[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 268 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 76 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2 tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7 44

Re: Package with open and closed dual license

Kevin Kofler wrote: > try tcplay, a BSD-licensed interoperable implementation that is > already packaged in Fedora. tcplay hasn't been maintained in a while. Upstream hasn't pushed any commits since 2014. https://github.com/bwalex/tc-play And the history of builds for new releases of Fedora

Re: On GCL and libselinux

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:23 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > I'm surprised that you can turn off ASLR for a running process. > Clearly, this can only be partially effective. I think the other bits > (adjusting the heap break) are what matters. You need to move that > initialization code into malloc

normaliz soname change

I'm building normaliz 3.7.2 for Rawhide. It changes the soname from libnormaliz.so.0 to libnormaliz.so.3. The only dependent package is polymake, which I am rebuilding. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Re: Groups are not accessible by filter

> On 9 May 2019, at 14:52, Anuj Borah wrote: > > @William Brown > > Its not relevant to this subject line , but its related to lib389 . > > Question : Does get_attrs_vals_utf8 and all get_attrs_vals types should case > sensitive ?? > > Look at bellow result: > > with search_s: > >

[Bug 1707588] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000121 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707588 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1708462] New: perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708462 Bug ID: 1708462 Summary: perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DAVTalk Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1704271] perl-PAR-Packer-1.048 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704271 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Also, if for some reason I don't grok one absolutely needs to use the > exact same spec file for Fedora 31+ and EPEL7 (which is based on F19), > than keeping the dependency as it is now is also an option. One extra > unneeded

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:56:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:02 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by > > %systemd_requires) from packages which provide systemd units. > > > >

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:02 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by > %systemd_requires) from packages which provide systemd units. > In general, I think this idea has some solid foundation. But I think it'd be

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

Miro Hrončok wrote: >> So long as EPEL (and Rawhide, tbh) are under the aegis of Fedora, it >> would be nice at least /some/ effort was made not to toss over >> incompatible changes, or a broad need for dist conditionals, across the >> package ecosystem with such cavilerity. > > It's called

[EPEL-devel] Re: KDE rebuild for RHEL8

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:38 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 5/8/19 4:09 PM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:03 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > >> > >> I have uploaded my build to my fedora people area. Unfortunately the > >> source rpm's wouldn't fit. I'll work on getting just the

[Bug 1708398] New: perl-Config-Model-Tester-4.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708398 Bug ID: 1708398 Summary: perl-Config-Model-Tester-4.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Config-Model-Tester Keywords:

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Japheth Cleaver: > > On 5/9/2019 7:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > > > > On 5/9/19 9:00 AM,

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 08:12:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 05. 19 19:21, Japheth Cleaver wrote: > >On 5/9/2019 7:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > >>>On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On 09. 05. 19 19:21, Japheth Cleaver wrote: On 5/9/2019 7:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On 09. 05. 19 16:19, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by %systemd_requires) from packages which provide systemd units. I now filed [1], which removes the recommendation to use

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:57 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Japheth Cleaver: > > On 5/9/2019 7:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > > > > On 5/9/19 9:00 AM,

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2019, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Japheth Cleaver: > On 5/9/2019 7:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > > > On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > let's drop the

Intent to orphan python-pytest-testmon

Hey! I intent to orphan python-pytest-testmon. I no longer have use for it and it is a leaf package. Th package is usually low maintenance, except now it doesn't build with Python 3.8 yet. https://github.com/tarpas/pytest-testmon/issues/139 So my plan is to orphan it and eventually also

Intent to orphan python-pytest-testmon

Hey! I intent to orphan python-pytest-testmon. I no longer have use for it and it is a leaf package. Th package is usually low maintenance, except now it doesn't build with Python 3.8 yet. https://github.com/tarpas/pytest-testmon/issues/139 So my plan is to orphan it and eventually also

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On 5/9/2019 7:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by %systemd_requires) from packages which

Re: Upgrade to F30 gone wrong

On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:00 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 5/9/19 12:55 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2019, 4:50 AM Panu Matilainen > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nicolas' point is that the rescue boot entry only works in a limited > >

cleaning up installation of systemd *user* units

Hi everyone, tl;dr: I submitted some PRs. If you didn't get a PR, feel free to ignore this. Otherwise read on for a lengthy explanation... We now have a round 100 user units packaged in Fedora, yay! Our packaging guidelines [1] specify that they should be packaged essentially in the same way as

Fedora Rawhide-20190509.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 47 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 13/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 398345

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

Kevin and Clement, thanks for the explanation. I am looking forward to seeing the final compose. > So, likely we haven't had a armv7 fedora 30 compose recently, and so no one has updated it. The container sig would be the ones to ask here. Sure, I will subscribe the mailing list. > Yes I do

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by > > %systemd_requires) from packages which provide systemd units. > > > > I now filed [1],

Do you use Bodhi's REST API or Python bindings?

Greetings! Do you use Bodhi's REST API or Python bindings? If so, we are considering changing them and would like your feedback. You can reply off-list to me, or you can drop a comment here if you'd like to be involved: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3204 Thanks! signature.asc

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190509.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190508.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190509.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 174 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 126.50 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

On 5/9/19 9:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by > %systemd_requires) from packages which provide systemd units. > > I now filed [1], which removes the recommendation to use %systemd_requires. > Quoting from

Re: On GCL and libselinux

* Daniel P. Berrangé: > Though as Florian suggests, the better solution is to not have > the personality() call in main - have it called by malloc(), or > possibly a constructor function that's part of the object > providing the malloc replacement. The latter does not work because the ELF

dropping %systemd_requires from most packages (guidelines change and mass package update proposal)

Hi, let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as implemented by %systemd_requires) from packages which provide systemd units. I now filed [1], which removes the recommendation to use %systemd_requires. Quoting from that ticket: Nowadays systemd.rpm does a preset-all call when it is

Re: I wish to stop maintaining python2-defusedxml

On 04. 05. 19 17:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27. 04. 19 15:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 20. 04. 19 20:33, Miro Hrončok wrote: Only one package (fawkes-devenv) requires python2-defusedxml. It already has broken dependencies on mogodb-server and the source package (fawkes) doesn't build.

[Bug 1708214] New: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708214 Bug ID: 1708214 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-DNS-SEC to 1.13 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC Assignee: wjhns...@hardakers.net

[Bug 1706973] Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.134

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706973 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Package with open and closed dual license

Andrew Toskin wrote: > Oh, sorry, I hadn't thought to try searching for previous threads about > VeraCrypt in particular. > > And, looking at it again, the dual license here is tricky, because it > looks like the old TrueCrypt files are still TrueCrypt-licensed, while the > new files are

Re: On GCL and libselinux

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 06:49:30PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > Awhile back, I mentioned that GCL was building in mock on my local > machine, but was segfaulting on the koji builders. By dint of much > experimentation, I now know what is going on. For the enlightenment > of anybody who cares: >

Re: On GCL and libselinux

* Jerry James: > Awhile back, I mentioned that GCL was building in mock on my local > machine, but was segfaulting on the koji builders. By dint of much > experimentation, I now know what is going on. For the enlightenment > of anybody who cares: > > - GCL is linked with libtirpc. > - libtirpc

[Bug 1683158] stompclt-1.6 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683158 lionel.c...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Docker and user namespaces on F30

On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 19:09 +0200, Jun Aruga wrote: > > Which looks even stranger. > > > > I see we don't have the same version of docker. I have version > > 18.06.3, > > build d7080c1. Did you install docker from > > https://docs.docker.com/install/ ? > > Yes, for docker-ce I installed it from

Re: Upgrade to F30 gone wrong

On 5/9/19 12:55 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2019, 4:50 AM Panu Matilainen > wrote: Nicolas' point is that the rescue boot entry only works in a limited number of scenarios. I'm not sure which of three 'rescue' options is being discussed.

[Bug 1707588] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000121 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707588 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test2-Suite-0.000121-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f9bf60a79e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1707588] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000121 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707588 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|