Fedora-Modular 27-20171111.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 19/94 (x86_64), 5/19 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171110.n.1): ID: 168670 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-11-13 blocker review meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for Monday, as there are no proposed Server Final blockers at present. Please yell if you think we will need to run a meeting. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT

[Test-Announce] 2017-11-13 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2017-11-13 # Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's time for another meeting! We've finished with Fedora 27, but not Fedora Modular Server

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171111.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171110.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-2017.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

[Bug 1509642] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509642 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Locale-1.17-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1509252] perl-Class-Container-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509252 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Class-Container-0.13-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1509767] perl-Scope-Upper-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509767 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Scope-Upper-0.30-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1509643] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509643 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.15-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1509739] perl-Lingua-KO-Hangul-Util-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509739 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Lingua-KO-Hangul-Util-0.28-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1509719] perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509719 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.003-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1508409] perl-CGI-4.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508409 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CGI-4.37-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1507463] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507463 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.14-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1507437] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0132 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507437 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-LibXML-2.0132-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1506120] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506120 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-LibXML-2.0132-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1505672] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505672 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.007-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1505673] perl-SNMP-Info-3.38 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505673 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-SNMP-Info-3.38-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1505088] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505088 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1505141] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000082 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505141 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test2-Suite-0.82-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1505135] perl-PAR-Packer-1.040 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505135 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PAR-Packer-1.040-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1505117] perl-App-Cme-1.024 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505117 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-App-Cme-1.024-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1505126] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505126 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171020-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1505087] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1505087 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.40-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1503228] perl-Lingua-Translit-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503228 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Lingua-Translit-0.28-1

[Bug 1503941] perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503941 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Email-Address-XS-1.01-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1504097] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0130 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504097 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-XML-LibXML-2.0130-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1503367] perl-Dancer2-0.205002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503367 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dancer2-0.205002-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1503040] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503040 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test2-Suite-0.80-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1503041] perl-Test-Timer-2.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503041 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Timer-2.04-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On 11/10/2017 10:43 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 09:47:02AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> All that said, I don't see where s390x is involved in the current build. >> The parent task is being handled by buildvm-23, but indeed it seems like >> something has gone wrong. I

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 09:47:02AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > All that said, I don't see where s390x is involved in the current build. > The parent task is being handled by buildvm-23, but indeed it seems like > something has gone wrong. I can try and free that task to another > builder, but that

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171026.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

On 11/10/2017 09:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: ...snip... > > On a bigger note: Do we really want to have a window after branch where > Bodhi isn't active? Might it be better to put that as part of the > Branch step? I don't think we want a longer freeze period (especially > during beta) but we

Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

On 10/11/17 17:38, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Full details are in cap_from_text(3) by the looks of it. Unfortunately, no. None of the fine manuals I located explain the difference between ep and just p flags :( Everyone seems to use +ep blindly, but the Fedora spec only adds p? The

Fedora-Modular 27-20171110.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 18/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386) ID: 168522 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/168522 ID: 168536 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL:

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

On 11/10/2017 06:32 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Christopher > wrote: > > +1000 from me. > > I maintain or co-maintain probably more than 60 packages and I still don't > completely get it. I've read the wiki, I watched the video on

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: And, on a even bigger note, the F27 July-to-October experiment worked reasonably well (with the large remainer of the still-outstanding Modular Server) but I don't think we want to do that again. I'd like to

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On 11/10/2017 07:01 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 06:33:09AM -0800, John Reiser wrote: >> On 11/10/2017 1058Z, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >>> 24 hours and counting ... >>> >>> I talked to someone on #fedora-admin about this and it is caused by >>> Koji having to load

Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

> Full details are in cap_from_text(3) by the looks of it. Unfortunately, no. None of the fine manuals I located explain the difference between ep and just p flags :( Everyone seems to use +ep blindly, but the Fedora spec only adds p? Regards, -- Nicolas mailhot

Re: Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

- Mail original - De: "Jeffrey Ollie" > Instead of setting CAP_NET_RAW on the binary, why not have systemd give the > service the capability at runtime? The blackbox exporter isn't something > that you run from the CLI much anyway is it? Yes that's another solution, I hadn't thought so

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:27:25PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jkurik/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle This looks generally good to me. The one change I would make is to add to "Tue: Primary date from which rest of schedule derives". Make that: Tue: Primary date

Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

On 10/11/17 16:47, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Thanks a lot, I should have thought of it myself, I must be tired today. Is there a difference between setcap cap_net_raw+ep and %caps(cap_net_raw=p) I can't seem to locate a correct setcap or %caps() reference I imagine you want =ep to

Fedora 27-20171110.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 6/137 (x86_64) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171110.n.0): ID: 168421 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/168421 ID

Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

Instead of setting CAP_NET_RAW on the binary, why not have systemd give the service the capability at runtime? The blackbox exporter isn't something that you run from the CLI much anyway is it? Here's what part of my service file looks like: [Service] User=blackbox_exporter

Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

Hi Tom Thanks a lot, I should have thought of it myself, I must be tired today. Is there a difference between setcap cap_net_raw+ep and %caps(cap_net_raw=p) I can't seem to locate a correct setcap or %caps() reference Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171110.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171110.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171110.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

Hi, There is a RPM macro for it. You may find a good example in the spec file of wireshark On November 10, 2017 5:07:28 PM GMT+01:00, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: >Hi, > >I'm building the prometheus blackbox exporter that needs the >CAP_NET_RAW capability to conduct ICMP probes (I don't

Re: Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

On 10/11/17 16:07, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: I'm building the prometheus blackbox exporter that needs the CAP_NET_RAW capability to conduct ICMP probes (I don't want to run it as root) I've done the naïve setcap cap_net_raw+ep

Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

Hi everybody, I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle. The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a review, I would like to ask anyone who is interested for a review and

Adding CAP_NET_RAW to binaries

Hi, I'm building the prometheus blackbox exporter that needs the CAP_NET_RAW capability to conduct ICMP probes (I don't want to run it as root) I've done the naïve setcap cap_net_raw+ep

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 14:39 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 11/08/2017 06:08 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > since there has been some discussion in the last time about > > removing > > libcrypt from glibc in some

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 06:33:09AM -0800, John Reiser wrote: > On 11/10/2017 1058Z, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >24 hours and counting ... > > > >I talked to someone on #fedora-admin about this and it is caused by > >Koji having to load the metadata (files, dependencies etc) of every > >RPM

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-84459b620f -- You are

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-84459b620f -- You are

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-84459b620f -- You are

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-84459b620f -- You are

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-84459b620f -- You are

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f -- You are

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f -- You are

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f -- You are receiving

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f -- You are

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-967e14970f -- You are

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ca4e0dd503 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ca4e0dd503 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ca4e0dd503 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ca4e0dd503 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ca4e0dd503 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e5b17ca891 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45a5cb89a1 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45a5cb89a1 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45a5cb89a1 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45a5cb89a1 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-45a5cb89a1 -- You are receiving this

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 09:12:33AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> > The fedora-release package

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On 11/10/2017 1058Z, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: 24 hours and counting ... I talked to someone on #fedora-admin about this and it is caused by Koji having to load the metadata (files, dependencies etc) of every RPM into its database. Combined with the fact this happens to be running on s390x

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Christopher wrote: > > The biggest concerns/questions I have about modularity are probably not > even the biggest challenges the modularity effort has to overcome. My > concerns/questions are really about "what's my role in this?". I'm

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Kalev Lember > wrote: > > On 11/10/2017 02:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Please just ignore this module nonsense. The more maintainers boycott > it, > >> the less

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora >> > version and changes slowly,

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora > > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for > > systemd units, which change fairly often (a few

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

On 11/10/2017 02:21 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: libxcrypt will be fully binary compatible with software linked against glibc's libcrypt and does not require any rebuilds. However, the converse is not true: programs linked against libxcrypt will not work with glibc's

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 11/10/2017 02:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Please just ignore this module nonsense. The more maintainers boycott it, >> the less likely it is to succeed and produce completely unnecessary extra >> work for you, me

Re: streamlining fedora-release

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for > systemd units, which change fairly often (a few requests per month). Why not have a separate fedora-presets then?

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

On 11/09/2017 02:26 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2017-11-08 11:08, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: since there has been some discussion in the last time about removing libcrypt from glibc in some time [1,2,3,4] and splitting it out into a separate project which can evolve quicker, I'd like to

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

On 11/10/2017 02:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Please just ignore this module nonsense. The more maintainers boycott it, > the less likely it is to succeed and produce completely unnecessary extra > work for you, me and all the other maintainers. Kevin, please stop the trolling and belittling

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

On 11/08/2017 06:08 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hello everyone, since there has been some discussion in the last time about removing libcrypt from glibc in some time [1,2,3,4] and splitting it out into a separate project which can evolve quicker, I'd like to hear your oppinion about

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

Christopher wrote: > Is it necessary for maintainers to create modules for their RPM packages? > Is modularity something that a maintainer for an RPM package must deal > with? Please just ignore this module nonsense. The more maintainers boycott it, the less likely it is to succeed and produce

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > libxcrypt will be fully binary compatible with software linked against > glibc's libcrypt and does not require any rebuilds. However, the > converse is not true: programs linked against libxcrypt will not work > with glibc's libcrypt. It comes with a set of

F28 System Wide Change: time-1.8

= System Wide Change: time-1.8 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/time-1.8 Change owner(s): * Petr A new time tool version 1.8 has changed output format. == Detailed Description == After many years a new 1.8 version of time tool was released. This version brings some noticeable changes:

[Bug 1511916] perl-Log-Agent-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511916 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1511916] perl-Log-Agent-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511916 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Log-Agent-1.003-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1511916] perl-Log-Agent-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511916 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1350452 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1350452=edit [patch] Update to 1.003 (#1511916) -- You are

[Bug 1511916] New: perl-Log-Agent-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511916 Bug ID: 1511916 Summary: perl-Log-Agent-1.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Log-Agent Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1511913] New: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.808 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511913 Bug ID: 1511913 Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.808 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1511913] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-1.808 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511913 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting

Fedora 27-20171110.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 6/137 (x86_64) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171105.n.0): ID: 168248 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/168248

[Bug 1489703] perl-DBD-Multi-1.01-1.fc28 FTBFS: t/ unavailable-server.t fails: DBI connect('dbname=fake;host=192.0.2.1',' fakeuser',...) failed: could not connect to server: Network is unreachable

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489703 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Tagging large packages (texlive) takes a very long time

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:52:19PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:01:44PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23008582 > > > > This has been stuck in the final tagging stage for must be at least 1 > > hour

  1   2   >