https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708843
Bug ID: 1708843
Summary: perl-Text-CSV-2.00 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-CSV
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708462
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.16-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 7/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 399406
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190510.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190510.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 296
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 33
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.01 GiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/05/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190510git9e80a33.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708462
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704989
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708826
Bug ID: 1708826
Summary: perl-Geo-ShapeFile-3.00 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Geo-ShapeFile
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi all,
With gpg2 being the default in F30, and it having better support for
using auth subkeys as SSH keys, I no longer have need of
monkeysphere's ability to transfer keys from gpg-agent to ssh-agent
for myself. However, it may have other uses than what I was using it
for, so if anybody wants
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:29, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 23:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [...]
> > This is not a zero cost on our side to keep this going, and its benefits
> > are currently to 90 systems versus 1.5 million
On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 23:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[...]
> This is not a zero cost on our side to keep this going, and its benefits
> are currently to 90 systems versus 1.5 million systems (x86_64). If it is
> important enough that we need to keep doing it, then we will have to find
>
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 16:22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 18:07, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > With Fedora soon to no longer build for the PPC64 platform, the ability
> for
> > EPEL to continue support of this platform is going to
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50364
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 18:07, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> With Fedora soon to no longer build for the PPC64 platform, the ability for
> EPEL to continue support of this platform is going to get much harder.
I assume that's because the builders are running Fedora. What if they
were rebuilt to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
The following packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MingwEnvToolchainUpdate
== Summary ==
Update the MinGW base environment and toolchain to the latest upstream
stable releases.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:smani|Sandro Mani]]
* Email: manisan...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
The following packages
Greetings!
Back in December, I sent out a threat^Wannouncement that I would be
making a lot of backwards incompatible changes to Bodhi in an upcoming
4.0.0 release[0].
I didn't expect it to take this long at the time, but five months later
we finally have a beta built[1] and deployed to
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 12:10 PM, Tomasz Torcz
wrote:
This is not what Fedora ships. We have (in F30)
docker-1.13.1-67.git1185cfd or moby-engine-18.06.3-2.ce.gitd7080c1.
What is going on with this very weird, very confusing versioning? The
Fedora version doesn't even look like the
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 04:17:18PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote:
> Podman 1.2 and Docker CE 18.09.5 on My Fedora 30 work for your use case.
>
> $ docker --version
> Docker version 18.09.5, build e8ff056
This is not what Fedora ships. We have (in F30)
docker-1.13.1-67.git1185cfd or
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 398845
With Fedora soon to no longer build for the PPC64 platform, the ability for
EPEL to continue support of this platform is going to get much harder.
As such, it would be good to look at ending support for this platform in
our build system when RHEL-7.7 happens.
What could be done is the following:
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-05-10)
===
Meeting started by mhroncok at 15:00:13 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-05-10/fesco.2019-05-10-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190509.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190510.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 125
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 105.82 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708688
Bug ID: 1708688
Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-DeploymentHandler-0.002231 is
available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708586
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707920
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |p...@city-fan.org
--
You are
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 08:21:24AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:27 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:56:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:02 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
On 5/9/19 9:13 PM, William Brown wrote:
Hi all,
So I think it's time for me to write some logging code to improve the
situation. Relevant links before we start:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49415
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/logging-performance-improvement.html
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:27 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 04:56:25PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:02 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > let's drop the requirement and ordering on systemd (as
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-05-10 15:00 UTC'
This is today, sorry for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708586
Bug ID: 1708586
Summary: perl-Array-Diff-0.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Array-Diff
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708462
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.16-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9ae6581bdf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 08:27:07AM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> It is up to you. If the plan is always to have master in sync with your
> module stream, then you can keep master. If you want to retire sway from
> rawhide at some point, you would need to move to the stream branch.
This.
Though
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708462
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.16-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f5230a2c48
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708462
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.16-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b5c0c68401
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708462
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708398
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
It is up to you. If the plan is always to have master in sync with your
module stream, then you can keep master. If you want to retire sway from
rawhide at some point, you would need to move to the stream branch.
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:25 AM Till Hofmann
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently
On 5/9/2019 4:14 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
Also, if for some reason I don't grok one absolutely needs to use the
exact same spec file for Fedora 31+ and EPEL7 (which is based on F19),
than keeping the dependency as it is now
Hi all,
I'm currently working on a module for sway. We basically just want to
have a stream that always contains the latest version of sway (including
all its dependencies), the same version that is also in rawhide (this
stream should be named 'rolling' if I understand the guidelines
correctly).
41 matches
Mail list logo
