Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 10:56 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Hello all, > > I've recently been wondering why we haven't allowed kernel module > packages in Fedora since Fedora 8. I've tried searching through our > wiki and the mailing list, but I haven't come up with any concrete > reasons for why we

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > ZFS cannot be included in the GPL-licensed Linux kernel, because it is > licensed under the GPL-incompatible CDDL Harald, you missed the point. We all understand it cannot be included in the kernel - we're

Re: Packages that remove the egg-info

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/14/2016 02:25 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > During a Package Review I was doing on a python package, Kevin > Kofler joined the conversation to point out that was wrong to > suggest that the python packages should remove the egg-info >

Re: ZFS on linux

Am 14.01.2016 um 20:34 schrieb Gerald B. Cox: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Reindl Harald > wrote: ZFS cannot be included in the GPL-licensed Linux kernel, because it is licensed under the GPL-incompatible CDDL Harald, you

Re: Updating hdf5 to 1.8.16 in rawhide soon

Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Richard, once the hdf5 builds are done, would it be better for your > rebuild to be done in the f24-boost tag with the new Boost, to avoid > building it twice? Works for me. I don't think too many are using it

Re: kmods and Fedora

On 01/14/2016 07:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: Aside from the DNF issue, is there anything else I'm missing in relation to kmods in Fedora? If you have secure boot, you have to go through the process to sign the kernel modules you build and register the key with the boot system. -- devel mailing

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 01/14/2016 07:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> Aside from the DNF issue, is there anything else I'm missing in >> relation to kmods in Fedora? >> > If you have secure boot, you have to go through the process to sign the >

Re: ZFS on linux

Am 14.01.2016 um 19:45 schrieb Bill Nottingham: Bill, your maildomain is burned and the only reason that your mails appear here is there the mailing list is whitelisted based on SPF 1.5 URIBL_SBL_A Contains URL's A record listed in the SBL blocklist [URIs: splat.cc] 1.5 URIBL_SBL Contains

Re: ZFS on linux

I think someone needs to agree to become the maintainer for such a package, correct? Who's willing to do this? I haven't tested ZoL on my UEFI+Secure Boot NUC yet, but my expectation is that this kernel module isn't going to be signed by anything trusted, so it'd fail to load. If that's true,

Re: kmods and Fedora

Am 15.01.2016 um 00:36 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski: If, for example, it simply installed into /lib/modules/VERSION/akmod/path/to/driver.ko, then rpm could be taught to delete /lib/modules/VERSION when the corresponding kernel package goes away (either using a scriptlet in the kernel package or

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Zach Villers wrote: >> Well - If there was to be a plan, it would have to start with RH legal >> making that determination would it not? >> >> Could FESCO or the other

[Bug 1298821] New: perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.13-3.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'removing all bad wine' at t/02-basic.t line 248

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298821 Bug ID: 1298821 Summary: perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.13-3.fc24 FTBFS: Failed test 'removing all bad wine' at t/02-basic.t line 248 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component:

Cannot add dependency job for unit dnf-makecache.timer, ignoring: Unit dnf-makecache.timer is masked

WHO defines that "dependency" and WHY? when i say "mask, i want it refreshed when it is used" than *i mean* that and there is no business to spit my logs on all machines al day long full with "you have masked it" Jan 14 21:30:01 localhost systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit

Re: Call for Fedora 24 Test Days

Hello Adam! I have noticed that the Koji build of the "cloud vagrant libvirt" box[0] found at [1] doesn't boot. The console just says that it's waiting for the disk. I scanned through the page at [1] but I didn't see a section that was specifically dedicated to documenting problems that are

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Samuel Sieb

Re: kmods and Fedora

Am 14.01.2016 um 20:09 schrieb Neal Gompa: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 01/14/2016 07:56 AM,

Re: kmods and Fedora

On Jan 14, 2016 9:34 AM, "Nicolas Chauvet" wrote: > > 2016-01-14 18:05 GMT+01:00 Neal Gompa : >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> > >> > Am 14.01.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Neal Gompa: >> >> >> >> I've recently

Re: ZFS on linux

> On 14 Jan 2016, at 11:39, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 20:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> likely i did much more research than you can even imagine long >>> before >>>

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham > wrote: > >> As a rule, I try not to take legal licensing interpretations from a CTO >> who's trying to sell me the thing they're talking about the

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 14.01.2016 um 19:57 schrieb Gerald B. Cox: >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham > > wrote: >> >> As a rule, I try not to take legal licensing

Packages that remove the egg-info

During a Package Review I was doing on a python package, Kevin Kofler joined the conversation to point out that was wrong to suggest that the python packages should remove the egg-info provided by upstream. I was a little surprised by this so I started to look around and I found a wiki page

Re: ZFS on linux

Am 14.01.2016 um 20:35 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 20:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: likely i did much more research than you can even imagine long before that thread started I find this challenging to believe. i don't care what you believe CDDL is incompatible with

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 20:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> likely i did much more research than you can even imagine long >> before >> that thread started > > I find this challenging to believe. > >> CDDL is

[Bug 1297527] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-API - Accessing Twilio's REST API with Perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- dfateyev's scratch build of perl-WWW-Twilio-API-0.18-2.fc23.denf.src.rpm for rawhide completed

Re: ELF arch question

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:42:48 +0100, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I want BLAS/LAPACK implementations to do something like: > > %if > Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) > %else > Provides: libblas.so.3 > %endif https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/213021.html %if %{__isa_bits} =

[Bug 1297527] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-API - Accessing Twilio's REST API with Perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527 --- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) > Hrm, okay. perl-libwww-perl's packaging in EL6 could be improved, it seems. It would be good, but I doubt they would do it now with rhel6.

Fedora Rawhide 20160114 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160113 Images in Rawhide 20160113 but not this: Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 5 of 66 ID: 3126Test: x86_64 kde_live

Re: ZFS on linux

On 01/14/2016 03:26 PM, Zach Villers wrote: > Now that Debian has added zfs support to their experimental branch; > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/zfs-linux_0.6.4.2-1.html I don't know where you got this information. If a package is in NEW, it is not yet part of Debian. In fact, it means

[389-devel] Re: design review: don't call plugins for retro changelog

On 01/14/2016 09:42 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: We had many issues with the retro changelog plugin. The main reason is that the retro CL is a separate backend and if there is more than one regular backend it is easy to run into deadlocks, eg a change in backend A triggers and ADD in theh RCL,

[389-devel] Re: design review: don't call plugins for retro changelog

On 01/14/2016 04:08 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 01/14/2016 09:42 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: We had many issues with the retro changelog plugin. The main reason is that the retro CL is a separate backend and if there is more than one regular backend it is easy to run into deadlocks, eg a

Re: ELF arch question

On 01/14/2016 07:24 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 16:03 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: rpm flags shared libraries of ELFCLASS64 with '(64bit)' on all architectures except Alpha (which thankfully we don't support). My question is, are ELFCLASS64 libraries always installed in

Re: ELF arch question

Am 14.01.2016 um 15:42 schrieb Orion Poplawski: I want BLAS/LAPACK implementations to do something like: %if Provides: libblas.so.3()(64bit) %else Provides: libblas.so.3 %endif not sure why you think you need to specify that explicitly while rpmbuild does that on it's own, but anyways,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 816 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 581 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 430

spot uploaded Exporter-Lite-0.08.tar.gz for perl-Exporter-Lite

4982e3e96b9536cbce8b1f708eb718a1 Exporter-Lite-0.08.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Exporter-Lite/Exporter-Lite-0.08.tar.gz/md5/4982e3e96b9536cbce8b1f708eb718a1/Exporter-Lite-0.08.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

spot pushed to perl-Exporter-Lite (master). "0.08"

From 6fed537b65e768eef01bc9312a38d20784bb4d9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:05:20 -0500 Subject: 0.08 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Exporter-Lite.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

Re: ZFS on linux

Well - If there was to be a plan, it would have to start with RH legal making that determination would it not? Could FESCO or the other council (sorry it escapes me ATM) take this up as a meeting item? Is it worth presenting for a legal determination? In my mind, if it was approved by legal we

Re: ZFS on linux

Zach Villers writes: > I understand. My thought was, that there seems to be a push to add support > in Debian and Ubuntu. Would it now be possible/make sense to create maybe a > nodebug kernel package based on a stable kernel supported by ZFS and > zfs/spl packages maybe

Re: ZFS on linux

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:07:57PM -0500, Zach Villers wrote: > A - determine with we were going to start building a kernel with nodebug > turned off Why? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

<    1   2