Re: F25 updates/updates-testing failures in bodhi

2017-01-26 Thread Bojan Smojver
> f25 updates testing you mean? Yeah. Basically, the testing stuff stalled, so updates are not making it in, which means no testing (apart from a few adventurous folks downloading from koji) etc. -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: F25 updates/updates-testing failures in bodhi

2017-01-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:04:33 +1100 Bojan Smojver wrote: > Anyone understands what's going on with these? Seems like everything > F25 related has been stuck for quite a while now... f25 updates testing you mean? It's the atomic part of the compose failing. Folks are working on it. It's being t

F25 updates/updates-testing failures in bodhi

2017-01-26 Thread Bojan Smojver
Anyone understands what's going on with these? Seems like everything F25 related has been stuck for quite a while now... -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating protobuf to 3.2.0rc2 in rawhide

2017-01-26 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 01/24/2017 08:52 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm updating protobuf to 3.2.0rc2 in rawhide, which includes a soname bump, > and will be rebuilding dependent packages. > This is now almost complete. Failed builds: usbguard - looks to be problems in it not using std:: properly. ola - looks li

pkgconf appears to have broken dynafed builds

2017-01-26 Thread Orion Poplawski
With pkgconf, dynafed fails to build. Configure appears to find things, but needed include dirs do not seem to be added to the build: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6524/17426524/build.log -- Checking for module 'gfal2>=2.1.7' -- Found gfal2, version 2.12.3 cd /builddir/build/

Re: Increasing compatibility with rpm-ostree for host packages

2017-01-26 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 02:03 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> How about you just explain here what it is you want rather than making >> everybody go and read some bug? > > OK, here's a copy of the text: > > rpm-ostree is a new model for rpm pack

Re: Fedora 25 Respin 20170120 compose check report

2017-01-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 11:40 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 1/22 (x86_64) > > ID: 55678 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55678 > > Passed openQA tests: 21/22 (x

Fedora Rawhide-20170125.n.0 compose check report

2017-01-26 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 14/96 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170120.n.0

Fedora 25 Respin 20170120 compose check report

2017-01-26 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/22 (x86_64) ID: 55678 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/55678 Passed openQA tests: 21/22 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-c

Re: polymake blocks system updates by strict Perl dependence

2017-01-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 10:33 +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-01-25, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > https://piuparts.debian.org/doc/README.html > > "PIUPARTS is a tool for testing that packages can be installed,=20 > > upgraded and removed" > > > > In Debian it seems to be a 'big hammer'

Re: polymake blocks system updates by strict Perl dependence

2017-01-26 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2017-01-25, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > https://piuparts.debian.org/doc/README.html > "PIUPARTS is a tool for testing that packages can be installed,=20 > upgraded and removed" > > In Debian it seems to be a 'big hammer' manual tool that has to be run=20 > as root, etc. > Could somethi

Re: How to build both python 2 and 3 bindings from autotools?

2017-01-26 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/26/2017 12:10 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: Before I start hacking up something nasty I figured it's better to ask: how do I build both py2 and py3 bindings from a package using autotools (i.e. AM_PATH_PYTHON)? If these packages aren't too bugged, using 2 separate build trees and setting som

Re: How to build both python 2 and 3 bindings from autotools?

2017-01-26 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 09:10 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Before I start hacking up something nasty I figured it's better to > ask: how > do I build both py2 and py3 bindings from a package using autotools > (i.e. > AM_PATH_PYTHON)?  I think it's better to not use automake's stuff for this and use

Orphaning rubygem-linode

2017-01-26 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, I just updated and fixed rubygem-linode, but since I have no use for this package, I just orphaned it in PkgDb. Feel free to pick it up or let it go away ... Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Re: How to build both python 2 and 3 bindings from autotools?

2017-01-26 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Thursday, January 26, 2017 1:27:00 AM CET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:10:30AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > Before I start hacking up something nasty I figured it's better to ask: how > > do I build both py2 and py3 bindings from a package using autotools (

Re: How to build both python 2 and 3 bindings from autotools?

2017-01-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:10:30AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Before I start hacking up something nasty I figured it's better to ask: how > do I build both py2 and py3 bindings from a package using autotools (i.e. > AM_PATH_PYTHON)? > > So far my idea revolves around installing both python-de

Re: polymake blocks system updates by strict Perl dependence

2017-01-26 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/25/2017 07:22 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:48:33PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: Polymake blocks system updates by strict Perl dependence: polymake-3.0r2-1.fc25.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.24.0 and the new perl package is tagged 4:5.24.1 Thi

F26 Self Contained Change: NetworkManager 1.8

2017-01-26 Thread Jan Kurik
= Proposed Self Contained Change: NetworkManager 1.8 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkManager18 Change owner(s): * Lubomir Rintel Update to NetworkManager to version 1.8. == Detailed Description == NetworkManager 1.8 will include significant changes and improvements: * MACsec