Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:53 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > You can always bump release and submit a new(er) build I thought of that, but Kevin Fenzi killed it a few minutes later and I was able to resubmit it. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

Il giorno ven 13 lug 2018 alle 12:39, Igor Gnatenko ha scritto: On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:19 Miro Hrončok wrote: On 8.7.2018 20:46, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot > , I'm > going to

evemu license change

Was a single package GPLv3+, is now split into a evemu-libs subpackage LGPLv3+ and the evemu package (still GPLv3+). Cheers, Peter ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:34 PM Rex Dieter wrote: >> Strictly speaking, it was a bug in PyQt4, which should be fixed now. >> Please try again. (scidavis scratch build succeeded just now for me) > > Thank you for taking care of this so quickly Rex. > Unfortunately,

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.

[Bug 1601289] New: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 Bug ID: 1601289 Summary: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-JMAPTalk Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1601286] New: perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 Bug ID: 1601286 Summary: perl-DB_File-1.842 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DB_File Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1601285] New: perl-App-cpm-0.975 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601285 Bug ID: 1601285 Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.975 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-cpm Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Koji (was: Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3)

On 07/14/2018 09:14 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:15:38AM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: >>> koji >>> >>> koji is kinda important. I think this is meaning python2-koji? >>> I would hope python3-koji/koji stays around? >>> >> ditto > > I don't understand, will Koji

[Bug 1601159] perl-Business-ISMN-1.132 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601159 Colin Macdonald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: xfig license change

Xfig has its own strdup implementation - that's funny. 2018-07-15 9:25 GMT+02:00 Honza Horak : > License of xfig package was changed > from: MIT > to: MIT and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ > > PR submitted, not yet merged: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfig/pull-request/3 > > Hans or Steve, please,

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:34 PM Rex Dieter wrote: > Strictly speaking, it was a bug in PyQt4, which should be fixed now. Please > try again. (scidavis scratch build succeeded just now for me) Thank you for taking care of this so quickly Rex. Unfortunately, it seems that I will have to wait for

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone > mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and > according to koschei they started to happen after the update from > sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Does each build start with its own fresh VM? Do you care about the > > data in that build VM if either qemu or the host crashes? If the > > answers are 'Yes' and 'No'

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rex Dieter wrote: Hello, A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after the update from sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to

Re: sip-related build failures in rawhide

Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone > mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and > according to koschei they started to happen after the update from > sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to

Re: fsck error creating live cd

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to build a live cd with livecd-creator and towards the > latter part of the process I encountered the following error, > > Checking filesystem /var/tmp/imgcreate-230i9kyl/tmp-fjf6k6vu/ext3fs.img > resizing

sip-related build failures in rawhide

Hello, A few days ago scidavis builds started failing in rawhide. Someone mentioned here that sip was to blame for a number of such failures and according to koschei they started to happen after the update from sip-4.19.9-0.2.dev1805261119.fc29 to sip-4.19.12-2.fc29. According to the logs[0],

[Bug 1599060] perl-App-Nopaste-1.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599060 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1599306] perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.1 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599306 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1597929] perl-Mojolicious-7.88 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597929 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1595477] perl-MojoX-JSON-RPC-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595477 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[EPEL-devel] Re: Adding EPEL7 branch

You have to request epel7, not el7. Greetings, Christian On 15/07/18 12:21, Jeremy Sanders wrote: > Hi - > > I'm obviously missing something from the docs here. I successfully > added a el6 branch to the patchelf fedora package, but I can't add > el7. Is this documented somewhere? > > $ fedpkg

[EPEL-devel] Adding EPEL7 branch

Hi - I'm obviously missing something from the docs here. I successfully added a el6 branch to the patchelf fedora package, but I can't add el7. Is this documented somewhere? $ fedpkg request-branch el7 Could not execute request_branch: el7 is a current release branch Thanks Jeremy

xfig license change

License of xfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ PR submitted, not yet merged: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfig/pull-request/3 Hans or Steve, please, merge. Thanks, Honza ___ devel mailing list --

transfig license change

License of transfig package was changed from: MIT to: MIT and GPLv3+ https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/transfig.git/commit/?id=fe80b4977bc3a9a3c47497a0042a2ca4a5001ba8 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Fedora Rawhide-20180714.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 44/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180711.n.0): ID: 257505 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/257505 ID: 257518 Test: