Does Fedora support the Intel 82801 RST (fake)RAID chip used in Lenovo's newest
ThinkPad P72? No F29 installer can see the two 2T SSDs setup as a RAID1 mirror,
either as a /dev/mdN array or individually as /dev/sdX or /dev/nvmeN. Adam
Williamson suggested I put this question to #fedora-devel. I
Upstream ISPC [0] will need a dockerfile to reproduce the failure to
build ispc package in Fedora[1][2]. Unfortunately, I know very little
about the Docker functionality so I will need assistance to do so.
The docker file for Fedora is inside the upstream tarball .
Thanks in advance.
Luya
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680208
Bug ID: 1680208
Summary: perl-JSON-4.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-JSON
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679579
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.90-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679806
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Socket-2.029-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679806
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679579
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Add -fsigned-char fix the build thanks, I still not understood, why only
ppc64le and GCC 9
A 22 de fevereiro de 2019 07:05:25 WET, Florian Weimer
escreveu:
>* Jerry James:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 7:28 PM Sérgio Basto
>wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm trying fix a FTBFS of gdcm , but just in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680158
Bug ID: 1680158
Summary: fusioninventory-agent-2.4.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fusioninventory-agent
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 2:19 PM Rick Elrod wrote:
> I'm here, I'm here. ;)
>
> Richard, would it be okay if I add you as a committer/comaintainer on
> that package? As you can tell, I have not had time to properly
> maintain it of late.
>
That'll work. Thanks!
Richard
I'm here, I'm here. ;)
Richard, would it be okay if I add you as a committer/comaintainer on
that package? As you can tell, I have not had time to properly
maintain it of late.
Rick
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:26 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Is anyone able to contact Rick? A BZ ticket[1] has not
There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-27 20:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4-6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-02-27 20:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
Fedora Infrastructure would like
There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-26 20:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-02-26 20:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
Fedora Infrastructure would like to
As we've now reached the branch point, it's time to start weekly
blocker status mails.
Action summary
=
Accepted blockers
-
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672761
ACTION: QA / dm-multipath team to verify the fix is fully complete
2.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50239
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
I want to start a brief discussion about a major problem we have backend
transaction plugins and the entry caches. I'm finding that when we get
into a nested state of be txn plugins and one of the later plugins that
is called fails then while we don't commit the disk changes (they are
Is anyone able to contact Rick? A BZ ticket[1] has not gotten a response
from some time.
Use fedora-active-user it looks like he's logged in recently but all other
activity has been from last year:
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user codeblock --email rel...@redhat.com
Last login in FAS:
On 2/22/19 1:01 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
file and teach RPM and mock how to
On 2/22/19 2:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:01 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies
Once upon a time, Petr Viktorin said:
> Yes, automagic generators don't work in the long run. Requirements
> are always better listed explicitly.
Perl has been using automatic generators for ages. They're not perfect,
but they're really good and work fine in the most common cases.
--
Chris
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 6:01 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
> On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
> >
> > = BuildRequires Generators =
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
> >
Hello,
I have orphaned the xcdroast package, feel free to take it or let it die. It
should be rebased but since the upstream version relies on the original
CDDL-licensed cdrtools there will always be some undroppable patches required
I'm afraid.
Regards,
--
Tomáš Smetana
OpenShift Engineering,
On 2/22/19 12:01 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
file and teach RPM and mock how to
On 2/18/19 9:19 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators
= BuildRequires Generators =
== Summary ==
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec
file and teach RPM and mock how to handle this.
I am very excited about this
On 2/19/19 7:04 PM, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi,
maybe you already noticed, there's a project called pipreqs that parses python
code for import statements. We've already a review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665749
Although, I doubt in general that any automagic with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ---
Ok. Dridi, please update the spec file according to above mentioned advice and
notify me here after doing so. I will then resume the full-featured formal
review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ngomp...@gmail.com |ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
@Petr, I'm happy to hand this off to you, as I only grabbed it because he
seemed to be asking for reviewers. An expert is always better. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ---
Neal seems interested in reviewing this package. Thus only few notes from me:
The URL value point to an umbrella project, not the the strip-nondeterminism
itself. I'd rather use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679806
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Socket-2.029-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-57ae02c030
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679806
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Socket-2.029-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-55312d5125
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679806
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Socket-2.029-1.fc31|perl-Socket-2.029-1.fc30
--
You are
On 2/21/19 8:22 PM, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
On 2/20/2019 7:29 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 2/20/19 5:19 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:46 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
No, that was a bad joke from my end, what I need is proper apt in
Fedora to use sbuild.
If you also do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679806
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
35 matches
Mail list logo
