[Bug 1771314] perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771314 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1771314] perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771314 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1770714] Upgrade perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX to 1.02

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770714 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1771119] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771119 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com --- Comment

[Bug 1771314] New: perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771314 Bug ID: 1771314 Summary: perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Protocol-HTTP2 Keywords: FutureFeature,

[EPEL-devel] Missing Python 3 bindings for C libraries in EL7

Hi everyone, Background: The Pulp 3 upstream project is written in Python 3. Our installer normally uses PyPI for pure python packages, and OS packages for C libraries & their python bindings. Problem: With RHEL7/CentOS7, we often run into the following thorny situation: - Package libjuicy,

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b3dc1811a1 rssh-2.3.4-15.el6 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-755c983846 golang-1.13.3-1.el6 7

[Bug 1768805] perl-RDF-Trine for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768805 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1770310] perl-Net-OpenID-Consumer for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770310 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1770506] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770506 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2380c4654e freetds-1.1.20-1.el8 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c6c395c50a chromium-78.0.3904.87-1.el8 minizip1.2-1.2.11-24.el8

[Bug 1770507] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770507 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1768802] perl-RDF-Query for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768802 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1763668] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-MouseX-Foreign

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763668 Bug 1763668 depends on bug 1761857, which changed state. Bug 1761857 Summary: perl-Mouse for EL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761857 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1763667] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763667 Bug 1763667 depends on bug 1763664, which changed state. Bug 1763664 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-MooseX-AttributeHelpers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763664 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1761857] perl-Mouse for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761857 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1744699] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1765525] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Data-Denter

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765525 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1763667] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Pod-Coverage-Moose

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763667 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1762449] perl-Type-Tiny for EL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762449 Bug 1762449 depends on bug 1761857, which changed state. Bug 1761857 Summary: perl-Mouse for EL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761857 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1761983] Requesting perl-Redis for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761983 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1744690] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690 Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1744699, which changed state. Bug 1744699 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744699 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1763637] EPEL8 builds

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763637 Bug 1763637 depends on bug 1765852, which changed state. Bug 1765852 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Term-Size https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765852 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1765886] Please provide EPEL8 package

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765886 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1765529] [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Data-Serializer

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765529 Bug 1765529 depends on bug 1765525, which changed state. Bug 1765525 Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Data-Denter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765525 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1763664] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-MooseX-AttributeHelpers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763664 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[389-devel] Please review: 50703 - ldapssotoken for ds-portal

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50703 Thanks! -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[Bug 1770716] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20191110-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.17-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.70-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-11-12 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/11/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.3-20191112git66a21bf.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Review request: xournalpp

Xournal which is currently shipped by default on Fedora Design Suite has remained stale since 2016. Enter xournal++, a fork started as a rewrite in c++ to evolve beyond. The author of xournal even encourage its use considering the compatibility with the format. Here is the ticket:

[Bug 1770716] Upgrade perl-Module-CoreList to 5.20191110

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-11-12 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team

[Bug 1767613] perl-Devel-Timer-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767613 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-Timer-0.13-1.fc3 |perl-Devel-Timer-0.13-1.fc3

[Bug 1767613] perl-Devel-Timer-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767613 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

David Timms wrote: > Perhaps calling a compat package 3.2.0.develseries.3.1.3 etc would make > sense to indicate to consumers that they are using what will soon (TM) > become the main version. Please no. There is a numeric version, please use that, not some ugly version hack. What would be

Re: Modularity and all the things

Matthew Miller wrote: > One of the things I love about Fedora is that we don't have a big company- > vs-community divide. Huh? In what parallel universe do you live? Modularity is just yet another example that clearly shows this divide. Just look at how Red Hat's desktop environment choice

[Bug 1771165] New: perl-App-s2p-1.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771165 Bug ID: 1771165 Summary: perl-App-s2p-1.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-App-s2p Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Scott Talbert wrote: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux or from the horse - (Mr Ed):

Re: Modularity and all the things

Matthew Miller wrote: > There are certainly many examples of awesome great stuff that's been > created in Fedora without the investment of Red Hat (or anyone's) full > time employees. The zchunk metadata feature is a recent example. The > Stewardship SIG is another one. This is good stuff, and I'm

Next NeuroFedora team meeting: 1600 UTC on Tuesday, 12th November

Hello everyone, You are invited to the next NeuroFedora team meeting at 1600UTC on Tuesday 12th November. You can see the time in your local time zone by running this command in a terminal: $ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1600 next Tue' or please use the link below:

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Tue, 12 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote: David Timms wrote: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux or from the horse - (Mr Ed):

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

David Timms wrote: > see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux > or from the horse - (Mr Ed): > https://github.com/audacity/audacity/blob/master/linux/build.txt > " > wxWidgets: > > 1) Clone wxWidgets and checkout 3.1.1 from the Audacity fork of the > wxWidgets project: >

Re: Modularity and all the things

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 03:02:13PM -0500, Alex Scheel wrote: > From my organization at least, we have PM and management buy-in to > continue contributing so long as we don't have a long-term solution > that somebody else manages for us. So far, ursine packages have been > our solution and we've

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 8:05 am, David Timms wrote: Audacity support when my users crash because they aren't running the recommended library (there is other locally adjusted libs which Audacity uses). Not that this is different from the past - but I would like it to oops, dropped word this is "no"

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 1:33 am, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:09 Vít Ondruch > wrote: Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > David Timms wrote: >> I would like to be able to release the next Audacity (once tested) when >> it

[Bug 1771119] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771119 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1635047 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1635047=edit [patch] Update to 1.02 (#1771119) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1771119] New: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771119 Bug ID: 1771119 Summary: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 1:51 am, Scott Talbert wrote: On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote: Issue: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 2:36 am, Christopher Engelhard wrote: On 11/11/2019 3:51 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > Hi, one of the wxGTK maintainers here.  Where is the requirement to use > wxGTK 3.1 documented?  Like Kevin, I can't find that documented. And if > it is definitely required, *why* is it

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 12/11/19 12:39 am, Kevin Kofler wrote: David Timms wrote: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. see: https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Building_On_Linux or from the horse - (Mr Ed):

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to statically link with libpython3.8.a for better performance

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:23 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * John M. Harris, Jr.: > > > Anyone that has ever worked with CD images understands that every megabyte > > counts. > > It's clearly not a priority for Fedora. It wouldn't be too difficult to > replace glibc-all-langpacks with

Re: Modularity and all the things

- Original Message - > From: "Matthew Miller" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 1:16:22 PM > Subject: Re: Modularity and all the things > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:28:02PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > That's all well and good,

Re: are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 1:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:10:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and > rawhide. > > > > I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting > > killed. > > >

Re: are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:34:10AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:10:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and rawhide. > > > > I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting > >

Re: are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:10:07PM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and rawhide. > > I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting > killed. > >

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:17:28PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > 4. Documentation of how to create a module stream is comprehensive but > daunting. There is a lot of available information, but what is really > lacking is a basic walkthrough for converting a single package to a > module stream.

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 1:15 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Robbie Harwood writes: > > > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > > >> My intention was to provide some scope to the problem, because it > >> seemed that a lot of alternatives being floated were not seeing some > >> of the more subtle cases

Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

Robbie Harwood writes: > Stephen Gallagher writes: > >> My intention was to provide some scope to the problem, because it >> seemed that a lot of alternatives being floated were not seeing some >> of the more subtle cases that we were trying to address. However, the >> biggest problem is that

Re: Modularity and all the things

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 10:28:02PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > That's all well and good, but you seem to be forgetting that people > are actually getting *paid* to work on modularity for fedora. > Any proposal for an alternative, which apparently needs to arrive at > least at MVP /

are the ppc64le builders low on memory?

Last week I built ceph 14.2.4-2 and it built fine on both fc31 and rawhide. I fixed a typo for a Requires: and the ppc64le builds today are getting killed. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7359/38917359/build.log thanks -- Kaleb ___

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 11. 11. 19 19:09, Miro Hrončok wrote: Excellent. I think this is ready to be presented to fesco for a vote. Unless we decide it requires a change proposal. To limit the required bureaucracy, I can help draft it. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On 11. 11. 19 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 09:51:33AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Before you do this, can we figure out the details? 1. Do we use bodhi to handle the freeze? Previously, this would not be possible, as

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-11-11)

= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-11-11) = Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-11-11/fesco.2019-11-11-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 09:51:33AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Before you do this, can we figure out the details? > > > > 1. Do we use bodhi to handle the freeze? > > > > Previously, this would not be possible, as bodhi was not yet

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: On-demand Side Tags

Per conversation with Miro and Zbigniew, this proposal is withdrawn for the time being. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal

Hi, A fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal has been pushed to FPC today: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/934 It should be clearer, more opinionated, and take into account: – updates of The OpenType standard – variable fonts – web fonts – upstream depreciation of non

Fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal

Hi, A fonts packaging policy rewrite proposal has been pushed to FPC today: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/934 It should be clearer, more opinionated, and take into account: – updates of The OpenType standard – variable fonts – web fonts – upstream depreciation of non

[389-devel] please review: PR 50700 - Add disk monitor to CLI and UI

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50700 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora 31 Elections: Nomination period open

Reminder that the nominations for various Fedora leadership bodies are open through 23:59 UTC on 13 November. Nominations must be submitted before that time on the appropriate wiki page (links below). Current nomination counts: FESCo: 6 for 5 seats Council: 0 for 1 seat Mindshare: 1 for 1 seat

Re: Fedora 31 Elections: Nomination period open

Reminder that the nominations for various Fedora leadership bodies are open through 23:59 UTC on 13 November. Nominations must be submitted before that time on the appropriate wiki page (links below). Current nomination counts: FESCo: 6 for 5 seats Council: 0 for 1 seat Mindshare: 1 for 1 seat

Re: Fedora 31 Does Not Use Swap Well?

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 8:42 PM Code Zombie wrote: > > > Hi, > I recently installed a fresh Fedora 31 in order to improve performance. I > have started to have a new problem. When my memory fills up when launching an > Android emulator, the system starts acting very slowly and becomes quite >

pcre2-10.34-RC2 with AArch64 SIMD JIT

I've just pushed pcre2-10.34-RC2 into Fedora 32. Among some boring featuring like Unicode 12.1.0 and matching in invalid UTF strings, now the AArch64 JIT compiler uses NEON instructions for better performance. It's a quite fresh new code and there were some issues with it that I believe are

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On 11/11/2019 3:51 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > Hi, one of the wxGTK maintainers here.  Where is the requirement to use > wxGTK 3.1 documented?  Like Kevin, I can't find that documented.  And if > it is definitely required, *why* is it required? On Archlinux audacity-git [1] builds against the

Re: I wrote a blog on why we moved Fedora 31 to cgroup V2

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:06:40AM -0500, Daniel Walsh wrote: > https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/fedora-31-control-group-v2 You write that snap does not run with v2, but linked bug shows snapd was fixed 2 months ago: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bb0a25e48d2 -- Tomasz

Re: Python Annual Release Cycle adjusted to match odd-numbered Fedora releases

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > tl;dr New Python 3.X versions will be released annually, with RC > period adjusted to make it possible to update Python in odd-numbered > Fedora releases. We plan to submit the Python 3.9 change proposal > for Fedora 33 after the

Re: Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2019-11-11)

> F32 System-Wide Change: Modules in non-Modular Buildroot > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2257 > Sorry, this is actually https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2255 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

I wrote a blog on why we moved Fedora 31 to cgroup V2

https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/fedora-31-control-group-v2 If you like it, please put it out on social media. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, David Timms wrote: Issue: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2 release. Upstream is currently at 3.1.3 and

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 4:01 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Before you do this, can we figure out the details? > > 1. Do we use bodhi to handle the freeze? > > Previously, this would not be possible, as bodhi was not yet "activated" at > branching, however with rawhide gating (and hopefully "branched

[Bug 1770506] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770506 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1770507] Plans for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770507 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 15:09 Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > > David Timms wrote: > >> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. > > Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. > > > >> The normal Fedora

[Bug 1770721] Upgrade perl-Parse-PMFile to 0.42

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770721 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

Dne 11. 11. 19 v 14:39 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > David Timms wrote: >> Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. > Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. > >> The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. >> wxGTK3.1 is

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

David Timms wrote: > Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. Does it really? I cannot find this requirement in their git repository. > The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. > wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to

Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

Issue: Audacity development (git) requires linking against wxGTK3.1. The normal Fedora wxGTK3 package is at wxGTK3-3.04 in F29/30/31/devel. wxGTK3.1 is a development series which eventually leads to wxGTK3.2 release. Upstream is currently at 3.1.3 and expecting at least a 3.1.4 next year.

Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow

On 08. 11. 19 13:16, Miro Hrončok wrote: According to the policy for packages that fail to build from source: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ I plan to orphan packages with NEW Fedora 31 Fail To Build From Source bugzillas tomorrow.

[Bug 1770719] Upgrade perl-Net-LibIDN2 to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770719 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-5bdc4ba7c3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5bdc4ba7c3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-eb875b74dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-eb875b74dc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-e57eb4c32c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e57eb4c32c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Review swap for python-molten

Hi everyone, I'd like to ask for a review for python-molten: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770162 It requires python-typing-inspect (which will be reviewed by my sponsor): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768490 I'm open for any review in exchange. Thanks in

[Bug 1770718] Upgrade perl-Net-DAVTalk to 0.17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770718 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-24efeb13e4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-24efeb13e4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1770717] Upgrade perl-Module-Load-Conditional to 0.70

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-c72d751f08 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c72d751f08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

  1   2   >