Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On 01/20/2016 08:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I have filed a bug (against gtk3 for now) about this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300432 I still don't know the cause of this issue, I don't think this is gtk3's fault (alone). It's possible to generate similar

Re: review swap: nvme-cli

I'll take it for review. I have two simple reviews if you wouldn't mind:  1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299179 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300158 Thanks, Dennis Chen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part smime.p7s Description:

[389-devel] Please review (take 3): [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch git patch file (master) -- revised following the comments by William in #comment:8

[Bug 1285486] perl-Test-CheckManifest: please update and build epel7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285486 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-CheckManifest-1.29-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1282828] Bump perl-Test-TCP version in epel7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282828 Bug 1282828 depends on bug 1284623, which changed state. Bug 1284623 Summary: perl-Test-SharedFork: update to 0.29 in epel7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284623 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1284623] perl-Test-SharedFork: update to 0.29 in epel7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284623 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-SharedFork-0.35-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1285486] perl-Test-CheckManifest: please update and build epel7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285486 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1284623] perl-Test-SharedFork: update to 0.29 in epel7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284623 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Orphaning lexertl, libpuma, tex-zfuzz, undertaker

I am orphaning a few packages that I no longer use. All of them, except lexertl, are on their latest upstream versions in Rawhide. None of them have any open bugs. Upstream releases are fairly rare for all of these packages. They are: - lexertl: a modular lexical analyzer generator (needed by

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:45:15 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Wouldn't there also be the problem of headers getting clobbered when > you do this? Not generally. Not all projects generate headers to be arch-specific. At least in the C/C++ world, it is much more common for headers to contain

review swap: nvme-cli

I'll gladly trade a simple review for a simple review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298019 It's the command line tool for poking at nvme disks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On 01/21/2016 12:45 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: We don't store libraries and headers in such a way that the different arches can coexist without clobbering. Headers being installed to /usr/include must be multilib capable. I.e. they either must be arch-independent or contain sufficient magic

[Bug 1299287] perl-System-Command-1.117 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299287 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-System-Command-1.117-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1300111] perl-Log-Report-1.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300111 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: bodhi - new update obsoleted an older update that had been submitted for stable

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Luke Macken wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Richard Fearn >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> >> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/763 >> > >>

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1297530] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML - Light and fast TwiML generator

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297530 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML-1.05-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1285518] Review Request: perl-File-Edit-Portable - Read and write files while keeping the original line-endings intact

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285518 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- The package should be updated before submit. The latest version is File-Edit-Portable-1.15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1300290] perl-Module-Build-0.4216 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300290 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1285518] Review Request: perl-File-Edit-Portable - Read and write files while keeping the original line-endings intact

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285518 --- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev --- Sure. I waited for some modules to be populated in EPEL. Now it's done and tested, so I will update/push packages for this module soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:59:01 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:59:01 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > However on the same host if you do: > > > > > > dnf install gtk3-devel.i686 > > > > > > then there's a

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

On 01/20/2016 05:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/20/2016 10:18 AM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: > > Hi, > > > I am currently packaging dnsdist[1][2]. This is a binary that has a > > httpserver built-in, and the html, css and js files embedded in the > > binary. The javascript files are jquery

Changes in F24 schedule - additional one-week slip

Hello, Fedora people, Earlier this month, it was brought to FESCo's attention that when it had made the initial Fedora 24 schedule, it failed to accommodate a necessary mass-rebuild for the GCC 6 compiler. As a result, FESCo decided[2] to slip the release by at least two weeks and by as much as

REMINDER: System V to systemd unit migration

At the FESCo meeting on October 14th [1], it was decided that the time has come to finally complete the migration away from System V init scripts. This email is a reminder about this Change, following the announcement sent by Stephen Gallagher [2]. You might also want to check the list of

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding epel-rpm-macros to the buildroot

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:02:46 -0600 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I've now done many mass rebuilds both with and without epel-rpm-macros > in the buildroot and have found exactly 31 failures which result from > the presence of the macro package. This macro package enables, in

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On 01/20/2016 04:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: If you're on freshly installed Fedora 23 (x86-64), then dnf install gtk3-devel.x86_64 gets you everything you need to compile a simple Gtk3 application[1]. However on the same host if you do: dnf install gtk3-devel.i686 then there's a

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding epel-rpm-macros to the buildroot

> "DG" == Dennis Gilmore writes: DG> When you are ready for the change to be made, please file a ticket DG> with releng, we will need to coordinate a koji and comps change. Yep, that was part of my plan. After committing the tiny fixes needed for those few packages (many

F24 Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AtomicStorageClients Change owner(s): * mmicene Kubernetes provides a mechanism for providing storage to Pods via volumes. Volumes support several underlying storage protocols, but clients are

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding epel-rpm-macros to the buildroot

On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 08:26:13 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:02:46 -0600 > > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > I've now done many mass rebuilds both with and without epel-rpm-macros > > in the buildroot and have found exactly 31 failures which result

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Qua, 2016-01-20 at 17:59 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:32:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > IMO, this is supposed to work => Bug > > > > The big question would be: Where? I bet more in packaging which have some missing %{_isa} dnf repoquery --requires  

Changes in F24 schedule - additional one-week slip

Hello, Fedora people, Earlier this month, it was brought to FESCo's attention that when it had made the initial Fedora 24 schedule, it failed to accommodate a necessary mass-rebuild for the GCC 6 compiler. As a result, FESCo decided[2] to slip the release by at least two weeks and by as much as

Re: COPR repo in mock?

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016, at 08:05 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > There are actually some very real security reasons not to let mock > pull arbitrary configuration files from local directories. It would > provide way, way too much power to the local developer to build > arbitrary chroot cages on the

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:32:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > IMO, this is supposed to work => Bug > > The big question would be: Where? It cannot work as long as gtk3-devel relies on pkgconfig(foo) dependencies instead of arch-specific explicit Requires. -- devel mailing list

jplesnik uploaded Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz for perl-Module-Build

681e174d184087d7e5bf64a338c5e48c Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Module-Build/Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz/md5/681e174d184087d7e5bf64a338c5e48c/Module-Build-0.4216.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

If you're on freshly installed Fedora 23 (x86-64), then dnf install gtk3-devel.x86_64 gets you everything you need to compile a simple Gtk3 application[1]. However on the same host if you do: dnf install gtk3-devel.i686 then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3

Fedora Rawhide 20160120 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160119: Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64 No images in Rawhide 20160119 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 4 of 63 ID: 3484

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:59:25PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:32:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > IMO, this is supposed to work => Bug > > > > The big question would be: Where? > > It cannot work as long as gtk3-devel relies on pkgconfig(foo) dependencies >

Embedding javascript in binary

Hi, I am currently packaging dnsdist[1][2]. This is a binary that has a httpserver built-in, and the html, css and js files embedded in the binary. The javascript files are jquery and a few other known scripts[3], and there is one javascript specific to dnsdist itself[4]. What are the guidelines

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2016 10:18 AM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently packaging dnsdist[1][2]. This is a binary that has a > httpserver built-in, and the html, css and js files embedded in the > binary. The javascript files are jquery and a few

jplesnik pushed to perl-Module-Build (master). "0.4216 bump"

From 68a39743a48b5de59e5ed42cf7f8e818b676db20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:02:46 +0100 Subject: 0.4216 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Module-Build.spec | 18 +- sources| 2 +- 3

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-01-21 17:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2016-01-21 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2016-01-21 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST 2016-01-21 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST 2016-01-21

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

I have filed a bug (against gtk3 for now) about this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300432 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch Note: no need to review this patch

AMD FirePro W4100

I'm looking at upgrading my video setup to support 3 monitors. I had intended to purchase an AMD FirePro V4900, since it is known to "just work" with the open source drivers, but I see that the W4100 is now available at approximately the same price point, with more memory, etc., etc. Has anyone

Python naming guidelines clarification

Hello. I've got several Python packages on review. But I'm not sure if the naming policy applies to the spec file the same way as it applies on the resulting packages. socketIO-client RHBZ #1300092 ripe-atlas-sagan RHBZ #1300217 ripe-atlas-cousteau RHBZ #1300219 ripe-atlas-tools RHBZ #1300222

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > However on the same host if you do: > > dnf install gtk3-devel.i686 > > then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3 > application[2]. There were always missing many %{?_isa} in BuildRequires, I was filing many

The %license property is now supported in EPEL6

Just a note that it EPEL6 no longer requires you to include the definition of %license property; you can use it freely in your %files list as you would in EPEL7 or Fedora. It simply maps to %doc as it would if you had included the magic line noise manually. This works for me in koji; if it

[Bug 1297530] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML - Light and fast TwiML generator

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297530 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1297530] Review Request: perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML - Light and fast TwiML generator

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297530 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-WWW-Twilio-TwiML-1.05-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1294485] perl-Net-GitHub-0.81 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294485 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1297773] perl-Net-GitHub-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297773 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:59:01 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > However on the same host if you do: > > > > dnf install gtk3-devel.i686 > > > > then there's a lot missing before you can compile a 32 bit Gtk3 > > application[2]. >

Re: Python naming guidelines clarification

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:44:50PM +0100, Jan Včelák wrote: > Hello. > > I've got several Python packages on review. But I'm not sure if the > naming policy applies to the spec file the same way as it applies on > the resulting packages. > > socketIO-client RHBZ #1300092 > ripe-atlas-sagan RHBZ

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM Sander Hoentjen wrote: [snip] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript > Yeah I read that, but is says "Please note that this section really only > applies to JavaScript libraries intended for use on the web." so I am > not sure

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48394: lower password history minimum to 1

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48394 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48394/0001-Ticket-48394-lower-password-history-minimum-to-1.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48417

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the review by mreynolds (Thanks!!) -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s

[Bug 1297257] Man pages installed in wrong place

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297257 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Razor-Agent-2.85-21.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1297257] Man pages installed in wrong place

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297257 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

F24 Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Atomic Storage Clients = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AtomicStorageClients Change owner(s): * mmicene Kubernetes provides a mechanism for providing storage to Pods via volumes. Volumes support several underlying storage protocols, but clients are

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1297365] Upgrade perl-Date-Holidays-DE to 1.7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297365 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1297594] perl-Getopt-Lucid-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297594 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1297773] perl-Net-GitHub-0.82 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297773 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-GitHub-0.82-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1294485] perl-Net-GitHub-0.81 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294485 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-GitHub-0.82-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1300111] perl-Log-Report-1.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300111 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1300481] New: perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300481 Bug ID: 1300481 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1300481] perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300481 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1116747 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116747=edit [patch] Update to 6.41 (#1300481) -- You are

[Bug 1300484] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300484 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1116751 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116751=edit [patch] Update to 0.0131 (#1300484) -- You are

[Bug 1300484] New: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300484 Bug ID: 1300484 Summary: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Run-CmdLine Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1300484] perl-Test-Run-CmdLine-0.0131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300484 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12626191 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1300488] perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300488 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12626230 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

Re: bodhi - new update obsoleted an older update that had been submitted for stable

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Richard Fearn wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/763 > > > > You beat me to it :) Thanks for doing that! > > > > And Luke seems to have fixed

[EPEL-devel] EPEL5 mass rebuild (2016-01-20, 179 failures)

I performed a mass build of EPEL5, skipping only a few packages that take absolutely forever to build (libguestfs, thunderbird-lightning, ikarus and pypy). I also skipped rubygem-eventmachine because its test suite hangs forever. Turns out that I should also have skipped

Re: Should 'dnf install gtk3-devel.i686' work?

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:59:01 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:50:03 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > However on the same host if you do: >> > >> > dnf install gtk3-devel.i686 >> > >> >

[Bug 1299287] perl-System-Command-1.117 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299287 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1300481] perl-Mojolicious-6.41 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300481 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12626166 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1300488] New: perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300488 Bug ID: 1300488 Summary: perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-XPath Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1300488] perl-XML-XPath-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300488 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1116756 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116756=edit [patch] Update to 1.25 (#1300488) -- You are

Re: AMD FirePro W4100

On 01/20/2016 01:21 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: I'm looking at upgrading my video setup to support 3 monitors. I had intended to purchase an AMD FirePro V4900, since it is known to "just work" with the open source drivers, but I see that the W4100 is now available at approximately the same price

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report-Optional (master). "1.02 bump"

From e5e1a7d337fe12036fdc9b7dfb7a4c85dd0fb47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:02:19 +0100 Subject: 1.02 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec | 10 -- sources

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report-Optional (f23). "1.02 bump"

From e5e1a7d337fe12036fdc9b7dfb7a4c85dd0fb47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:02:19 +0100 Subject: 1.02 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Log-Report-Optional.spec | 10 -- sources

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ppisar's perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=712489 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1300111] perl-Log-Report-1.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300111 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report (f23). "1.12 bump"

From 1314d38b76bb10432ff73af819778db98d28da98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:21:29 +0100 Subject: 1.12 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Log-Report.spec | 17 ++--- sources | 2 +-

[Bug 1300113] perl-HTML-Parser-3.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300113 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-HTML-Parser-3.72-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=712514 -- You are receiving this mail

jplesnik uploaded XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz for perl-XML-XPath

5eea1e03f4a548b427d9a8cdd13c98be XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-XML-XPath/XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz/md5/5eea1e03f4a548b427d9a8cdd13c98be/XML-XPath-1.24.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel

[Bug 1300129] perl-XML-XPath-1.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300129 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report (master). "1.12 bump"

From c0e477cec0b7c63508b9552069a4d508cdf7ba20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:21:29 +0100 Subject: 1.12 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Log-Report.spec | 17 ++--- sources | 2 +-

ppisar pushed to perl-Log-Report (f22). "1.12 bump"

From 912294e7b9c358419de5e00cfe07874fbb39da5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:21:29 +0100 Subject: 1.12 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Log-Report.spec | 17 ++--- sources | 2 +-

jplesnik pushed to perl-HTML-Parser (master). "3.72 bump"

From b5a5a01631566dd706eae2cda2e7014c4c2a2e8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:55:12 +0100 Subject: 3.72 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-HTML-Parser.spec | 15 +++ sources | 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1295094] perl-Math-PlanePath-122 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295094 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

ppisar uploaded Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz for perl-Log-Report-Optional

4b35c7c2c32004d7d7eeae1286f9927b Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Log-Report-Optional/Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz/md5/4b35c7c2c32004d7d7eeae1286f9927b/Log-Report-Optional-1.02.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[Bug 1300112] perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300112 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Report-Optional-1.02-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-28e25379b1 -- You are receiving

  1   2   >