Hello all,
Some of you may have already noticed, but for those who haven't,
livecd-tools and appliance-tools have a new maintainer now. I took
over the Fedora packages and the appliance-tools repository in
December, and formally took over the livecd-tools repository a few
weeks ago.
## New projec
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 43/107 (x86_64), 2/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170309.n.0):
ID: 62515 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://
Hi everyone,
I would like to request admin access to the package Onboard. Onboard is an
onscreen keyboard which I am using on my BayTrail tablet and it works really
well.
The package was orphaned in 2011
(http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/onboard.git/tree/dead.package) because
it failed
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Failed openQA tests: 18/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170309.n.0):
ID: 62341 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62341
ID:
On 03/10/2017 11:59 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 11:51 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> A cmake build test is failing with the jump in rpm from 4.13.0.1-3.fc26
>> >
>> 4.13.0.1-7.fc27
>>
>> The upshot appears to be that an rpm generated by cmake's cpack utility has
>> addi
hi
you should remove all Android implementations from its code
used only in android enviroment
for the moment i don't want upgrade okhttp to the 3 series
regards
.g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837450
Il 10/03/2017 16:44, Martin Gansser ha scritto:
I tried to compile the ne
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 11:51 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> A cmake build test is failing with the jump in rpm from 4.13.0.1-3.fc26
> >
> 4.13.0.1-7.fc27
>
> The upshot appears to be that an rpm generated by cmake's cpack utility has
> additional files in it, e.g.:
>
> /usr/lib/.build-id
>
A cmake build test is failing with the jump in rpm from 4.13.0.1-3.fc26
>
4.13.0.1-7.fc27
The upshot appears to be that an rpm generated by cmake's cpack utility has
additional files in it, e.g.:
/usr/lib/.build-id
/usr/lib/.build-id/5d
/usr/lib/.build-id/5d/a319a6e633c6da1cd98aafe3744ad
I can take it.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:38 AM Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to orphan the netty package in Fedora next week since I no
> longer using it. Please let me know if you are interested in
> maintaining it.
>
> Here is a list of packages that depend on netty (it's probably
I suspect this is due to the configure script from the upstream sources
expecting the location of the header.py to be
/usr/lib64/xulrunner-devel-44.0/sdk/bin/header.py while the Fedora rpm of
xulrunner installs it at a different location, more specifically at
/usr/lib64/xulrunner/header.py [0]
Hi,
I've updated the js package with a fix for the 48-bit VA change [1]
from Jeremy Linton. Lack of the fix broke some other builds during
the mass rebuild that were running for example "xsltproc | elinks" for
generating their docs (eg. pam [2]). So the new js builds are done for
Rawhide and F-26
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-03-10)
===
Meeting started by Rathann at 16:02:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-03-10/fesco.2017-03-10-16.02.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
I try to build the pyxpcom
nope
[root@localhost mythcat]# dnf install xulrunner-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 2:50:44 ago on Fri Mar 10 15:05:41 2017.
Package xulrunner-devel-44.0-9.fc25.x86_64 is already installed, skipping.
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!
maybe is somethi
I tried to compile the new version 3.6.0 of okhttp, itook the rpm spec file
from http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/okhttp.git/tree/okhttp.spec
and changed the version numbering.
my rpm spec file:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/okhttp3/okhttp-3.6.0.spec
But the compilation fails
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-03-10 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
Hi,
I'm going to orphan the netty package in Fedora next week since I no
longer using it. Please let me know if you are interested in
maintaining it.
Here is a list of packages that depend on netty (it's probably
incomplete):
artemis-commons
artemis-core-client
artemis-maven-plugin
artemis-rest
On 03/10/2017 12:23 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 11:41, Marek Skalický wrote:
Hi,
packaging guidelines says that bundling should be avoided if upstream
supports it (build system has this option).
I was dealing with situation with icu. Fedora version diff
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 11:41, Marek Skalický wrote:
> Hi,
> packaging guidelines says that bundling should be avoided if upstream
> supports it (build system has this option).
>
> I was dealing with situation with icu. Fedora version differs from
> bundled versions in packages.
> Because of t
Hi,
packaging guidelines says that bundling should be avoided if upstream
supports it (build system has this option).
I was dealing with situation with icu. Fedora version differs from
bundled versions in packages.
Because of this for mozjs45 some tests are failing, so I had to disable
them. For m
Hi,
that update was made by me. I am really sorry I completely missed soname
change when preparing that update. What I wanted to fix was that ldns
package did not build with OpenSSL 1.1. That would require a change
in opendnssec as well. But would not create conflict that would prevent
installing
20 matches
Mail list logo
