https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782351
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781553
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||upstream-release-monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781826
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-eecb612d98 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-eecb612d98
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781752
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781750
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782662
Bug ID: 1782662
Summary: perl-PDL-2.020 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/12/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.5-20191212git80e0ce2.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690
Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1758485, which changed state.
Bug 1758485 Summary: spawn-fcgi for EL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758485
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690
Bug 1744690 depends on bug 1775926, which changed state.
Bug 1775926 Summary: Spawn-fcgi dependency failing lightpd-fastcgi install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775926
What|Removed |Added
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
484 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
226 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
224
John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> To clarify a bit, the most common method of extracting a key from a TPM
> has been to simply desolder the TPM from the system and solder it onto
> another system. This works with the popular implementations.
Surely that is not a process that you want to advertise to end
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
cacti-1.2.8-1.el8
cacti-spine-1.2.8-1.el8
dwarves-1.15-4.el8
hitch-1.5.2-1.el8
perl-MooseX-Aliases-0.11-16.el8
vim-gv-0-3.20191207gitf12b8b8.el8
xorgxrdp-0.2.12-1.el8
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
I tried to submit a new update for txt2man for EPEL 8.
It was a PITA but I *THOUGHT* I got it correct. Now I see the wrong package
was included in the update.
Problem 1: bodhi couldn't find the update so I tried to paste it in
manually (which was a PITA in itself).
Instead it chose
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782622
This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for
davidcl, following
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
.
Many of your packages are FTBFS in rawhide, including
> On 11 Dec 2019, at 20:29, thierry bordaz wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/11/19 1:21 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 Dec 2019, at 19:15, thierry bordaz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> Thanks for these very interesting results.
>>> It would help if you can provide the stap scripts to make
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:25 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> Now that modules in epel are close to becoming reality [1] it has
> brought up a question.
> If it's already been asked and answered, please point me to it.
>
> If we are building a module, and one of the packages in that module
> depends on
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 17:23, Fred Gleason wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2019, at 12:50, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> The issue is that most 'users' of the language do not see a difference
> between the 2. When they say python3x they mean
> python3x+whatever-bits-i-needed. So as soon as you put in
Now that modules in epel are close to becoming reality [1] it has
brought up a question.
If it's already been asked and answered, please point me to it.
If we are building a module, and one of the packages in that module
depends on one of the missing RHEL devel packages.
Is it acceptable to build
On Dec 11, 2019, at 12:50, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The issue is that most 'users' of the language do not see a difference
> between the 2. When they say python3x they mean
> python3x+whatever-bits-i-needed. So as soon as you put in the
> interpreter.. then comes the 'why isn't python37-x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782591
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 09:18:01PM -, Simon Guest wrote:
> I just upgraded my system, and went from cobbler 2.8.4 to cobbler 2.8.5. It
> is badly broken.
...snip...
Please file a bug on it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora%20EPEL=epel7=cobbler
There's no way to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782581
Bug ID: 1782581
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-3.005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISBN
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Sorry, this is in EPEL 7.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
I just upgraded my system, and went from cobbler 2.8.4 to cobbler 2.8.5. It is
badly broken.
Looking into this further, I see there is no cobbler release tagged as 2.8.5 on
GitHub.
https://github.com/cobbler/cobbler/releases
The cobbler source RPM for so-called 2.8.5 references a git commit,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782552
Bug ID: 1782552
Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20191107 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
Keywords:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 11:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 11. 12. 19 17:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey EPEL people.
> >>
> >> We got a request to branch Python 3.7 foe EPEL 7:
> >>
> >>
On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 02:46 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
> 21 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
> openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
> below
This compose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770717
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773830
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191129151030.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.30-3120191129151030.a9ea5770 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762085
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763515
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768068
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754124
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773830
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774785
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770716
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.28-3120191129151235.a5d38390 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
On 11. 12. 19 17:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey EPEL people.
We got a request to branch Python 3.7 foe EPEL 7:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781940
Are there volunteers to make that effort? And if so, should this be done
On 11. 12. 19 17:01, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey EPEL people.
We got a request to branch Python 3.7 foe EPEL 7:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781940
Are there volunteers to make that effort? And if so, should this be done
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hey EPEL people.
>
> We got a request to branch Python 3.7 foe EPEL 7:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781940
>
> Are there volunteers to make that effort? And if so, should this be done in
> EPEL
> 8 first? And what about
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191210.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191211.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 24
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782378
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.048-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
21 of 43 required tests failed, 18 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 50/165 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781557
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||upstream-release-monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782356
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782378
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1643963
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1643963=edit
[patch] Update to 0.048 (#1782378)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782378
Bug ID: 1782378
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.048 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781753
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Co-maintainer request (to |Add perl-Net-Amazon-S3 to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781561
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||upstream-release-monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782350
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782356
Bug ID: 1782356
Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9904 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPANPLUS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782350
Bug ID: 1782350
Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.87 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782351
Bug ID: 1782351
Summary: perl-Config-Model-Tester-4.005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Config-Model-Tester
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782350
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old
sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source
URLs. If possible, please update the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782330
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781057
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||upstream-release-monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782328
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781555
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||upstream-release-monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782328
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old
sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source
URLs. If possible, please update the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782328
Bug ID: 1782328
Summary: perl-Coro-Multicore-1.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Coro-Multicore
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782330
Bug ID: 1782330
Summary: perl-Linux-Inotify2-2.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Linux-Inotify2
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782299
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782294
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782298
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782295
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782298
Bug ID: 1782298
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.093 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782299
Bug ID: 1782299
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782294
Bug ID: 1782294
Summary: perl-IO-Compress-2.093 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IO-Compress
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782295
Bug ID: 1782295
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.093 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib
Keywords:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what are the gcc 10 plans for Fedora 32? Will there be a change proposal for
> that? Is Fedora 32 the target for gcc 10?
Yes.
> I remember that gcc was updated to 9 during Fedora 30 cycle without a change
> proposal and
On Wed, 2019-12-11 at 14:53 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what are the gcc 10 plans for Fedora 32? Will there be a change
> proposal for
> that? Is Fedora 32 the target for gcc 10?
Plan is for gcc-10 to be the compiler for F32. We coordinate with the
Fedora leaders on this each year
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782281
Bug ID: 1782281
Summary: perl-MooseX-Daemonize-0.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-MooseX-Daemonize
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781552
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||upstream-release-monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782239
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Hello,
what are the gcc 10 plans for Fedora 32? Will there be a change proposal for
that? Is Fedora 32 the target for gcc 10?
I remember that gcc was updated to 9 during Fedora 30 cycle without a change
proposal and the change proposal was submitted later, after the deadline and
after gcc
I would like to take http_ping, since it is a simple spec file :-) and
I am still learning packaging.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:31 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 21:49 Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> On 09. 12. 19 18:38, Adam Miller wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:15 AM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782239
Bug ID: 1782239
Summary: perl-Archive-Extract-0.86 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Archive-Extract
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Am 11.12.19 um 13:08 schrieb Lumir Balhar:
> I don't know these tools but you can guess what happened from the file/line
> combination in the stack and from the error name which contains the name of
> the exception.
Well, unfortunately this is not the case for certbot. It crashes in a generic
On 12/11/19 1:21 AM, William Brown wrote:
On 10 Dec 2019, at 19:15, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hi William,
Thanks for these very interesting results.
It would help if you can provide the stap scripts to make sure what you are
accounting the latency.
Yes, I plan to put them into a PR soon
On Tuesday, 10 December 2019 at 13:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 11. 19 21:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'm sure there are other pain points and I encourage you to share
> > them. Please adhere to the guidelines about objectively measurable
> > issues, though.
>
> M5. Modular packages are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781565
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781565
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
This is triggered by upgrading perl-Config-Model from 2.136-1.fc31 to
perl-Config-Model-2.137-1.fc32.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781752
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781750
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781749
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781826
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
I'm wondering if there is a way to get the Python exception message via
retrace/abrt?
From what I can see the web interface only shows the call stack but without a
specific exception there is not much I can do.
(I saw the exception message when a user created a bugzilla bug)
Example:
90 matches
Mail list logo
