Re: Release fedpkg-1.33

On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 13:42 +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > Hi all, > > A new version fedpkg-1.33 is released. > > Changelog > > - Allow running tests against specified rpkg (cqi) > - Fix test due to rpkg uses getpass.getuser (cqi) > - Getting bodhi version works with Python 3 - #213 (cqi) > - Dete

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-05-17 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-05-17 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-05-17 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2018-05-17 1

Release fedpkg-1.33

Hi all, A new version fedpkg-1.33 is released. Changelog - Allow running tests against specified rpkg (cqi) - Fix test due to rpkg uses getpass.getuser (cqi) - Getting bodhi version works with Python 3 - #213 (cqi) - Detect Bodhi client by major version - #204 (cqi) - Allow requesting modular re

Fedora Rawhide-20180516.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 22/137 (x86_64), 10/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180515.n.2): ID: 237853 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/237853 ID: 237866

Need Sponsor: PrestoPalette

Hi All, I wanted to re-introduce myself as well as ask for a sponsor for my package PrestoPalette. Here's the link to the (approved) review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570047 My original introduction email can be found here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/li

soname change - libqalculate.so.17

libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.5.0. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On 16/05/18 23:17, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > I don't think SSSD or FreeIPA *require* it. They offer netgroup > functionality that can be used with it. Maybe I misunderstood your question? > Are

Re: [systemd-devel] Running “telinit u” on glibc update

On Mi, 16.05.18 15:01, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > In Fedora, for historic reasons, we run “/sbin/telinit u” after installing a > new glibc RPM package version. > > Does this still make sense? Should we remove the code which invokes telinit > from the glibc package? So I am pre

Re: Fop fonts issue in a freshly updated Fedora 28+

Hi Peter, On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:05:07PM +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > > Just got a strange issue while generating doc-files from sources with fop: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/763/26980763/build.log > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodEr

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180515.1

On 05/16/2018 02:03 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 28.20180515.1 > Commit(x86_64): > a29367c58417c28e2bd8306c1f438b934df79eba13706e078fe8564d9e0eb32b > Commit(aarch64): > ec501e5a6833e6117632c3a7fc90ef17

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180515.1

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180515.1 Commit(x86_64): a29367c58417c28e2bd8306c1f438b934df79eba13706e078fe8564d9e0eb32b Commit(aarch64): ec501e5a6833e6117632c3a7fc90ef17530399b6411ad9ba2c5c85f22cabe8dd Commit(ppc64le): dfe24e5d495ec16fbe2d61e6b

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Wed, 16 May 2018 20:39:02 +0530 Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. > > How difficult is this ? newbie, sophmore cse student but would like > to give this a shot if this isn't too difficult.Want to start > contributing. I build a custom ker

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 16 May 2018 at 11:09, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: >> Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. > > How difficult is this ? newbie, sophmore cse student but would like to give > this a shot if this isn't too difficult.Want to start contributing. > > It is going to be one of those, y

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180516.n.0 changes

___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 10:48 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:39 PM Hayden Barnes > wrote: > > > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a > > third-party dnf repo? > > Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. BTW : I'd like test dr

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On 05/16/2018 05:02 PM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: Hello people, I would like to know if you know about any service / tool / application that still relies on NIS domain to be set in Fedora? So far, I know only about SSSD/FreeIPA relying on it. Does anybody know anything else? All replies

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On ke, 16 touko 2018, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: Hello people, I would like to know if you know about any service / tool / application that still relies on NIS domain to be set in Fedora? So far, I know only about SSSD/FreeIPA relying on it. Does anybody know anything else? All replies are w

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I don't think SSSD or FreeIPA *require* it. They offer netgroup > functionality that can be used with it. Maybe I misunderstood your > question? Are you just asking which things in the distro interact with NIS > domains at all? > > Perha

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. How difficult is this ? newbie, sophmore cse student but would like to give this a shot if this isn't too difficult.Want to start contributing. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:39 PM Hay

Re: What services / tools still require NIS domain?

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:03 AM David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Hello people, > > I would like to know if you know about any service / tool / application > that still relies on NIS domain to be set in Fedora? > > So far, I know only about SSSD/FreeIPA relying on it. Does anybody know > anything

What services / tools still require NIS domain?

Hello people, I would like to know if you know about any service / tool / application that still relies on NIS domain to be set in Fedora? So far, I know only about SSSD/FreeIPA relying on it. Does anybody know anything else? All replies are welcome. :) Best regards, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] *Ass

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180516.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180516.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:39 PM Hayden Barnes wrote: > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a third-party dnf repo? Yes, if someone wishes to build and maintain that kernel. josh ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor

Re: [Design-team] Testing the wireframes of the Fedora Community App

> > So I tried to add something to the calendar but none of the add to > calendar links are active. So I don't know if I can actually say I > completed the task or not? It's done :) The main thing was *discoverability*. In the actual app, native UI will pop up to add it to Calendar, so we skipped

Re: [Design-team] Testing the wireframes of the Fedora Community App

Hey Abhishek, So I tried to add something to the calendar but none of the add to calendar links are active. So I don't know if I can actually say I completed the task or not? ~m Ar 05/16/2018 08:50 AM, scríobh Abhishek Sharma: Hello Máirín     The 4 tasks this appears to be assigning disapp

Running “telinit u” on glibc update

In Fedora, for historic reasons, we run “/sbin/telinit u” after installing a new glibc RPM package version. Does this still make sense? Should we remove the code which invokes telinit from the glibc package? Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -

Re: [Design-team] Testing the wireframes of the Fedora Community App

Hello Máirín The 4 tasks this appears to be assigning disappear when you get to the > mockups - can you provide the list of tasks so we can have it to reference > as we go through the mockups? > Also I don't see any kind of survey or other method of providing feedback > on each task? How should we

Re: Testing the wireframes of the Fedora Community App

> > > I just wanted to test and stumbled upon a problem: no back or cancel > button. Hi Silvia, Can you let me know which particular screen are you referring to? Perhaps, add a comment here https://www.quant-ux.com/share.html?h=a2aa10albzVO4GPTETM7K8maNo3aObl9zCrhZx3lcvu7ylZRY5xY4eQ98lPy Thank

Re: [Design-team] Testing the wireframes of the Fedora Community App

Hi Abhishek! The 4 tasks this appears to be assigning disappear when you get to the mockups - can you provide the list of tasks so we can have it to reference as we go through the mockups? Also I don't see any kind of survey or other method of providing feedback on each task? How should we go

Re: F28 `dnf update` "Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'"

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:53:10AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On F28, `dnf update` recently started to fail for me with "Error: Failed to > synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'": > > > $ sudo dnf -vv --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=fedora-debuginfo --refresh > > makecache > > Loaded

F28 `dnf update` "Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'"

On F28, `dnf update` recently started to fail for me with "Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'": $ sudo dnf -vv --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=fedora-debuginfo --refresh makecache Loaded plugins: builddep, config-manager, copr, debug, debuginfo-install, download, gen

Re: Testing the wireframes of the Fedora Community App

Hi! I just wanted to test and stumbled upon a problem: no back or cancel button. There should be one in case one changes his/her mind. Kind regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah On 16 May 2018 at 08:52, Abhishek Sharma wrote: > Hello People! > > So we are working on revamping the Fedora Community A

Testing the wireframes of the Fedora Community App

Hello People! So we are working on revamping the Fedora Community App , and after an initial feedback and user testing session, we have an improved wireframe ready for another round of testing. I was wondering if some of you