https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/06/02/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.9-20180601gitb0e0580.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585352
Bug ID: 1585352
Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.57 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Locale-Codes
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585345
Bug ID: 1585345
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.71 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Date-Manip
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Wednesday, 30 May 2018 at 21:31, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> do you mean this selection ?
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/attachments/pagure-acl-selection.png
Yes.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-06-01)
===
Meeting started by dgilmore at 15:00:53 UTC. The full logs are
available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-06-01/fesco.2018-
06-01-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jason L Tibbitts III said:
> > If we're going to patch grub to expand the set of keys it will watch
> > for, is it possible to just expand the set to encompass all keys? We
> > don't really need to make it that hard
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Ken Coar wrote:
> On 05/31/2018 06:06 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
>> wrote:
"CM" == Chris Murphy writes:
>>>
>>> Plus, there's an upside: if you're hammering F11 or F8 or F12 or Esc or
>>> whatever to
Hans de Goede writes:
> 1) . . ., no way to get to the menu
I think this steps over a line we should not cross.
There's a huge difference between HIDING grub's functionality, and
essentially DISABLING it. While I'm opposted to hiding the grub menu in
general, as long as there's some obvious
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Hans de Goede said:
>> On 31-05-18 15:08, Chris Adams wrote:
>> >Once upon a time, Hans de Goede said:
>> >>And for F30, single OS install we get:
>> >>
>> >>1) grub menu not shown, 0 second timeout, no way to get to the
On 06/01/2018 02:44 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> The e-mail address associated with Namratha Kothapalli (nkothapa) is no
> longer valid. Does anybody know how to contact Namratha?
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1893
___
devel mailing list --
On 06/01/2018 02:39 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> First of all I want to thank everyone for their input.
>>
>> I also want to make clear that the hide the menu +
>> not listening for a keypress at all (aka fastboot) is a
>>
The e-mail address associated with Namratha Kothapalli (nkothapa) is no
longer valid. Does anybody know how to contact Namratha?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> First of all I want to thank everyone for their input.
>
> I also want to make clear that the hide the menu +
> not listening for a keypress at all (aka fastboot) is a
> Fedora 30 thing, quoting myself:
>
> "For F29, single OS
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
Yeah if you add the gnutls-glib-networking.config file in the RPM,
that
defeats the point IMHO, as it'll never fallback to use @SYSTEM if this
file always exists with @GLIBNETWORKING defined in it.
The idea of the mechanism was that
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 09:08:28AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
>> > end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
>> > to the graphical login manager without
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:35 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:25:41PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >When I try to fork rpms/thrift, I get the error message:Â Repo
> >"forks/ctubbsii/thrift" already exists.
> >
> >However, it clearly does not exist. It is not
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:47:36PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31-05-18 15:20, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > On 05/31/2018 06:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > ...
> > > This will basically get us back the F28 behavior of showing the
> > > menu but only after a failed boot, I think that
> "TK" == Tomas Kovar writes:
TK> - this one is on the polish side of things:
[don't keep bouncing to text mode]
I might also add that as part of this, we'd also need to get rid of the
very early message about EFI secure boot being enabled. Then we'd be
left only with the random kernel
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 11:49:51AM -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> > IIUC, glib-networking uses GNUTLS. If so, a while ago I added ability
> > to
> > specify an ordered list of named priority aliases to GNUTLS that might
> >
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
IIUC, glib-networking uses GNUTLS. If so, a while ago I added
ability to
specify an ordered list of named priority aliases to GNUTLS that
might handle
the kind of scenario you describe.
Michael Watters wrote:
> What about users that don't use a graphical login manager? Personally I
> *like* seeing boot messages so that I know what is going on.
>
> Having the menu available is also quite useful for booting into rescue
> mode or selecting a different kernel.
Note, this is all
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:23:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
> end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
> to the graphical login manager without him seeing any
> text messages / menus filled with
Well said. Seems like Fedora is slowly turning into Fisher Price My
First Linux instead of being a distro that actually respects its users.
IME people that run Fedora usually know what they're doing and trying to
obfuscate and hide things simply makes the distro *harder* to use.
On 06/01/2018
What about users that don't use a graphical login manager? Personally I
*like* seeing boot messages so that I know what is going on.
Having the menu available is also quite useful for booting into rescue
mode or selecting a different kernel.
On 05/31/2018 06:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:25:42AM -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> > What is the availibility of TLS 1.2 vs 1.1/1.0 on the internet ?
> > ie how likely is this to break the ability of users to access websites
> > they care about ?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
What is the availibility of TLS 1.2 vs 1.1/1.0 on the internet ?
ie how likely is this to break the ability of users to access websites
they care about ?
Yeah... this has been discussed on this list before. If this change is
made,
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Martin Stransky
wrote:
Okay and can I apply somewhere for that?
You could apply by creating an issue here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issues
Still, I'm not likely to vote in favor, myself. If you're not satisifed
with adding a new action to the
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-06-01 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below
On 06/01/2018 10:29 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> So the menu could look something like
>
> -
> Fedora
> Recovery options
> |`- Fedora (older kernel, 4.13.0-103)
> |`- Fedora (older kernel, 4.14.5-300)
> |`- Fedora (older
On 06/01/2018 04:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> For F30, single OS Fedora Workstation install install we get:
>
> 1) grub menu not shown, 0 second timeout, no way to get to the menu
^
This scares me and I would not like to see
On 06/01/2018 05:06 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> It is irony, that people, who are capable to get into the grub menu if
> they need, complain about it being hidden. So to say, I am 100% for
> hiding the grub menu, speeding up the boot process, and if need it, I'll
> find a way to get it.
I fail to
On 31/05/18 12:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working on improving the Fedora boot experience, with the
> end goal being a user pressing the on button and then going
> to the graphical login manager without him seeing any
> text messages / menus filled with technical jargon.
Making
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2018-05-25-15.03.html
Full log:
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2018-05-25-15.03.log.html
Meeting summary
init process (maxamillion, 15:03:16)
Follow Ups (maxamillion, 15:04:27)
#1890 updating the
Dne 1.6.2018 v 15:51 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
Hi,
On 01-06-18 15:26, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Hans de Goede said:
For F30, single OS Fedora Workstation install install we get:
1) grub menu not shown, 0 second timeout, no way to get to the menu
What I haven't seen answered is
On 05/31/2018 07:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Well, to unpack a bit: "let's just slap a choice in the installer!" is
> almost never the right answer.
I consider myself n00b-slapped. My only defence is my ignorance
of discussions in this area. Point taken. :-)
--
#kenB-|}
Ken, Baron
On 05/31/2018 06:06 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
>>> "CM" == Chris Murphy writes:
>>
>> Plus, there's an upside: if you're hammering F11 or F8 or F12 or Esc or
>> whatever to try and get into the BIOS, and you miss it, then at
Hi,
On 01-06-18 15:26, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Hans de Goede said:
For F30, single OS Fedora Workstation install install we get:
1) grub menu not shown, 0 second timeout, no way to get to the menu
What I haven't seen answered is this: what do we really gain from this?
Your
Once upon a time, Hans de Goede said:
> For F30, single OS Fedora Workstation install install we get:
>
> 1) grub menu not shown, 0 second timeout, no way to get to the menu
What I haven't seen answered is this: what do we really gain from this?
Your initial message said that the EFI firmware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584662
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584611
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-LibIDN2-1.00-4.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 01:40:58PM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
>
>
> Owner(s):
> * Tomáš Mráz
>
>
> We update the current system-wide crypto policy to further
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585179
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
This needs perl(PPIx::QuoteLike), not yet in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 00:39 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Martin Stransky wrote:
> > The Wayland backend is available as an extra desktop entry.
>
> We try hard to avoid messy menus with duplicate entries, and you get away
> with adding an extra desktop entry to an application installed by
On 06/01/2018 02:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
We try hard to avoid messy menus with duplicate entries, and you get away
with adding an extra desktop entry to an application installed by
default on
almost all Spins, for an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585179
Bug ID: 1585179
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-1.132 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Perl-Critic
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580998
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPANPLUS-0.917.400-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581511
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MongoDB-1.8.2-1.fc27.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585175
Bug ID: 1585175
Summary: perl-Log-Report-1.27 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Log-Report
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580998
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPANPLUS-0.917.400-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581511
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MongoDB-1.8.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584611
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
= Proposed System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
Owner(s):
* Tomáš Mráz
We update the current system-wide crypto policy to further disable
legacy cryptographic protocols (TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1) and weak
= Proposed System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
Owner(s):
* Tomáš Mráz
We update the current system-wide crypto policy to further disable
legacy cryptographic protocols (TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1) and weak
Hi,
On 01-06-18 11:54, Tomas Kovar wrote:
Hi all,
I have two suggestions:
- on UEFI systems, would it be possible to use an EFI variable to force grub
menu? That way, it would be possible to enter the menu from UEFI boot loader or
shell, even if the system itself is in non-working state or
Hi,
I would like to open discussion about Copr retention policy change.
Right now we have:
> How long do you keep the builds? ¶
> We keep the last successful build from each package indefinitely. All other
> builds (old packages, failed builds) are
deleted after 14 days.
This means that we
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 02:19:48AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>
>> the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has
>> just started. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1] and
>> Mindshare [2].
>> You can vote
Please let me remind we have opened Voting to Fedora Council [1] and
Mindshare Committee [2]. You can vote till June 6th, 2018 when the
voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC.
On Community blog [3] you can also find interviews with all the
candidates. Please have a look at it.
[1]
Hi all,
I have two suggestions:
- on UEFI systems, would it be possible to use an EFI variable to force grub
menu? That way, it would be possible to enter the menu from UEFI boot loader or
shell, even if the system itself is in non-working state or on read-only device.
- this one is on the
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:25:41PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
>When I try to fork rpms/thrift, I get the error message:Â Repo
>"forks/ctubbsii/thrift" already exists.
>
>However, it clearly does not exist. It is not listed
>at https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/ctubbsii , which
Hi,
> Side note, android's 'reboot' cmd can take an argument, like 'reboot
> fastboot' or 'reboot recovery'.. that might be one of the few features
> from android worth copying ;-)
I'm still missing something simliar to "lilo -R " in the world
of modern boot loaders. This used to set the lilo
Dne 31.5.2018 v 21:36 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
>> "JF" == John Florian writes:
> JF> Does Fedora really have that large of non-technical audience?
>
> It's an interesting question, but it seems to me that the answer doesn't
> really matter. If they're non-technical, the assumption
Hi All,
First of all I want to thank everyone for their input.
I also want to make clear that the hide the menu +
not listening for a keypress at all (aka fastboot) is a
Fedora 30 thing, quoting myself:
"For F29, single OS Fedora Workstation install we get:
1) grub menu hidden by default with
On 06/01/2018 02:26 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
We try hard to avoid messy menus with duplicate entries, and you get away
with adding an extra desktop entry to an application installed by
default on
almost all Spins, for an
On 05/31/2018 05:26 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 05/31/2018 08:42 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
I'm fine with changing the default - I understand that under normal
circumstances most people could care less about seeing the screen - but I
do strongly agree with the comment above. When things
A question arose about a good choice of the default directory for
trusted CA certificates over these proposed rpm PRs:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/strongswan/pull-request/6
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/strongswan/pull-request/7
An IKEv2 client from strongSwan package, charon-nm,
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:53 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Jan Kurik writes:
>
> > = Proposed System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HiddenGrubMenu
> >
> >
> > Owner(s):
> > * Hans de Goede
> >
> >
> > On systems with only a single OS installed, the
66 matches
Mail list logo
