On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Aug 23, 2016 16:46, "Dusty Mabe" wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this?
We fixed an information leak that
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate Alpha-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
On Aug 23, 2016 16:46, "Dusty Mabe" wrote:
>
>
> I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
> single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
> non-private window.
>
> Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this?
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351821
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48967
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48967/0001-Ticket-48967-passwordMinAge-attribute-doesn-t-limit-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/15/2016 08:31 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
Hi,
I just submitted the 4.6.6 kernel update to stable for F23/F24. Both
4.7.1 and 4.6.7 are expected to be released upstream on Tuesday. 4.6.7
will be the last 4.6.y based kernel for F23/F24. 4.7.1 or 4.7.2 will
be available for testing sometime
On 08/23/2016 04:44 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this?
I just noticed it after reading
I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos
single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a
non-private window.
Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this?
Dusty
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dear EPEL packagers,
is anyone up for a swap review?
Review Request: antlr-python - Python runtime support for
ANTLR-generated parsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189171
This is an addon for the RHEL6 package which is missing python bindings.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 29511 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29511
ID: 29512 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Next-1.16-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
412 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
406 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
337
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Next-1.16-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363866
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-SubCountry-1.66-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363866
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 11/89 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 29413 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29413
ID: 29414 Test: x86_64
Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
We need a compat-pkg for rubygem-listen, I'm afraid… :(
Am 23.08.2016 um 19:45 schrieb gil:
hi
damm i dont know what happen!
$ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L
/home/gil/deps
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPSCO meeting on 2016-08-24 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux Steering COmmittee (EPSCO) has a weekly
meeting to go over concerns and problems in
hi
damm i dont know what happen!
$ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L
/home/gil/deps
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1368851
INFO: --> SRPM url:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:46:07 -0400
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I have to be out due to a family emergency. Can some one take over
> running the meeting this week?
I can do it (and hopefully not get distracted right before meeting
time).
kevin
pgpjtsROwE4sp.pgp
Hi,
Recently I opened a review [1] for a new sphinx theme:
py3doc_enhanced_theme [2]
The upstream name is sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme, so in my opinion,
the the package should be named python-sphinx_py3doc_enhanced_theme.
Furthermore, there's another sphinx theme with underscores in its
name:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Next-1.16-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Next-1.16-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
> "PV" == Petr Viktorin writes:
PV> - Make it standard practice in Fedora to use this data and treat the
PV> spec file as an immutable generated artifact.
If you're saying that any changes which are made to the spec file (say,
by release engineering doing a rebuild or
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48964
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48964/0001-Ticket-48964-cleanAllRUV-changelog-purging-incorrect.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core
On i386:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core
On armhfp:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core
On 08/17/2016 06:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 August 2016 at 19:42, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
It can't track/change BR/R's as RPM is Turing complete and impossible to parse.
Imagine, we have pythonXdist(foo) extracted from PyPI metadata, but in
Fedora we still need to add
A'ighty! Took them… =)
Am 23.08.2016 um 16:37 schrieb gil:
Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto:
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed
change in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
hi
On Mon, Aug 22 2016 at 4:31:57 pm CEST, Viktor Ashirov
wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48965
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48965/0001-Ticket-48965-Fix-generation-of-the-pre-release-versi.patch
Fix building failures using rpm.mk:
Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto:
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change
in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
hi
take:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368844
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351821
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-Python-0.50-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-06afcb36da
--
You are receiving this
From 8a30c3881585448fc2f6a6484ec82510578663d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:13:49 +0200
Subject: 0.50 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Inline-Python.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351821
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jplesnik's perl-Inline-Python-0.50-1.fc26 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=793911
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351821
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change
in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1368851_resolved=1
[2]
From 9b538b241b23d7a92a2c3fab0d118e77870dd478 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:13:49 +0200
Subject: 0.50 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Inline-Python.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
738db8e953bdd994238832a55c6340c9 Inline-Python-0.50.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Inline-Python/Inline-Python-0.50.tar.gz/md5/738db8e953bdd994238832a55c6340c9/Inline-Python-0.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 13:26, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:17:54 +0200
> gil wrote:
>
> > hi
> >
> > tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
> >
> > on arm builder
> > but there is this problem
> >
> >
From 58745d5ed818761d4ab6b6ecd177249df6432d80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:43:00 +0200
Subject: 2.005 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
From eedb7fc96190faabe268d56563b47c6e02921d4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:43:00 +0200
Subject: 2.005 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
0762a0b644d7f6d7774e3b0bd08d602e Config-Model-Itself-2.005.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Config-Model-Itself/Config-Model-Itself-2.005.tar.gz/md5/0762a0b644d7f6d7774e3b0bd08d602e/Config-Model-Itself-2.005.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:59:21 AM CDT gil wrote:
> Il 23/08/2016 00:53, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
> > On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:43:28 AM CDT gil wrote:
> >> hi any idea?
> >
> > Looks like it was a bad timing issue and you should be able to submit the
> > build for an update. if that
From 0ff019a56029d277f198c396d61a951a7c49d98d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:16:51 +0200
Subject: 2.088 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Config-Model.spec | 7 +--
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
From b6240be3030cad7ce38b4208c59883f9b8c3eea7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:16:51 +0200
Subject: 2.088 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Config-Model.spec | 7 +--
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 7
81d35911b3fdad7405fb9d0f8b56953a Config-Model-2.088.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Config-Model/Config-Model-2.088.tar.gz/md5/81d35911b3fdad7405fb9d0f8b56953a/Config-Model-2.088.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366591
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366591
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.90-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
>
> -
>
> The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and
> outdated information was removed.
>
> *
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:17:54 +0200
gil wrote:
> hi
>
> tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
>
> on arm builder
> but there is this problem
>
> net_openhft_ticker_impl_JNIClock.cpp:59:25: error: 'rdtsc' was not
> declared in this scope
rdtsc
On 23/08/16 12:17, gil wrote:
tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
on arm builder
but there is this problem
net_openhft_ticker_impl_JNIClock.cpp:59:25: error: 'rdtsc' was not
declared in this scope
any ideas?
Well rdtsc is an x86 assembly instruction to read
Hi,
Okay, I could install the shellcheck with the Fedora package.
And it works, and it looks nice.
I am going to use those 2 checkers for a while.
Thanks.
Jun Aruga
- Original Message -
> From: "Christopher"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
hi
tried to build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
on arm builder
but there is this problem
net_openhft_ticker_impl_JNIClock.cpp:59:25: error: 'rdtsc' was not
declared in this scope
any ideas?
thanks in advance
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
On 08/23/2016 12:43 AM, gil wrote:
> hi any idea?
The task failed, but the build succeeded.
You shouldn't need to worry about that.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
From 1c9734277a1af5128b25beca42b03dfd96eab0d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:22:35 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.037
- New upstream release 2.037
- Disable OCSP support when Net::SSLeay 1.75..1.77 is used (CPAN RT#116795)
- Fix session
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-IO-Socket-SSL.git/commit/?h=perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.037-1.fc26=1c9734277a1af5128b25beca42b03dfd96eab0d1
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 1c9734277a1af5128b25beca42b03dfd96eab0d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:22:35 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.037
- New upstream release 2.037
- Disable OCSP support when Net::SSLeay 1.75..1.77 is used (CPAN RT#116795)
- Fix session
From 1c9734277a1af5128b25beca42b03dfd96eab0d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:22:35 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.037
- New upstream release 2.037
- Disable OCSP support when Net::SSLeay 1.75..1.77 is used (CPAN RT#116795)
- Fix session
415172849bcc03a1f59ea012233ad127 IO-Socket-SSL-2.037.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/IO-Socket-SSL-2.037.tar.gz/md5/415172849bcc03a1f59ea012233ad127/IO-Socket-SSL-2.037.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Interesting... it still won't give me the drop-down box to be able to
> change it.
> It's weird, because I can change
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308662
> I had assumed it was because of the lack of admin on the older branch, but
> if
63 matches
Mail list logo