[Bug 1281628] perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90103 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281628 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1279863] perl-Mojolicious-6.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279863 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

eseyman uploaded Mojolicious-6.31.tar.gz for perl-Mojolicious

fe84256d973e8374e48f987d666027dd Mojolicious-6.31.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mojolicious/Mojolicious-6.31.tar.gz/md5/fe84256d973e8374e48f987d666027dd/Mojolicious-6.31.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

[Bug 1279863] perl-Mojolicious-6.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279863 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- eseyman's perl-Mojolicious-6.31-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=699420 -- You are receiving this mail

eseyman uploaded IO-Async-0.69.tar.gz for perl-IO-Async

7585a39460c38e550f2037cc925a0374 IO-Async-0.69.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-IO-Async/IO-Async-0.69.tar.gz/md5/7585a39460c38e550f2037cc925a0374/IO-Async-0.69.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing

eseyman pushed to perl-Mojolicious (master). "Update to 6.31"

From 061204fa7f499c4dd9cad9656034e8b8eef443ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:54:09 +0100 Subject: Update to 6.31 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Mojolicious.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-Valgrind (perl-Test-Valgrind-1.17-1.fc24). "Update to 1.17 (..more)"

From eadd866cad9b474abcc5cc29a3fd71a1db5ff255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:21:47 + Subject: Update to 1.17 - New upstream release 1.17 - The Test::Valgrind tests will now be skipped when the default and user-supplied

pghmcfc uploaded Test-Valgrind-1.17.tar.gz for perl-Test-Valgrind

8ec5e531437ee2567df4d308c5cd5abd Test-Valgrind-1.17.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Valgrind/Test-Valgrind-1.17.tar.gz/md5/8ec5e531437ee2567df4d308c5cd5abd/Test-Valgrind-1.17.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Test-Valgrind (master). "Update to 1.17 (..more)"

From eadd866cad9b474abcc5cc29a3fd71a1db5ff255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 14:21:47 + Subject: Update to 1.17 - New upstream release 1.17 - The Test::Valgrind tests will now be skipped when the default and user-supplied

Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

Il 11/11/2015 03:26, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: Hi, Where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ? [1] says that have been push to stable but upgrading my system, mariadb is downgraded from mariadb-10.0.21 to mariadb-10.0.20 ! [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13442 Other strange case

python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 On i386: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 On armhfp: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi)

Re: python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/15/2015 03:14 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On > x86_64: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = > 0:3.4 On i386: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires > python(abi)

Re: python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

On 11/15/2015 03:14 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 > On i386: > python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 > On armhfp: >

Re: where is mariadb-10.0.21-1.fc23 ?

Am 12.11.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 12.11.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: On Nov 12, 2015 6:39 AM, "Reindl Harald" who says you that a update for F22 would behave identical on F23 or the other direction when half of the OS has different

eseyman pushed to perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki (master). "Update to 0.20"

From fc0e413ecdb480954696c24ef0b3f9e90945eb25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:13:01 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.20 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki.spec | 11 --- sources | 2 +- 3

eseyman pushed to perl-IO-Async (master). "Update to 0.69"

From 4975d65b1804a4438a5a1c3f342a8f825e063325 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:19:48 +0100 Subject: Update to 0.69 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-IO-Async.spec | 5 - sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+),

eseyman pushed to perl-ParseUtil-Domain (master). "Update to 2.422"

From 6404364819e6ea35b39c3e95cf3f72851e37153a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:02:26 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.422 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-ParseUtil-Domain.spec | 17 +++-- sources|

eseyman uploaded ParseUtil-Domain-2.422.tar.gz for perl-ParseUtil-Domain

573455c01f4776b6cc70f518f8f3dadb ParseUtil-Domain-2.422.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-ParseUtil-Domain/ParseUtil-Domain-2.422.tar.gz/md5/573455c01f4776b6cc70f518f8f3dadb/ParseUtil-Domain-2.422.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

eseyman uploaded Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.20.tar.gz for perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki

8cb4d4ac514a34a10209fe43362551b4 Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.20.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Pod-Simple-Wiki/Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.20.tar.gz/md5/8cb4d4ac514a34a10209fe43362551b4/Pod-Simple-Wiki-0.20.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1277067] perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Credential-HTTP-1.016-3.fc24 FTBFS: t/live_app.t test fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277067 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1282192] perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282192 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1094401 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1094401=edit [patch] Update to 0.05 (#1282192) -- You are

[Bug 1282192] New: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282192 Bug ID: 1282192 Summary: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1282192] perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282192 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11848047 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1281985] perl-Test-Strict-0.34 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281985 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

rawhide report: 20151115 changes

Compose started at Sun Nov 15 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [APLpy] python3-APLpy-1.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0

Re: python3-libs and python3-devel both provide libpython3.5m.so.1.0 in rawhide?

- Original Message - > From: "Neal Gompa" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 3:03:01 PM > Subject: python3-libs and python3-devel both provide libpython3.5m.so.1.0 in > rawhide? >

Re: Orphaning Arduino

Ok I will :) On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Peter Oliver < lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Pete V wrote: > > very new to this packaging thing but I do use Arduino myselfI'll be glad to >> take it on :) >> > > Great! See >

Re: python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 18:57:49 + Jonathan Underwood wrote: > I am seeing this same problem with python-importmagic, even though it > seems to have been rebuilt for py 3.5. Have the new builds not been > tagged into rawhide or something? python-importmagic was

Re: How to remove old source file?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 08:01:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Detecting obsolete tarballs is not what git status is for. It should only be > listing files that really need to be added to git (or to the lookaside > cache). It also breaks git clean which is used to clean files. What is the

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 251 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 147 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7 55

Re: How to remove old source file?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> There is also ".gitignore" file which is sometimes unmaintained and huge. > > This is a feature. If you still have old tarballs in your checkout, they > should be ignored as well as the current

Re: What's the current status of mp3-licensing issues?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Haïkel wrote: > Besides, determining when a patent expires is not that easy and Fedora > Legal is backed by skilled lawyers that said the contrary. Unless Fedora > Legal confirms your theory (which I doubt), it's useless to discuss this

Re: Issue with new package in koji?

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > I'm trying to create a new update for the builds of hgsubversion that I > did ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=21326 ) > but whenever I click submit it just pops up a box in the lower right

Re: python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

On 15 November 2015 at 14:25, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 11/15/2015 03:14 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: >> On x86_64: >> python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 >> On i386: >>

Re: How to remove old source file?

Jan Kratochvil wrote: > That's IMO not right because then you have left many old useless .tar.gz > files in that directory and 'git status' does not say they are no longer > used. Detecting obsolete tarballs is not what git status is for. It should only be listing files that really need to be

Re: How to remove old source file?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 08:45:04PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 08:01:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Detecting obsolete tarballs is not what git status is for. It should only > > be > > listing files that really need to be added to git (or to the lookaside > >

Fedora Rawhide 20151115 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Minimal disk raw armhfp Kde disk raw armhfp Cloud disk raw x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151114: Security live x86_64 Lxde live i386 Xfce live x86_64 Games

Review Swap

Hello, anyone interested in doing a package review swap? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276901 cheers PeteV aka (irc: brainspoil) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: How to remove old source file?

Till Maas wrote: > It also breaks git clean which is used to clean files. What is the > reason that making .gitignore append-only would be useful btw? If I don't bother cleaning away the old tarballs, I don't want them to show up as uncommitted files in git-cola (or command-line "git status", I

Re: python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

On 15 November 2015 at 19:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 18:57:49 + > Jonathan Underwood wrote: > >> I am seeing this same problem with python-importmagic, even though it >> seems to have been rebuilt for py 3.5. Have the new

Re: Self Introductory: Brigham Keys, Esq

On Sáb, 2015-11-14 at 22:19 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 01:49:10PM -0600, Brigham Keys, Esq. wrote: > > Hello, > >   My name is Brigham Keys, and I am a software developer from the > > United States. My experience with free software started probably > >

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2015-11-15)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-11-15)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: wayland in rawhide

> hi, > > > Here's one on Ironlake, with two monitors plugged in. > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750610 > > > > still not fixed, doesn't fall back. > Well, black screens obviously aren't good, and we should clearly fix this. > > If we don't get it fixed by closer to release,

[Bug 1282020] perl-PathTools-3.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282020 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1282020] perl-PathTools-3.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282020 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Fixed In

ppisar uploaded Math-BigInt-1.999710.tar.gz for perl-Math-BigInt

23191ddbdd21c19ba8058cfb16ac8a9f Math-BigInt-1.999710.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Math-BigInt/Math-BigInt-1.999710.tar.gz/md5/23191ddbdd21c19ba8058cfb16ac8a9f/Math-BigInt-1.999710.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

ppisar pushed to perl-Math-BigInt (master). "1.999710 bump"

From a1c53ee221dfa8c99e71d129b0914f48709acef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:23:55 +0100 Subject: 1.999710 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Math-BigInt.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1281978] perl-Math-BigInt-1.999710 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281978 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

ppisar uploaded PathTools-3.59.tar.gz for perl-PathTools

f6c07a32c7b219257385d13ac594f3d5 PathTools-3.59.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-PathTools/PathTools-3.59.tar.gz/md5/f6c07a32c7b219257385d13ac594f3d5/PathTools-3.59.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

Re: What's the current status of mp3-licensing issues?

People have moved past vorbis and into the world of Opus. Even MP3 is more for the vast amounts of legacy content - most current content will be AACL. Saying that, as a no-lawyer, it did seem last time that I looked that many remaining patents after September 2015 were for encoding processes, but

Re: What's the current status of mp3-licensing issues?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Naheem Zaffar wrote: > People have moved past vorbis and into the world of Opus. Even MP3 is more > for the vast amounts of legacy content - most current content will be AACL. My understand is that Opus excels at lower bitrates; above

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 757 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 521 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 371

Re: What's the current status of mp3-licensing issues?

Hi, You should have contacted fedora-legal list on that topic. Besides, determining when a patent expires is not that easy and Fedora Legal is backed by skilled lawyers that said the contrary. Unless Fedora Legal confirms your theory (which I doubt), it's useless to discuss this on this list.

Re: How to remove old source file?

Jan Kratochvil wrote: > There is also ".gitignore" file which is sometimes unmaintained and huge. This is a feature. If you still have old tarballs in your checkout, they should be ignored as well as the current ones. There is a reason fedpkg new-sources does NOT remove old entries from

Re: Orphaning Arduino

On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Pete V wrote: very new to this packaging thing but I do use Arduino myselfI'll be glad to take it on :) Great! See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group for how to get sponsored as a packager. -- Peter Oliver -- devel mailing list