https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
865 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
627 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
209
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
743 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
737 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
627
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 14/126 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170718.n.0):
ID: 122712 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_service_manipulation
URL:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49329
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/22d1ad047ade37f1209125960c213eb9ec1e8acd061cc48832edc93389731697-0001-Issue-49329-Descriptive-error-msg-for-USN-cleanup-ta.patch
Thanks,
___
389-devel mailing list --
Michal Novotny wrote:
> I am no flatpack expert, but I think that really any container technology
> in question should be just a porter of an rpm or set of rpms and there
> should (could) be packaged ansible scripts that are able to setup and
> spawn those containers e.g. in OpenShift or just on a
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 15:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! Heads up: there is a brief openQA outage at present while I
> upgrade the production instance to Fedora 26. Staging was already
> upgraded last week, so there shouldn't be any big problems. Thanks!
Upgrade's done, and all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473467
Bug ID: 1473467
Summary: perl-Nmap-Parser-1.36 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Nmap-Parser
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473468
Bug ID: 1473468
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170720 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473464
Bug ID: 1473464
Summary: perl-HTML-FormHandler-0.40068 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-HTML-FormHandler
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472755
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Richard Hughes wrote:
> Sure they can. If you install the KDE runtime and the GNOME runtime,
> these are both built upon the Freedesktop runtime and share a huge
> number of files. Any duplicate files get deduplicated on disk -- you
> don't even download the duplicates when you update either or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473460
Bug ID: 1473460
Summary: perl-Code-TidyAll-0.62 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Code-TidyAll
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473459
Bug ID: 1473459
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.30 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hey folks! Heads up: there is a brief openQA outage at present while I
upgrade the production instance to Fedora 26. Staging was already
upgraded last week, so there shouldn't be any big problems. Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:43:41PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> The current version is quite old (10.2.7) and I believe that may
> have been built before f27/rawhide was updated to gcc-7.
> 10.2.8, 10.2.9, and 11.x.y do not build due to internal compiler errors.
> 12.1.1 does build at this
On 20/07/17 12:47, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:27:54 -0400 (EDT), John Ellson wrote:
>>
>> This works well for me, upstream, for building and testing across all
>> distributions, but perhaps the .spec file is less optimal when you
>> separately maintain versions for each
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much
> less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help
> maintaining my packages (listed below). If you are
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:43:41PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> The current version is quite old (10.2.7) and I believe that may have been
> built before f27/rawhide was updated to gcc-7.
> 10.2.8, 10.2.9, and 11.x.y do not build due to internal compiler errors.
> 12.1.1 does build at this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473017
--- Comment #4 from Juan Orti ---
IMHO is wrong to configure dcc with /etc as its data dir.
I disagree to change the current ProtectSystem value. I think it's a good
default and the administrator always can override
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473017
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bieringer ---
btw. RPM packaging layout is the same using dcc from here:
https://updates.atomicorp.com/channels/atomic/centos/7/x86_64/RPMS/
dcc-1.3.158-5.el7.art.x86_64.rpm
--
You are receiving
The current version is quite old (10.2.7) and I believe that may have
been built before f27/rawhide was updated to gcc-7.
10.2.8, 10.2.9, and 11.x.y do not build due to internal compiler errors.
12.1.1 does build at this time [1].
I am the package owner.
Thanks,
[1]
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:36:10 -0400 (EDT), John Ellson wrote:
> Specific examples please?
Non-versioned Obsoletes as one example. Arch-independent explicit Requires
as another example.
When is the last time you've run the fedora-review tool on this src.rpm?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473017
Peter Bieringer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@bieringer.de) |
--- Comment
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 11:13 -0700, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 8:05 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 12:56 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> > > [...]
> > Bundling enables some of the key features of Flatpak - the ability to
> > try out new versions of an
On 7/19/2017 8:05 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 12:56 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 20:43, Owen Taylor wrote:
[...]
An example of where conditionals may be useful is when a library is
bundled into a Flatpak - the rebuild for the flatpak
I've limited the upstream .spec to el >= 6 and fc >= 23, and then removed a lot
of conditionals that are no longer needed (with some loss of generality).
Latest upstream spec (pre-configure source) is at:
https://github.com/ellson/graphviz/blob/master/graphviz.spec.in
and the resulting source
On 20/07/17 13:55, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> I rather prefer to have this change in Fedora _now_ in a _planned_
>> release where this can be tested out before the final F27 is released.
>
> I modified the unit
On 07/20/2017 10:00 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2017-07-20 17:04 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski :
>> My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much
>> less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help
>> maintaining my
On 07/20/2017 09:36 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 20 July 2017 at 11:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much
>> less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help
>>
First step is done [0]
[0]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python3.git/commit/?id=5b6a3e0e34f46702773ad1082df3b782c1a8b7ac
Regards,
Charalampos Stratakis
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Coghlan"
To:
2017-07-20 17:04 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski :
> My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much
> less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help
> maintaining my packages (listed below). If you are interested, please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
Bug ID: 1473368
Summary: [abrt] perl-XML-XPath: XML_ParserFree(): perl killed
by signal 6
Product: Fedora
Version: 26
Component: perl-XML-XPath
Assignee:
On 20 July 2017 at 11:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much
> less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help
> maintaining my packages (listed below). If you are interested,
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Orion Poplawski
wrote:
>
> rpms/abi-compliance-checker -- An ABI Compliance Checker ( epel7 el6 )
> rpms/abi-dumper -- Tool to dump ABI of an ELF object containing DWARF debug
> rpms/fail2ban -- Daemon to ban hosts that cause multiple
My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much
less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help
maintaining my packages (listed below). If you are interested, please add
yourself as co-maintainers in pkgdb. Thanks!
Rex Dieter wrote:
> fyi, will be importing qt-5.9.1 into rawhide today. There may be
> temporary periods of inconsistent dependencies while builds are underway,
> but it should be sorted out quickly.
>
> Please let us (kde-sig) know if anything breaks, thanks.
import complete, some builds are
Fedora 26 will get the 4.12.3 stable kernel update sent to
updates-testing in the next couple of days. Shortly afterwards Fedora
25 will get a 4.12 update as well. Fedora 24 will remain on 4.11 until
the end of life.
Thanks,
Justin
___
devel mailing
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:02:09AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> But all of that above is a separate problem. What I'd like to understand is
> why you think existing bugs should be treated differently from new bugs.
> What is the rationale? And if you want to treat them differently, then how?
I
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017, at 08:49 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> As Fedora is going to use (IIRC) Flatpack's in OCI format rather than
> ostree, does it also work with OCI images? Both deduplication on disk,
> and also delta-downloads?
dedup is a tricky topic since we use SELinux;
Thanks, I subscribed to the list a few minutes ago.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Doubtful. It's a maintenance nightmare
OK, but I'm raising this issue to try to get some help on getting a little
closer.
> Tons of defines and conditionals, which toggle almost everything (BR,
> features and subpkgs)
Yes,as a means of stating which feature can be built for which distro. This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465062
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
If i try to update my rawhide test engine i get a gpg key error at
kernel 4.13
"Importing the key has not helped, wrong key?"
From b6f84b3e2cd42046743643e5b0625d8decf30ac7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 15:22:31 +0200
Subject: Comply to packaging guidelines
---
perl-pmtools.spec | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From 93ad8dabaed42fff03d8020d1da4224e3b4b9199 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 15:20:24 +0200
Subject: Adapt to Perl 5.26.0 POD changes
---
perl-pmtools.spec| 8 +++-
pmtools-2.0.0-t_pfcat_5.26.patch
On 18 July 2017 at 20:11, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>> The mailing list x...@lists.fedoraproject.org has been created. Please
>> subscribe to the list if you are interested in
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 17:19 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> /*Richard Hughes*/ wrote on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:24:10 +0100:
> > On 20 July 2017 at 04:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > It's even required. There is no support for unbundling anything beyond the
> > > runtime at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465062
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465429
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
From b9c908898fa66f0a104fddbe46ecbdfc36c87be5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 15:06:26 +0200
Subject: 4.100 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-MooX-Options.spec | 61 +-
sources
From 5a6680fb6fc272187758d42c48ea6fd411cecd77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 15:00:16 +0200
Subject: Enable building on 32-bit platforms since perl is built with
use64bitint
---
perl-Mango.spec | 26
546962d2b6754164fbdb31f07d895df396be6dbc60d2dfcf3de911692546ada12f09fc5643250573fe49b9c4d173e762302ff773a0f9da5c2cdbcd4dff2da4aa
MooX-Options-4.100.tar.gz
/*Colin Walters*/ wrote on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:43:12 -0400:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017, at 02:58 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
But if I've understood correctly, any changes to the base will be discarded
when you update the base image. right?
No; `rpm-ostree install` is persistent, and so are other
/*Richard Hughes*/ wrote on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:24:10 +0100:
On 20 July 2017 at 04:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It's even required. There is no support for unbundling anything beyond the
runtime at all, nor can runtimes share files without duplicating them.
Sure they can.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> > The mailing list x...@lists.fedoraproject.org has been created. Please
> > subscribe to the list if you are interested
On 07/20/2017 01:51 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hello, Jeremy.
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 12:55, Jeremy C wrote:
Hello,
I am wanting to build a copy of Unicenta which is an open source Point of
Sales system. It is currently not in the Fedora repository's. The program uses
a GNU
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:21 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> I rather prefer to have this change in Fedora _now_ in a _planned_
> release where this can be tested out before the final F27 is released.
I modified the unit file on a F26 VPS and I didn't have any problems
PCRE2 upstream released 10.30-RC1, a release candidate for 10.30. This
version will have three major changes:
(1) libpcre2-posix.so library changed ABI and SONAME to
libpcre2-posix.so.2. There is no other user of this library in Fedora's x86_64
repository, thus no mass rebuild is needed. Still
Hello, Jeremy.
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 12:55, Jeremy C wrote:
> Hello,
> I am wanting to build a copy of Unicenta which is an open source Point of
> Sales system. It is currently not in the Fedora repository's. The program
> uses
> a GNU GPL license. I am wondering if it is all OK to run
Hello,
I've receive few emails builds 'Package started to fail in Fedora
rawhide' recently. The reason of this is koschei uses arch_override to 'x86_64
i686 aarch64 ppc64'
Example [1]. Documentation [2] says it can be changed but I don't see
such option in the UI.
I had to disable i686 builds
Hi, I prepared change in spec to store doc files under /usr/share/doc/git
directory and each doc file it is there only once now (earlier, there were some
docfiles multiples times inside various sub-packages). See [0]. In case you
don't
want to change there anything, I will push it to master + F26
On Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:24, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 20 July 2017 at 04:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > It's even required. There is no support for unbundling anything beyond the
> > runtime at all, nor can runtimes share files without duplicating them.
>
> Sure
On 20/07/17 09:46, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 07/20/2017 02:09 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 18/07/17 22:55, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2017 10:03 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
On 18/07/17 17:50, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 07/18/2017 03:55 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> This
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:40:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > these packages (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jonludlam/opam/)
> > > about a year ago and never heard back, so... technically I guess I
> > > could proceed with the non-responsive maintainer policy. But is that
> > >
Hello,
I am wanting to build a copy of Unicenta which is an open source Point of
Sales system. It is currently not in the Fedora repository's. The program uses
a GNU GPL license. I am wondering if it is all OK to run the build?
As you may be able to tell I am new to the whole contributing to
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:27:54 -0400 (EDT), John Ellson wrote:
> Jaroslav Škarvada requested that i move the discussion from:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410366
>
> about unifying the graphviz .spec file with upstream, to this list.
>
>
> Perhaps the unification
From 85ce7827a9f1f4530269189086001e69eb5f771d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:36:50 +0200
Subject: 1.363 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Config-Model-TkUI.spec | 27 ---
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465429
Bug 1465429 depends on bug 1472679, which changed state.
Bug 1472679 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO - Provide
API used in translator modules without translating
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472679
From 98fa27cdec793ace966284769b7c3f5090ea8023 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:25:06 +0200
Subject: Initial import
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO.spec | 56
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473053
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470030
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #5)
> Florian, I guess I should dig into the ppc64 code and see why memcheck is
> not accurately tracking this. But since you recently touched
On 20 July 2017 at 16:12, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> * checking for refleaks means we can't run parallel tests across
>> multiple processes. If we were to move refleak testing out to an
>> integration
From 34222ce61c609deab8240184d458582649a12fcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:19:43 +0200
Subject: 1.004 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed.spec | 5 -
sources
2731728811866bc9978dc074e9f2c37ef1577a7e4f1f34d031b41d42e0b0c6e80ddcecf3c353ceb297021a37cb876efad594f6470984f979413dcd4ce4f31fbc
Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed-1.004.tar.gz
From 92aa664250e7dec5141c008ba7cf047df555ee3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:10:17 +0200
Subject: Release 0.102080 on EPEL7
---
.gitignore | 1 +
dead.package| 2 --
perl-Throwable.spec | 97
098365cb1d7e0ecb90ec0a3074eda779fe58240e0024f5ed6b3f0d713d871ff1282044984635ef49eed55e3a3097110743d9fa844e1351db77b4bcbd3b2255d1
Throwable-0.102080.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473052
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
From cd3e3f9175be7c45621e8a843cf620fabad6e621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:05:13 +0200
Subject: 1.005 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderMaketext.spec | 5 -
sources
From a1486fceafa77f52cc5dcd6977417c25dd8266f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:04:14 +0200
Subject: Release 0.09 on EPEL7
---
.cvsignore | 0
.gitignore | 1 +
Makefile | 21
485e4be93af1bc17d3b3b7441d91cfe554fb34c6d5f9b3d56a242b1f68681e6e5569e32d93a636f59e663ed821cf629ba367a3d78c07c7d28e2dc86e110146ee
Locale-Utils-PlaceholderMaketext-1.005.tar.gz
35000e8cabb6ca4cc0cac53af99fc9cb8ac14b1e71dbfa27dc58a339cb1b54e439064f2241798e351cc5ad297a2f9e4fde870ca97e2eb09a2430c11af589d412
Sub-Override-0.09.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473051
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
From 1e638eff727b4b7a68c6190cde213ca5d100fb66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:51:01 +0200
Subject: 0.006 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderBabelFish.spec | 5 -
sources
04b306310034b7f3090f225f175925604bc0cad73a285b40b6aef122f7695444e5b74422ca613f53754467f232e2149bd61f113fe0b8f25b8de7a923c8658ebe
Locale-Utils-PlaceholderBabelFish-0.006.tar.gz
On 20 July 2017 at 04:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> It's even required. There is no support for unbundling anything beyond the
> runtime at all, nor can runtimes share files without duplicating them.
Sure they can. If you install the KDE runtime and the GNOME runtime,
these
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on
rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO (master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO (master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'commit' permission on
rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO (master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on
rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-MooX-Locale-TextDomain-OO/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
From 98362dbaa3939d3051ad1f61624882a01257ee84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:17:43 +0200
Subject: Initial import
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Tk-FontDialog.spec | 64 +
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog
(master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'commit' permission on rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog
(master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog
(master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog
(master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Tk-FontDialog/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 20.7.2017 08:12, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Nick Coghlan > wrote:
Hi folks,
While working on bootstrapping a new community sclo-python collection,
I ran into some readability problems with the way the
I am no flatpack expert, but I think that really any container technology
in question should be just a porter of an rpm or set of rpms and there
should (could) be packaged ansible scripts that are able to setup and spawn
those containers e.g. in OpenShift or just on a host machine through ssh or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465429
Bug 1465429 depends on bug 1472377, which changed state.
Bug 1472377 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO - Perl
Object-oriented Interface to Uniforum Message Translation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472377
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO (master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on
rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo