Re: Orphaned bouml

2018-08-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Debarshi Ray wrote: > Feel free to pick it up if you want to. If you do, you might want to > update it to one of the more recent upstream releases [3]. That is not possible because Bouml is not Free Software anymore. Bouml 7 is "free" as in beer, but not Free Software, and therefore not

Re: [HEADS UP] Update libgit2 to 0.27

2018-08-16 Thread Amit Saha
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 7:25 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 02:14:41PM +1000, Amit Saha wrote: > > Hi Igor, > > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:33 PM Igor Gnatenko < > > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > >

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Luke Macken (lmacken)

2018-08-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:13:07 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16.8.2018 16:11, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > > On 08/16/2018 07:29 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Luke Macken (lmacken) is not responsive. > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610474 > >> > >> Anyone knows how to

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16.8.2018 21:16, Alec Leamas wrote: On 16/08/18 14:54, Fabio Valentini wrote: Thanks for your help! You are listed as the main admin for the fedora-review project on pagure [0] - can you give me (decathorpe), Miro (churchyard), and Neal (ngompa) access to the project? Done. Welcome tto

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

2018-08-16 Thread Ben Rosser
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd *really* like to see us get to a point where package review is > fully-automated. Basically we could just have a web-service that you pass a > URL to an SRPM plus authenticate with your FAS account and it will perform > all of the

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

2018-08-16 Thread Michal Novotny
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:04 PM Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 8:30 AM Michal Novotny wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > >>> > >>>

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

2018-08-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 5:04 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 8:30 AM Michal Novotny wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> >>> f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] >>> and many

how to troubleshoot performance problems that trigger kidle-inject

2018-08-16 Thread Chris Murphy
Hi, Example 1: Firefox, 1 tab open (Google Keep) https://drive.google.com/open?id=19dRvyWIgXjN0cyLv21JmPSn-WR9lXx11 Example 2: Firefox, 1 tab open (my bank's web site) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-XMYbyOkWYzgBmo50tdKVUdlioSul11c It also happens with Chrome. It happens with Fedora's

Re: how to troubleshoot performance problems that trigger kidle-inject

2018-08-16 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > HP Spectre 13" display, core i7-6500U. Fedora 28 Workstation Kernels 4.17.x through 4.18 definite exhibit the behavior. I'm not certain about 4.16.x -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list --

Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

2018-08-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 8:30 AM Michal Novotny wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > >> f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] >> and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2,

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Alec Leamas
On 16/08/18 14:54, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Thanks for your help! You are listed as the main admin for the > fedora-review project on pagure [0] - can you give me (decathorpe), > Miro (churchyard), and Neal (ngompa) access to the project? > Done. Welcome tto the project, you are all admins!

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2018-08-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 67 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7 62 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-15b7dc35af pass-1.7.2-1.el7 35

Re: Changes in packages workflow vs. modular Fedora

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 3.8.2018 16:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hi, I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is something I don't know the answer for. The question is a bit harder to formulate simply, so let put it in examples: a) A need packaging guideline is about to be discussed.

[Bug 1611585] perl-Log-Any-1.707 is available

2018-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611585 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Any-1.707-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16.8.2018 16:36, Graham Leggett wrote: On 16 Aug 2018, at 13:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: Björn Esser (besser82) is not responsive. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610811 It’s August, I’m guessing they’re on a well deserved holiday. Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer?

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

2018-08-16 Thread Graham Leggett
On 16 Aug 2018, at 13:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Björn Esser (besser82) is not responsive. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610811 It’s August, I’m guessing they’re on a well deserved holiday. > Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? Definitely not like this: "Do

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Luke Macken (lmacken)

2018-08-16 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 08/16/2018 07:29 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Luke Macken (lmacken) is not responsive. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610474 > > Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? > ping him on twitter? https://twitter.com/lmacken ___

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Luke Macken (lmacken)

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16.8.2018 16:11, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 08/16/2018 07:29 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Luke Macken (lmacken) is not responsive. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610474 Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? ping him on twitter? https://twitter.com/lmacken

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Michal Novotny
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 3:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I was actually thinking about this some time ago. If there's a > > responsive fedora-review maintainer who can respond to people's > > questions and complains (because if we start running it for every > > package build and show it in Bodhi,

Re: Orphaned rocksdb

2018-08-16 Thread Tomasz Torcz
16 sie 2018 15:26 Matej Mužila napisał(a):Hi, I've orphaned the rocksdb package. Nothing depends on it and it seems that it is not needed in Fedora. Isn't rocksdb used by ceph-osd? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1611585] perl-Log-Any-1.707 is available

2018-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611585 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
I was actually thinking about this some time ago. If there's a responsive fedora-review maintainer who can respond to people's questions and complains (because if we start running it for every package build and show it in Bodhi, there will be some), I can help to make it run as a Taskotron

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 2:31 PM Michal Novotny wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > >> f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] >> and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2,

Orphaned rocksdb

2018-08-16 Thread Matej Mužila
Hi, I've orphaned the rocksdb package. Nothing depends on it and it seems that it is not needed in Fedora. Matej ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 8:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16.8.2018 13:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > >> > >> f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] > >> and many issues and unhandled

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On jeudi 16 août 2018 10:47:05 CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] > and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2, 3]. > The last upstream commit was 2 years ago. > > f-r has is annoyingly

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Michal Novotny
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] > and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2, 3]. > The last upstream commit was 2 years ago. > > f-r has is

[Bug 1614884] Tests fail with OpenSSL 1.1.1

2018-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1614884 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-SSLeay-1.85-5.fc29 |perl-Net-SSLeay-1.85-6.fc29 -- You are

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

2018-08-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 8:16 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Björn Esser (besser82) is not responsive. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610811 > > Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? > He doesn't appear to be completely dead to the world. He did some work in libxcrypt on

Re: how to track downstream these days

2018-08-16 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, August 13, 2018 10:57:48 PM CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > You don't need this nested call, because --alldeps are now the default. > > $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires zlib.x86_64|wc -l > 3162 Note that --alldeps (eventhough it is probably default nowadays) doesn't work for

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16.8.2018 13:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2, 3]. The last upstream commit was 2 years

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] > and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2, 3]. > The last upstream commit was 2 years ago. > > f-r has is annoyingly

Nonresponsive maintainer: Luke Macken (lmacken)

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
Luke Macken (lmacken) is not responsive. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610474 Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
Björn Esser (besser82) is not responsive. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610811 Anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Provenpackager help request: ignored pull requests

2018-08-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16.8.2018 04:46, Scott Talbert wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011.  I have made a bunch of pull requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response

Re: [HEADS UP] Update libgit2 to 0.27

2018-08-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 02:14:41PM +1000, Amit Saha wrote: >> Hi Igor, >> >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:33 PM Igor Gnatenko < >> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> > Hello everyone, >> > >> > 0.27.x is released long

fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2, 3]. The last upstream commit was 2 years ago. f-r has is annoyingly outdated and gives often outright bad advice (for example about BR:gcc or BR:g++). The

Re: [HEADS UP] Update libgit2 to 0.27

2018-08-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 02:14:41PM +1000, Amit Saha wrote: > Hi Igor, > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:33 PM Igor Gnatenko < > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > 0.27.x is released long time ago, but I never got time for updating it. It > > obviously involves

Re: About to orphan python-pymtp

2018-08-16 Thread Manas Mangaonkar
Hey I know this is a bit late but i can maintain this,let me know if the offer is still valid. On Sat, 4 Aug 2018, 02:00 Ville-Pekka Vainio, wrote: > Hi! > > In light of the recent FTBFS reports, I would like to orphan > python-pymtp, because I haven't used it in a while. > There's one other