This is the patch we have been waiting for!
https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/ticket/45
https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/attachment/ticket/45/0001-Ticket-45-Upgrade-liblfds-to-710.patch
It's a very large change, due to the replacement of the lfds library.
It's overall a huge performance
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 11/92 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160907.n.0):
ID: 33083 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
Greetings.
There's a large amount of space used on fedorapeople.org for group
projects:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/GuestVolGroup00-project 342G 328G 15G 96% /project
This includes /project/repos/ (which is
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 6/92 (x86_64)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160906.n.0):
ID: 32969 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32969
ID: 32970
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
I have developed a workaround for the issue you reported. I am able to
build your package without issue. I have submitted the updated package
to testing and I would welcome any testing. In the meantime I will set
up another complete el5 rebuild to double-check.
Alternately, I could simply
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
From 107ab8bcc4d497df44ab8c0dda33e5f158b01248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:59:19 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.71
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 0.71
-
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:38:11 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 21:48 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:40:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 21:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
From 82bfdbcd1f0b764e81ee118ef83ef55ecb292987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:05:21 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.122
- New upstream release 1.122
- Added $Test::Deep::LeafWrapper to control the behavior of simple values in
the
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Test-Deep.git/commit/?h=perl-Test-Deep-1.122-1.fc26=82bfdbcd1f0b764e81ee118ef83ef55ecb292987
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
From 107ab8bcc4d497df44ab8c0dda33e5f158b01248 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:59:19 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.71
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 0.71
-
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 9:07:12 PM CDT Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Do we (Fedora) offer any shared file storage for a Fedora-related
> project? It's got to store a couple of gigabytes, and allow uploads
> from FAS-authenticated users, perhaps using ssh/scp.
>
> This is for storing the
d0ae3a08db408eb03492824ec75cc0d2 YAML-LibYAML-0.71.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-YAML-LibYAML/YAML-LibYAML-0.71.tar.gz/md5/d0ae3a08db408eb03492824ec75cc0d2/YAML-LibYAML-0.71.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
From 82bfdbcd1f0b764e81ee118ef83ef55ecb292987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:05:21 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.122
- New upstream release 1.122
- Added $Test::Deep::LeafWrapper to control the behavior of simple values in
the
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2016-09-09 16:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets below
From 82bfdbcd1f0b764e81ee118ef83ef55ecb292987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:05:21 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.122
- New upstream release 1.122
- Added $Test::Deep::LeafWrapper to control the behavior of simple values in
the
On 09/08/2016 11:27 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/22/2016 11:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/11/2016 07:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/11/2016 05:16 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote:
Hi!
As some of you may know, nodejs package that is present in
EPEL is pretty outdated. The
d3ccc0289c21175a2990a4927a94d8b5 Test-Deep-1.122.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Deep/Test-Deep-1.122.tar.gz/md5/d3ccc0289c21175a2990a4927a94d8b5/Test-Deep-1.122.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
On 08/22/2016 11:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 07:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 08/11/2016 05:16 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> As some of you may know, nodejs package that is present in
>>> EPEL is pretty outdated. The current v0.10 that we have will
>>> go
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:26:36 -
"Christian Stadelmann" wrote:
> Still not working.
>
> The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing
> "recommends" XML tags is the
> 2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
>
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 11/89 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160907.n.0):
ID: 32805 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/32805
ID: 32821
Something for next weeks meeting. We have a bunch of old packages on
this list which either need to be taken over or pulled.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 8 September 2016 at 07:15
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-09-08)
To:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Christian Stadelmann
wrote:
> So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go into
> repo metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi
> and probably should go into a separate post here
So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go into repo
metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi and
probably should go into a separate post here and on devel-announce too.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Christian Stadelmann
wrote:
> Still not working.
>
> The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML
> tags is the
> 2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
> file,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374295
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
From 919a85a154bdd687c3b02d25b26530571fe90ba7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:30:08 +0200
Subject: 5.34.36.1 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Alien-ROOT.spec | 12 ++--
sources | 2 +-
6ee6c8e4cf283982ceabbf79a310863f Alien-ROOT-v5.34.36.1.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Alien-ROOT/Alien-ROOT-v5.34.36.1.tar.gz/md5/6ee6c8e4cf283982ceabbf79a310863f/Alien-ROOT-v5.34.36.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Still not working.
The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML
tags is the
2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
file, but it just has those tags for 6 packages.
¹ /var/cache/dnf/updates-testing-648243a4cddd356c
--
devel
ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-Alien-ROOT to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374295
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374295
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374295
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1199033
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1199033=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374295
Bug ID: 1374295
Summary: perl-Alien-ROOT-v5.34.36.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Alien-ROOT
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 09/08/2016 01:48 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 08 September 2016 at 13:37, Michal Luscon wrote:
On 09/08/2016 01:05 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
[...]
Given it's the updates system there, at least IMO, needs to be full contingency
plans etc. Sorry, the history of
On Thursday, 08 September 2016 at 13:37, Michal Luscon wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 01:05 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
[...]
> > Given it's the updates system there, at least IMO, needs to be full
> > contingency
> > plans etc. Sorry, the history of the dnf team not breaking stuff even
> > on small bumps
On 09/08/2016 07:05 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>Sounds like this scope would warrant a Change?
>>
>> The components should be already prepared for DNF-2 and the changes
>> are not huge. There's the FESCO ticket [5]. If it is not accepted then
>> we will submit a Change.
On 09/08/2016 01:05 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Sounds like this scope would warrant a Change?
The components should be already prepared for DNF-2 and the changes
are not huge. There's the FESCO ticket [5]. If it is not accepted then
we will submit a Change.
Actually, the preferred
On 09/07/2016 06:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 7 September 2016 at 19:30, Tomas Orsava wrote:
On 09/06/2016 08:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Very interesting, although I see a pragmatic problem with trying to
check for explicitly missing packages only after checking for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374095
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Recently, I updated http-parser from a 2.1 git prerelease snapshot to the
> latest
> stable release 2.7.1 in all supported Fedora branches. I didn't anticipate any
> issues because 1) the soname didn't change and 2)
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
From b681c529acd27d21c9b6c4912884acc46eac8ea5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:09:50 +0200
Subject: 2.45 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-CPAN-FindDependencies.spec | 13 -
sources
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
>>Sounds like this scope would warrant a Change?
>
> The components should be already prepared for DNF-2 and the changes
> are not huge. There's the FESCO ticket [5]. If it is not accepted then
> we will submit a Change.
Actually, the preferred approach would be
7ffdf905f5f8dbb9ac290c42aec88b25 CPAN-FindDependencies-2.45.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/CPAN-FindDependencies-2.45.tar.gz/md5/7ffdf905f5f8dbb9ac290c42aec88b25/CPAN-FindDependencies-2.45.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Recently, I updated http-parser from a 2.1 git prerelease snapshot to the latest
stable release 2.7.1 in all supported Fedora branches. I didn't anticipate any
issues because 1) the soname didn't change and 2) the project upstream uses
semantic versioning, which should imply that 2.7.x should be
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:06:26AM +0200, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> This is a test. The mailing list should not accept e-mails with From: header
> pointing to the mailing list.
>
Even banning the address does not help. I created a Fedora infrastructure bug
report
Kevin, yeah, you are right. It will work as there is no -Release.
Didn't see this before.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> +Obsoletes: evas-generic-loaders <= 1.17.0
>>
>> This is basically wrong because current version is
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, September 8, 2016, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> I wrote:
>> > <= 1.17.0 should still match that, I think (because there's no -Release
>> > in
>> > there), but still, <= Obsoletes are
This is a test. The mailing list should not accept e-mails with From: header
pointing to the mailing list.
-- Petr
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
55 matches
Mail list logo