Fedora Rawhide-20180117.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 28/129 (x86_64), 11/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180116.n.0): ID: 186693 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/186693 ID: 186694 Test:

[Bug 1392472] root is not built for ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1392478] root is not built for ppc64le

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1533867] perl-Socket-2.026 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533867 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1534083] perl-Socket-2.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534083 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Rawhide 20180117.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20180117.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[Bug 1392478] root is not built for ppc64le

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1392472] root is not built for ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Fedora Rawhide-20180116.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 27/129 (x86_64), 11/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180115.n.0): ID: 186259 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL:

[Bug 1392472] root is not built for ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1392478] root is not built for ppc64le

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1535738] perl-Net-Twitter-4.01043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535738 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Net-Twitter-4.01043-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1535738] perl-Net-Twitter-4.01043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535738 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1382664 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1382664=edit [patch] Update to 4.01043 (#1535738) -- You are

[Bug 1535738] New: perl-Net-Twitter-4.01043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535738 Bug ID: 1535738 Summary: perl-Net-Twitter-4.01043 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Twitter Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1535735] New: perl-MongoDB-v1.8.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535735 Bug ID: 1535735 Summary: perl-MongoDB-v1.8.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MongoDB Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1535729] New: perl-Log-Any-1.705 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535729 Bug ID: 1535729 Summary: perl-Log-Any-1.705 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Log-Any Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Fedora Objective: Fedora Modularization — The Release

I wanted to share with you that the Fedora Council has approved[0] the latest installment of the Modularity Objective during today's meeting. The new Objective is "Fedora Modularization — The Release[1]" and the first "implementation vehicle" is captured in the F28 Addon Modularity Change[2]. As

Re: Status of SWDB (Unified database for DNF)

ohh okz. i guess the real questrion is, will DNF3 be usable before Branching point? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Status of SWDB (Unified database for DNF)

On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 23:08 +, Greg Evenden wrote: > igor as long as DNF3 is working/stable before Beta Freeze im sure > DNF3 can still make it into F28, Christ, no. DNF's behaviour has consequences just about *everywhere* you look in the distro. A major new DNF release needs to be landed

Re: Status of SWDB (Unified database for DNF)

igor as long as DNF3 is working/stable before Beta Freeze im sure DNF3 can still make it into F28, however there does need to be a system-wide change made for it for f28 IMO ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Intent to retire: yaml-cpp03

The only package I am aware of using it was OpenColorIO but the new 1.1.0 release now uses 5.x. Fedora 27: # for lib in "libyaml-cpp.so.0.3" "libyaml-cpp.so.0.3()(64bit)"; do repoquery --source --whatrequires "$lib"; done Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Wed 17 Jan 2018 02:57:49 PM

Re: Self Introduction: Matyas (Mat) Selmeci

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:25:43AM -0600, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > My name is Matyas Selmeci and I work for the Open Science Grid, a > collaboration of ~100 universities and research labs around the US > that share batch computing resources with each other. We've been > developing an RPM-based

[Bug 1522691] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.31

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522691 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Firebird-1.31-1.fc

Re: Self Introduction: Matyas (Mat) Selmeci

Hello Matyas and welcome! - Original Message - > From: "Mátyás Selmeci" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:25:43 PM > Subject: Self Introduction: Matyas (Mat) Selmeci > > Hi

[Bug 1522691] Upgrade perl-DBD-Firebird to 1.31

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522691 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DBD-Firebird-1.31-1.fc

Self Introduction: Matyas (Mat) Selmeci

Hi all, My name is Matyas Selmeci and I work for the Open Science Grid, a collaboration of ~100 universities and research labs around the US that share batch computing resources with each other. We've been developing an RPM-based software stack for our users, some of which are based on EPEL

[389-devel] revised: Ticket 49370 - local password policies are not pulling in the on/off defaults

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/1487a0f5a5664a56a03fc9d685fa66e8effaab30136fbf0f5287c74a3ba6cb99-0001-Ticket-49370-Add-all-the-password-policy-defaults-to.patch On 01/17/2018 08:44 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote: > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49370 > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: libsodium upgrade for EPEL7

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Carl George wrote: > To facilitate packages that require a newer version of libsodium, I have > coordinated an update of libsodium in EPEL7 from version 1.0.5 > (libsodium.so.13) to version 1.0.16 (libsodium.so.23). To avoid any ABI >

[EPEL-devel] libsodium upgrade for EPEL7

To facilitate packages that require a newer version of libsodium, I have coordinated an update of libsodium in EPEL7 from version 1.0.5 (libsodium.so.13) to version 1.0.16 (libsodium.so.23). To avoid any ABI breakage for existing packages, a new libsodium13 compatibility package has been

Re: Exploring the idea of CentOS/RHEL branches in dist-git [was Re: Python3 will be in next major RHEL release, please adjust %if statements accordingly]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 08:18:42AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > - Better Git frontend for CentOS > - Possibility to submit PRs against RHEL branches > - Easy to see changes from RHEL and Fedora (and CentOS). > What are some others? I'd like to see these branches as candidates for inclusion in

[Bug 1392478] root is not built for ppc64le

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2cb0650968 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1392472] root is not built for ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b23b84434f -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1392478] root is not built for ppc64le

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b23b84434f -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1392472] root is not built for ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-cf857aea6b -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1392472] root is not built for ppc64

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392472 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2cb0650968 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1392478] root is not built for ppc64le

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- root-6.12.04-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-cf857aea6b -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Packaging and dependencies

More or less, yes, but you should add the dependent package review requests as blockers to the main package review request. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Packaging and dependencies

Hello, Let's say I want to package a program depending on libraries which are not (yet) part of Fedora. Is the following procedure correct ? 1) Submit a review for the original package, and a review for each dependency. Mention into the reviews how they are linked to the original submission. 2)

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

On 01/09/2018 04:51 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: Initial NOTE: I have made some bigger changes in Ghostscript package during the cleanup, which should be self-contained. In my opinion those changes are not so significant to create "self-contained change" wiki page for it (for F28), but if

Fedora Infrastructure manager change

Hello Fedora developers, I know some of you may not be familiar with me[1] unless you’re also working with CentOS or EPEL, but I’d like to take this opportunity to introduce myself a bit more formally on the list. As of 1 February, I’ll be the reporting manager for the Fedora Infrastructure

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On 01/17/2018 08:47 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > Clearly what we have now is, in practice, not working as intended. The original intent as I understood it from the thread long ago[0] was to reduce the number of updates that go out on non-Tuesdays, and make most updates happen on Tuesdays.

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180101.n.0 changes

On 03/01/18 14:07 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 03/01/18 12:55 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:43:34AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 02/01/18 12:45 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:13:15PM +, Fedora Rawhide

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

Thanks, Kevin. Knowing when the updates are actually going out adds important context to this discussion. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: I don't see how this is helpful. Kevin has a point here. Clearly what we have now is, in practice, not

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 01/09/2018 12:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> If we update a repo for some minor enhancements it means everyone in the >>> world has to pay for that. If we just push all those out every tuesday >>> and don't update those unless there's something urgent

[Bug 1535448] New: perl-Data-Dump-Color-0.240 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535448 Bug ID: 1535448 Summary: perl-Data-Dump-Color-0.240 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Data-Dump-Color Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Python3 will be in next major RHEL release, please adjust %if statements accordingly

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: > Hello, > Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL > 7.6, but with numbers higher than 7. > There are many, many packages with something like the following > > if 0%{?fedora} >%define with_python3 1 >

[Bug 1534083] perl-Socket-2.027 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534083 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Socket-2.027-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cb6a92a511 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1533867] perl-Socket-2.026 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533867 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Socket-2.027-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cb6a92a511 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

On 01/09/2018 04:16 PM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: I'm a bit perplexed by this change. It looks like minor version update, in such case it need no to be announced so widely. On the other hand, you are changing the source. According to the guidelines, changing source requires re-review.

Re: Pulling in rpmfusion appstream data with weak dependencies?

Hi Igor, On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 10:52:50 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > to the rpmfusion appstream data spec files. However, based on my > > understanding of how these things work, this implies that the rpmfusion > > appstream data packages are pulled into a transaction only if the fedora > >

Re: Pulling in rpmfusion appstream data with weak dependencies?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 18:08 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > We're generating appstream data for rpmfusion packages nowadays to > enable users to install packages from there using gnome-software and > friends too. > > Is there a way to

Re: Status of SWDB (Unified database for DNF)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 09:33 +, Eduard Cuba wrote: > Hello, > > SWDB is in DNF upstream since October 19. However, it's not released yet > and it's being reworked due to changes in database design and performance > issues. Also, the

Re: Status of SWDB (Unified database for DNF)

Hello, SWDB is in DNF upstream since October 19. However, it's not released yet and it's being reworked due to changes in database design and performance issues. Also, the GObject-introspection bindings are being dropped and replaced by C++ API with SWIG bindings to match long-term libdnf

F28 Self Contained Change: Chinese Default Fonts to Google Noto

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Chinese Default Fonts to Google Noto = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ChineseDefaultFontsToNoto Change owner(s): * Peng Wu Changes the default fonts for Chinese to Google Noto. == Detailed Description == Changes the default fonts for Chinese to Google

F28 Self Contained Change: Chinese Default Fonts to Google Noto

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Chinese Default Fonts to Google Noto = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ChineseDefaultFontsToNoto Change owner(s): * Peng Wu Changes the default fonts for Chinese to Google Noto. == Detailed Description == Changes the default fonts for Chinese to Google

Fedora Rawhide-20180115.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 12/129 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180114.n.0): ID: 185983 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/185983 ID: 185984 Test: x86_64