[Bug 1668421] perl-Inline-Struct-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668421 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Struct-0.26-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62b38ee2b3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1667692] perl-Inline-Struct-0.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667692 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1667692] perl-Inline-Struct-0.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667692 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Struct-0.26-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-73ba6fe947 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1668421] perl-Inline-Struct-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668421 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Inline-Struct-0.26-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-73ba6fe947 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1668421] perl-Inline-Struct-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668421 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-01-23 - 91% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/01/23/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20190123gite08b20c.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1665838] Upgrade perl-Imager to 1.009

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665838 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1663304] Drop sub-package perl-interpreter

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663304 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this > > > year and only realized that

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 08:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this > > year and only realized that when I've successfully built first non-scratch > > gcc 9 rpms. I

Re: systemd unit file not updated on new package update

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:45:48PM -, Germano Massullo wrote: > I reply to your message in the bottom part, just let me explain how I got > this situation, because my previous message lacked of informations. > > I have built and installed a new BOINC release with a systemd unit file >

Re: systemd unit file not updated on new package update

On 1/22/19 8:45 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: I have never placed BOINC systemd unit file in /etc/systemd/system but I am wondering if "systemctl edit --full" can trigger the creation of such files under this folder Yes. The /usr/lib/systemd location is for the original packaged unit files.

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

Hi, an official package for the displaylink driver would be awesome. Upstream or the manufacturer of this docking stations with external gpu (plugged via USB-C) seems to care about Ubuntu only as there are official builds for this distribution only. Another problem is that not everything in

No rawhide Labs

Hi all, I'm looking at this page [1] and all builds for the Live media are failing. Currently we have not a single Lab which is building and Fedora 30 is already on the way. The mirror seems to have only the Spins. So, the result on the mentioned page are up-to-date. For the Security Lab I made

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of ldconfig scriptlets

And ldconfig part is done. I'll remove other scriptlets this/next week. On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:32 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/needless-scriptlets.txt > > Here's the list of packages which have dependency on /sbin/ldconfig > with their respective

[Bug 1664253] Upgrade perl-File-Temp to 0.2309

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664253 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1662932] Cannot install: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier-0.25-3.fc29.noarch: nothing provides perl(JavaScript::Packer1)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662932 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1668421] New: perl-Inline-Struct-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668421 Bug ID: 1668421 Summary: perl-Inline-Struct-0.26 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Inline-Struct Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: systemd unit file not updated on new package update

I reply to your message in the bottom part, just let me explain how I got this situation, because my previous message lacked of informations. I have built and installed a new BOINC release with a systemd unit file patch, and I have noticed that the service behaviour has not changed. Therefore I

Re: Attempt to update ispc

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:36:22AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > Upstream ispc updated to 1.10.0.  Unfortunately, the build failed with > broken clang++ compiler according to koji   > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32150411) > > Can someone investigate

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal for EPSCO: Python34 Moving to Python36

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 15:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 18. 11. 18 1:21, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 11/15/18 10:08 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> I missed this in the last meeting from items that needed to be voted on. > >> > >> The changes would be to make epel macros to have > >> > >>

Re: Agenda for Tuesday's Modularity Working Group Meeting (2019-01-22)

...and it was cancelled because the usually attending people are on travels. On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 15:33 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Sorry that this one's a little late, scheduling snafu... > > Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the > Fedora Modularity Working

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:46:44 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno mar, 22/01/2019 alle 09.24 -0500, John Harris ha scritto: > > On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:11:24 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > > > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro! ... a S.O. like > > > othermentioned in this page

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:35:46 AM EST Luis Manuel Segundo wrote: > Hello Dario, you can download the necessary driver for your Fedora from this > address https://github.com/displaylink-rpm/displaylink-rpm/releases and > then run the RPM with this command > e.g. > sudo dnf install

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

Il giorno mar, 22/01/2019 alle 09.24 -0500, John Harris ha scritto: > On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:11:24 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro! ... a S.O. like > > othermentioned in this page is: "Linux"! ... not "Ubuntu" > > S.O? Opss! I meant O.S. (Operating

Re: [atomic-announce] Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190121.0

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:54 AM wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: > > Version: 29.20190121.0 > Commit(x86_64): > cdcbea2ccac7804770be806befd30895457de080d1525ee6050a5bebdfeefeb7 > Commit(aarch64): >

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

Hello Dario, you can download the necessary driver for your Fedora from this address https://github.com/displaylink-rpm/displaylink-rpm/releases and then run the RPM with this command e.g. sudo dnf install fedora-29-displaylink-1.5.1-1.x86_64.rpm Regards

Agenda for Tuesday's Modularity Working Group Meeting (2019-01-22)

Sorry that this one's a little late, scheduling snafu... Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the Fedora Modularity Working Group meeting on Tuesday at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-3 on irc.freenode.net. To find out when this is in your local time zone, check the

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

> Hi, I would like to try to use un my Asus notebook with Fedora 29 this ASUS > USB3.0 HZ-3 Docking Station > https://www.asus.com/it/Laptops-Accessories/ASUS_USB30_HZ3_Docking_Station/ > > For Linux I have found this driver: > https://www.displaylink.com/downloads/ > > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O,

Re: Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 9:11:24 AM EST Dario Lesca wrote: > But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro! ... a S.O. like other > mentioned in this page is: "Linux"! ... not "Ubuntu" S.O? > > Ubuntu is Linux, Linux is not Ubuntu! Ubuntu includes Linux, yes. > This is very irritating ... Why

Ruby soname bump

Hi, We have Ruby 2.6 ready in side tag and we are about to merge the changes back to Rawhide [1]. Therefore I just want to give heads up that although we rebuilt most of the packages due to libruby soname bump, there might still be some breakage. You can find the list of packages with know issue

Driver for USB 3.0 Docking Station (displaylink?)

Hi, I would like to try to use un my Asus notebook with Fedora 29 this ASUS USB3.0 HZ-3 Docking Station https://www.asus.com/it/Laptops-Accessories/ASUS_USB30_HZ3_Docking_Station/ For Linux I have found this driver: https://www.displaylink.com/downloads/ But "Ubuntu" is not a S.O, it's a Distro!

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal for EPSCO: Python34 Moving to Python36

On 18. 11. 18 1:21, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/15/18 10:08 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I missed this in the last meeting from items that needed to be voted on. The changes would be to make epel macros to have %python3_pkgversion 36 %python3_other_pkgversion 34 This should allow for

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal for EPSCO: Python34 Moving to Python36

On 18. 11. 18 1:21, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/15/18 10:08 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I missed this in the last meeting from items that needed to be voted on. The changes would be to make epel macros to have %python3_pkgversion 36 %python3_other_pkgversion 34 This should allow for

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On ti, 22 tammi 2019, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this year and only realized that when I've successfully built first non-scratch gcc 9 rpms. I believe Carlos has been

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this > year and only realized that when I've successfully built first non-scratch > gcc 9 rpms. I believe Carlos has been mentioning GCC when F30 mass rebuild >

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190121.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190121.0 Commit(x86_64): cdcbea2ccac7804770be806befd30895457de080d1525ee6050a5bebdfeefeb7 Commit(aarch64): 327fc6d2c7c8dc44733b6cfa5e8db3711ba15a46022862688427b162cd55d9cf Commit(ppc64le):

[389-devel] Re: [discuss] composable object types in lib389

On 01/22/2019 09:51 AM, Anuj Borah wrote: @Ludwig Krispenz   The script i have attached in my previous mail was ported from the TET script . Now i am attaching the main bash script , please check it out. I'll do it once again, but William and I had asked several

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On 22. 01. 19 10:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:02:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: This is already happening, gcc was updated, I see bugs for gcc 9 related FTBFS being open. This is not a proper way to coordinate this kind of thing. I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

Am Montag, den 21.01.2019, 15:16 -0500 schrieb Ben Cotton: > * Proposal owners: > Build gcc in f30, rebuild packages that have direct dependencies on > exact gcc version (libtool, annobin, gcc-python-plugin). Did not happen. Rawhide buildroot was broken yesterday around 9:50 UTC. I was doing the

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:02:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > This is already happening, gcc was updated, I see bugs for gcc 9 related > FTBFS being open. This is not a proper way to coordinate this kind of thing. I'm sorry, I forgot to create the every year feature request for GCC this year

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On 21. 01. 19 23:42, Ben Cotton wrote: On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I think we want this to go through. The new version is already packaged and I know some work has been done to resolve compilation failures. There's still plenty of time to resolve the

[389-devel] Re: [discuss] composable object types in lib389

@Ludwig Krispenz The script i have attached in my previous mail was ported from the TET script . Now i am attaching the main bash script , please check it out. On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 1:48 PM Ludwig wrote: > > > On 01/22/2019 08:57 AM, Anuj Borah wrote: > > @Ludwig Krispenz , exactly,

[389-devel] Re: [discuss] composable object types in lib389

On 01/22/2019 08:57 AM, Anuj Borah wrote: @Ludwig Krispenz   , exactly, Please check attached script , how it is implemented . Filter role and aci combination . But this is not testing role based acis, your bind rule always is userdn=, and you are using the

[Bug 1662966] Upgrade perl-Text-CSV to 1.99

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662966 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|