new packages pending review & approve

Hello there, I have 2 packages under review now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720 Some reviews and updates have been done, and now it has been quiet for some days. Could someone help with the review and approve? Since it's

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-10-27 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2016-10-27 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. rktime): 2016-10-27 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2016-10-27 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2016-10-27

Re: Pondering security update time frames

There are some good thoughts in this thread. A few people have suggested that getting the update process to go faster would really help with these problems, and I agree. Patrick Uiterwijk has recently made quite a few contributions to Bodhi that a) make it more reliable, and b) allow it to gate

Re: [OT] Best Practices: Populating RPM SPEC %defines in basic Ant build management

On 10/26/2016 12:32 PM, Bryan Smith wrote: PREFACE: My apologies as this may be off-topic. But I figured this might be the best set of SMEs to ask this question, especially since I'm drawing a blank from when I had to do this a few years ago. Environment: - Disconnected systems (no or very

Re: %{python3_pkgversion} tag

On 10/26/2016 05:16 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: A proven packager edited one of the python libraries I maintain, to add some useful stuff. Among all the edits he made, there is one in particular that made me write this message. %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}} has been

Re: Firefox 49.0.2

I use e10 all the time. Works fine. --  Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

%{python3_pkgversion} tag

A proven packager edited one of the python libraries I maintain, to add some useful stuff. Among all the edits he made, there is one in particular that made me write this message. %{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{pypi_name}} has been replaced with %{?python_provide:%python_provide

[Bug 1387642] perl-Log-Report-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387642 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1388082] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile-2.055 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388082 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile-2.055-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug

[Bug 1387849] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1388282] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388282 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Proposal to move things from fedora-qa.git to Pagure

Hey folks! So, if no-one has any objections, I'm intending to move the contents of fedora-qa.git from fedorahosted to Pagure. At the same time, I think it'd make sense to split some things out into their own projects. My rough plan is to split out at least check-compose, relvalconsumer and stats

Re: f24 x86_64 :: yumex-dnf SIGSEGV

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > does anyone have any idea about this? is my ram dying? If you suspect a problem with your RAM, you should try testing it with memtest86+ and something like Prime95 before filing a bug report (if there is indeed a

Re: Pondering security update time frames

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370061#c7 -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pondering security update time frames

I guess I must have misread this as all kernels built in koji, not just scratch builds. Ouch. -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1388082] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile-2.055 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388082 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile-2.055-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug

[Bug 1388282] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388282 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1387849] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

review swap

Hello toghether, I have Odoo waiting for review [1]. It is the package for my change proposal for Fedora 26 [2]. Anyone interested to swap reviews? Cheers, Björn [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Odoo

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug in awscli-1.11.0-1.el7

Hi Stephen, today I noticed the bugzilla and entered a bug, thanks. On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 25 October 2016 at 16:32, Ben Smith wrote: > > After an upgrade to the current EPEL awcli, a system I'm working on >

[OT] Best Practices: Populating RPM SPEC %defines in basic Ant build management

PREFACE: My apologies as this may be off-topic. But I figured this might be the best set of SMEs to ask this question, especially since I'm drawing a blank from when I had to do this a few years ago. Environment: - Disconnected systems (no or very limited Internet access) - Apache Ant build

[Bug 1389064] New: EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 Bug ID: 1389064 Summary: EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IPTables-ChainMgr Assignee: m...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1389064] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|

[Bug 1389060] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389060 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|

[Bug 1389064] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 --- Comment #1 from Miloslav Trmač --- I’m afraid I can’t take on that maintenance work. If you wanted to maintain that yourself (or even take over the package completely), I’d be happy to ACK the necessary permissions in

[Bug 1389060] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389060 --- Comment #1 from Miloslav Trmač --- I’m afraid I can’t take on that maintenance work. If you wanted to maintain that yourself (or even take over the package completely), I’d be happy to ACK the necessary permissions in

[Bug 1389060] New: EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389060 Bug ID: 1389060 Summary: EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IPTables-Parse Assignee: m...@redhat.com Reporter:

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS (perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0219-1.fc26). "Update to 3.0219 (..more)"

From 22a87d3f266ace5ad9d92b73c06e7f63f9575d41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:04:31 +0100 Subject: Update to 3.0219 - New upstream release 3.0219 - Work around mingw 4.0 modfl() bug (Perl RT#125924) --- perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS.spec | 6

Fedora Rawhide-20161026.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 12/101 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161025.n.0): ID: 44327 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/44327 ID: 44328

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS (master). "Update to 3.0219 (..more)"

From 22a87d3f266ace5ad9d92b73c06e7f63f9575d41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:04:31 +0100 Subject: Update to 3.0219 - New upstream release 3.0219 - Work around mingw 4.0 modfl() bug (Perl RT#125924) --- perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS.spec | 6

pghmcfc uploaded Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0219.tar.gz for perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS

91ce668c8bf3b6ddc526b4e61f710b2b Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0219.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS/Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0219.tar.gz/md5/91ce668c8bf3b6ddc526b4e61f710b2b/Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0219.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bug in awscli-1.11.0-1.el7

On 25 October 2016 at 16:32, Ben Smith wrote: > After an upgrade to the current EPEL awcli, a system I'm working on broke. > There's a bug with downloading empty files that's been fixed in 1.11.1. We > verified that upgrading to awscli-1.11.2-1.el7 fixes the problem. > >

Re: F26 proposed release tooling changes

kerberos support for Fedora infra would be an amazing step forward. Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat - Original Message - From: "Amanda Carter" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 8:04:40

[Bug 1388082] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-Compile-2.055 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388082 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA

[Bug 1388282] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388282 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1387849] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387849 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: F26 proposed release tooling changes

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > We implemented HTTPS proxying of the Kerberos protocol, based on > MS-KKDCP specification. It is in MIT Kerberos 1.13+. Oh, fantastic! I didn't know that standard, or that MIT Kerberos supported it. - Ken

Fedora 25-20161026.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161025.n.0): ID: 44499 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/44499 ID: 44524 Test: x86_64 universal

Re: reviewing captagent (HOMER / SIPCapture)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Is anybody interested in reviewing captagent? > I was going to take it, but it looks like someone beat me to the punch. -Jared ___ devel mailing list --

Re: scikit-learn in Fedora 25 ?

Jason, thanks, I contacted the package maintainer. Tom On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "TD" == Tom Devel writes: > > TD> I have used scikit-learn in several previous Fedora releases, > TD> however if I look at > TD>

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 07:37:32PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Nope. We have talked about having some kind of fast track, but IMHO, we > should just get the normal process faster. Getting the normal process faster would help in a large number of other areas. Right now, when we have issues in a

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:59:24PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > 1. Updates, even critical security updates, are very slow. Getting an > update out involves creating a build and an update (which is > reasonably fast for most packages), pushing the update to There are two open tickets on

Re: RPM %changelog?

> On 10/25/2016 09:35 PM, David Shea wrote: > > Well then, who exactly should set the RPM standard if not RPM itself? > > FWIW, the change in question occurred in the transition from RPM V3 > packages to V4 packages which involved much more than just file name > storage and RPM still

f24 x86_64 :: yumex-dnf SIGSEGV

Hi! I have a laptop with fedora 24 and today i encountered a strange thing : beside various crashes in kde (apps crashing at logout or shutdown, suspend to ram not working) i tried to use yumex-dnf through ssh -XY and i got a stern : [root@t420 ~]# yumex-dnf Segmentation fault (core dumped)

[EPEL-devel] EPEL-ANNOUNCE Re: New rnapshot build for EPEL is testing

On 18 October 2016 at 06:26, Steven Roberts wrote: > EPEL packages for a new rsnapshot version (1.4.2) have been built and > available in testing. > > There are many bug fixed in this release. From upstream the config file > should be comptabile with the existing 1.3.1

Fedora 25 compose report: 20161026.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-25-20161025.n.0 NEW: Fedora-25-20161026.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 79 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 69.71 KiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On 26 October 2016 at 07:33, Florian Weimer wrote: > For Fedora, I would suggest to replicate the separate security archive with > its push mirrors. The way the Fedora updates repository is updated seems to > cause far more delays than what is lost due to build delays (the

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: RPM %changelog?

On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 09:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > That wouldn't really bother me, so I'm only curious, but why do you > find having a big changelog at the end of the file so annoying? It's > at > the end and you pretty much never have to look at it. Is it just > because it tends to match

Re: Curios - Why python3 is not in critical path?

On martes, 11 de octubre de 2016 10:50:44 AM CDT William Moreno wrote: > Hello! > > Looking at the pkgdb looks like python3 it is not included in the Fedora > critical path: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python3/ >

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 1:33:34 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: > Debian does not build from SCM, but directly from maintainer-uploaded > source packages, so there is no need to have a private SCM. Do we have a good marketing for the fact that we are that "superior" compared to Debian then?

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 2:03:20 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: > > However, extending Koji to support "hidden builds" is certainly a good > > idea. > > Trust me, it's not. Embargoes are against the spirit of Fedora, and a > general hassle for everyone involved. Vague argument, sorry.

ppisar pushed to perl-Term-Chrome (master). "Import"

ppisar pushed to perl-Term-Chrome (master). "Import" http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Term-Chrome.git/commit/?h=master=75ef26c4d9f20b62f522317a27a6d95c6446bde2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Chrome/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Chrome/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Chrome/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Term-Chrome (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Chrome/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 7:37:32 PM CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > 3. AFAIK Fedora has no means by which it can participate in embargoed >> > updates. For this to work, I think there ought to be private git >> >

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On 10/26/2016 01:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: For Fedora, I would suggest to replicate the separate security archive with its push mirrors. The way the Fedora updates repository is updated seems to cause far more delays than what is lost due to build delays (the only part the embargoed builders

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> >> Debian has a completely separate installation of its equivalent to Koji (the >> dak part, the builders are separate from archive

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Debian has a completely separate installation of its equivalent to Koji (the > dak part, the builders are separate from archive management). Nowadays, it's > source code is mostly up-to-date to what the main archive

[389-devel] Please review: Ticket 49018 - Fix runUpgrade compatibility with RHEL 6

Hi team, please review my fix for lib389: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49018 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49018/0001-Fix-runUpgrade-tool-issues.patch Thanks, Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ 389-devel

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On 10/26/2016 12:23 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 7:37:32 PM CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: 3. AFAIK Fedora has no means by which it can participate in embargoed updates. For this to work, I think there ought to be private git branches, a way to get Koji to make a private

Re: RPM %changelog?

On 10/25/2016 09:35 PM, David Shea wrote: Please, no, don't do that. RPM is a standard lol. * The representation of file names in package headers changed in rpm-4.0. * Originally, file names were stored as an array of absolute paths. * In rpm-4.0, file names are stored as separate arrays

ppisar pushed to perl-Params-ValidationCompiler (master). "Break build cycle: perl-Moose ??? perl-DateTime ??? perl-Params-ValidationCompiler"

From 6313c66174aa521f093770a3931dadbaa0456f1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:21:06 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?q?Break=20build=20cycle:=20perl-Moose=20=E2=86=92=20perl-?=

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > If there existed updates-urgent and updates-urgent-testing repositories > for packages like kernel (example: Dirty COW patch-to-testing wait time > was rather long; note that some people cannot install unsigned kernel >

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 7:37:32 PM CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 3. AFAIK Fedora has no means by which it can participate in embargoed > > updates. For this to work, I think there ought to be private git > > branches, a way to get Koji to make a private build from a private git > > branch, and

Re: Firefox 49.0.2

Thanks for pointing it here, I miss that minor update. Btw. a new #BZ at bugzilla.redhat.com would work even better. There are two security bugs marked as "High" which means "Moderate" in Fedora terms. The big ones has "Critical" rating and there's none fixed in this release. AFAIK the main

ppisar pushed to perl-Unicode-Collate (f23). "1.16 bump"

From b1c6b13e4bdd3f1b0a07db1b802c4c7f4696daef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:02:08 +0200 Subject: 1.16 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Unicode-Collate.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +-

ppisar pushed to perl-Unicode-Collate (f24). "1.16 bump"

From 9e4e6de53635b49a63889ccf62adfa22ad377388 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:02:08 +0200 Subject: 1.16 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Unicode-Collate.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +-

[Bug 1388282] perl-Unicode-Collate-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388282 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-Unicode-Collate (f25). "1.16 bump"

From 856686ecc7c5013440dab30b11067ac81fd6d60f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:02:08 +0200 Subject: 1.16 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Unicode-Collate.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +-

ppisar uploaded Unicode-Collate-1.16.tar.gz for perl-Unicode-Collate

95df877960af69fcd4abf1515818b7e5 Unicode-Collate-1.16.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Unicode-Collate/Unicode-Collate-1.16.tar.gz/md5/95df877960af69fcd4abf1515818b7e5/Unicode-Collate-1.16.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing

Re: F25 workstation, and (almost) hidpi displays

- Mail original - De: "Adam Williamson" > Sure, it's arbitrary. Arbitrary doesn't necessarily mean 'bad'. The > 96dpi consensus worked perfectly well: hardware manufacturers knew what > sizes and resolutions to make their monitors That's pretty disingenious. Hardware manufacturers

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Devel-Gladiator/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Devel-Gladiator/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Devel-Gladiator/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Devel-Gladiator (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Devel-Gladiator/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-Is/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-Is/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-Is/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Test-Is (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-Is/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filter-Encoding/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filter-Encoding/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed jplesnik's 'commit' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filter-Encoding/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved'

ppisar changed perl-sig's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Filter-Encoding (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Filter-Encoding/ ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Firefox 49.0.2

> On 10/26/2016 02:45 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > And it seems that Fedora builds do not enable e10s, so the cache leak > might actually affect users. > > Florian i dont think e10s are actually stable enough for users to actually use, but as i said above, i really dont think 49.0.2 warrants

Re: F25 workstation, and (almost) hidpi displays

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:20:30 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 08:30 +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: But, GTK core maintainers have always insisted those didn't exist (just like they insisted on hardcoding 96 dpi, on the eve of Apple

[Bug 1388782] bugzilla rejected automatically generated bug report claiming spam

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388782 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC|emman...@seyman.fr,

[Bug 1388782] New: bugzilla rejected automatically generated bug report claiming spam

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388782 Bug ID: 1388782 Summary: bugzilla rejected automatically generated bug report claiming spam Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: bugzilla Severity: urgent

Re: F25 workstation, and (almost) hidpi displays

On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 08:30 +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > But, GTK core maintainers have always insisted those didn't exist > (just like they insisted on hardcoding 96 dpi, on the eve of Apple > showing the world it was arbitrary and obsolete). ...by releasing displays carefully

[EPEL-devel] Re: Desktop application major update (darktable)

Il 25/10/2016 19:07, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > Well, we need more information (or at least I do): > > * Is 1.x still supported by upstream? No > * is 1.x still supported by anyone else (rhel, other lts distros, > people you could work with on backporting fixes). I don't think so, and I have

Re: F26 proposed release tooling changes

On ti, 25 loka 2016, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On martes, 25 de octubre de 2016 2:42:15 PM CDT Ken Dreyer wrote: Hi Amanda, I'm curious about this change: "Kerberos support in koji, fedpkg, OSBS " Is koji.fedoraproject.org is

Re: F25 workstation, and (almost) hidpi displays

- Mail original - De: "Andrew Lutomirski" > (Projectors are probably a lost cause and perhaps it should be purely > a function of resolution.) Even for projectors it would be rather easy since video organisations (SMPTE, THX, ISF, etc) publish strict guidelines on the optimal viewing