https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664970
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664970
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Type-Tiny-1.004004-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f94fce8c83
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662876
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662885
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA |perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-CPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662881
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662955
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.6-1.fc30 |perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.6-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662870
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662879
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.23 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656899
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.5 |perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-1.5
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:41 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> Funny (and scary) is that anaconda provides function to choose exact
> languages support when system is installed but nothing is added to
> /etc/rpm/macros to really make this choice real.
> %find_lang macro takes care of tagging some files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663185
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:41 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 21:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
>> Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks
>> package. With this Change
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:38 AM wrote:
> Will gnome-control-center be able to install missing language packs and
> input sources?
> What about gnome-initial-setup?
>
Good questions but that is outside the scope of this Change. :-)
Eventually we would like that to be the case yes - but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662885
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470542
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-Packer-1.037-5.fc2 |perl-PAR-Packer-1.037-5.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662955
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662879
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656899
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/01/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20190111gite31057e.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Remove BR on wxGTK as it is about to be
retired` that you are following:
``
Ping.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Alien-wxWidgets/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
> On 10 Jan 2019, at 19:43, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 8:03 AM William Brown
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey there,
>>
>> I think we are missing a large suite of tests from: src/lib389/lib389/tests
>>
>> Should we move these into the suites? Or should we add this path to the CI?
+1, it would be nice to separate flatpaks from the actual distribution.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://splentity.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
devel mailing list --
On 1/10/19 11:47 AM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Thanks for bringing some attention to this, Ben. I don't do a whole lot of
> packaging, but I admit there are some places where the workflow could be
> improved. I'd be willing to join the group and help where I can.
>
> Some notes off the top of my
On 1/10/19 10:58 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have arisen from the
> - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to solve
> the "koji says I'm unauthenticated" error got boring after the third time.
Mine
On 02. 01. 19 22:14, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FullyRemoveDeprecatedAndUnsafeFunctionsFromLibcrypt
== Summary ==
This change is about removing binary support for deprecated and unsafe
functions and bumping libcrypt.so to libcrypt.so.2.
== Owner ==
* Name:
+1 from me. That seems like a nice reasonable thing for us to do. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
I'd like to unretire the 'rtv' package in accordance with the
documented un-retirement policy.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rtv/commits/master
The package seems to have been retired because it could not build with
Python 3.7. However, I found that there were new upstream releases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664253
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
Will be working on bringing exiv2-0.27.0 to rawhide over the coming days.
Includes both abi and minor api changes.
Tracking progress in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665246
in case anyone's aware of incompatibilities, can block that bug. Thanks.
According to repoquery,
Thanks for bringing some attention to this, Ben. I don't do a whole lot of
packaging, but I admit there are some places where the workflow could be
improved. I'd be willing to join the group and help where I can.
Some notes off the top of my head that I ran into recently:
- fedpkg hides quite
On 1/10/19 8:35 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Should a bug report be filed, and if so where?
Please file against pungi:
https://pagure.io/pungi/issues
Thanks!
kevin
--
>
> Marek Blaha wrote:
>
>> Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata.
>> I've downloaded metalink
On 1/10/19 6:14 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As per
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package
>
> I'd like to take over python-tenacity so I can help maintain this as part
> of RDO.
>
> I did ask for commit
Hello,
We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
have arisen from the deprecation of pkgdb that have made the packager
workflow ever
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:36 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
In the future, we'd like to switch to running gnome-initial-setup
prior to anaconda for language and keyboard layout selection, then
anaconda, then gnome-initial-setup again on firstboot. Anaconda would
therefore not be used for
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 21:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
>
> == Summary ==
> Language support groups in Comps file will get replaced by langpacks
> package. With this Change we want meta-packages like langpacks-ja to
> also
Will gnome-control-center be able to install missing language packs and
input sources?
What about gnome-initial-setup?
In the future, we'd like to switch to running gnome-initial-setup prior
to anaconda for language and keyboard layout selection, then anaconda,
then gnome-initial-setup
Should a bug report be filed, and if so where?
Marek Blaha wrote:
> Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata.
> I've downloaded metalink from URL
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f29=x86_64
> I checked a few mirrors from
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 09:11 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 19:07 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Can you explain what this "fedmsg integration" is? Is it just the
> > popups
> > like "nnn created an update for yyy"?
> > If it's just that, from my side I can say I
Looks like the problem is with fedora updates source repository metadata.
I've downloaded metalink from URL
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f29=x86_64
I checked a few mirrors from the list and the content of primary metadata
file is somewhat unsatisfying
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663185
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
dnf download --source wireshark
[...]
No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.
Exiting due to strict setting.
Error: No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hello,
As per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package
I'd like to take over python-tenacity so I can help maintain this as part
of RDO.
I did ask for commit access here:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2045
but it was
Notification time stamped 2019-01-10 14:12:17 UTC
From 423de1294d35d035653d2f122cd23989d190d40f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Jan 10 2019 08:18:32 +
Subject: Upstream update.
Add BR: perl(Moo).
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 395f573..336d57b 100644
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 19:07 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Can you explain what this "fedmsg integration" is? Is it just the
> popups
> like "nnn created an update for yyy"?
> If it's just that, from my side I can say I find those cute, but of
> no
> practical use.
Indeed, the popups
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 01:29:42PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 12:30:53PM -0500, John Harris wrote:
> > > The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking
> > > measures. We don't want to track; just count.
> > If this is ever implemented, we should
Notification time stamped 2019-01-10 13:34:47 UTC
From 423de1294d35d035653d2f122cd23989d190d40f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Jan 10 2019 08:18:32 +
Subject: Upstream update.
Add BR: perl(Moo).
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 395f573..336d57b 100644
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665064
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj |ppi...@redhat.com
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:37 PM David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 14:56 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > E.g. if you net-install Fedora in Japanese language then installation
> > of any base package like libreoffice-core or man-pages are installing
> > automatically
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:23 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Randy Barlow wrote:
> > I don't know of a way that integration is useful, but I wanted to see
> > if others thought it was useful. So, do you find it useful?
>
> I just find those notifications annoying and pointless. This feature could
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665064
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kh...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665064
Bug ID: 1665064
Summary: XMLRPC does not support include_fields
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Status: NEW
Component: bugzilla
Assignee: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:31:38PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:23 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > > Do you plan to remove the comps groups?
Hi,
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 14:56 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> E.g. if you net-install Fedora in Japanese language then installation
> of any base package like libreoffice-core or man-pages are installing
> automatically libreoffice-langpack-ja or man-pages-ja but langpacks-
> ja
> is not installing
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:43:01AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Moreover, afair we install and enable NTP clients by default on all
> our installations, no? just like pretty much any other OS these days
> does... counting by NTP mostly just means switching from NTP pool
> servers to fedora's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664971
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hello Chris,
As Petr Pisar said it, last Fedora's kernel uses a compiled binary software
sign-file file. It
is still a perl script in RHEL.
Your command line should work if you remove perl invocation:
/usr/src/kernels/4.19.14-300.fc29.x86_64/scripts/sign-file sha256
/home/chris/MOK.priv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664968
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 8:03 AM William Brown wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> I think we are missing a large suite of tests from: src/lib389/lib389/tests
>
> Should we move these into the suites? Or should we add this path to the CI?
We wanted to decouple some tests from lib389 tests directory and move
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664967
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
> Actually, Bodhi relies on Fedora Packages, which is experiencing
> problems in updating its database:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/issues/410
Ah - yes I did notice that it wasn't coming up in
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ either. That would explain
why Bodhi
On 2019-01-10, Chris Murphy wrote:
> [root@fnuc extra]# perl
> /usr/src/kernels/4.19.14-300.fc29.x86_64/scripts/sign-file sha256
> /home/chris/MOK.priv /home/chris/MOK.der icp.ko
> Unrecognized character \x7F; marked by <-- HERE after <-- HERE near
> column 1 at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664965
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:03 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 1/9/19 10:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I'm not finding an updated version of this documentation:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-module-with-the-private-key.html
>
64 matches
Mail list logo
