On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:18:06AM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
> Bugzilla is reporting the following error for the slim package:
> %systemd_postun scriptlets need service files as an argument
> I looked online a bit and could not find immediately what I should do here.
> Could
Hi,
Bugzilla is reporting the following error for the slim package:
%systemd_postun scriptlets need service files as an argument
I looked online a bit and could not find immediately what I should do here.
Could someone please point me to some suggestions/help?
I do not want the package to be
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-10-22 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
Hello, as you can read here [1], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a
new people focused workflow for newcomers.
In two words: people willing to contribute, instead of sending them
directly to wiki pages or documentation sites, we would like to discuss
with them and keep them in the wheel,
Hello, as you can read here [1], the Fedora Join SIG is experimenting a
new people focused workflow for newcomers.
In two words: people willing to contribute, instead of sending them
directly to wiki pages or documentation sites, we would like to discuss
with them and keep them in the wheel,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763924
Bug ID: 1763924
Summary: perl-Sys-Syslog-0.36 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Syslog
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
> On 22 Oct 2019, at 07:28, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/19 10:00 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 19:55, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> I like your radical approach :-)
>>>
>>> In my opinion our connection code is getting to complicated by
On 10/9/19 10:00 PM, William Brown wrote:
On 9 Oct 2019, at 19:55, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi William,
I like your radical approach :-)
In my opinion our connection code is getting to complicated by maintaining two
different implementations in parallel - not separated, but intermangled
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 03:32 Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
>
I'll trade you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hello,
after the recent discussions, the Fedora's "Fails to Build From Source" policy
[0] has been updated [1][2].
The changes include:
## The policy no longer requires e-mails to devel to orphan a package
This requirement made automation hard and resulted in most of the packages never
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:59:30AM +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
> FYI: FESCO ticket was created
>
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2246
Yeah, and we had a bit more discussion there, which we probibly should
have just had here. ;)
In particular bcotton asked how we avoid scheduling the
* Debarshi Ray:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 07:19:02AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>> On Monday, October 14, 2019 6:12:18 AM MST mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:49 AM, John M. Harris Jr
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > > It's good that we can
>> > > reference external
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 07:19:02AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, October 14, 2019 6:12:18 AM MST mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:49 AM, John M. Harris Jr
> >
> > wrote:
> > > It's good that we can
> > > reference external repositories such as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20191020-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763514
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.16-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hi Zbigniew and Kevin
Many thanks for your explanation.
I clearly understand the htslib's situation now.
--
Jun | He - His - Him
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 12:59, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hello EPEL maintainers and users,
>
> I've found today that epel8 builds are mangling python shebangs to
> platform-python (which is somewhat internal implementation of python
> for internal RHEL needs). So depending on that is quite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753401
--- Comment #1 from Denis Fateyev ---
Any updates?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for some packages, and none of our other packages depend
on these anymore. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of
them, preferably someone who actively uses them or maintains a package
that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761523
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20191020.n.0):
ID: 473207 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/473207
ID: 473215 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20191020-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763514
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.16-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
Hello EPEL maintainers and users,
I've found today that epel8 builds are mangling python shebangs to
platform-python (which is somewhat internal implementation of python
for internal RHEL needs). So depending on that is quite problematic
and will break at some point.
+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762918
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762255
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761155
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1c488e885d
python-ecdsa-0.13.3-1.el8
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-942baf668f
nsd-4.2.2-1.el8
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761858
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762022
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761491
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762021
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
OLD: Fedora-31-20191020.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191021.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:57:48AM +0200, Christian Kellner wrote:
> First of all, sorry for replying so late, Benjman was quite busy with
> GNOME and sytemd user session transistion and is now on a longer PTO.
>
> On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 16:29 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > So what are we going
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763497
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763494
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763495
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-10-21/fesco.2019-10-21-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-10-21/fesco.2019-10-21-15.00.txt
Log:
On 21. 10. 19 17:36, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 10. 19 17:17, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm working on packaging opencasecade for Fedora as OCE (occt community
edition) has not been updated in years.
Unfortunately while the occt license was updated to be truly open source they
still require a
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 10:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on packaging opencasecade for Fedora as OCE (occt community
> edition) has not been updated in years.
>
> Unfortunately while the occt license was updated to be truly open source
> they still require a login to download the
On 21. 10. 19 17:17, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm working on packaging opencasecade for Fedora as OCE (occt community edition)
has not been updated in years.
Unfortunately while the occt license was updated to be truly open source they
still require a login to download the source archive.
Is
I'm working on packaging opencasecade for Fedora as OCE (occt community
edition) has not been updated in years.
Unfortunately while the occt license was updated to be truly open source
they still require a login to download the source archive.
Is this a FOSS problem or just a technical/infra
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 11:08, Randy Barlow wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The problem is that COPRs do not have any way of communicating with
> > each other. If I grab from copr-A and it has libfoo-2.3.1-1 and I
> > grab
> > from copr-B and it has
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 14:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Packaging in Fedora is
> definitely harder than it used to be. We still haven't really
> recovered from
> pkgdb retirement, various infra tools don't have enough support, etc.
> No easy solutions to this problem either, but I
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 09:37, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 15:17 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 01:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > > If I were to start
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 14:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> The problem is hard. If there was an obvious solution, we wouldn't be
> having this discussion.
I've pointed out a few times that other distros have solved the "too
fast, too slow" problem. In at least one case, as long ago
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 09:16 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The problem is that COPRs do not have any way of communicating with
> each other. If I grab from copr-A and it has libfoo-2.3.1-1 and I
> grab
> from copr-B and it has libfoo-2.3.2-2 then I am going to replace
> copr-A's packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763653
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
On 10/21/19 7:16 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 01:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
If I were to start from scratch on this, I would look at the simplest
solution I would want from Boltron. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763514
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762255
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763495
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763497
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
(In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1)
> I appreciate if you take care of the package for epel7.
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/18612
How about the el6 branch?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763494
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763494
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I appreciate if you take care of the package for epel7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763497
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I appreciate if you take care of the package for epel7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763495
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I appreciate if you take care of the package for epel7.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:36:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 15:17 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 01:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > > If I
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 15:17 Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 01:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > If I were to start from scratch on this, I would look at the simplest
> > > solution I
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 01:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 09:30:52PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > If I were to start from scratch on this, I would look at the simplest
> > solution I would want from Boltron. I want to make it so a package team can
> >
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:23 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:42:02PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:49:18PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 03:52:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
>
>
>
> This has been working quite fine so far, so it would be bad to loose this
> capability, as the actual
> users in question are definitely not power users and will not be able to
> fix any of these issues
> by themselves.
>
>
+1, this was one of my points, too. I think that Fedora should be
On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 13:05 +0200, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
> > Or, even better (or worse): Sombody installs GIMP via GNOME Software,
> >
> > and under the hood, dnf does its magic and installs gimp from the
> >
> > module, which might depend on another, even non-default module, etc.
> >
> > But
I've been responding privately to people stepping up, to reduce noise.
Thank you to everyone who has volunteered so far :-)
FYI, nginx and tor/torsocks have new owners now. Felix (heffer) and
Marcel (maha) respectively.
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
On 10/20/2019 11:28 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> welcome to Fedora. sshguard review is more than enough for a first package,
> quite a complicated beast. I'll sponsor you into the packager group.
>
> Zbyszek
Hi,
sorry for the late reply, I was away over the
On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:28:27 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Of course if you just don't modularize FreeIPA at all you don't have
> > the kickstart problem, but then you *do* still have the 'we're stuck
> > shipping this one version of FreeIPA for the next
Hi all,
It's become clear that I haven't had the time I thought I'd have this past
year due to $life ...
These are in a bit of a broken state and right now I'd advise people that
need them to use upstream packages/containers.
I don't foresee sufficient time coming in the near future with family
Dne 18. 10. 19 v 17:04 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:03:24PM +0200, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>> Exactly ... this is what I believe, too. I think that Fedora users put
>> Fedora on their desktops and laptops to be creative in many ways of
>> creativity. Some make make music,
Hello,
It finally built, and I have a review up here if anyone would like to
swap reviews:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
Thanks for your help, everyone,
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:42:02PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:49:18PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 03:52:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:09:14PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
73 matches
Mail list logo
