On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hello Luya,
>
> I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC,
> SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/
>
> The main patch backports the changes made in 2.0 for WebkitGTK 2.0
> compat
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
> upstream, including many bug fixes, documentation updates, and
> long-standing RFEs. There are some new features, but relatively few
> entirely new fe
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
> are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package
> which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to be hylafax+ package, I
> created bugzilla for
Hi,
/*Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-szmek*/ wrote on Sat, 7 Oct 2017 07:18:59 +:
Two boot-time services provided by the venerable initscripts package:
<...>
- fedora-readonly.service: this is used to mount parts of the filesystem rw
in case the system is using read-only root filesystem. To do a
On 7 October 2017 at 12:31, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual refrain
>> here is that we should *try* new things and have the ability
>> to back them out if they don't work (the latter
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:45:14PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> >> I'm personally very in favor of this; of c
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 79/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171006.n.0):
ID: 153296 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://op
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:45:14PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> >> I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual refrain
> >> here is that we should *try* new thin
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 17/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171006.n.0):
ID: 153431 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Sat, 2017-10-07 at 12:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual ref
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2017-10-07 at 12:31 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual refrain
> > here is that we should *try* new things and have the ab
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual refrain
>> here is that we should *try* new things and have the ability
>> to back them out if they don't work (the la
On 10/07/2017 06:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual refrain
here is that we should *try* new things and have the ability
to back them out if they don't work (the latter bit is what t
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> I'm personally very in favor of this; of course my usual refrain
> here is that we should *try* new things and have the ability
> to back them out if they don't work (the latter bit is what the
> current system doesn't support).
You
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:04:12PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
>> upstream, including many bug fixes, documentation updates, and
>> long-stand
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:04:12PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
> upstream, including many bug fixes, documentation updates, and
> long-standing RFEs. There are some new features, but relatively few
> entire
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Lukas Vrabec wrote:
> On 03/23/2017 01:12 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
>>
>> Greetings. Is https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib
>> the right place to contribute to the Fedora SELinux policy?
>>
>> I added a pull request for a small update needed fo
On vendredi 6 octobre 2017 22:24:01 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro
> >
> > mailto:mike.catanz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth
> >
> > mailto:james.
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017, at 08:14 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Well, my point is that in this case there aren't any big changes, only> some
> relatively minor feature additions. According to the policy,
> "minor" upgrades are OK after beta. The only difference for critical
> path packages
On 7 October 2017 at 13:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 09:19:17AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Although personally I have no specific objections and indeed plan to use
> > the IP accounting stuff on a bunch of units... since we're already past
> > beta, this i
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 09:19:17AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> Although personally I have no specific objections and indeed plan to use
> the IP accounting stuff on a bunch of units... since we're already past
> beta, this is a critical component of the system and it's not got a Change
> on the w
Dear Developpers,
I'm sorry to inform you I orphaned OpenStego package, I can't maintain
it anymore. The software doesn't work in fedora since two updates,
upstream is not able to fix the problem (first report was in 2012
IIRC). It is a very old package and should be retired in six weeks.
Best re
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:51 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>
>> Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>>
>> > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
>> > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package.
>
>
> I don't see a urw-base35-
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 05:49 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>>
>> I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts
>> are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package
>> which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to b
On 6 Oct 2017 16:08, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
wrote:
Hi,
systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
upstream, including many bug fixes, documentation updates, and
long-standing RFEs. There are some new features, but relatively few
entirely new features or changes in
Hi,
Thank you both for starting to clean up the awful mess that URW fonts had
become over time. It had come to the point they were totally unusable by
anything but a few apps that hardcoded them. They were tripping many many users
(countless why *awful things* happen as soon as I try to use one
Two boot-time services provided by the venerable initscripts package:
– fedora-loadmodules.service: this loads kernel modules based on
configuration in /etc/rc.modules. Identical functionality is provided by
systemd-modules-load.service. (systemd-modules-load.service reads
modules-load.d di
27 matches
Mail list logo
