This was fixed upstream in capstone. I'm rebuilding capstone &
qemu (again) now.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 18:48 -0500, John Harris wrote:
> On Friday, January 11, 2019 4:36:54 PM EST Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > That is, apply the logic above only if(hash(machine_id)%1000==0)
> > (this becomes a poll instead of a referendum, results must then be
> > multiplied by 1000)
>
> If this
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/01/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20190112gitc1f96bd.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664970
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Type-Tiny-1.004004-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664970
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
På Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:50:00 +0100
Germano Massullo skrev:
> Hello,
> AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU
> Computing[1] is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not, is anybody
> interested in setting up a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662960
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662957
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-NetPacket-1.7.0-1.fc30 |perl-NetPacket-1.7.0-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-RT-Client-REST-0.56-1. |perl-RT-Client-REST-0.56-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662957
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Friday, January 11, 2019 4:36:54 PM EST Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> That is, apply the logic above only if(hash(machine_id)%1000==0)
> (this becomes a poll instead of a referendum, results must then be
> multiplied by 1000)
If this is done, the likelyhood of invalid data for the given Spin is
On 1/8/19 4:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> If all you want to do is count, then it should be entirely sufficient
> to do it like this:
>
>GET /metalink?repo=fedora-28=x86_64==1 HTTP/1.1
>
> the first time within each one-week window and a simple
>
>GET
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694496
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat...@redhat.com
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > So in 107 current Fedora specs are used %lang() macros.
> > Probably some of them can be removed by proper use %find_lang.
>
> The problem with _install_langs is that there is no easy way to change it
> after installation, say you find out
On 1/11/19 9:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in Copr?
I'd rather have a licensing sign-off step. Allow fedora-review to automate the spec
review and build test, but break out the licensing check. Maybe in the future we can
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 18:16 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote:
> Hi,
> > > Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ?
> >
> > What to do ?
> > Propose a review swap , you review a package for other and other
> > review
> > your package and sponsor / mentor you .
>
> How to initialise a
Hi,
Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ?
What to do ?
Propose a review swap , you review a package for other and other review
your package and sponsor / mentor you .
How to initialise a review swap ?
Is there a mailing list or something to initialise review swaps ?
Are
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 18:00 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ?
Is not wdune that need be sponsored is you that need be sponsored, you
by being sponsored get permissions to write and include wdune in Fedora
.
I can't sponsor you because
Hi,
Are there any tips how to get wdune fedora sponsoring ?
We are working years on free software, but the distributors simply
ignore it
(or worse) use a more than 10 years old version (like in debian/ubuntu) 8-(
What is wrong with wdune ?
It uses old technologies like motif or X3D.
Motif
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 11:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 10:19, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
>> > build and host it? That would
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 10:19, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> > build and host it? That would not be great.
>
> Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> > build and host it? That would not be great.
>
> Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:28 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> * In fedscm_admin: Map flatpaks namespace to the ‘module’ PDC branch
> type when storing the SLA into the PDC, to avoid PDC changes, and
> because the SLA really is a module SLA.
Digging into this, I don't think this is right - it would break
Am Freitag, den 11.01.2019, 15:13 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2019, 23:34 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> > On 02. 01. 19 22:14, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FullyRemoveDeprecatedAndUnsafeFunctionsFromLibcrypt
> > >
> > > ==
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> build and host it? That would not be great.
Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in Copr?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm Randy Barlow On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 14:14 +, Christopher Brown wrote:
> > I did ask for commit access here:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2045
> >
> > but it was just orphaned. Not sure why. I've read the meeting logs.
> > It just seems like all the
Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2019, 23:34 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> On 02. 01. 19 22:14, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FullyRemoveDeprecatedAndUnsafeFunctionsFromLibcrypt
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > This change is about removing binary support for deprecated and
> >
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:59 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have arisen from
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 01:58:17PM -0500, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have
Neal Gompa wrote:
> GOA has the ability to store kerberos logins and initialize them as
> part of your login session, too.
Every time I log in locally on my workstation? That's not good. I
suppose that's suitable in a centralized corporate or university
network, but as an infrequent Fedora
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> > > fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> > >
I'm definitely interested to help (I have 6+ years experience as a
packager)!
Can we have a topic on discussion.fp.o? I think it is much easier to
discuss such things there.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 20:07 Ben Rosser Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
>
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> > fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> > my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to
> > solve the
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:11:00PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 05:27, Jens-Ulrik Petersen
> wrote:
> [..]
>
> > %find_lang used --with-man option takes care of collecting all language
> >> specific man pages as well, and more than 100 Fedora package are using this
> >>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:23 AM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 08:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Was
> > there some kind of design rationale for them? Or were they just added
> > because 'hey, fedmsg is cool'?
>
> I don't know because they were added before my tenure, though
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 08:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Was
> there some kind of design rationale for them? Or were they just added
> because 'hey, fedmsg is cool'?
I don't know because they were added before my tenure, though I suspect
it was the latter.
signature.asc
Description: This is
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 05:27, Jens-Ulrik Petersen
wrote:
[..]
> %find_lang used --with-man option takes care of collecting all language
>> specific man pages as well, and more than 100 Fedora package are using this
>> option .. but again nothing during fresh Fedora install is using those tags.
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 14:14 +, Christopher Brown wrote:
> I did ask for commit access here:
>
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2045
>
> but it was just orphaned. Not sure why. I've read the meeting logs.
> It just seems like all the packages were orphaned.
You said you weren't interested in
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 05:17, Jens-Ulrik Petersen
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:41 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 21:07, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Comps_Language_Group_With_Langpacks
>>> Language support groups in
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:29 AM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> Just checked myself, I don't have the file either, and I use a separate local
> account for RPM packaging (that uses a different name than my FAS login). No
> idea what that's about, I can't recall any tool ever complaining about the
>
Just checked myself, I don't have the file either, and I use a separate local
account for RPM packaging (that uses a different name than my FAS login). No
idea what that's about, I can't recall any tool ever complaining about the file
missing.
___
Goog small update, thx. I moved the hint into the "Kerberos" admon and
now it is almost perfect IMO ;)
Just noticed the note about ~/.fedora.upn file, what is it about? I
don't have such file on my system, therefore I assume I don't need it,
because my FAS name is the same as my system user
Am Freitag, den 11.01.2019, 09:43 + schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:40:59AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:30:29AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:24:12AM +, Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:40:59AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:30:29AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:24:12AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:14:29AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > >
That's good to know!
I have updated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers to
reflect this.
Thanks Vit.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:09 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:30:29AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:24:12AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:14:29AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1178711
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:30:29AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:24:12AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:14:29AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1178711
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:24:12AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:14:29AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1178711
> >
> > This broke qemu, and indirectly libvirt.
> >
> > I will submit a new build for
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:14:29AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1178711
>
> This broke qemu, and indirectly libvirt.
>
> I will submit a new build for qemu to see if that fixes things. I
> didn't look closely to see if there are API
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1178711
This broke qemu, and indirectly libvirt.
I will submit a new build for qemu to see if that fixes things. I
didn't look closely to see if there are API changes.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to solve
> the "koji says I'm
53 matches
Mail list logo
