:19 AM, Luigi Votta wrote: > > Hello I'm tring to build claws-mail 3.13.0 with its plugins. > > After running > > ./configure > > > > I've that the geolocation plugin (the only one), will not > >

Re: Strange missing dependencies for claws-mail-plugins-geolocation

On 10/01/2015 10:07 AM, Luigi Votta wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:40:49 -0600 > Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> On 10/01/2015 09:19 AM, Luigi Votta wrote: >>> Hello I'm tring to build claws-mail 3.13.0 with its plugins. >>> After running >>> ./configure >>> >>> I've that the

Re: Strange missing dependencies for claws-mail-plugins-geolocation

On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 17:19 +0200, Luigi Votta wrote: > Hello I'm tring to build claws-mail 3.13.0 with its plugins. > After running > ./configure > > I've that the geolocation plugin (the only one), will not > build, cause missing dependencies. > > It claims for > champlain-gtk-0.8 > (and

comps packagereq items default to "mandatory"

I'm not sure that this is common knowledge as it is not specifically mentioned in either: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups or https://fedorahosted.org/comps/ that the default type for packagereq is "mandatory". As a result I believe that there

XSD on EPEL7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all. I need XSD on EPEL7. Is it possible a build? Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xsd/ Bugzilla request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251682 Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at'

Can't build EPEL 6 package: broken dependencies, Release Enginering ???

See here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11296302 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6309/11296309/root.log -- DEBUG util.py:441: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/dist-6E-epel-build-4130166-530761/root/', 'groupinstall',

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

> Huh. Does this always default to Source Mage, or does it have > heuristics which are misfiring? Neither. The Fedora package is built using `make logos-all`, which means that all available logos are compiled in. The `find` command is used to find the logos, and C code for building a linked list

Re: comps packagereq items default to "mandatory"

Orion Poplawski (or...@cora.nwra.com) said: > Almost none of those appear to be "Mandatory". > > We think this is becoming an issue now because it appears that dnf perhaps now > prevents kickstart installs from removing mandatory packages from the install > set. See

Planned Outage: Server updates/reboots - 2015-10-06 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage: Server updates/reboots - 2015-10-06 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-10-06 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d

Planned Outage: Server updates/reboots - 2015-10-06 21:00 UTC

Planned Outage: Server updates/reboots - 2015-10-06 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-10-06 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d

Minutes from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-10-01)

== #fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-10-01) == Meeting started by hhorak at 17:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available at

Re: Can't build EPEL 6 package: broken dependencies, Release Enginering ???

Yep. I am working on it as I type. Should be fixed in a few here... kevin pgpKxu7oQq4CA.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Planned Outage: fedorainfracloud.org / copr - 2015-10-05 00:00 UTC

Planned Outage: fedorainfracloud.org / copr - 2015-10-05 00:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-10-05 00:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

Hi, On 09/30/2015 09:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer > responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point > of contact on. > > Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of > contact for that

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 at 14:35, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Just to circle around here (in case people don't read my reply to the > FESCo meeting agenda), I'm making the following revised proposal[1] to > FESCo which may or may not be discussed at today's meeting (given that > it was

Fedora Rawhide 20151001 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150930 No images in Rawhide 20150930 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 50 of 52 ID: 4341Test: i386 kde_live default_install ID: 4340Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install@uefi ID: 4339Test:

Re: Can't build EPEL 6 package: broken dependencies, Release Enginering ???

This was fixed a few minutes after my last email. If you still see problems, please file an infrastructure trac ticket. Thanks, kevin pgpUtmyqG4O3C.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:57:43PM +0100, Richard Fearn wrote: > > Huh. Does this always default to Source Mage, or does it have > > heuristics which are misfiring? > > Neither. The Fedora package is built using `make logos-all`, which > means that all available logos are compiled in. The `find`

Fedora 23 Branched 20151001 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150930 No images in 23 Branched 20150930 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 15 of 52 ID: 4393Test: i386 kde_live default_install ID: 4392Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install ID: 4391Test: i386

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

Hi, On Thursday, 01 October 2015 at 00:04, Christian Dersch wrote: > I've taken yasm. I'd like to co-maintain. It's essential for mplayer and ffmpeg over at RPMFusion. Request for commit access submitted. Regards, -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion

RE: bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

> Is anybody else bothered by the latest BZ changes? Where does one select > the > Fedora release to limit search results to? And how does one figure out > where > to select kernel or dracut? Those scroll lists are much too difficult to > find > anything in, overscrolling nearly always except

Re: bugzilla search missing fields; can't find if F21 dracut bug filed lately

On 10/01/2015 02:07 PM, John Florian wrote: >> Is anybody else bothered by the latest BZ changes? Where does one select >> the >> Fedora release to limit search results to? And how does one figure out >> where >> to select kernel or dracut? Those scroll lists are much too difficult to >> find >>

Fedora 23 Branched 20151001 compose check report

No missing expected images. No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150930 No images in 23 Branched 20150930 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 8 of 52 ID: 4409Test: i386 workstation_live default_install ID: 4408Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit ID: 4393

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:01:29PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams have no > > mechanism to build against system libraries '''may''' opt to carry > > bundled libraries, but if they do, they '''must''' include {{{Provides: > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:46:57PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/linux_logo/5.11/10.fc22/data/logs/x86_64/build.log > What about a Fedora logo? We need to ask Fedora Design for a trademark-approved ASCII art version. --

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:38:31PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >bundling out. Second, it demonstrates a case where it'd be better if > >the bundling had been documented, because it would have shown up in a > >query when the security team was working on that vulnerability > > the last part

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 01.10.2015 um 23:27 schrieb Matthew Miller: On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:01:29PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams have no mechanism to build against system libraries '''may''' opt to carry bundled libraries, but if they do,

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/30/2015 06:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:52:48PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: people not declaring their bundles and not care about policies did the same before: not declare it and not ask for exceptions - there is a logical flow in "now that i don't need to ask

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 23:54 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Seems to me, as if today's generation of fedora users and esp. > current > Fedora leaders need to go through the lessons people who had been > using > Linux then were tought the cruel way. I know you always think you're the ONLY ONE

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 10/02/2015 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 23:54 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Seems to me, as if today's generation of fedora users and esp. current Fedora leaders need to go through the lessons people who had been using Linux then were tought the cruel way. I know

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 07:00:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:38:31PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > >bundling out. Second, it demonstrates a case where it'd be better if > > >the bundling had been documented, because it would have shown up in a > > >query when the

[Bug 1266798] perl-Net-SSH2-0.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266798 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1267402] perl-DBD-Pg-3.5.2 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267402 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1267292] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267292 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1236299] perl-Net-Stomp-0.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236299 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1266054] perl-System-Command-1.114 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266054 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1266896] perl-System-Command-1.115 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266896 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/30/2015 05:20 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Ralf Corsepius >wrote: On 09/30/2015 04:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: the opposite is more likely: people trying to avoid the FPC burden now

Re: Orphan Spyder package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/01/2015 03:17 AM, Radek Novacek wrote: > Hi, > > "Spyder is the Scientific PYthon Development EnviRonment" > > I no longer use Spyder, so I'm looking for someone who wants to > take it over. Please, ask for ACLs for it if you would like to

ppisar pushed to perl-Devel-PPPort (f23). "3.32 bump"

From b3fc890288bfde850d08cdf326029be48687ba43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:53:12 +0200 Subject: 3.32 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a70ea7f..109789c 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -3,3

[Bug 1267775] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267775 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1267775] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267775 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d0faad0a4a -- You are receiving this

ppisar pushed to perl-Devel-PPPort (master). "3.32 bump"

From b3fc890288bfde850d08cdf326029be48687ba43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:53:12 +0200 Subject: 3.32 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a70ea7f..109789c 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -3,3

ppisar uploaded Devel-PPPort-3.32.tar.gz for perl-Devel-PPPort

ef35bde9fc410ccf6dea17d7780b1c1a Devel-PPPort-3.32.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Devel-PPPort/Devel-PPPort-3.32.tar.gz/md5/ef35bde9fc410ccf6dea17d7780b1c1a/Devel-PPPort-3.32.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

ppisar pushed to perl-Devel-PPPort (f22). "3.32 bump"

From 3c8a50e11e047e58dbf64a6015f994f5aa3d21ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:53:12 +0200 Subject: 3.32 bump diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index a70ea7f..109789c 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -3,3

[Bug 1267775] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267775 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-e0b5bf8d54 -- You are receiving this

Orphan Spyder package

Hi, "Spyder is the Scientific PYthon Development EnviRonment" I no longer use Spyder, so I'm looking for someone who wants to take it over. Please, ask for ACLs for it if you would like to take it over. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/spyder/ Radek Novacek -- devel mailing

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new Point of Contact

Am 2015-10-01 06:50, schrieb Michael Cronenworth: On 09/30/2015 11:47 PM, Jens Lody wrote: I want to take these theree, but they are still not official orphaned, so I can not take ownership. Should I just wait until the status changed in pkgdb ? Those packages were orphaned but they were

ppisar pushed to perl-Makefile-Parser (master). "Remove build-dependency for disabled auto_install"

From b8ff0b48abae787891ea36c5ce92f4270eb2d590 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:53:43 +0200 Subject: Remove build-dependency for disabled auto_install diff --git a/perl-Makefile-Parser.spec b/perl-Makefile-Parser.spec

[Bug 1267775] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267775 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Devel-PPPort-3.32-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=688890 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1268161] New: perl-DBD-Pg-3.5.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268161 Bug ID: 1268161 Summary: perl-DBD-Pg-3.5.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-Pg Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1268163] New: perl-Gtk3-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268163 Bug ID: 1268163 Summary: perl-Gtk3-0.025 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gtk3 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: berra...@redhat.com

[Bug 1268163] perl-Gtk3-0.025 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268163 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1079304 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1079304=edit [patch] Update to 0.025 (#1268163) -- You are

[Bug 1268161] perl-DBD-Pg-3.5.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268161 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1079302 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1079302=edit [patch] Update to 3.5.3 (#1268161) -- You are

[Bug 1253876] perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.032 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253876 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11299711 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1266798] perl-Net-SSH2-0.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266798 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-SSH2-0.55-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test

[Bug 1266896] perl-System-Command-1.115 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266896 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-System-Command-1.115-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to

[Bug 1236299] perl-Net-Stomp-0.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236299 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Stomp-0.56-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test

  1   2   >