[Bug 1400099] New: perl-Business-ISSN-1.001-3.fc26 FTBFS: Failed test ' Found some modules that didn't show up in PREREQ_PM or *_REQUIRES'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400099 Bug ID: 1400099 Summary: perl-Business-ISSN-1.001-3.fc26 FTBFS: Failed test 'Found some modules that didn't show up in PREREQ_PM or *_REQUIRES' Product: Fedora

Re: state of advanced audio in Fedora

IMHO Jack is a must for professional audio, because of its low latency and connection facility. You should run it with realtime scheduler and high priority, and in F24 there was a problem with systemd not configuring correct limits. I don't know if this problem has been corrected now. 2016-11-29

Re: [HELPWANTED] Building jquery for F24 branch

Dne 30.11.2016 v 02:30 Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM Tom Hughes > wrote: > > On 30/11/16 01:02, Christopher wrote: > > > > > If you're planning to update from 1.11 to 1.12 then I would have > to ask > if that

Re: [HELPWANTED] Building jquery for F24 branch

Dne 30.11.2016 v 02:30 Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:13 PM Tom Hughes > wrote: > > > > If you're planning to update from 1.11 to 1.12 then I would have > to ask > if that is even appropriate in a released version

Re: Nautilus usability

just as a side note, Nautilus usability is greatly improving and i guess i am part of many users who still need a fm and are very happy to see efforts beeing done on this app. Also, files operation popover was a great add on. Sorry for the noise. ___

Re: Nautilus usability

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:16:57 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 11/29/2016 09:08 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > About gnome bugzilla: > > Once I had reported a bug in gnome-software, and it took almost a year for > > someone to respond at all. > > Really? I fixed the bug 2 days after you had

Re: urw-fonts: Versioning Mess

On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 12:14, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > I took over the maintenance of urw-fonts to update them to the latest > version (ghostscript and other packages needs them). However, there are > several problems in versioning of it, and I would like to discuss future >

urw-fonts: Versioning Mess

Hello guys, I took over the maintenance of urw-fonts to update them to the latest version (ghostscript and other packages needs them). However, there are several problems in versioning of it, and I would like to discuss future steps for the package. The current problems: * our urw-fonts are kind

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2016-11-30)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-11-30)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-11-30)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2016-11-30)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (f25). "2.88 bump"

From 601ed785c19c2d5758120aa9e4ab8cb7fd61605e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:48:50 +0100 Subject: 2.88 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Encode.spec | 12 sources | 2 +- 3 files changed,

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (f25). "Delete unused patch"

From 0c167ef013a2db3232079721e82ba4cbc2ebff7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:52:48 +0100 Subject: Delete unused patch --- 86-Fix-panic-when-encoding-undef-scalars.patch | 47 -- 1 file

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (master). "2.88 bump"

From 75e4f5bd22a889a8d292f4d4cb9525a5211a7469 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:48:50 +0100 Subject: 2.88 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Encode.spec | 12 sources | 2 +- 3 files changed,

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (master). "Delete unused patch"

From 1c11c0d5e4076cc7273f8943322e5fc411176bc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:52:48 +0100 Subject: Delete unused patch --- 86-Fix-panic-when-encoding-undef-scalars.patch | 47 -- 1 file

[EPEL-devel] speexdsp update overwrites part of a RHEL 7 package

Hello, a package entered stable that overwrites part of a RHEL 7 package. The bug is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396841 As originally reported, the contributor has not replied in 10 days so I'm reporting the thing here. I would consider this an urgent bug; as it's

Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 02:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 09:38 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > So if this is what you wanted to do (data validation), it might be a good > > idea to have that submitter middleware. > > Yeah, that's really kind of the key 'job' of that

ppisar uploaded Encode-2.88.tar.gz for perl-Encode

119e8668e1d7b128ce39375445526a7e Encode-2.88.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Encode/Encode-2.88.tar.gz/md5/119e8668e1d7b128ce39375445526a7e/Encode-2.88.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 19:41 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote: > > 2. Keep a record of no. of validation test done by a tester and highlight > > it once he login. A badge is being prepared for no. of validation

Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 09:40 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The validator/submitter component would be responsible for watching out > > for new composes and keeping track of tests and 'test environments' (if

<    1   2