Hello,
Perl 5.28 change was discussed on FESCO meeting and was accepted.
Perl 5.28 was released on June 23 2018 and mass rebuild can start.
I have required `f29-perl' build-root for this purpose and it was created.
I will start the rebuild later today and you can be notified via mail about
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/06/26/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.11-20180625git749b9f3.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
It's been FTBFS for a while and the current version has some insecure
settings so I propose retiring iksemel fairly soon. As far as I can see it
only affects Asterisk and Zabbix. Asterisk's use of iksemel is optional so
it should be easy to build without and I suspect the same is true of Zabbix.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595012
Bug ID: 1595012
Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.61 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SNMP-Info
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595010
Bug ID: 1595010
Summary: perl-Test-Smoke-1.72 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Smoke
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595002
Bug ID: 1595002
Summary: perl-MongoDB-v1.8.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MongoDB
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595000
Bug ID: 1595000
Summary: perl-MCE-1.836 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MCE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594999
Bug ID: 1594999
Summary: perl-Module-Depends-0.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-Depends
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594774
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594993
Bug ID: 1594993
Summary: perl-Event-RPC-1.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Event-RPC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2018-06-26 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity
On 06/25/2018 02:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 25.06.18 13:22, Kyle Marek (pspps...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>> So think about this one bit ahead. Right now it's clear that even with
>>> Grub's relatively large contributor base it'shard to impossible to
>>> support modern Linux file
churchyard commented on the pull-request: `update to 1.3.0, conditionalize
system bits, fix gcode.t test` that you are following:
``
Pushed some little tweaks. Seems to run fine on F28.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/3
On 06/23/2018 02:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
I've submitted the patch upstream, I hope it fares better than my last attempt.
Thanks for that, it looks like the maintainer accepted the package.
I took the patch into today's rawhide build and it seems to
have completed.
I have filed at
On Mo, 25.06.18 13:22, Kyle Marek (pspps...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > So think about this one bit ahead. Right now it's clear that even with
> > Grub's relatively large contributor base it'shard to impossible to
> > support modern Linux file systems properly — even just for
> > read-only. See the the
On Mo, 25.06.18 09:09, Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) wrote:
> Now let's think this through. You're proposing that $BOOT be the
> ESP.
Yes, I think that's wise, but the boot loader spec allows $BOOT to be
separate from the ESP, so I am not sure why you are warming this up
again.
You can
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:18:04PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Although still, the FESCo meeting agenda used to be place, where it was
> obvious, that something probably happened with the ticket and it needs
> FESCo (and possibly my) attention. The notification of new issues would
> not replace
Also added cli autocomplete...
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49805
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
churchyard commented on the pull-request: `update to 1.3.0, conditionalize
system bits, fix gcode.t test` that you are following:
``
src/admesh/stl.h:32:2: error: #error "admesh works correctly on little endian
machines only!"
I guess we can Exclude BE, as I don't expect much people need to
churchyard commented on the pull-request: `update to 1.3.0, conditionalize
system bits, fix gcode.t test` that you are following:
``
this is #2 with tabs -> spaces, uncommented BR, removed unused pacthes
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/3
churchyard commented on the pull-request: `WIP: Slic3r 1.3.0` that you are
following:
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/3
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
churchyard commented on the pull-request: `update to 1.3.0, conditionalize
system bits, fix gcode.t test` that you are following:
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/3
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/2
churchyard opened a new pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following:
``
update to 1.3.0, conditionalize system bits, fix gcode.t test
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/3
___
churchyard canceled a pull-request against the project: `slic3r` that you are
following.
Cancelled pull-request:
``
update to 1.3.0, conditionalize system bits, fix gcode.t test
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/2
___
spot commented on the pull-request: `update to 1.3.0, conditionalize system
bits, fix gcode.t test` that you are following:
``
Yeah, it totally does. I didn't catch it since I had polyclipping-devel
installed locally.
``
To reply, visit the link below
churchyard commented on the pull-request: `update to 1.3.0, conditionalize
system bits, fix gcode.t test` that you are following:
``
this might need uncommenting. the build is failing with fatal error:
polyclipping/clipper.hpp: No such file or directory
``
To reply, visit the link below
On 06/25/2018 06:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 22.06.18 14:17, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> On Fr, 22.06.18 19:01, Javier Martinez Canillas (jav...@dowhile0.org) wrote:
>>>
> Whereas
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/138 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180624.n.0):
ID: 252180 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/252180
ID: 252182 Test: x86_64 universal
Stephen opened this FPC ticket: https://pagure.io/packaging-
committee/issue/777
So, I'm stepping back from writing the draft... think it would just slow
down the process, since you folks
are more clear on what you're wanting - and I'm fine with what both Stephen
and Jason wrote previously.
On
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:40:41PM +0200, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
> On 14.6.2018 12:06, Jan Kurik wrote:
> I noticed the official spec defines a field named "machine-id". AFAICS,
> GRUB2 doesn't implement that option, but it supports a field named "id".
> Are these used for the same thing? If they
> On Jun 25, 2018, at 3:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> On Fr, 22.06.18 14:17, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> On Fr, 22.06.18 19:01, Javier Martinez Canillas (jav...@dowhile0.org) wrote:
>>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-06-25)
=
Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:00:53 UTC. The full logs are available
> On Jun 25, 2018, at 3:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Mo, 25.06.18 11:23, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>
>>> That would break applications like libguestfs which run as non-root and
>>> have
Hi Zbigniew,
>>> Also, what is the relationship between
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS230
>>> and
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231
>>
>> BINUTILS230 was the change request to bring in FSF binutils 2.30. This
>> is the version that is currently used in
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180624.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180625.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 21
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.41 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 25.6.2018 16:49, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
We have 170 packages with blocked dependencies.
We also have 176 packages that fail to build from source (+ ~10 more that
are being handled).
I need your help, I cannot possibly fix 178 packages.
I've opened bugzillas for some, but
On 25.6.2018 16:49, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
We have 170 packages with blocked dependencies.
We also have 176 packages that fail to build from source (+ ~10 more that
are being handled).
I need your help, I cannot possibly fix 178 packages.
I've opened bugzillas for some, but
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> We have 170 packages with blocked dependencies.
> We also have 176 packages that fail to build from source (+ ~10 more that
> are being handled).
>
> I need your help, I cannot possibly fix 178 packages.
>
> I've opened bugzillas for some, but let me ask you via e-mail
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> We have 170 packages with blocked dependencies.
> We also have 176 packages that fail to build from source (+ ~10 more that
> are being handled).
>
> I need your help, I cannot possibly fix 178 packages.
>
> I've opened bugzillas for some, but let me ask you via e-mail
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 13:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
[..]
> > not really in the first scenario I gave the user decided to change
> > his environment and despite warnings shot himself in the foot, in
> > the second the user was handed a loaded gun with no safety and also
> > managed to
Hi,
On 06/22/2018 02:25 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> [...]
>> I think you keep putting some kind of base standard on the hypothetical
>> attacker and then your argument is "if they can do X then they can do
>> Y". Because we're both SW engineers, the relation between X and Y is
>> obvious to us, so
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fr, 22.06.18 13:35, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> > > $BOOT being non-vfat is a fairly substantial departure from either
> > >
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:42:33AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 18.06.18 16:50, Ondřej Lysoněk (olyso...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 18.6.2018 15:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > >
> > >> The
On 19.6.2018 11:27, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13.6.2018 15:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I've just started to build the bootstrap sequence in a side tag
(f29-python).
I'm now mass rebuilding everything. Will do a couple of rounds before I
will look at the logs. If you see you package failing for a
On 19.6.2018 11:27, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13.6.2018 15:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I've just started to build the bootstrap sequence in a side tag
(f29-python).
I'm now mass rebuilding everything. Will do a couple of rounds before I
will look at the logs. If you see you package failing for a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594779
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1594787
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594787
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1594779, 1592093
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594779
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
This release claim it needs pkgconf-1.5.0. Also this release disappeared from
CPAN web page. Let's wait.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594779
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1592093
Referenced Bugs:
Hi,
On 25-06-18 13:26, Radka Janekova wrote:
ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#Current_status
> "Enable USB autosuspend for USB bluetooth receivers by default. If all other USB
devices on the laptop also have USB auto-suspend enabled (which typically is
Dne 25.6.2018 v 14:03 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:26:48AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Red Hat is planning on upgrading Bugzilla to BZ5 in September. There's
>> a test instance running now at http://bugzilla5.redhat.com/
>>
>> Since Fedora is a major
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594787
Bug ID: 1594787
Summary: perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf-0.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mo, 25.06.18 13:46, Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > > Which file system do you have in mind even for this?
> > >
> > > Unspecified for now. i.e. no change. It would remain ext4 by default I
> > > expect, but ultimately whatever anaconda allows.
>
> IMHO the only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594779
Bug ID: 1594779
Summary: perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Alien-pkgconf
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594774
Bug ID: 1594774
Summary: perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Date-Holidays-DE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:26:48AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Red Hat is planning on upgrading Bugzilla to BZ5 in September. There's
> a test instance running now at http://bugzilla5.redhat.com/
>
> Since Fedora is a major user and stakeholder here, it'd be helpful if
> we make sure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594609
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
2018-06-25 13:14 GMT+02:00 Miro Hrončok :
> On 25.6.2018 12:08, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> trying to update sos to upstream 3.6.
>> Failed on f29 target[1]
>>
>> pushed to f29-python target as suggested and failed again[2] and failed
>> also on f28 target[3], missing six module
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Iain Rae wrote:
>
>
> On 25/06/18 10:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:21:46AM +0100, Iain Rae wrote:
> >>On 22/06/18 20:56, Till Maas wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:24:54PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fr, 22.06.18 13:35, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
> > $BOOT being non-vfat is a fairly substantial departure from either
> > BootLoaderSpec, the original requires $BOOT be vfat, the mjg59 version
> >
Hi,
> > > Which file system do you have in mind even for this?
> >
> > Unspecified for now. i.e. no change. It would remain ext4 by default I
> > expect, but ultimately whatever anaconda allows.
IMHO the only thing which is reasonable here would be something simple
with posix semantics, which
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:47:04AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
>
> >> Do you foresee any significant issues with this version upgrade in the
> >> mass rebuild?
>
> No. I am currently testing the 2.31 sources on the FSF branch, but so far
> everything looks good.
>
> >> Anything
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594476
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:57:28PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 25.06.18 11:54, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mo, 25.06.18 11:23, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#Current_status
> "Enable USB autosuspend for USB bluetooth receivers by default. If all
other USB devices on the laptop also have USB auto-suspend enabled (which
typically is true) this saves aprox. 0.4 Watts of power on an idle
On 25.6.2018 12:08, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Hi,
trying to update sos to upstream 3.6.
Failed on f29 target[1]
pushed to f29-python target as suggested and failed again[2] and failed also on
f28 target[3], missing six module everywhere.
spec file has Requires: python3-six but looks like it's
On Mo, 25.06.18 11:54, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 25.06.18 11:23, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > That would break applications like libguestfs which run as non-root
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594610
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Temp-0.230.600-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-97b72daea6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594610
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Temp-0.230.600-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-741164810b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 25.06.18 11:23, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > That would break applications like libguestfs which run as non-root and
> > have valid need to access /boot/vmlinuz*
>
> Hmm, can you elaborate on
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7948d6772e
ansible-2.5.5-1.el6
The following builds have been
On Mo, 25.06.18 11:23, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> That would break applications like libguestfs which run as non-root and
> have valid need to access /boot/vmlinuz*
Hmm, can you elaborate on that? What precisely do they need there?
If it's just the kernel image itself
On Fr, 22.06.18 14:26, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Kyle Marek wrote:
>
> > Anaconda in F28 currently claims /boot cannot be vfat. However, this appears
> > to be an artificial limitation, because `grub2-install` works and makes a
> > bootable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594610
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
17 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-86538d58b1
strongswan-5.6.3-1.el7
15 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
12
On Fr, 22.06.18 14:17, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Fr, 22.06.18 19:01, Javier Martinez Canillas (jav...@dowhile0.org) wrote:
> >
> >> > Whereas constantly changing the ESP, means we need some way to
> >> >
2018-06-25 12:15 GMT+02:00 Vít Ondruch :
>
> From the notification on the top of the BZ page:
Whoops. :-)
Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:04:54AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 16:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Kyle Marek said:
> > > On 06/22/2018 05:15 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > > And basic Unix permissions... because there can be privileged
> > > > content in
> >
On Fr, 22.06.18 15:54, Kyle Marek (pspps...@gmail.com) wrote:
> What is the benefit to sharing $BOOT between different operating
> systems/distros?
>
> I'd like to point out that $BOOT doesn't have to be shared to dual-boot
> multiple distros or benefit from other details of BLS.
But it's an
Dne 25.6.2018 v 11:30 Alessio Ciregia napsal(a):
> 2018-06-21 17:26 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
>> Red Hat is planning on upgrading Bugzilla to BZ5 in September. There's
>> a test instance running now at http://bugzilla5.redhat.com/
>>
>> Since Fedora is a major user and stakeholder here, it'd be
On 25/06/18 10:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:21:46AM +0100, Iain Rae wrote:
On 22/06/18 20:56, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:24:54PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
I do not see any reason why a user would put something in
On Fr, 22.06.18 13:35, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> $BOOT being non-vfat is a fairly substantial departure from either
> BootLoaderSpec, the original requires $BOOT be vfat, the mjg59 version
> require $BOOT be firmware readable. That is not a complaint, I'm just
> making an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594562
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Authen-SCRAM-0.011-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5556e0f57a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Hi,
trying to update sos to upstream 3.6.
Failed on f29 target[1]
pushed to f29-python target as suggested and failed again[2] and failed also on
f28 target[3], missing six module everywhere.
spec file has Requires: python3-six but looks like it's not failing preparing
the chroot despite the
On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 16:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Kyle Marek said:
> > On 06/22/2018 05:15 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > > And basic Unix permissions... because there can be privileged
> > > content in
> > > GRUB config and even initramfs.
> >
> > That's interesting. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594732
Bug ID: 1594732
Summary: Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.61
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SNMP-Info
Assignee: w...@gouldfamily.org
Reporter:
Hi Zbigniew,
>> Do you foresee any significant issues with this version upgrade in the
>> mass rebuild?
No. I am currently testing the 2.31 sources on the FSF branch, but so far
everything looks good.
>> Anything in particular that maintainers and upstreams
>> should looks at?
I hope not.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594562
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591047
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-BSON-1.6.6-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f154968fa7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594523
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-BSON-1.6.6-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f154968fa7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593041
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-BSON-1.6.6-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f154968fa7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
2018-06-21 17:26 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :
> Red Hat is planning on upgrading Bugzilla to BZ5 in September. There's
> a test instance running now at http://bugzilla5.redhat.com/
>
> Since Fedora is a major user and stakeholder here, it'd be helpful if
> we make sure everything works for us. If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594523
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:21:46AM +0100, Iain Rae wrote:
> On 22/06/18 20:56, Till Maas wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:24:54PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> >>Till Maas wrote:
> >>>I do not see any reason why a user would put something in ~/bin that
> >>>would mask something in /usr/bin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594473
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180622-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9a32e86668
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594473
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hi,
qpdf has new version - 8.1.0 - and it bumps the soname of shared library
to 21.1.0. Only cups-filters depends on it, so I'll manage the rebuild
myself.
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Red Hat is planning on upgrading Bugzilla to BZ5 in September. There's
a test instance running now at http://bugzilla5.redhat.com/
Since Fedora is a major user and stakeholder here, it'd be helpful if
we make sure everything works for us. If you find any bugs, report at
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Minishift Spin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minishift_Spin
Owner(s):
* Praveen Kumar
* Gerard Braad
A Fedora Spin providing an easy way for minishift users to consume
fedora as an ISO.
== Detailed description ==
Minishift
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Minishift Spin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Minishift_Spin
Owner(s):
* Praveen Kumar
* Gerard Braad
A Fedora Spin providing an easy way for minishift users to consume
fedora as an ISO.
== Detailed description ==
Minishift
100 matches
Mail list logo
